Forum menu
Zwift, my journey, ...
 

Zwift, my journey, my weight and my fitness.

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It must be a day for equipment failure. I managed to get TWO punctures this morning while trying to get a zwift ride in...grrrr

How on earth did you manage to get two punctures on the turbo trainer..?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've had a puncture on Zwift, patched it. Got another 10 mins into it and the valve went. 😆


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've had a puncture on Zwift, patched it. Got another 10 mins into it and the valve went.

With your output you've probably overheated the tyre...


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyone had issues on their T2240 Flow trainer not changing resistance whilst hooked up to Zwift running on an ipad? Re started trainer and ipad but it didn't work.

Trainer is only a month or so old.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:31 pm
Posts: 28712
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I have to say, reading all these posts, the T2240 isn't looking to be quite the bargain we first thought is it ?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:36 pm
Posts: 2784
Full Member
 

I managed to get TWO punctures this morning while trying to get a zwift ride in...grrrr

Gotta laugh as messing up a virtual ride with a real world puncture

/pleased with direct drive trainer 🙂


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 3:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

weeksy - Member
I have to say, reading all these posts, the T2240 isn't looking to be quite the bargain we first thought is it ?

Quite! Worked great for the first month - didn't use it for a week and now the resistance isn't changing - strange really. At first I thought it was the fact I was using an iPad but I remembered that I'd done two rides on the iPad with no problems before.

Maybe it's time to go and get a replacement.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Quite! Worked great for the first month - didn't use it for a week and now the resistance isn't changing - strange really. At first I thought it was the fact I was using an iPad but I remembered that I'd done two rides on the iPad with no problems before.

Maybe it's time to go and get a replacement.

Might be worth checking to see whether you can change resistance using the Tacx app first. I've had a couple of rides where the resistance wasn't changing but I'm not convinced whether it was a Tacx issue or a Zwift one.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@epicsteve - can you do that on the Tacx Utility App? Is it the Testing Dashboard?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:22 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

[quote=buenfoxa ]Anyone had issues on their T2240 Flow trainer not changing resistance whilst hooked up to Zwift running on an ipad? Re started trainer and ipad but it didn't work.
Trainer is only a month or so old.

is it paired as a power source or a controllable trainer.

mine appeared to forget the controllable trainer pairing last week but i was in the middle of a race before I realised. re-pair it and control came back.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

is it paired as a power source or a controllable trainer.

mine appeared to forget the controllable trainer pairing last week but i was in the middle of a race before I realised. re-pair it and control came back.

Good shout - will take a look at that aswell.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think Tacx's quality control isn't the best. Even the Neo at £1k isn't ultra reliable.

My Vortex took 2 boxes of vortex's before I managed to assemble a working unit, using parts from both. It's a bit creaky at the moment too.

Just realised I've made a stupid error. Zwift has been using the stages power meter for power and the vortex for cadence... Didn't realise the stages could also do cadence, hoping my power increases slightly now back to where it used to be. 😳


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:35 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

why would cadence reading affect the power reading?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think Tacx's quality control isn't the best. Even the Neo at £1k isn't ultra reliable.

My Vortex took 2 boxes of vortex's before I managed to assemble a working unit, using parts from both. It's a bit creaky at the moment too.

I managed to track down the noise to the motor housing - it seems it's "split" ever so slightly; it was clipped together with some very small looking plastic ridges and only screwed together on one side. Nothing is broken, but the plastic ridges won't clip together completely any more.

I'm planning to take it back to Halfords and ask for a replacement - best to take everything and disassemble it I guess? Or leave assembled to demonstrate problem?

Very annoyed 👿


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:03 pm
Posts: 24854
Free Member
 

I guess because power is a function of both how hard you press the pedal but also how often.

(hyperbole) You might have the force of an bull but if you're only cranking twice a minute you still won't be travelling far.

If the cadence coming off the turbo isn't correct (and i don't know how it works it out, maybe by measuring subtle differences in the power stroke and converting that) then even if the torque measured on the crank is right the overall calc won't be right.

NB not an engineer hence may have misused some terms, but you know what i mean


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just realised I've made a stupid error. Zwift has been using the stages power meter for power and the vortex for cadence... Didn't realise the stages could also do cadence, hoping my power increases slightly now back to where it used to be.

