Forum menu
The couch is always open
I would ask you to tell me about my mother, but it might scar me.
People argue for three main reasons:-
1. They're trolling
2. They're stupid
3. They don't realise they're stupid
Personally - I fall into all three at times. I rarely say anything that I totally mean (unless it is actually bike related).
Is this the real life?
Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide,
No escape from reality.......
We argue cos we can. It's as simple as that.
...so this is the bit where everyone should let it lie....
My money is on TJ or Elfin to post a big long thought out bit next....
ready?..
I'm too tired and I'm going to bed.
But I dare say I'll think of something tomorrow.
I think TJ has been pretty open and honest actually. I don't believe him when he say's it's not about winning though. ๐
ahh, you were gonna type a big long bit, you were! go on go on go on!
All you need to do now is accept that you are going to change nobodies opinion by arguing about it on an internet forum.
utterly wrong! I've had my opinion about several things changed as a result of our arguments, and I cannot be unique. If everyone's positions were thoroughly entrenched there'd be no point arguing ๐
*muffled noises off-stage*
I agree with you SFB, I've come to learn a few things just by reading some threads. I don't see why ideas or opinions can't be mobile and changeable. It's what makes this site interesting.
+1 it can be really rather amusing sometimes... but as a rule its only funny when its obvious to everyone else that someone is trolling another and succeeding in winding them up, watching 2 people argue when they genuinely believe what they're typing is boring.
However as I alluded to above its recognising that I have made my point and walking away I find hard - but I am working on this
very reflective TJ, gibbs would be proud ๐ +10 internetz for you sir.
I disagreeLOL
SKILZ
๐ first chuckle of the morning, good work ๐
If I continue to be antagonistic towards others, then the potential for happy, positive relationships could be reduced.
very reflective... so why continue to do so? i'm going to be honest here and i hope you dont take too much offence buddy: you can be a really funny guy on this forum, very perceptive at times and seem like you'd be a fun guy to hang around with... but then sometimes you wade into a thread and destroy any fun by appearing to be (intentionally or not) incredibly condescending and a real buzz killington. its a shame because, as the tags on this thread might suggest.. people tend to end up only perceiving you in the negative light as that sticks in minds for longer than the fun stuff.
I find it is often the most (apparently) intelligent people that flatly refuse to listen to another person's point of view or ever accept they might actually be wrong.
๐ excellent post, i might suggest a small alteration (as the most intelligent person on here i feel confident that i'm 1billion percent correct) people who [b]think[/b] they're intelligent will refuse to listen to another person's point of view or ever accept they might actually be wrong... people who [b]know[/b] they're super awesome just keep quiet or troll the hell out of the smaller minds ๐ (its a bit like having a large penis... those with, keep quiet, sit back and smile. Those without will go on and on and on about how big it is, then get angry when challenged.
in the end:
The greatest lesson is you can't win an argument.Also some people just don't care
now who wants to fight?!
I think a good chin-to-chin argument is good for the soul, it can clear the air, pass the time or provide merryment. I've had the odd 'discussion' where I've been giggling away like a teenage girl becasue I've thought it funny, whilst (it seems) the other person(s) are getting all hysterical and popping corks right left and centre. In reality, I hope they're laughing about it too. ๐
I've met sooooooo mant people off here I've lost count and 99.9% of the time they're nothing like their internet persona and are really great people in one way or another
The one thing that does baffle me is when people won't let something lie: Sometimes I just shut a thread down and never ever read it again, or I've forgotten all about the insults etc by the next day. But there are those who seem to bear grudges for a very long time....
I like trying to be eloquent and succint.. cos in the real world I am a bumbling.. introverted.. barely coherent.. coarse and vulgar bumpkin.. and I'll also walk away long before any confrontation.. so..
here I get to exercise some bits of me brain that are usually kept in the attic..
TJ and my prescription next time it kicks off:
PP - sometimes I am incapable of not re-opening the thread.
Imagine the scene. I'm sat at work bored of my bonce. Read BBC, done facebook, finger hovering over the STW bookmark... must resist.. but the minutes and hours tick by... someone may have replied.. they might be misunderstanding the point.. just a quick check, I won't reply I'll just read..
The odd argument use to be amusing but nearly every thread turns into an argument now usually by the same group.
I just find it all pretty boring now.
I know people think I have to win but thats not what it ia about at all to me.
Thou doth protest too much!
