Who do you want to ...
 

[Closed] Who do you want to win the Labour party leadership contest?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

And why?


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:30 am
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

Dianne Abbot

For a laugh


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, definitely on of the Milibands, but given that their father Ralph was the last of the socialist Milibands, I think i'd have to go for the space cowboy brother, Steve


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:37 am
Posts: 57275
Full Member
 

I think a draw between the Milliband brothers would be good. They would then be forced to do everything in unison forming a hilarious double-act. PMQ's would look like the Ant and Dec show on a Saturday night.

Whats not to like?


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

How about looney left Andy Burnham? That'd make Labour unelectable - great!


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Milibands are a pair of superior, swotty geeks that the nation at large is never going to warm to.

Man-of-the-People Andy Burnham is Labour's only hope.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:53 am
 Rio
Posts: 1618
Full Member
 

Ed Balls, just for the comedy headlines.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:55 am
 tron
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about looney left Andy Burnham? That'd make Labour unelectable - great!

Unelectable oppositions are never a good thing. Look how his Tonyness went off without a decent Tory party...


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:56 am
Posts: 34454
Full Member
 

dianne for me, i just like her
shes not too far left but shes not just another blair/cameron/clegg clone like the milliblands

and balls is a prick


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

An Ed, preferably Balls, but tother if not.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 11:59 am
Posts: 57275
Full Member
 

erm.... isn't the point that they'd ALL make labour unelectable? Labour just is unelectable at the moment. In the same way the Tory's were after being booted out last time. Look where the constant leadership changes got them

Why not work on the same principle and give them all a go at it


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 12:01 pm
Posts: 19522
Free Member
 

Ed Balls or/and Dianne Abbot for comedy double act.

The funny talking Milibands for keeping it in the family i.e. let the younger brother be the leader.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 12:02 pm
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

Agree with the comment above about unelectable oppostions, but that aside no longer care (I used to care passionately) as I no longer trust Labour after Iraq, civil liberties etc etc. Am very disillusioned indeed, and I suspect many are, which is when the lunatic fringe parties tend to pick up votes.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 3546
Free Member
 

Presumably if Ed Miliband gets in his brother will suddenly go off to that job he thought about in Europe a while ago. Certainly couldn't give him the shadow treasurers job otherwise there would be uproar.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Steve Miller Band.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:32 pm
Posts: 7357
Free Member
 

Same as ononeorange. Disillusioned by Tory Bliar. Brown micro-managed too much and made too many mistakes (telling everyone in advance that you want to sell off our gold, great sales tactic). Of the current bunch, well non of them really.

David M = Camerclegg clone
Ed M = unconvinced
Ed B = unconvinced
Andy Burnham = inexperienced lightweight - no chance against Camerclegg
Diane Abbott = stuck to her socialist principles so highly that she sent her son to private school - rank hypocrite

Voted Lib Dem last time. Now feel really let down by Cleggeron.

Makes no difference who gets it, they're all only in it for themselves anyway.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:38 pm
Posts: 875
Free Member
 

Who cares!


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No outstanding candidate. they are all so bland!


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd love big Di to win (obviously she won't)... never ceases to amaze me how someone so well educated can be so consistently wrong.

I guess she's in good company tho', they'll be unelectable whoever wins (+1 for that not being a good thing)


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dianne Abbot? No way. Hypocrite and racist.

Red Ken cha cha cha!

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:43 pm
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

Godzilla

PM question time would be a lot more fun with a fire breathing monster on one side of the dispatch box.....

[img] [/img]

but mainly anyone that makes labour unelectable - ever


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

No outstanding candidate. they are all so bland!
I can't agree with that!

It's very true, the Milliband's are far too geeky, too middle class. I guess they might appeal to young IT workers.

The Labour party can forget trying to appeal to the middle classes as this group has had a enough of this party over the past 13 years! They overwhelmingly voted with thier feet recently (and quite rightly so).

There's no point trying to appeal to tradidtional Labour voters because they'll vote Labour anyway.

I don't agree that Labour are unelectable however. We face painful times ahead thanks to the last "shower" who were in power, but people have short memories and will blame who ever is in government at the time the axe falls. I certainly wouldn't want to be in Clegg/Cameron's shoes! Their job is almost impossible.

In four years time, the feeling in the country could be quite different to today. [u]IF[/u] Labour got back in and started to run up debt again, I trully believe the UK would be finished and it would end up with around the same economic ranking as some of the countries of the former Soviet Union.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The only one I could see actually making it to PM would be David Milliband.

But in reality I don't care ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 1:58 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50558
 

[img] http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/graphics/petergriffin.jp g" target="_blank">http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/graphics/petergriffin.jp g"/> [/img]


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dig up John Smith, even in his current state he'd do a better job than any of the candidates.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:02 pm
Posts: 57275
Full Member
 

There's no point trying to appeal to tradidtional Labour voters because they'll vote Labour anyway.