The Stages will always be using its own cadence sensor combined with torque from its strain gauges to work out power. Having Zwift use a different cadence sensor makes no difference to the reported power.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:12 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

thats what I thought, it'll just be the number that gets recorded in zwift/strava. power is power.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's my thought process too! When I was pedaling last night my cadence was erratic even though I was at a consistent cadence, so clearly somethings going wrong now I'm not using the vortex for both measurements as it used to be consistent.

I haven't really read up on this so I'm a bit clueless/stabbing in the dark here. 😆


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@epicsteve - can you do that on the Tacx Utility App? Is it the Testing Dashboard?

It's not in the utility app - it's in the Training app (not that I've used that yet!).


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've tried both my 4iiii power meter for power in Zwift and also the readings from the T2240 - they seem close enough that it doesn't matter which is used. I have Zwift getting cadence from the power meter though - mainly 'cause I can't quite get my head around how the T2240 would know that (although it does seem reasonably accurate at working it out). Even more confusingly I've also got a Garmin speed & cadence sensor on the bike however I've turned that off for the moment.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cadence from the tacx is likely to be a bit erratic as it works it out from pulses in the pedal stroke. There's probably a fair bit of "smoothing" that goes on with the data.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:25 pm
Posts: 301
Full Member
 

Cadence- Get a Wahoo Ant+/blue tooth cadence sensor- attach to cranks- works well.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for the Wahoo kit-had a Wahoo Kicker Snap/Cadence Sensor/Heart Rate monitor since Black Friday and approx 700KMs on Zwift has been faultless, just works every time and setup was easy.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:48 pm
Posts: 2644
Free Member
 

Alp girl, my first one did the same but after 30 mins fiddling I did manage to get it to clip together. If you can't fix it I would package it up and take it back. Halfords should swap it without any drama.

I'm 52 out of 57 on Box Hill. I'm confident I can make it up to 50th 🙂


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 5:49 pm
Posts: 315
Full Member
 

The t2240 is definitely built to a budget price but frankly for £190 before discounts it's had me riding exactly 992km more than I would have done without it. Better than a gym membership for me.

They all seem to have "the ratchety creak" after a while and that's probably the well-known issue with the plastic roller and metal sheath starting to separate. There are some posted fixes for out of warranty turbos or you could try to exchange, although I'd expect a replacement to do the same thing sooner rather than later.

like alpgirl and timidwheeler I was getting some *other* horrible noises from my t2240, which I discovered was due to the plastic body over the electromechanical section coming slightly askew and fouling a moving part. The plastic has a crappy twist-lock fit secured with a t20 torx self-tapping screw. I loosened that and was able to re-engage the twist-fit. That noise has gone now.

Tacx neo on order now though 😉


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 8:49 pm
Posts: 315
Full Member
 

By the way, I think pulling the power cable out from the turbo can pull on the cover, potentially causing the cover to come out of alignment. I've taken to unplugging at the wall socket instead.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 8:54 pm
Posts: 4968
Free Member
 

I hate the creaking noise of my T2440,it's not the low rpm roller issue though.
I've only had it a few days, does the creaking noise constitute a reason to reject it and get money back, would rather spend more on another


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 9:39 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

Mine doesn't creak. Are you using the QR that came with it?

I'd take it back


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 9:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's not supposed to creak so shouldn't be a problem to use it as a reason to return


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 9:53 pm
Posts: 4968
Free Member
 

I'm going to check it carefully again and it's going back if I can't stop it. I hate noises on bikes (or turbos )


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 10:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

like alpgirl and timidwheeler I was getting some *other* horrible noises from my t2240, which I discovered was due to the plastic body over the electromechanical section coming slightly askew and fouling a moving part. The plastic has a crappy twist-lock fit secured with a t20 torx self-tapping screw. I loosened that and was able to re-engage the twist-fit. That noise has gone now.

