Forum menu

Ukraine

Posts: 7283
Full Member
 

Mach 2.2 and 50,000ft isnt high enough or fast enough?

Although the ability to find ballistic missiles, plot an intercept then launch h an amraam requires todays radar technology.
Hitting shared drones with a cannon would be a peice of cake
Plus the F16 started life in the 70s, ok so it was in production later but its not new new.
And all new planes require alot of maintenance, are supet complex high tech peices of equipment.
Tornado was a brilliant mrca, range, payload, speed plus manoeuvrability. I guess with every single thing developed to kill people. The people who are going to be killed devise ways to prevent that happening, and mach7 sam missiles flying up your exhaust pipe isnt going to end well for the pilot


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 8:53 am
Posts: 6711
Free Member
 

At least F16 is still built (currently block 70/72) so parts are theoretically available. Tornado hasn't been built since the last century 🙂


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 9:06 am
Posts: 12378
Full Member
 

Mach 2.2 and 50,000ft isnt high enough or fast enough?

Although the ability to find ballistic missiles, plot an intercept then launch h an amraam requires todays radar technology.

As I understand it, Patriot missiles will defend against ballistic missiles. F16 would use AMRAAMs to defend against cruise missiles and aircraft.

The F16 is still in production and the newer models have advanced radars and can fire precision guided missiles to launch stand-off attacks against ground targets. There are thousands of F16 in service around the world. It will depend entirely on the specific model that Ukraine is supplied as to what radar it carries and what missiles it can fire.

I don't think any servicable Tornado ADVs would be available, all the RAF ones were withdrawn from service years ago. The GR versions would be extremely vulnerable to Russian air defenses if they tried to fly in and drop unguided bombs.


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 9:31 am
Posts: 14484
Free Member
 

Plus the F16 started life in the 70s, ok so it was in production later but its not new new.

Again, just regurgitating what ive read but. Current or recently retired F16s will have a very different set of capabilities to those produced in the 70s.


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 5:54 pm
Posts: 14484
Free Member
 

At least F16 is still built (currently block 70/72) so parts are theoretically available. Tornado hasn’t been built since the last century 🙂

Poland is a current operator starting from 2006, Romania also current starting from 2010ish, id say theyd get a helping hand with the maintenance supply chains at the very least.


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 5:58 pm
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

Again, just regurgitating what ive read but. Current or recently retired F16s will have a very different set of capabilities to those produced in the 70s.

I should think so, the F14 tomcat was the American fighter jet de jour in 'Top gun' released in 1986. I guess at that time, the F16 was more a prototype than a service jet, as they had the F15 Eagle inbetween?

As said, They can have a long life span as they can be refitted with new computers/weapons systems.


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 6:06 pm
Posts: 2158
Full Member
 

Simplifying, but the F14 and F15 are Navy and Air Force contemporaries. The F16 and the F18 are broadly the same (16- usaf, 18- usn)


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 6:16 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Mach 2.2 and 50,000ft isnt high enough or fast enough?

It's worth pointing out that the Tornado isn't cheap to operate - it's a swing-wing aircraft and as such this carries a significant weight and maintenance penalty. Moreover the F3 was at a significant disadvantage thanks to the fact that this long range, high altitude interceptor still carried the same engines that were optimised for low level flight as per the GR1/4.

There are more than four times as many F-16s as Tornadoes and various air forces have upgraded their early F-16A/Bs to F-16V standard which features an AESA radar amongst other improvements.


 
Posted : 21/05/2023 7:47 pm
Posts: 12378
Full Member
 

F14 tomcat was the American fighter jet de jour in ‘Top gun’ released in 1986. I guess at that time, the F16 was more a prototype than a service jet, as they had the F15 Eagle inbetween?

The F14 was a naval aircraft, the U.S. airforce equivalent is the F15. They were both introduced in the mid-1970s to replace the F4, following lessons learned in Vietnam. They were both very expensive so the F16 and F18 were introduced as cheaper aircraft to supplement them. Those both entered in the early 1980s. The F18E is a much larger development of the F18, it's really a different aircraft. It's of similar size to the F15 and replaced the F14. The F35 will eventually replace all of those.

The key thing for their capabilities will be the radar and electronics they have fitted. An early model airframe upgraded to the latest electronics will still be a very effective aircraft.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 12:40 am
Posts: 343
Full Member
 

Ragarding the F16/F18 discussion, back in the 70's there was a competetion for the new lighter fighter for the USAF. The entries were the YF16 and the YF17. The F16 won and the rest is history.

