Forum menu
So he's a racist prick.
Apparently that's allowed now.
So he’s a racist prick.
Apparently that’s allowed now.
What's allowed? From what I can see, he's lost his job..... so very much not-allowed it seems?
Ha, he used the "brief authority" speech from Measure to Measure, it's supposed to be a cutting barb about the transient nature of temporary authority, fittingly ironic in a circular way that that quote should be his downfall.
Ill judged - yes. Is he a racist - probably not. He has used it several times in the past to answer other SM arguers, but has this time sent it to a recipient who has taken hold of two (admittedly incendiary) words rather than the context.
I called my kids 'cheeky little monkeys' several times when they were younger. I don't call my nephew the same, he's mixed race and I've modified my language to cheeky little scamps.
But if I was to use the same language to him that I used to my kids many times, I'm worried I'm now a racist. Or am I already, because I used that phrase and now don't for fear of being labelled what I clearly am?
Ill judged – yes. Is he a racist – probably not.
This
At least he didn't say "jungle drums"
But if I was to use the same language to him that I used to my kids many times, I’m worried I’m now a racist. Or am I already, because I used that phrase and now don’t for fear of being labelled what I clearly am?
If you’re having to ask yourself or others these questions, there’s probably a diversity awareness course you can sign up for.
What social media gaff did Alasdair Stewart make to force him to quit?
Alastair.
If you’re having to ask yourself or others these questions, there’s probably a diversity awareness course you can sign up for.
Aye, because merely saying a word now makes you a racist.
I always thought cheeky monkey referred to the fact that monkeys, at least the ones I’ve observed, are generally pretty high scoring on the cheeky scale. Yes I’m looking at you in particular gibbons.
I'll be going home to tell my toddler he's a goddamn racist tonight - he keeps talking about monkeys jumping on the bed!
Aye, because merely saying a word now makes you a racist.
That’s absolutely what I was saying, yes.
It's a pongy day when the truth gets you sacked.
Aren't we in fact, apes?
Maybe his mistake was to leave out the 'great' as in 'great apes'.
Should his defence have been it's the truth?
https://australianmuseum.net.au/learn/science/human-evolution/humans-are-apes-great-apes/
I always thought cheeky monkey referred to the fact that monkeys, at least the ones I’ve observed, are generally pretty high scoring on the cheeky scale. Yes I’m looking at you in particular gibbons.
Gibbons are, in fact, apes.
You are a speciesist and should resign immediately before you get sacked.
Ill judged? Possibly yes but not sure it makes him racist. Maybe Deadlydarcy can explain and tell us what he’s learnt at his equality and diversity training.
WTAF!?
Could he have argued it out? Probably
Is it a good excuse to get out? Maybe
I’m worried I’m now a racist
Surely you know whether you are racist or not? There’s a difference between that and an interpretation. Yesterday someone commented on the fact a work colleague had used the phrase “Chinese whispers” in an email. Racist? No. Unintentionally unaware that use of the phrase in today’s world could be offensive to some - yes.
The worlds changed and unfortunately sometimes the habitual nature of people unused to being so guarded slips through the net - as in this case. I’m sure to Alistair changing the nature of Shakespearean text - of which of course was a quote even and not a personal statement - would be troubling in itself. I think that’s what needs looking at - are we no longer able to quote literally on the basis that the content although written by someone else and without alteration has potential for offence in the modern day?
Thats a lot of media that would end up in the archives / bin.
It's not remotely racist:
But man, proud man,
Dress'd in a little brief authority,
Most ignorant of what he's most assur'd—
His glassy essence—like an angry ape
Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven
As makes the angels weep; who, with our spleens,
Would all themselves laugh mortal.
The tweet in context:
https://tinyurl.com/udksks3
Alistair changing the nature of Shakespearean text
Alastair
Yes I’m looking at you in particular gibbons.
I always thought they were funky rather than cheeky, have I been mislead?
I always thought they were funky rather than cheeky, have I been mislead?
The whole 'funky' thing is a stereotype so I've hit the report button.
Strikes me as really harsh, although quoting Shakespeare on social media is a ****tish thing to do, it's not racist, particularly with the nuance and context.
We re not talking big Ron/Marcel desailly here
Just don't comment on social media at all, you've a cushy safe anchorman job there's no need to raise your media profile so just shut your trap!
being a middle aged white male with a mortgage i clearly am offensive to many groups.
these famous faces in politics / tv / film / football management / music / FTSE100 Directors. etc should retire and enjoy a happy life. i cant imagine he needed the cash. at 67 you should be handing the reigns
although quoting Shakespeare on social media is a **** thing to do
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.
🙂
It’s the ending of careers I have an issue with . He has made a mistake, that’s all . Surely were not at the point where when someone mistakenly causes offence that’s it you are out no questions asked . In this case would an apology and an acknowledgment not of sufficed . It’s reactions like this that allow people like Laurence fox and piers Morgan to shout out about being oppressed white men .
i cant imagine he needed the cash. at 67 you should be handing the reigns
Retirement isn’t compulsory some people like to work.
at 67 you should be handing the reigns
An argument Prince Charles used to little effect.
