I hated the unions a lot more than Thatcher. Power cuts were a part of my childhood. Does anyone think the UK coal mining industry would have flourished today had the unions won the fight?
Who Knows, The UK still has nine operational coal fired, plus got a couple of Coal and Biomass and one Coal, Oil and Gas, power stations, this includes Selby which is the UK's largest power station; ~4x the capacity of Sizewell-B, our [i]newest[/i] (20 years old) Nuclear station, so yeah there would still be a market for coal in the UK...
As it is our energy needs are met mainly by various forms of gas fired station now (Open and closed cycle turbines) with some oil and gas fired boiler efforts a bit of ageing nuclear plant, plus some other minor stuff...
We will be well in Russia's pocket for the next Decade+ for Gas all because all of them since the 70's (especially Thatcher and later Blair) lacked the foresight to address future energy security for the UK, and we're dragging our arses getting new nuclear stations approved and built (which the French will have a stake in via EDF)...
Ultimately She crushed the Unions, and in the process gifted our Energy sector to foreign businesses...
I think it is safe to say the union movement did more to improve the standard of living, education, safety, reduced working hours than any govt. It should also be remembered that successful companies rarely have an issue with unions. Maybe if we had a stronger union presence then zero hours contracts wouldn't exist? As a few posts have pointed out people who were not around during Thatcher take a lot of their current employment benefits and rights for granted - to be blunt most rights you have as an employee have been delivered by union action or pressure and those people often went without pay on strike to get those benefits and yes the likes of Scargill got out of control but for everyone of him there was thousands of union members and officials who didn't. The miners strike was one of the lowest moments this country has ever witnessed - I doubt there will ever be another group of ordinary people who will stick together over a principle they showed more honour and dignity than any politician I have seen and if anyone fails to recognise that regardless of your political leanings then you are just the same as Blair. Rant over
I see you only made a small dig at that Blair bitch, Project...
The Chief Lizard (sorry) must be getting anxious about his legacy, he's set the spin machine in motion..
[url= http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/nov/26/stop-knee-jerk-blair-backlash-anti-poverty-award-save-the-children ]Guardian article defending Blairs record, written by spin meister. [/url]
Yeah I hate equal pay for men and women, holiday pay, maternity pay, better pay generally, protection from arbitrary sacking and better safety standards too. Bastards.
Did you not notice I said hated (as in past tense)? Anyway you certainly don't need a union to achieve any of those things in the modern workplace. Some of the big Unions back in the day were self-destructive and just as power crazy as any political party. I'm not a big fan of the likes of Unite today if I'm honest, but they are nothing compared to the old days. Any working group that thinks going on strike is a productive concept should be shot.
If it hadn't been for the unions, then I'm sure shooting workers for getting uppity would actually be legal
Anyway you certainly don't need a union to achieve any of those things in the modern workplace.
The current government would get rid of most of that stuff in a second if they thought they could get away with it. Unions are one of the main reasons why they can't.
People who fail to see this are, frankly, morons.
Any working group that thinks going on strike is a productive concept should be shot.
Ah yes I see I was correct in my previous assessment.
Okay so I'll concede that perhaps unions are a good thing in principle. So what about elected political parties then? Should they be banned?
you certainly don't need a union to achieve any of those things in the modern workplace
See how Fernades treated his employees?
Many employers will do the bare legal minimum they can get away with see also zero hours contract today for example
Any working group that thinks going on strike is a productive concept should be shot.
Its a fundamental human right to go on strike - no really it is - and shooting folk who withdraw their labour to gain fair treatment is what the bosses used to do when the law let them.
Most folk would agree a balance needs to be struck between the power of the employer to treat folk like shit and the power of the union to hold the employer to account.
Your solution is a poor one.
I'd best check the date. Have I just teleported into the industrial revolution or something?
See how Fernades treated his employees?
No need to feel sorry for F1 employees. They earn plenty and there are enough employment opportunities elsewhere for their skill set. No need for a union there.
If it hadn't been for the unions, then I'm sure shooting workers for getting uppity would actually be legal
I wouldn't be at all surprised if we see this is the Tory manifesto along with a re-introduction of slavery for the poor.
