- This topic has 27 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by Dales_rider.
-
Clever Photos
-
Come on then, let's have some properly clever (or just good) photos
I'll start with these that I just found
http://www.thephotoargus.com/inspiration/35-extraordinarily-clever-examples-of-toy-photography/
Posted 11 years agoNo Nicolai. No bloke in a judo suit.
FAIL.
Posted 11 years ago
Posted 11 years ago
Posted 11 years ago
unpossible
Posted 11 years agoeth3er, i like that!
Posted 11 years ago
Posted 11 years agoAAAAAAGH!!!! That pic of eth3r's is doing my head in!!!!
Posted 11 years ago
Posted 11 years agodjglover – Member
Short term ban coming your way me thinks. 😯
Posted 11 years ago
Posted 11 years agoa ban for that?? are you taking the pi$$
Posted 11 years agoIt's just not right is it, proper headache inducing.
Posted 11 years agoOh fug, it gets even worse, eth3r…
… I've just spotted (ok, I'm slow) that it's all the same guy, right…? Or two guys?
Posted 11 years agosame guy.
Posted 11 years agosame guy.
aw fvck!!!!! no!!!! seriously!!!!!! my head!!!!!! kabooooommmmm!!!!!
Posted 11 years agosame guy
How do you know ? I can't tell the difference.
Posted 11 years agoTake a closer look at the photo he is holding, frankly I think it's alchemy.
Posted 11 years agoCheesyfeet,
Sorry to be a pedantic c*nt but these aren't photographs.
Define your terms – clever or lucky? And for it to be a photo, it has to have been captured by a camera by a photographer rather than drawn by a graphic artist.
Posted 10 years agoSorry to be a pedantic c*nt but these aren't photographs.
So the claim that : toy photography provides great opportunities for clever composition, creative lighting and a chance to really have some fun. When done right a photographer can breath life and personality into the inanimate objects being shot …….. is just bollox then ?
Posted 10 years agoFor starters. Photographs by photographers with wit and vision using just a camera and film.
Posted 10 years agoErnie – not bollox.
I'm differentiating between photography and digital imaging. Simple distinction, no?
Posted 10 years ago
Posted 10 years agoSimple distinction, no?
I'm not disputing it. But if those aren't really photos of toys in "clever compositions" and using "creative lighting", then the claims on that link are clearly nonsense. I was asking really – I hadn't figured out that they weren't real objects.
Posted 10 years agoOh – I just read the original article.
They are photos.
Don't I look a bit silly…
Posted 10 years agoIs this clever?
Posted 10 years agoPosted 10 years ago
Posted 10 years ago
The topic ‘Clever Photos’ is closed to new replies.