[Closed] Watches

40 Posts
23 Users
0 Reactions
187 Views
Posts: 1583
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Back from a spin along canal to find my watch is dead. Well half of the numbers are dead on the digital display. It's only a few weeks old. Second watch I've killed in two months. So assuming I'm gonna get my £40 back, what (not overly expensive to wear in sporting type environments) watch to get?


 
Posted : 10/04/2016 8:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

G shock.


 
Posted : 10/04/2016 8:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Any G shock, you could pick up a G shock 6900 at a good price if you look about and they are bomb proof.


 
Posted : 10/04/2016 8:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do yourself a favour and buy a G-shock!!


 
Posted : 10/04/2016 8:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Posts: 1583
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Might look at g shock then...


 
Posted : 10/04/2016 8:17 pm
Posts: 4078
Free Member
 

Amazon sometimes have good deals on G Shock.


 
Posted : 10/04/2016 8:53 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

Reasonably loud alarm on the solar 6900 of that is of interest.


 
Posted : 10/04/2016 9:10 pm
Posts: 287
Full Member
 

G
Take your pick
http://www.watchshop.com/Casio-G-Shock-Watches.html


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:06 am
 IHN
Posts: 19932
Full Member
 

If you want to tell the time: £8 Casio digital; light, cheap, indestructible.

If you want to tell the time and project a gnaar, "let's offroad" kinf of image: pick your G-shock


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's a watch, not an image. If someone makes an assumption about a person based on what is around their wrist, the watch isn't the problem.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:12 am
 IHN
Posts: 19932
Full Member
 

Fair enough. But what's the advantage of the G-shock over the £8 one?


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In the interest of ballance, i should point out that my G Shock has recently run out of battery. It's only 10 years old.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But what's the advantage of the G-shock over the £8 one?

From my experience G-shocks are tough. Really tough. IMHO, subjected to abuse they will outlive a standard casio digi. Is that worth an extra £40-odd? I suppose it depends on how reliant you are on knowing the time!


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Swatch Skins are good in that they are thin and light so don't bounce around on your wrist and they fit nicely under a glove if required.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:20 am
Posts: 568
Free Member
 

I've said before that the g shocks are bombproof, had mine for 6 years now as a work watch, spends its life with me up to the elbows inside aircraft, getting snagged scratched, fully submersed in hydraulic oil, engine oil, and avtur. Still going strong, minus a few scratches. Bought for $38 from an American PX


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 10:21 am
Posts: 2980
Free Member
 

Have you considered a G-Shock? 😉


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 11:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can't vouch for it as I don't have one, but I believe the Casio G Shocks are sometimes recommended.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 11:37 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Sod the G-Shock - fussy displays with too smaller a digits.

This is the watch you're looking for:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Timex-Expedition-Digital-Display-T49951SU/dp/B00CYZOF28/ref=sr_1_8?s=watch&ie=UTF8&qid=1460374290&sr=1-8&keywords=timex+expedition

Compared to a g-shock - watch on the right

[img] [/img]

I have one - bought it for when I was driving the lorries. Been scraped against pallets of bricks, under pallets, used in the foulest of weathers and doesn't have a mark on it.

Plus you can actually read the time at a glance...


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 11:37 am
 IHN
Posts: 19932
Full Member
 

Yeah, but it's no G-Shock


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 11:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That Timex looks pretty damn good for the money. Worth a shot I reckon.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 11:46 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Its bloody good - keeps time remarkably well also. Hasn't so much as lost or gained a minute in over a year now.

Note it is very big and deep too. But bombproof...


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 11:55 am
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

+1 Swatch - cheap, light (important), comfy and last well.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 12:08 pm
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 12:12 pm
Posts: 4402
Free Member
 

G shock, built to withstand everything your wrist can't


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 12:12 pm
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 12:13 pm
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 12:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i've had my g shock (AW590) for about 3 years and its been faultless. ive even stopped wearing my much more expensive watches because of it


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 12:49 pm
 Yak
Posts: 6933
Full Member
 

I've broken numerous casio bin ladens, a few swatches, 3 divers, but only 1 g-shock. I don't do anything ridiculous with them, just day-to-day stuff. I accept that watches are largely disposable items that eventually do get broken. But for years use to failure / price the g-shock wins by far.

