I’m sure I’ve read his lawyer saying “just because it isn’t true, doesn’t mean it’s not harmful” effectively saying they bought silence, not to admit guilt. I can see this working, and believe it would be common practice. It appears that the NDA does exist, no one is denying it, the counter claim for $20m is due to breach<span style=”font-size: 0.8rem;”>. Why it exists is another matter, and how it was paid for and whether that constitutes campaign funds.</span>
I guess the counter claim is pretty normal as well, enough noise and there’s no doubt, enough money will silence the Stormy Daniels claims. I wonder if enough damage has been done. I suspect not.