Forum menu
Volcano RANT! Ryana...
 

[Closed] Volcano RANT! Ryanair FAIL

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1525600]

[url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8630438.stm?ls ]From the BBC:

Ryanair, Europe's largest low-cost carrier, has cancelled all flights to and from northern Europe until at least mid-Wednesday because of the ash cloud.

The airline's CEO, Michael O'Leary, has said he is "nervous" about the airlines who are seeking compensation because of the volcano.

He also said that passengers seeking expenses in such extraordinary circumstances is "ludicrous."

[/url]

Why, exactly, is it ludicrous that passengers are claiming expenses from their airlines? The passengers have a contract with the airline to transport them from A to B at the prescribed time. If the airline renegues on that contract, through whatever reason, surely it's the airline's problem? Yes, the volcano is unusual, but not unknown. If you don't like the fact that one day your airline business may be grounded by reasons beyond your control, then don't operate one. Simples...


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:21 am
Posts: 218
Free Member
 

Force majeure


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:27 am
 Drac
Posts: 50609
 

If you don't like the fact your flight might be cancelled due to reasons beyond the airlines control, don't fly.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:29 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Why, exactly, is it ludicrous that passengers are claiming expenses from their airlines?

Because it's beyond their control. There's nowt anyone can do about it. Suck it up.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:31 am
Posts: 762
Free Member
 

Ive just rang through to them to try and get a refund on a ticket that was cancelled. Apparently theyre so busy they cant answer my call. Not particularly happy. They havent even emailed me to inform me how to go about processing a refund.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:31 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Ive just rang through to them to try and get a refund on a ticket that was cancelled. Apparently theyre so busy they cant answer my call. Not particularly happy. They havent even emailed me to inform me how to go about processing a refund.

Mrs PP books travel for many people in her company as part of her job. She's spending all day on hold, 1hr+ each time, just to speak to someone, because her boss says she has to. When she gets through, there's nothing that can be done.

Her advice - It's just tough titty. Forget about it. Walk away. It's not worth it. Give it a few days after it's all blown over (Pun intended!) before ringing again.

Quit moaning.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:34 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Yup - airlines are covering hotels etc out of goodwill (or it maybe in the contract) - they don't have a duty to do so otherwise.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:34 am
Posts: 41849
Free Member
 

As a general rule insurance excludes stuff like this is as it would push up premiums disproportionately.

£10 travel insurance for your week in spain covers you for the 1 in 20 or so people that lose a camera, passport of wallet (20*£10=£200, about the cost of sorting any of those).

It would bankrupt them to have to cover however many million passengers for weeks or potentialy months of hotels and other expenses.

If you dont agree with the small print, fly with an airline who will pay your expenses in this scenario, but they wont be as cheep as ryanair.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Because it's beyond their control. There's nowt anyone can do about it. Suck it up.

Tough $hit. Hiding behind force majeure is a bit low, frankly. So it's beyond their control. Tough. They'd happily milk you if there were reasons beyond your control as to why you couldn't make it to the airport and the plane did fly.

They sold the ticket. They agreed the contract to transport you (and your goods at £10 per bag) (plus taxes) (plus surcharges). It's their problem.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:37 am
Posts: 3729
Free Member
 

airlines are covering hotels etc out of goodwill (or it maybe in the contract) - they don't have a duty to do so otherwise.

If they are a European airline and flying into/around Europe then they do have a legal duty to provide meals and accomodation for passnegers stuck abroad. If Mr O'Leary hasn't built this risk into his pricing policy then perhaps his buisness model isn't quite a good as he thinks.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:40 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

You miss the flight - you lose the fare. They can't fly you - they lose the fare.

Dream on zokes.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:40 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

There's a reason why Ryanair are so cheap (in every way). They're fine until the smallest thing goes wrong, then they leave you high and dry. I use them for only one route these days because noone else flies it.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:43 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[i]They agreed the contract to transport you [/i]

Indeed. How carefully did you read the contract before agreeing it? Admittedly it probably doesn't actually include the word "volcano".

🙂


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:44 am
Posts: 8101
Free Member
 

If you pay 5 pounds for your flight should the airline really cough up for a 2 grand hotel bill for something not their fault?

Insurance companies should be covering this, not the airlines. They take the opportunity to look at the dealer's cards before making a bet... well, this time it's backfired.

I'm with O'Leary on this. Though if I paid more fir the ticket I'd expect correspondingly more support in return.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:51 am
Posts: 24857
Free Member
 

Point is that it is EU law that the airline picks up the tab. O'Leary hasn't a leg to stand on this time.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8621779.stm


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Insurance companies should be covering this, not the airlines[/i]
Presumably airlines also have insurance.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:53 am
Posts: 57
Free Member
 

Force majeure is there in the contract becasue of these unusual occurrences.
Ryanair flies places you can't otherwise get to as cheaply and strands you there if it has problems. (Like me in Morocco)
You'll get you money back for the flight, as they promised. It's just that getting home might cost you more by other routes.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The passengers have a contract with the airline to transport them from A to B at the prescribed time

wrong, read the small print

I think you're confusing Ryanair (thieving shits) with a volcano erupting

If there was no petrol available for your car would you expect your car manufacturer to pay for a train or a hotel?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:54 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I'm with O'Leary on this. Though if I paid more fir the ticket I'd expect correspondingly more support in return.