He has made a mistake
Not even that. I bet for one minute he didn’t know his faceless audience was a) black b) likely to take offensive and c) Shakespeare’s considered offensive these days. As we can see on STW, there are many facets of comprehension and interpretation of words typed into the internet these days, so much so you’ll soon have to have the foresight of a Grand Chess Master/Mistress/LGBT player to be able to post something considered completely inoffensive to anyone.
I'm a fully signed up SJW and I think its pretty harsh. There is a difference between offense given and offense taken.
At 67 maybe he just though sod it, i don't need this crap anymore and agreed to go quietly.
his faceless audience
You know the person he sent it to has a profile pic of their face and that it was visible to the Stewart when he was typing his reply?
That’s absolutely what I was saying, yes.
You sir, are a fool. People like you devalue the debate and are one of the main drivers to society at large not getting it. The sooner folk with your attitude move on and folk with sense retake the moral high ground the better for everyone but especially those from minorities backgrounds you bewilderingly think your stance is helping.
But edit - I met AS on numerous occasions. No idea if he was racist but he was certainly a knob. A knob who was responsible for a very ****ed up son. So my sympathies are non existent.
People are saying it's a mistake, but I'm not even sure it's a mistake. If he'd showed me that quote and said in advance he was going to post it on twitter in response to some know-it-all I wouldn't for one second have thought there was any prejudice in it [1]. It's several tenuous logical steps to get to racism.
If you were looking for an 'ist' the obvious one is that it's sexist. It's a woman talking about men in derogatory terms, rather than using man as a term for 'mankind'. Change the gender and ask if it's acceptable:
"But woman, proud woman,
Dress’d in a little brief authority,
Most ignorant of what she’s most assur’d—
Her glassy essence—like an angry ape"
[1] Beyond the obvious insanity of someone famous squabbling online using their own name.
It’s several tenuous logical steps to get to racism.
Like if you told a Scottish person to "put a sock in it"?
I'm sure he can look back fondly on the good times - like that time he got sacked from 'Police, Camera, Action!' after crashing into a telegraph pole more than three times over the drink drive limit.
As someone once wrote:
The Gods are just, and of our pleasant vices
Make instruments to plague us.
TLDR;
White person compares black person to ape. Loses job.
Discussion all getting a bit Laurence Fox/Piers Morgan 'you can't even...nowadays'.
You know the person he sent it to has a profile pic of their face and that it was visible to the Stewart when he was typing his reply?
Firstly, I don't think we do know that at all.
Secondly, do you really behave like Basil Fawlty in the 'Germans' episode and make a racial assesment of everyone you talk to and then make sure you don't say Ape? "I said it once, but I think I got away with it."
You might make judgements on skin colour by most of us don't and IME 100pc of the current crop of young kids don't even notice skin colour.
TLDR;
17th Century White man compares another 17th Century white man to ape in entirely non-racist context. 21st Century man quotes in the same context. Other 21st Century man deliberately chooses to take different meaning despite 400 years of established understanding of original context just because he wanted to win a Twitter argument. Man Loses job.
FTFY
You might make judgements on skin colour by most of us don’t
I've never been accused on here or anywhere else online or in real life of being a racist before so you can **** off and when you finish ****ing off **** off some more.
You utter **** coming on here and making judgements like that about me.
Just **** off.
I called my kids ‘cheeky little monkeys’ several times when they were younger. I don’t call my nephew the same, he’s mixed race and I’ve modified my language to cheeky little scamps.
But if I was to use the same language to him that I used to my kids many times, I’m worried I’m now a racist. Or am I already, because I used that phrase and now don’t for fear of being labelled what I clearly am?
Umm.. well it's something. On the face of it what should you feel a need to discriminate against your nephew an account of his race? (Not like you can't... but more in the way if he's called Richard he might prefer you don't call him dick)
Quite honestly it makes me wonder what century we are living in?
Sometime back in the late 20C ... maybe longer perhaps monkey might have been a derogatory term for people with darker skin... however in all honestly surely not something 21C? (At least in Europe)
I guess my point is whatever name it's given even within some group of xenophobes referring to someone of darker skin as a monkey is surely more reflecting on some regressive 19C viewpoint?
Some people believe in lizard people taking over the earth or flat earth (or in all probability both).. so I can't see it being "no-one believes" whilst millions of us refer to our sprogs lovingly as monkey's... and I can't in truth see Alasdair Stewart as being in the Lizard man camp... (unlike David Ike)
and I can’t in truth see Alasdair Stewart as being in the Lizard man camp
Alastair
Says a lot about the UK that drink driving didn't end his career, but using a Shakespearian quote to call out Dunning Kruger[1] in an internet squabble did.
[1] DK in his opinion, who knows if it was or not.
could be worse, he could have referred to "watermelon smiles" or crowds of "flag-waving piccaninnies", because that would definitely get you sacked. Or elected.
That "defense" piece from the spectator is ****ing awful. Basically saying if your not smashing minorities beneath hobnail boots then you can't be racist, and the media bubble is a glittering light of diversity.
And I think DD has been misunderstood, obfuscating the debate with frivolous examples does look like deflection. It is clear that calling his kids cheeky monkeys is not racist, and that changing his language when referring to black kids is sensible. The question (does that make me racist) afterwards is just facetious.