However, the USN also hade a requirment but the docterine of the day was that any naval aircraft had to be 2 engine so the F16(N) was ruled out. The USN went to Northrop and asked if they could produce a slightly larger Naval version of the YF17. The result was the F18. So both the F16 and F18 can trace their origin to the same tender.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 11:42 am
Posts: 12378
Full Member
 

Yes, and the YF17 has it's roots in the F5. It just got bigger and more complex with every iteration. The F5 is tiny compared to the F18E.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 12:01 pm
Posts: 35092
Full Member
 

F16 is an ageing aircraft, that requires lots of maintenance and spares

There's lots of that about though, and lots of folks with that knowledge, It' been in service so long that it's well understood and servicing it is cheap and fast (unlike the Tornado) and it does well in roughly prepared strips. I'd say the short comings are the same as similar aircraft that would be replacing (MiG-29) it's short range, day fighter that has a relatively underpowered radar (nose is small) and I think what the Ukraine air force need is something that can shoot down RU-AF interceptors (Su-27 and 35) which have 80-100 mile BVR that can track and shoot down F-16 from within Russian airspace. I don't know if the F16 can even get close enough to engage.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 12:09 pm
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

Most important is that the F16 was the prettiest fighter of its day 😁


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 12:26 pm
Posts: 1116
Full Member
 

useful thread on F16s and operating them

https://twitter.com/TJOSInt/status/1659757656997871619


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 12:36 pm
Posts: 14484
Free Member
 

So...er...

Someone has just invaded Russia (according to some very pro-Ukrainian Twitter accounts.

Im going to park that in the disinformation pile (mountain)

https://twitter.com/Tendar/status/1660604017574117379?t=e26pNwTK_THvQ-yS3GlYKA&s=19

https://twitter.com/intermarium24/status/1660581411722518528?t=5S_mJjSVR3q7V7VjWrTCFg&s=19

Presumably either nonsense of a diversionary tactic


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 1:38 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Excellent thread @joefm

The jet that is probably the best fit for Ukraine is the Saab Gripen equipped with Meteor missiles, however it's not a simple as having a whip-round and asking Saab to crank up production, Saab expects to produce thirty Gripen E aircraft this year, they're all earmarked for Sweden and Brazil - the order for 34 Brazilian Gripens was placed in 2014 and it will be 2027 before all the jets are delivered.

The Gripen was designed to be maintained by conscripts and can be dispersed to operate from motorways. I would be surprised if the Gripen E wasn't on Ukraine's future shopping list, but for now it looks as though the choices are between refurbished F16s, newly retired F-18A/Cs or the Mirage 2000.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 2:00 pm
Posts: 14484
Free Member
 

Ah, googled the right search terms now for the French newspaper report of Ukrainians being trained on Mirage 2000s

https://www.lefigaro.fr/international/la-france-forme-des-pilotes-ukrainiens-sur-des-mirage-20230322

For more than a month and a half, about thirty of them have been receiving accelerated training on French fighter-bombers at the air bases of Mont-de-Marsan and Nancy. According to the Ministry of Defence, the training of the pilots themselves would not have started, only that of “air military personnel”.

Article from March 23

No idea obviously of what was really happening/not happening


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 2:15 pm
Posts: 46112
Full Member
 

Im going to park that in the disinformation pile (mountain)

Maybe.
Maybe, just maybe, some of the Russian soldiers have had enough...


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 2:36 pm
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

https://twitter.com/officejjsmart/status/1660598094847696896

Just protecting ethnic Russians in western Russia. Nothing to see here.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 3:11 pm
Posts: 14484
Free Member
Posts: 4438
Full Member
 

The Russian Volunteer corps are a strange one, they hate Putin.so.. good.. but they're not exactly wholesome.

However, if Ukraine wanted to cause a massive distraction and give Russian command conniption fits ahead of an offensive this would be a bloody fantastic way to do it.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 4:10 pm
Posts: 46112
Full Member
 

A question: what percentage of military personnel are in Ukraine, killed or injured?
Any issues internally could be very hard to deal with if you have very thin resources over a country the size of Russia...


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 4:18 pm
Posts: 4438
Full Member
 

Obviously huge 'pinch of salt' qualifiers apply here but this is what the chatter is saying.

The RVC forces are reported to be already 5-8KM inside Russia and are currently fighting in the town of Grayvoron, they have already downed at least one helicopter sent to reinforce the border.

To make things even more spicy, there's apparently a military base in Golovchino, which is the next town down the road from where the RVC are fighting... this base that holds nuclear weapons.

Crikey, I wouldn't want to be the unfortunate Kremlin official who had to tell Putin about this.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 5:37 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

Well it just shows how poorly defended they have left russia with all the focus on keeping Ukrainian territory. being mentioned on the beeb now as well so has some credibility.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 5:57 pm
Posts: 34537
Full Member
 

yeah they appear to be far-right Russian nutters, I cant see how they dont end up getting taken out by Russia eventually

Ive seen numbers saying theres 1000+ of them , with a number of tanks, IFVs & drones, Russia will have to divert a fair number of troops to clear them out

will Russia have to call in air strikes on their own towns?

they seem to be good at causing chaos
https://twitter.com/officejjsmart/status/1660664585773363201


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 6:00 pm
Posts: 46112
Full Member
 

Well that's a dirty/superb way of ensuring anyone in border or police uniform is going to keep out the way...