Currently 'borrowing' my wife's g-shock. It's 18 years old and still in good nick*. (only had it for 2 months so far....)

*when I say good nick - I did cock up a battery change somehow and not all the buttons work. Enough of them work though 🙂


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

G-shocks are good but they get caught on stuff, smacked against things and so on because they are so sodding large. Also the straps are sweaty.

I like these

http://www.watchshop.com//mens-timex-indiglo-expedition-rugged-watch-t49863-p99941624.html?utm_source=froogle&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=shoppingfeeds&source=froogle&gclid=CjwKEAjwlq24BRDMjdK7g8mD6BASJABBl8n3c6BwjfVKyhaQL2Ef0G42HsNuXMlKlSu-YnnfLhaDsxoCkGvw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

Cheap, look OK and indiglo is better than lume.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 1:40 pm
Posts: 325
Free Member
 

If you want to tell the time: £8 Casio digital; light, cheap, indestructible.

If only you could replace strap. Have a box of broken strapped casios, but they last me about three years each time before strap goes where its bent on putting watch on. Car mechanicing, mtbing and various stupidities.

Love them


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 4:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Garmin Fenix 3

[img] [/img]

Cheap, pretty come with a choice of faces and widgets/apps to download.

Did i mention they are pretty


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 4:34 pm
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

It's a watch, not an image. If someone makes an assumption about a person based on what is around their wrist, the watch isn't the problem.

That might have been true 10 years ago, but we don't need watches to tell the time since everyone has a mobile phone. Sure, there are certain instances where a watch is more practical, but there are also plenty of times when having a phone is more useful (purely as a timepiece I mean). So wearing a watch had become a lot more about style than function.

I have a few watches, including a G-shock (for when I want to look rugged), a seiko diver (for when I'm feeling nostalgic) and a basic £8 casio analogue thing that's just so awesomely utilitarian. It's also really low profile so doesn't snag on stuff.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 4:39 pm
Posts: 1712
Free Member
 

mrsfry - Garmin Fenix 3 are 300gbp - "Cheap"(?)


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 4:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So wearing a watch had become a lot more about style than function.

A panerai or a rolex, yes absolutely. But a G-shock or a Timex?
The more pertinent thing is that people actually think like this. If I see someone wearing a Gshock/rolex/whatever, I just think "Oh look a Gshock/rolex/whatever", why anyone would look at it and think stuff like "oh, here's an outdoor wannabe etc" I don't know. It's not a good thing.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 4:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If size is an issue you can always get a 5600 they are quite small and flat on the wrist.

And stgeorge check here for replacement straps. Keith is an awesome guy and can get pretty much any thing. www.tiktox.com


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 4:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mrsfry - Garmin Fenix 3 are 300gbp - "Cheap"(?)

If you buy it with the HRM it's a bargin 8) . The new Fenix has the HRM in the back of the watch (not the one i bought and don't like)

£330 next day delivery (did i mention it's pretty)

PS

I don't have kids


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 5:02 pm
Posts: 325
Free Member
 

but there are also plenty of times when having a phone is more useful (purely as a timepiece I mean

Lost me there, how can a phone be more useful as a timepiece than a watch? Even if you did secrete your watch away in a pocket.

And thanks to Zer0


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't always have my phone with and if i do it is either in the bottom of my bag or hiding in some pocket. Watches are easy to wear (see Youtube for tutorials on how to wear them) and quick to look at.


 
Posted : 11/04/2016 5:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You ain't wrong there. I hate having to pull my phone out every time I want to see what time it is. But I only own a G shock Frogman now (I used to collect watches and got rid of all but 1)and it's so big it gets on my nerves.


 
Posted : 12/04/2016 9:47 am