You write that like it’s a bad thing.
We have GE when people dont understand the issues but we accept that
We’ve done this one (multiple times) with a GE we might get 5 years of shit (though actually nothing close to the scale of change precipitated by this vote), but it’s not even the case that the people get 5 years to recognise they’ve got it wrong – governments don’t tend to do really mad things because they know they’ll get found out. There is not chance to throw out leaving the EU, so they (think they) can get away with anything.
That’s how it works – yes it flawed – but its better than the alternative. We even have one version here, actually in its second iteration now, which proves this point very well.
You’re thinking of parliamentary democracy? Yes that works – for a limited definition of “works” (clearly there are ways to improve it a lot, but let’s not get into that here). I don’t see how that provides any evidence that direct democracy is a good thing, and recent evidence suggests the complete opposite – all sorts of alternatives to that which are clearly better.
We dont silent the ignorant.
No – preferably you provide them with something else to vote on where their ignorance does no harm. I’m a big fan of XF, BGT, SCD for that purpose.
I’m sure I’m coming across as arrogant and elitist in this post – but in my defence they started it.