I think you'll find that most of them didn't bother last time out


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:03 pm
 Esme
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The one I've voted for!

But, just out of interest . . .

Super Scale 20: "Who cares"? Do you not agree with democracy? What system would [b]you[/b] prefer?

Coyote, being an "inexperienced lightweight" didn't hold David Cameron back


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

There's no point trying to appeal to tradidtional Labour voters because they'll vote Labour anyway.

I think you'll find that most of them didn't bother last time out

Cool! ๐Ÿ˜ˆ


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:10 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The most competent in the whole land out of all the Labour faithful, Pingu.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:13 pm
Posts: 15
Full Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

LMAO!
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Oh Jeez... I grew to detest New Labour over their thirteen years in power to the point where I currently will not consider voting for them again.

Neither Ed Balls nor the Millibands have bothered to acknowledge the reasons why the voting public turned on them, instead they're merely offering meek soundbites about "immigration" or "ID Cards" which have little substance but drop hints to the middle classes about Daily Mail politics.

Yes, ID Cards were a policy I disagreed with strongly, however I also had issue with transportation, war in Iraq, pensions policy, the 10% tax rate, the sidestepped promise of an EU referendum, the disasterous love affair with the media and banking magnates and the worrying obsession with continuing Thatcherism.

I know I'm going to provoke a backlash from the Labourites on here, but frankly thirteen years of New Labour did more to destroy my faith in politicians than the Major Sleaze years ever did. The Labour party must be made to pay dearly for their fast and loose attitude to public opinion before I'd ever give one of their candidates the time of day.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Stryker millibrand
๐Ÿ˜† Great link!


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Major Sleaze years

All these were about was Edwina Currie dropping her knickers so she could write a book about it and make a few quid.

This pales into insignificance compared to the scandal over Dr David Kelly, as one example!

Anyway, who in their right mind would want to do her??? John Major must have got the wrong prescription for his glasses. ๐Ÿ˜ˆ


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well Pingu makes more sense and his actions are coherent at least.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Actually, aside from the GLOBAL financial crisis, the UK is in fact in better shape now than it was under the Tories. Health and education especially have improved, especially in areas previously neglected by the Tories. Crime is lower. And all sorts of other things.

Don't let facts cloud your bigoted judgement though eh?


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

But didn't Tony promise us the end of sleaze? (repeatedly)


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well, politics, and the actions of politicians, do seem to be much more transparent these days. Unlike when the Tories had pretty much most of the British Media in their pockets. The Tories were far more corrupt, it's just that they used their media connections to ensure their sordid dealings were covered up more. They'd offer up the odd sacrificial lamb to appease the left-wing press from time to time, but nobody truly corrupt.

[img] [/img]

Meanwhile, other Tories were quietly doing arms deals with foreign dictators...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

come off it sponge bob - sleaze was far more than that. remember envelopes full of cash? Remember serving tories going to jail?


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you are going to Tag about me [i]before I even join the thread[/i] at least spell my name right


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

<paraphrasing>

If you call him, he will come....

</paraphrasing> ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Interesting also, that the best response to the fact that many things in the UK have improved under Labour, is to wibble on abut 'sleaze'. A tory, talking about sleaze! ๐Ÿ˜†

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And let's not forget their support of the Khmer Rouge and Suharto


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

โ“


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The thatcher government continued to support the Khmer Rouge after they were thrown out of Cambodia and the extent of their atrocities was realised.

They also supported Suharto and his dictatorship in Indonesia


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The STW servers don't have adequate disk capacity for us to list about all the Labour sleaze and the successive mistakes they made!

My point was that Tony Blair banged on about erradicating sleaze. It was a key election manifesto pledge and he and his party spectacularly failed to deliver on this promise!

I did not say the Conservatives were perfect, of course they're not (are any politicians?).


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Spongebob, it's the scale!

Thatcher: Pol Pot (not the guy of Britain's got talent), Suharto, Pinochet, Sadaam?

C'mon get some perspective


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The STW servers don't have adequate disk capacity for us to list about all the Labour sleaze and the successive mistakes they made!

Google, Yahoo and Facebook's servers don't have the combined capacity to list all the Tory sleaze and corruption....


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

They all seem as bad as each other - get over it and go and ride your bike while the sun is still shining.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:53 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

I've never voted Tory and hopefully never will.

Having said that, Tony Blair does have the stain of feeding the public BS to justify partaking in a war which has (according to the UN) so far cost around 100,000 lives...

There is nothing that can possibly redeem the man in my eyes after that.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They'd offer up the odd sacrificial lamb to appease [b]the left-wing press[/b] from time to time

What is this left-wing press of which you speak? Didn't realise the Morning Star had quite so much clout!


