Community

Forum menu
Crank arm weights -...
 

[Closed] Crank arm weights - Shimano SLX vs XT

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Does anyone (tall order i know) know the difference in weight of an SLX crankset (arms) and Xt crank arms?


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:32 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

try weightweenies


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

?


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:36 pm
Posts: 13809
Full Member
 

[url= http://weightweenies.starbike.com/listings.php ]http://weightweenies.starbike.com/listings.php[/url]


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:40 pm
Posts: 13855
Free Member
 

Not much difference

http://www.sicklines.com/weights/crankarms/

[img] [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So that's the difference that paint makes basically. Are the chain rings any different or are they actually identical?


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:45 pm
Posts: 13855
Free Member
 

I do think there's more in it when rings are included, but basically, SLX is so good that it almost negates XT.


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:49 pm
Posts: 66093
Full Member
 

Chainrings are different- or were at least, when I got mine.

XTR's the same- the arms are a little lighter but most of the weight difference is in the other components.


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:49 pm
Posts: 8859
Free Member
 

As above, it's not very much. I've weighed both Mine (SLX and XT) both with just granny and middle rings as supplied from the factory (outer rings both removed) and the diff was about 50gms if irc. So, I presume 60gms ish dif for 3 chain rings. I certainly remember thinking that I would default to SLX in future. Not sure about XTR, beyond my price bracket.


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bugger, now I can't justify the xt option over slx when I go 2x10. That's almost a shame!


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:58 pm
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

The weight is mostly in the rings & ancillaries.

XTR's are ~500g bare.


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 9:59 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

I've old XT and XTR chainsets, there was 100g difference with Shimano rings, but only 50g difference once they'd both got Middleburn rings on.


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 10:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SLX supplied as twin and bash have steel pedal inserts so a bit heavier again - about 60g more than XT. The SLX supplied bashguard is very heavy too.


 
Posted : 23/04/2012 10:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SLX 9spd triple complete is 889g claimed
XT 9spd triple complete is 853g claimed
So 36g difference (and usually around £36 sort of figure difference)

Bottom bracket is the same between them

IIRC
SLX inner chainring is steel
XT inner chainring is aluminium
SLX middle chainring is steel teeth/'composite' ring
XT middle chainring is steel teeth/'carbon'? ring
SLX outer is aluminium (as is XT) but SLX appears much chunkier

I always suspected there would be little between the arms. 6grams seems about right

[SLX double bash is ~1000g complete, same BB, but as above steel inserts, I seem to think its steel axle? has all steel rings (incl. 104BCD 36T) and as above (104BCD 36T) bashring not light]


 
Posted : 24/04/2012 12:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[SLX double bash is ~1000g complete, same BB, but as above steel inserts, I seem to think its steel axle? has all steel rings (incl. 104BCD 36T) and as above (104BCD 36T) bashring not light]

Aren't all the Shimano axles steel? But, the axle on the SLX double is supposed to be a bit thicker/stronger. And the 36T chainring on the SLX double is aluminium. I wish it was steel as it would last a bit longer, but it isn't.


 
Posted : 24/04/2012 7:22 am