Forum menu
๐
is a bit worrying isn't it
(the fact you carry on reading assuming the stuff you don't know about is accurate)
Of course it does. The water on the street evaporates to form clouds which then comes back down as rain. Simples!"Wet Streets Cause Rain"
Cheers,
Jamie
I've stopped reading all newspapers (incl broadsheets) on the basis of the number of times I saw bias and misrepresentation. I figured if I can see inaccuracies in the stuff I know about then the other stuff is probably pretty similar...
But then again, my Dad has been telling me not to believe everything I read in the papers for decades now so it's hardly ground-breaking insight!
People believe things they know to be untrue for their own weird reasons... have you ever tried getting someone to change their view on whether cyclists should pay road tax!
Do you still read this forum? ๐I've stopped reading all newspapers (incl broadsheets) on the basis of the number of times I saw bias and misrepresentation.
yikes. never thought of it like that.
Similar effect on programs like The Gadget Show when you see them reviewing bikes. See also Top Gear.
and they expect people to make sensible decisions on Scottish independence or an EU referendum on the basis of media information...
and they expect people to make sensible decisions on Scottish independence or an EU referendum on the basis of media information...
cynical version: "they" expect the media to encourage people to make the decision that "they" are backing
Similar effect on programs like The Gadget Show when you see them reviewing bikes. See also Top Gear
This +100
Stopped watching Gadget Show after the road-disc-wheel-wrong-way-round debacle, felt I couldn't take anything they reported remotely seriously. Have done the same with all newspapers and most TV documentaries now too. <old cynic>
Something on Countryfile had the same effect on me, the presenter being a Walt and the item losing all credibility for the program.