On a serious note I like a good argument like many on here.
My rule is always argue/debate as if you were standing next to the person you are arguing with. I have adhered to this at all times including the idiot (arsenal backwards)
I honestly cant recall a time when I have posted something I would not have said in person.
Surfer - it honestly is not. I really do not see it as a win / lose thing at all. Thats just not how I work.
I think that a lot of what goes on here is not arguing or fighting so much as sophistry. Some people (myself included) enjoy the chance to bounce our ideas and opinions off other similarly inclined people.
If I were to be so opinionated and tenacious in my debating at home, the Mrs and I would be falling out all the time. You are my angst sink. You are my rant buffer.
I often think of this tune when I am waffling away on here and I think most people take it with a similar level of humorous indulgence, despite the odd moment of sheer frustration or rage.
EDIT:
Thats just not how I work.
[Pantomime]Oh yes it is![/Pantomime]
๐
This site provides a valuable social function. For example: I'm particularly glad when people pick me on my bad grammar. If only my teachers had been so thorough. ๐
In fact: I'm thinking of making my 6 year old submit her homework to the forum before handing it in. That should teach her to spell properly and pay attention to correct use of apostrophe's
I think its definitely an alpha male/insecurity think, no matter how anyone dresses it up. Unless its a wind up.
Binners - also the correct use full stops at the end of sentences?
๐
I'm afraid both my grammar and spelling are absolutely appalling fella. I have a theory I've developed over the years about why I (along with all graphic designers I've ever met) can't spell.
But when recounting it I tend to bore myself to tears, so I won't inflict it on the rest of the world
I think its definitely an alpha male/insecurity think, no matter how anyone dresses it up.
But with so little to gain? It is very rare that anyone concedes defeat, the act of arguing attracts as much negative feedback as the act of being wrong and in the unlikely event that one does 'win' the rewards for it may be a single concessionary post which will be forgotten in moments.
I agree that it is in part a pecking order thing but I reckon that in an innately argumentative place like STW, the one way to gain acceptance is to give as good as one gets. Maybe it is not about besting your rivals so much as being accepted by them?
apostrophe's
You used the word in a plural manner, not a possessive one, so the correct punctuation is apostrophes.
Please accept my apologies if it was a deliberate attempt at humour.
๐
grand idea binners. i've a pile of first certificate compostions here need correcting. anyone?
Terminals that makes sense but the argumentative types don't see it- its an emotional reaction for them and they lack the distance/rationality.
You may be right clinic-al. ๐
I AM RIGHT ๐ก
I think its definitely an alpha male/insecurity think, no matter how anyone dresses it up
Eventually the alpha male gets old & ripped to shreds by the younger blood though doesn't it? Or creeps off to die in a quiet corner in a pile of shit & pool of piss.....
This is one of the aspects that really annoys me. it is not a dominance game to me, it is not
an alpha male/insecurity think, no matter how anyone dresses it up.
That is not my motivation at all. I know it is for some and I know people do not understand this. But why can people not accept what I say?
What molgrips said is far closer to the point for me.
When engaged in an argument it's usually due to one of two things:a) being misconstrued really pisses some people off and
b) if you have considered something and you feel you have a valid point, you want it properly acknowledged and your intellect respected.
Now clearly for some it is dominance games - but there are some folk on here who lack the ability to understand that some folk work differently and thus as they don't understand the difference they don't believe it is there.
Edit - I have no desire to dominate, I want to be heard and understood.
The only time I'll argue is when someone is being a c0ck.
And the only 2 things that annoy me enough to think someone is a c0ck is
1. Responses which suggest the thread shouldn't have been started eg. yawn, wgaf, etc. (Leave the thread blank if that's what you think.)
2. Overly politically correct responses. Are you [i]really[/i] like that in real life!!?
Otherwise its all a bit pointless arguing with people who are not going to change their minds (eg. TJ on helmets). And this is just something to distract myself from work/tv.
Only you TJ...
๐
Aaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwww. Poor old TJ. Its all just a cry for help.
Do you need a hug? ๐
s'all about respect really isn't it..?
not the domineering alpha respect that the passive aggressives and closet tories associate with..
just good old mutual respect and understanding..
1. Responses which suggest the thread shouldn't have been started eg. yawn, wgaf, etc. (Leave the thread blank if that's what you think.)
