- This topic has 27 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Dales_rider.
- Clever Photos
Come on then, let's have some properly clever (or just good) photos
I'll start with these that I just found
http://www.thephotoargus.com/inspiration/35-extraordinarily-clever-examples-of-toy-photography/
Posted 9 years ago
Posted 9 years ago
unpossibleeth3er, i like that!
Posted 9 years agoAAAAAAGH!!!! That pic of eth3r's is doing my head in!!!!
Posted 9 years agoa ban for that?? are you taking the pi$$
Posted 9 years agoIt's just not right is it, proper headache inducing.
Posted 9 years agoOh fug, it gets even worse, eth3r…
… I've just spotted (ok, I'm slow) that it's all the same guy, right…? Or two guys?
Posted 9 years agosame guy.
Posted 9 years agoTake a closer look at the photo he is holding, frankly I think it's alchemy.
Posted 9 years agoCheesyfeet,
Sorry to be a pedantic c*nt but these aren't photographs.
Define your terms – clever or lucky? And for it to be a photo, it has to have been captured by a camera by a photographer rather than drawn by a graphic artist.
Posted 9 years agoSorry to be a pedantic c*nt but these aren't photographs.
So the claim that : toy photography provides great opportunities for clever composition, creative lighting and a chance to really have some fun. When done right a photographer can breath life and personality into the inanimate objects being shot …….. is just bollox then ?
Posted 9 years agoFor starters. Photographs by photographers with wit and vision using just a camera and film.
Posted 9 years agoErnie – not bollox.
I'm differentiating between photography and digital imaging. Simple distinction, no?
Posted 9 years agoSimple distinction, no?
I'm not disputing it. But if those aren't really photos of toys in "clever compositions" and using "creative lighting", then the claims on that link are clearly nonsense. I was asking really – I hadn't figured out that they weren't real objects.
Posted 9 years ago
_09633u.jpg)
The topic ‘Clever Photos’ is closed to new replies.