I'd be very careful about ever putting myself "with" a prick like O'Leary. He may be a man of comical soundbites, but he's an arsehole. Of that there's no doubt.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 9:58 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Are you stuck in Morrocco Moses? Ace. 🙂


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:00 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

IanMunro - Member
Insurance companies should be covering this, not the airlines
Presumably airlines also have insurance.

Indeed - with force majure clauses...


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It may run & run

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8626474.stm

can folks do a class action on this sort of thing


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:01 am
Posts: 1594
Full Member
 

Just remember that the EU rules only apply on the return leg of a journey... so if you haven't started the journey yet you are not covered, and if you booked two singles then you are not covered either...


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:02 am
Posts: 24857
Free Member
 

It might seem unfair, and the circumstances are really exceptional, but them's the rules and if they haven't made a provision for this sort of thing happening then they will be in future.

I just checked and they turned over €2.9 billion last year, making €100 million profit. I bet they have the cash reserves to do it (in fact the same report says they spent €1.3 billion on fuel last years so 1 week with no flights will save them €25 million in fuel which would pay for a quarter of a million extra nights in hotels and food at an average €100 per night) He's trying to avoid his obligations to save his profits which is what you'd expect him to do. Expect to pay more for your Ryanair flights in future though.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

if you've booked accommodation & flights with the same agent/provider, then you may technically have a 'package holiday' arrangement, which is then covered by the operators ATOL license (if they're a UK operator and bona fide etc)... as far as I know, if you're covered by ATOL then in this circumstance the obligation is on the agent to cover your costs and get you home?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:11 am
Posts: 762
Free Member
 

I wish I could get through to someone to a get a bloody refund!! Even an email address would be nice.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:29 am
 aP
Posts: 681
Free Member
 

I'm supposed to be going to Berlin on Friday morning, however its not so important that I'm prepared to put up with hours of being messed around so I probably won't go.
Its not a big deal, I think Berlin will probably still be there next time.

...oh, and living near Heathrow its lovely at the moment, the weather's nice, the sky is clear and we can hear birds and church bells and stuff for the first time in over 10 years. I'd be quite happy for this to carry on indefinately.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ha ha. saw a guy in spain on the news. ferry to portsmouth. taxi to aberdeen!!!

then asking 'who's gonna pay for this???'

you are you idiot! a taxi to aberdeen! are you mad???


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

most the EU legistlation covers returns flights. this is why with Ryan air you have to buy two singles....


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I haven't read all of this, but what I remember of contract law is... that if you enter a contract with specific clauses i.e. you ask the airline to deliver you to a specific destination at a specific time and they agree you might have a reason to make a claim.
This is, I think, an act of god and therefore unforseen, (debateable).

If you have a meeting in Paris at 16:00 and the flight arrives at 14:00, you might think that you have plenty of time. The airline might offer you an earlier flight to guarantee arrival. A reasonable request on the part of the airline, isn't it? You can now choose.

If you have booked through Ryan Air and told them before buying the tickets that you have a deadline, they agreed to get you there on time and entered a new and slightly different contract. They are agreeing to get you there and not just fly you there. Then I think you can claim. But would have to contest the act of god element, good luck.

If you booked the cheapest flight, got caught out by the volcano (why doesn't anyone call it by it's prper name??) and now want to claim. I think the answer is tough sh1t! Suck it up.

Look, I took a gamble and lost, can I have my money back?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:55 am
Posts: 14291
Free Member
 

Although I don't like O'Leary or his stupid airline I am with all the airlines on this one. It is completely out of their control and personally I disagree with all these demands for compensation are a bit much. I do also think that the airlines' requests for compensation from the government are also b0ll0x - both sides have to suck it up on this occasion.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 10:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

most the EU legistlation covers returns flights. this is why with Ryan air you have to buy two singles....

I think they'll struggle to claim they don't sell return tickets

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 11:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I see they're calling Don Quixote Airport by Ciudad Real, there was a call to name it Madrid South, it's 200km away FFS! Valladolid as Madrid North, again 200km. A bit cheeky, isn't it?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bu66er!


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 11:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

O'Leary is trying to make it out that it's 'unfair' to claim from airlines for something out of their control.

If you were ill the day before you were supposed to fly, that would also be unfair, but you'd still loose your money. (unless you were insured, but then why a volcano is less controllable than you being struck down with a virus is anyone's guess)

He sells flights to places, it's unfair that a volcano erupted and stopped him doing so. But he sold the flights, and as such agreed to bring people back on their return flights. He can't do that, and should foot the bill for it, be it extra hotels or alternative transport. EU law says he has to do that.

I'm pretty sure if in some way you managed to cause him some consequential losses through no fault of your own, he'd happily claim for them, and his lawyers fees too...