Many employers will do the bare legal minimum they can get away with
They will of course, but the bare legal minimum is not that bad today. Ever tried sacking someone recently? It's not as easy as you might think.
-Oldmanmtb -
Spot on, spot on.
Most folk would agree a balance needs to be struck between the power of the employer to treat folk like shit and the power of the union to hold the employer to account.
I'm just saying that TODAY (not a hundred years ago) you don't actually need a union to achieve this. But you do still need an elected government.
Anyway I still hated the unions more than Thatcher back in the day. That was my original point.
Many employees try and get away with doing the bare minimum as well, cuts both ways.
I'm just saying that TODAY (not a hundred years ago) you don't actually need a union to achieve this.
what do we need a good pamphlet campaign as these days employers are reasonable folk who like to protect workers? Naive
No need to feel sorry for F1 employees. They earn plenty and there are enough employment opportunities elsewhere for their skill set. No need for a union there.
WHOOSH the point you had to make was that a union would not have given them greater rights. Even the drivers have one and they are pretty well paid
Why is this as employers are so nice ?
whether you like the unions or not it is naive to think we can get what they achieved without them
You will be claiming that pensioners would get the triple lock if they did not vote next.
moshimonster - MemberI'm just saying that TODAY (not a hundred years ago) you don't actually need a union to achieve this.
Funny, in my last job my union were involved day to day to keep the employer in check. Now there are other channels that could be used for that but you don't want every bit of everyday bullshit having to go to tribunals etc- so ironically though individual managers hated being routinely shot down by the unions, the company recognised how valuable it was.
moshimonster - MemberAny working group that thinks going on strike is a productive concept should be shot.
Highly productive for me, got a backdated payrise and prevented a terms and conditions change.
Highly productive for me, got a backdated payrise and prevented a terms and conditions change.
That's not what I meant though is it.
what do we need a good pamphlet campaign as these days employers are reasonable folk who like to protect workers? Naive
There are employment laws today protecting "workers" and pretty strict ones at that. I guess that's why unions are less popular today. Maybe I am being naive but I've never thought for one second about joining a union to get decent working conditions.
Even the drivers have one and they are pretty well paid
I've always thought that was an oddity. But I only worked in F1 for 18 years so don't know a lot about the industry to be honest.
Anyway you union lovers are all still missing my original point. I'm not actually a union hater except for those who threaten strike action at every opportunity, which are thankfully quite rare today. I just hated the big unions back in the Thatcher days.
Maybe I am being naive
Yup. Frighteningly so.
Except for the bit when you wanted to shoot strikers
It's like being asked to choose between two particularly pungent and foul turds, you know - the type that you find unflushed in the lav that scream "lactose intolerant" or "had too much Guinness and bombay mix last night".
The only redeeming feature of either that I can possibly think of is that one of them has died.
Yup. Frighteningly so.
yeah whatever, I get by without union protection.
One thing that I notice here is quite a lot of hatred for employers. The very people who actually provide you with an income in the first place.
The current government would get rid of most of that stuff in a second if they thought they could get away with it. Unions are one of the main reasons why they can't.
Okay grum, since you are obviously an expert on employment law, explain to me (the naive moron) why the government would get rid of most employment law today if it wasn't for the unions? Serious question.
yeah whatever, I get by without union protection.
You do get union protection - even without being in a union, as I've tried to explain to you.
One thing that I notice here is quite a lot of hatred for employers.
Where? Crap straw man.
One thing that I notice here is quite a lot of hatred for employers. The very people who actually provide you with an income in the first place.
You sound like you think they're doing the workers a favour. You could also say they are cynically exploiting the workers efforts for profit. Or have a more balanced take on the subject....
I think you are being a bit goady and trolly and its pretty hard to work out what you really think whilst being pretty easy to judge what you are likeMaybe I am being naive
Its a bit boring as well tbh
Okay grum, since you are obviously an expert on employment law, explain to me (the naive moron) why the government would get rid of most employment law today if it wasn't for the unions?
Put very simply - because the people who fund the Tory party would be able to make more profits if they could get away with treating their employees worse. It's pretty obvious surely?