+1
It's when someone wants [i]soooo badly[/i] to look clever but they are actually too dense to think of something witty to say
Exactly - to me it's the equivalent of walking past a table of strangers in a pub where a conversation has just started, stopping, turning to them and saying "Who gives a f**?"
And nobody would do that.
walking past a table of strangers in a pub where a conversation has just started, stopping, turning to them and saying "Who gives a f**?"
And nobody would do that.
๐
another thing to add to my "things i must do to annoy younger people when i'm old" list! along with paying for everything in the smallest denomination of coins possible and pretending to be deaf when it suits me.
but yeah... +1
And nobody would do that
you've not been for a drink in my local...
Ok, nobody [u]ON STW[/u] would do that!! ๐
TJ why are you so bothered about people accepting what you say or not?
I love you all.
๐
Cynic al - its just frustrating.
For example on this thread. I stated it is not dominance games with me. Now only one person knows the truth about my motivations is me that is me. However I am clearly disbelieved by some and so effectively I am called a liar and also I get mocked. Frustrating indeed. I hate being called a liar.
People like you Al are so tied up in proving your dominance that you don't realise that we are not all like that. I am content within myself. I have no need to prove or show my dominance over others.
Thus all your interactions with me are filtered thru your mistaken belief that it is all about dominance games with me thus you consistently misunderstand me by your lack of understanding of my motives.I counted 9 snide putdowns from you to me in a week posted on here.
Remember the first time we met to go for a ride? You sprinted off into the distance to " make a point" that you were faster than me and I was slow. You have done this sort of thing to me many times and its only recently that I have realised it all about dominance and you think mistakenly that I am being competitive with you.
Julie will not go out on the bike now if you will be there as a result.
I find it very difficult to converse with you on the forum. I have only posted this long speil in the hope you might glean some understanding. I will not discuss this any further.
TandemJeremy - Member
Cynic al - its just frustrating.For example on this thread. I stated it is not dominance games with me. Now only one person knows the truth about my motivations is me that is me. However I am clearly disbelieved by some and so effectively I am called a liar and also I get mocked. Frustrating indeed. I hate being called a liar.
People like you Al are so tied up in proving your dominance that you don't realise that we are not all like that. I am content within myself. I have no need to prove or show my dominance over others.
Thus all your interactions with me are filtered thru your mistaken belief that it is all about dominance games with me thus you consistently misunderstand me by your lack of understanding of my motives.I counted 9 snide putdowns from you to me in a week posted on here.
Remember the first time we met to go for a ride? You sprinted off into the distance to " make a point" that you were faster than me and I was slow. You have done this sort of thing to me many times and its only recently that I have realised it all about dominance and you think mistakenly that I am being competitive with you.
Julie will not go out on the bike now if you will be there as a result.
I find it very difficult to converse with you on the forum. I have only posted this long speil in the hope you might glean some understanding. I will not discuss this any further.
Hmm - that seems like paranoia to me...
Only one person could make this thread about arguments a personal argument...
C'mon TJ, give it up for a minute, take a step back and chill.
I've pretty much given up trying to have a proper discussion on here after finding that I was gradually turning into TJ ๐ (no offence meant, BTW)
There are just too many different types of people, all with their own agendas for any kind of rational debate to take place. I just don't think it's possible, due to the very nature of the place.
Personally, I think this place would be massively improved by a limit on the number of posts/characters a week that individuals could post, but of course this would reduce throughput/advertising revenue so can't happen.
I admire SFB for his dedication to deliberately missing the point entirely, but appart from molgrips, barnsleymitch and a couple of others, it's just not worth trying to be sensible. I'm going to try and embrace my inner idiot from now on and see how that goes. ๐
The only things that still tempt me to get serious any more are the misogynists, the bullies and the relentlessly cynical non-entities that lurk on here like a turd on your favourite trail.
I miss the amusing trolling. The 'seagulling' thread was a particular favourite.
There are those with whom I will discuss matters on STW, comprising probably 95% of the population.
Others, unfortunately, are just hard work. Overly pedantic, utterly convinced about their own position, and quite unprepared to listen. I'm amazed that they managed to type at all, so firmly wedged are their fingers in their ears. I just don't want to engage with these people, so I don't; there's no point.
I'm not sure that I argue with anyone on here, though I accept that from time to time I'll give someone a poke. As said by someone earlier, my yardstick is whether I'd be prepared to say something to someone's face; if not, I'll not post it here.