Hmmm, maybe I should try that first? a replacement will probably have the same problem soon 🙁 Time to invest in the next model up?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 10:33 pm
Posts: 315
Full Member
 

New PB up Box Hill. Frustrating close to getting under 9. Still, I feel pretty good about the improvement over the last 2months. More W, fewer kg (body weight down 15% (although that's since July), FTP up 25%). Weeksy, thank you for starting this thread it's made a huge difference 😀


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 10:35 pm
Posts: 315
Full Member
 

Alpgirl I don't think you'll necessarily get that problem back, just don't yank the power cord out and it should stay in place. I think most of them develop the low speed creak sooner or later. I don't mind that though.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 10:37 pm
Posts: 4398
Free Member
 

That was my goal this evening dc2.0. I managed 08.21- just pipping me old Zwift racing nemesis Jason 🙂


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:00 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

Don't know if it makes a difference but I leave mine permanently set up, in fact the bike hasn't been off it since I bought it back end of november.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good work crosshair.

Got the thing with the serious lag between video and turbo control again tonight. Towards the end of the ride I timed it using the sleepers in the tube, was a good minute and a half lag. Annoyingly weird riding with it. I've only had it since the GCN meltdown. Anyone else had this?


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't know if it makes a difference but I leave mine permanently set up, in fact the bike hasn't been off it since I bought it back end of november.

Same here, that's why I can't work out why it has done that "crack open" thing - and I'm sub 2W/kg, so it's not my immense power output......


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:10 pm
Posts: 315
Full Member
 

I had no lag this evening, but had it badly during the KISS TT/GCN meltdown on Wednesday and at various other times. I have however just switched today from Bluetooth (I have a mac, so can connect bluetooth directly and don't need to use mobile link) over to ANT+, so that might have made a difference but too early to tell.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mrblobby: have you looked at the log file in Zwiftilizer?
That may shed some light on any problems...


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mrblobby: have you looked at the log file in Zwiftilizer?

I shall investigate!

over to ANT

I've been using bluetooth so far but might give ANT+ a go if it gets any worse. Weird thing is I've only had it happen twice (tonight and the night of the GCN ride) and both on the London course.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:16 pm
Posts: 66
Free Member
 

That was my goal this evening dc2.0. I managed 08.21- just pipping me old Zwift racing nemesis Jason

Good effort. I have managed to do 8:22 twice now, I might have to put a bit of effort in next time I ride up there.


 
Posted : 20/01/2017 11:42 pm
Posts: 4398
Free Member
 

I'm glad I sprinted at the end 😀


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 12:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After a few months of trouble free operation my t2240 has got the click/grind. Still working perfectly - just had to crank the tunes a notch to drown it out. 1 year warranty is it?


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 10:48 am
Posts: 24854
Free Member
 

Popped my zwift racing cherry this morning with a cat D Danish race or something. One lap of the London 8

Followed advice to be practically full on sprint out of the blocks and was briefly in the lead group, but that soon changed when I nearly blacked out and I gradually made my way back to mid pack where I stayed for the rest of the race. Had a good battle with a Malaysian lightweight lady and a well matched Austrian who I finally slayed on the nipple on the top of box hill (the bit where it goes back up to 10% and I nearly black out again)

Then on the downhill I'm full beans and the malaysian is doing 0w/kg in a tuck and staying with me. Is that her trainer, or is there a code to use or what?

Looked on ZP after and ended up 12/28*, with a 2.1W/kg average (203W / 160bpm - my max is about 170 so 'quite hard')

* Actually came 23/39, but 11 were DQ including some doing 3W/kg and more. Explains why keeping up with the lead group for the first bit nearly killed me. Why do folks enter lower cats; if people were taking this seriously** you don't really know who you're competing against which could affect tactics.

** I'm not, just did it to see how hard it would make me work. I'm still coughing now 90 mins later. Although I do see on message boards it REALLY pisses some people off!


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 11:44 am
Posts: 66
Free Member
 

Well done on the first race, it doesn't get any easier.

A few things affect the descent. If you are in a group, or even sat on someone's wheel you will descend quicker, so it is worth making the effort to get in a group before a long descent. This might mean a big effort to bridge a gap, or even easing off slightly to let a group catch you. In your case the lady behind was probably just slipstreaming you down the hill. The frame and wheels will have an impact on overall drag, so impact descending speed. And the tuck position seems to descend quicker, I think it is over 60kmph and 0w to trigger it.

On the London course always try to get in a group on the flats, and then 100% effort on the climbs.


 
Posted : 21/01/2017 12:14 pm
Page 53 / 343