JY +1
cookeaa - MemberAs it is our energy needs are met mainly by various forms of gas fired station now (Open and closed cycle turbines) with some oil and gas fired boiler efforts a bit of ageing nuclear plant, plus some other minor stuff...
FWIW in Scotland, renewables are the biggest producer at about 40% (25% nuclear, 20% coal, and only about 6% gas- yes I know that's not 100% pedants, I did all the maths on my fingers). I know we're better together but in this instance I think we'll decline to take our turn at being bummed by Putin 😉
Okay grum, since you are obviously an expert on employment law, explain to me (the naive moron) why the government would get rid of most employment law today if it wasn't for the unions?
They already have reduced employment rights, as of 6/4/2012 you can be sacked without recourse to unfair dismissal in the first two years (was one year prior to this). They are also trying to erode the right to strike as once they can ban striking they can carry on eroding other rights.
I think you are being a bit goady and trolly
That's a bit rich coming from you.
Actually you are right though. I have zero interest in politics or unions. But I did really hate unions growing up in the 80's.
Where? Crap straw man.
I can smell the hatred from here.
Put very simply - because the people who fund the Tory party would be able to make more profits if they could get away with treating their employees worse. It's pretty obvious surely?
and the voters? Would they like it?
I am an employer and a strong supporter of good unionism - I was also a member of the AUEW for over 20 years. I would love to see some people on here try and negotiate a personal employment contract from ground zero.....
I would disagree with the comments on the previous page about unions securing workers rights, my son, teenager limited experience and skills has to accept a zero hours contract, other older people in family can sit around at home dicking about on the Internet get paid well and have great term of employment, the difference is market value not employment rights.
I understand quite a few employer obligation came from EU laws rather than Union battles but would agree that good employers know the value of happy staff but again it's the more widespread acceptance of that dynamic they has reduced the need for unions.
Lastly on a slight aside my recollection of the coal miners strike was a complete lack of unity on their part in fact the my only first hand experience was miners fighting miners.
I'm also an employer and feel the unions have, and continue to play an important role in the economy. Unions, like businesses [i]can[/i] at times become too dominant - a monopoly of labour is as dangerous to public interests as a monopoly of any other kind - but overall, many of the laws and conditions negotiated for UK workers have wide ranging benefits to both the public and the economy.
Just as (to paraphrase Tolstoy) an army is always best prepared to win the last battle it fought in, so we are now looking at yesterday's issues. At present, I do feel that many larger firms are effectively side-stepping a lot of obligations by using agency workers to a very high degree, skewing the playing field in their own favour.
Zero hour contracts should be banned, full stop. People should have a minimum number of hours guaranteed. You don't need Unions to enact employment protection laws.
Unions have bankrupted the US airlines and most of their car companies. Our car industry was given a huge helping hand into obscurity by the unions.
I am employer and thankfully unions are irrelevant. I have to keep staff, clients and shareholders happy. I fail if I ignore any of them. Shareholders know that I prefer to have relatively small teams that are paid more than elsewhere. They are happy, they work hard and enjoy it and they do a good jobs for clients. So everyone is happy. No need for external interference, it's really very simple. The unions could be useful and explain pensions to their members, that would be a good start.
Rights are indeed protected by Europe - and we respect them too. One of the benefits of EU membership.
and the voters? Would they like it?
Of course they wouldn't! But then that's where party spin departments come in to play.
For example:
"We want to invade Iraq. In doing so, we'll take control of state oil production, keep an increasingly belligerent Iran in check and demonstrate to the people of the middle east that we're not to be trifled with".
Read as:
"Saddam Hussein possesses WMD and the delivery mechanism to launch it at Britain within forty five minutes. They have mobile chemical/biological warfare laboratories producing tonnes of the stuff. We're also going to liberate the long-suffering people of Iraq".
Do you see?
I know we're better together but in this instance I think we'll decline to take our turn at being bummed by Putin
The only thing we get significantly from Russia energy wise is coal, unlike Eastern Europe we don't get any gas from there. Most of our gas comes from Norway, Qatar (LNG), and then from the Holland and Belgium interconnectors.
Do you see?
Not really if I'm honest.
