Forum menu
Whisky... Single Ma...
 

[Closed] Whisky... Single Malt -v- Blended Brands

 kcal
Posts: 5450
Full Member
 

My local grocers (G&M) have bottles behind the counter for £3,500 🙂


 
Posted : 31/12/2013 9:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's worth pointing out that "blended" can be a bit misleading since it can cover quite different products.

Most blended whiskey or whisky is cheaper as they use grain rather than malt and as such are fundamentally slightly different. Many / most won't notice the difference, mind. Some blended whiskeys are blended single malts (eg Bushmills) and as such are usually regarded as better though clearly that's very subjective.


 
Posted : 31/12/2013 9:34 am
 igm
Posts: 11874
Full Member
 

Can O' Worms.

Not a blend (though it would be a decent name for one), but this thread.

My understanding is as follows (it'll be wrong or arguable, but it won't be far off).

Most whisky is blended.

Single Malt is a blend of whiskies from a single distillery. If it has an age, they will be of the same age. Normally there is water added during the blending - if it's cask strength there wasn't.

Single cask is unblended but may have added water.

Single grain whiskies also exist, though I forget any examples.

Blends may be malt or grain and generally refer to blending more than one distillery. The good blends are as good as the good singles, and the best are excellent. They also cost as much.

All distilleries are the oldest, newest, smallest, highest, lowest, most remote etc.

Of course like all Scots mythology, most whisky lore is subject to change without notice.


 
Posted : 31/12/2013 10:04 am
Posts: 3834
Free Member
 

That sounds about right I think apart from the blended single malt - if it has an age then the youngest whisky will be that age (there may well be older ones in there).


 
Posted : 31/12/2013 10:20 am
Page 2 / 2