JY – for one who likes to stress debate (see other threads today), the “safe (sic) us” comment is a little bizarre! As is the frequency of playing the ad hom defence card (see other threads) while using it at the same time. As for the accusation, you are entitled to your opinion, but I would call that an almost Stalinesque re-writing of history. 😉 But in the context of the topic under discussion, I am not sure of the need to personalise the issue though. MY point was a general one, it is sad when people, especially those who appear to live on here, can’t understand the need to play by the rules. If YOU want to personalise it, so be it….
Of course, I may have completely misunderstood your post entirely and missed the point that the subtle and wonderful irony was intended. If that was the case, then chapeau sir!