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:54 pm
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

My point was that Tony Blair banged on about erradicating sleaze.

Is that from the same hypocrisy bucket as Thatcher talking about "family values?"

Spongebrain - are you so bitter because the education system failed you so badly?


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:58 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Vote for Labour everytime as I don't want a progressive, intelligent, successful and influential UK in the world.

I want a Maxist state that has an army to rival North Korea and everyone learns about homosexuality at school as a practical subject.

Ingrowing not thinking bigger is the key.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:58 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

On a brighter note:

Tories **** each other

Labour **** the economy.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 3:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

learns about homosexuality at school as a practical subject.

surely more of a core subject at the Oxbridge feeder schools rather than the local comprehensive


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 4:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Spongebob - is your memory that short? Are you old enough to remeber the tory sleaze?

Now Labour have been responsible for some fairly smelly deals but nothing on the scale of the Tories.

Cabinet ministers lying in court and getting jailed? Attempts to bribe witnesses to court cases? Lying under oath in foreign courts and then having to admit it? Envelopes stuffed full of money changing hands? Open bribery? The PMs son taking cash bribes?

There is a difference of scale - both in the seriousness of the cases and in the number of them.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 4:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

hora - Member
Vote for Labour everytime as I don't want a progressive, intelligent, successful and influential UK in the world.

I want a Maxist state that has an army to rival North Korea and everyone learns about homosexuality at school as a practical subject.

Ingrowing not thinking bigger is the key.

Dear oh dear oh dear.

Have you got an ingrowing brain, Hora?

Binners, don't let him drink any more please. It's not kind.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

They all seem as bad as each other - get over it and go and ride your bike while the sun is still shining.

I just did thanks.

Why is it that socialists always revert to personal abuse of the people they don't agree with? I feel honoured to be singled out so often, it's inspirational! ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

Actually, "BigButSlimmerBloke", I could take your spelling of my name "Spongebrain" as a compliment! Afterall, I do absorb a great deal of what is going on around me, especially here and the misguided repeated diatribes against the Conservative party.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 6:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

President Robert Mugabe.

He's probably too respectable though.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 7:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

binners - Member

erm.... isn't the point that they'd ALL make labour unelectable? Labour just is unelectable at the moment.

And yet the latest opinion poll would suggest otherwise.....the Tories and Labour are now on level pegging, with the LibDems, despite their "morale boosting" conference, trailing on 13%.

[url= http://www.politics.co.uk/news/opinion-former-index/legal-and-constitutional/poll-labour-draws-level-amidst-unease-over-cuts-$21384137.htm ]Poll: Labour draws level amidst unease over cuts[/url]

Not bad for a party which hasn't even got a leader, eh? ...... in fact, possibly unprecedented.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 7:01 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Anyone who'll renationalise the railways and the utilities, the privatisation of which has been a disaster for the commuter and the less well off. We have a problem with congestion, pollution, safety on roads, renationalise the railways and see the difference it'd make. Labour needs to get much further left IMO. **** the Tories, shareholders and all these other rich ****ers who have no social conscience as long as they're alright.


 
Posted : 22/09/2010 7:03 pm
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

"There's no point trying to appeal to tradidtional Labour voters because they'll vote Labour anyway."

Err, no. Not always. I come from a background of Labour voters. I am left of centre myself. I never voted for Labour while Blair was leader because I did not trust him and I am unlikely to vote Labour if this set of candidates is the best they can field. To me they all look as shallow and self serving as Blair. No one seems to be seriously taking the line of 'lets move away from Blair type policies as they were immoral'. It just seems more 'follow Tonys example' as despite all, the high ups in the party still seem to revere him and his betrayal of the UK.

I was relieved when they were chucked out despite hating what has replaced them, as I was fed up of feeling ashamed of what the leader and cabinet and indeed, most of the labour MPs had become.


 
Posted : 23/09/2010 12:12 am
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

[i]I was relieved when they were chucked out despite hating what has replaced them, as I was fed up of feeling ashamed of what the leader and cabinet and indeed, most of the labour MPs had become. [/i]

Think that sums up my feelings entirely.

Who the hell are we meant to vote for now when all the parties seem to be trying to outdo each other in who is more free market than the other.


 
Posted : 23/09/2010 12:15 am
Posts: 14
Free Member
 

Actually, "BigButSlimmerBloke", I could take your spelling of my name "Spongebrain" as a compliment!

A sponge is
- a thing which absorbs stuff but doesn't retain it so it drains away leaving little or no trace
- full of holes
- a thing which spends most of it's life doing nothing of value, only being called in to service to wipe up spills and waste

Complimentary? don't have very high expectations do you?


 
Posted : 23/09/2010 11:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Nice one BigButDimmerBloke!

Anyhow, what do people think about the result?


 
Posted : 26/09/2010 1:11 pm