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

This is, I think, an act of god and therefore unforseen,

God doesn't exist, and it wasn't really unseen. Volcanoes erupt, they eject ash, ash hurts aeroplanes. Iceland has lots of active volcanoes. All this is known. What, exactly, was the unforeseen bit?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 11:52 am
Posts: 10962
Full Member
 

What, exactly, was the unforeseen bit?

Umm - when they erupt? It's kinda like earthquakes - yeah we know they happen, we know where they tend to happen but we can't tell when one's going to happen or how bad it will be.

Plus of course the weather conditions that were extant when the eruption occured also have a big part in the disruption - had there been a big Atlantic low pressure with strong winds from the SW the ash would be heading over towards Russia & we'd all be flying round without a care. As probably would they.

Of course if it was all as predictable as you say any informed traveller would already have made alternative plans for getting home just in case this happened, so why should anyone else pay for their lack of foresight?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 12:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Of course if it was all as predictable as you say any informed traveller would already have made alternative plans for getting home just in case this happened, so why should anyone else pay for their lack of foresight

Because that's what the airline's insurance should cover. After all, it's written into EU law that they have a duty of care for returning passengers, and whilst rare, Icelandic volcanoes and strange weather aren't that uncommon. Just because their business model skimped on insurance doesn't mean anyone else should have to pay for their cockup.

Umm - when they erupt? It's kinda like earthquakes - yeah we know they happen, we know where they tend to happen but we can't tell when one's going to happen or how bad it will be.

I'm fairly sure that the good people of San Francisco are covered by insurance that will pay out next time the San Andreas Fault makes its long-overdue shudder. Anyway, we also knew that Iceland appeared to be going through a period of increased activity, and we're pretty good at predicting the weather in the short term. I'm fairly sure someone at the met office, if asked, could have said that if that volcano (that was already erupting) continued to do so, and we keep having north easterlies, the ash will come here. If I were in charge of a business that could potentially be liable for £millions in hotels and alternative transport if such foreseen events took place, I'd either get the correct insurance, or self-insure by increasing ticket costs. If not, then when it happens, and the customers submit their claims which they are legally entitled to do so, you go bust, not then cry to the EU or Westminster for your poor management...

Let the free market sort it out 😉


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Legal duty, EU regs.

Though I feel some sympathy for airlines because it's not caused by their incompetence (for a change)

But rules is rules.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 12:23 pm
Posts: 6256
Full Member
 

ruinair handled things a bit differently to other scheduled airlines. BA etc seem to be ona rolling "we'll see what NATS/CAA say and if there's a window we'l try to fly what we can", but ruinair just said "sod it we're cancelling all flights until wednesday".

IMHO that means Ryanair cancelled and can't use the force majeure clause on anything reasonably outside of the closed airspace time (at the time of making the call). So Ryanair have to refund the entire sum paid, including any booking fees, taxes, the lot. Some other airlines that are shifting from winter flights to summer ones just said sod it, flight cancelled, heres your 100£ back.

Since Ryanair use contract pilots + cabin crew, I guess they are happy at having virtually no staff bills to pay?


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 1:54 pm
Posts: 1383
Free Member
 

dickydutch - I was supposed to be flying Ryanair today, and only got an e-mail from them yesterday saying how I can reschedule my flights or get a refund.

Was going to provide the link to re book flights to another day, but that has expired, I imagine they will e-mail you in due course with this. If you want to cancel and get a refund though, here's the link to that

[url= http://schchng.ryanair.com/refweb.asp ]Refund from Ryanair[/url]

"TO APPLY FOR A REFUND ONLINE:

Customers who are booked on any of the below flights, who wish to cancel and claim a full refund on the unused flight(s) can do so directly by clicking on the link below and entering the required details. Refunds will be processed in 10 working days back to the form of payment used to pay for the booking. "


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 2:43 pm
Posts: 898
Full Member
 

[i]If they are a European airline and flying into/around Europe then they do have a legal duty to provide meals and accomodation for passnegers stuck abroad. If Mr O'Leary hasn't built this risk into his pricing policy then perhaps his buisness model isn't quite a good as he thinks.[/i]

gonefishin is completely right. Airlines operating flights inside Europe (or European operators flying the return journey from anywhere in the world back to Europe) have to either refund the passengers or provide accommodation and meals (the passenger gets to choose) in the case of a delay [u]of any kind[/u].

O'Leary is a devious whinging scumbag but when he agreed to operate from Europe, he agreed to these rules. If his business wasn't adequately prepared or insured for this sort of event, it's their fault and should rightfully be their loss.

: P


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 2:47 pm
Posts: 5976
Free Member
 

As a general rule insurance excludes stuff like this is as it would push up premiums disproportionately.

Would it really? I don't think it's an especially common event. Heard a fella on the radio just advising people to make a claim via the ombudsman if they were denied reimbursement, since some insurance companies are paying out and some not.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 3:15 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

As far as I'm concerned I'd have paid a cheap price for the ticket, it's out of their control and providing I got the price of their ticket back I'd be happy enough as I could be with the situation. It's not their responsibility to have backups in case of natural disasters.


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 3:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[b]They like to think[/b] It's not their responsibility to have backups in case of natural disasters.

Fixed it for you 😉


 
Posted : 20/04/2010 4:07 pm
Page 1 / 2