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 6:25 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

sounds like psyops to me to cause more confusion and distraction


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 6:44 pm
Posts: 46112
Full Member
 

It's just been announced its a Special Military Operation.
Nothing to worry about.


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 7:10 pm
FuzzyWuzzy reacted
Posts: 41869
Free Member
 

Who had Putin declaring ACAB on their 2023 bingo card?


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 7:12 pm
Posts: 14484
Free Member
 

This is entirely the Imperialist CSTOs fault, if they hadnt aggressive expanded to Ukraine's borders this never would if happened.

(Stolen from Twitter)


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 8:02 pm
Posts: 46112
Full Member
Posts: 4593
Free Member
 

This is entirely the Imperialist CSTOs fault, if they hadnt aggressive expanded to Ukraine’s borders this never would if happened.

Heh yes there has been a lot of very funny snark on Twitter today!

The screenshot I was that the 'request to shoot police officers' was not official but made by Igor Girkin on his telegram channel

It has been absolutely fascinating seeing this play out. Surely they'll have to leg it back over the border sharpish? I doubt they'd be able to hang on too long once Russia scrambles some troops to sort it out (which they presumably have done by now).


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 8:35 pm
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

yes but where is russia scrambling troops from? those would have been reserves ready to reinforce against a ukr counter attack. maybe we will see a few more smash and grab style attacks over the border to keep the Russians redeploying and to create opportunities for the larger attacks. rock and hard place for Russia, ignore and watch chaos unfold or redeploy and weaken defenses.

bet as soon as proper troops arrive they scarper, regroup and hit somewhere else


 
Posted : 22/05/2023 9:05 pm
Posts: 4438
Full Member
 

bet as soon as proper troops arrive they scarper, regroup and hit somewhere else

Even if they don't hold their ground and retreat in the next 24 hours suddenly Russia has a huge stretch of border that they now have to secure and divert resources to just because of a 1,000 or so homegrown loons who will go yomping round their backyard if they don't.

If they do hold out for even a few days the embarrasment and effect on morale will be enormous.

Ukrainian Twitter is in raptures about all this as you can well imagine.


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 1:53 am
Posts: 13643
Free Member
Topic starter
 

"Russia started the war as the 2nd best army in the world, and now it's the best army in Russia" lol

https://twitter.com/fellarific/status/1660847236421386241?t=Xwp71PGfEK1ePYjidDeVUg&s=19


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 8:09 am
Posts: 46112
Full Member
 

It's also showing that there is/can be real opposition to Putin.
Every border guard, every police officer and every military base within 100miles of Ukraine is now on standby/high alert.
And every border guard, police officer, military personnel and politician across Russia has a wee germ of worry planted...


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 9:21 am
ready reacted
Posts: 8469
Full Member
 

UAF really targeting RU artillery - 40 destroyed/captured yesterday alone!


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 9:24 am
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

Fantastic - they’ve been taking out 15 to 20 every day for weeks now, 40 is massive 👍


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 10:12 am
Posts: 4438
Full Member
 

UAF really targeting RU artillery – 40 destroyed/captured yesterday alone!

Even if those numbers are inflated that's still good going.

The fact that Ukraine is putting their precious aircraft at risk by targeting artillery, targets that absolutely will have air defense near them and will be placed well behind the front line, therefore necessitating a deeper, more risky strike suggests 2 things:

1: The promise of Mig-29's and possibly F16's from the West is already giving Ukraine more operational freedom as they have more air assets inbound to replace their no doubt very very tired and battered existing fleet.

2: The counter offensive is close, very close. Big preemptive air strikes on Artillery positions is textbook 'what you do just before a big push'

Of course Ukraine have repeatedly shown that they march entirely to beat of their own drum and made me look like an idiot with my predictions so we'll see.


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 10:50 am
Posts: 41869
Free Member
 

Someone described it as, bomb, bomb, then bomb again, then attack.

The first bombing step is suppressing the long range air defenses so that planes can operate within range of the front line and can move onto:
The 2nd bombing step is taking out short range air defenses which clears the way for them to fly over it.
The 3rd bombing step is clearing a path for and offering support to the army.

I guess perhaps it's taking longer than expected because the Russians might also be using the dry ground to maneuver, meaning any bombing / shaping done 6 weeks ago becomes less relavent?


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 12:05 pm
Posts: 2111
Full Member
 

The (mis)information around what is/isn’t happening in Belgorod is fascinating. Russians are saying the incursion has been repelled and that 70+ turrrists have been killed. Also that American kit was used. And that some of their transport had ‘For Bakhmut’ scrawled on it.

To back this up they’ve published pictures of a row of dead bodies, some humvees in ditches and a burned out truck with writing on it.

the Ukrainians are saying that the dead bodies are wearing the wrong kit, that the humvees look remarkably unscathed for a vehicle that’s just been blown into a ditch and that the writing on the truck was either painted on afterwards or photoshopped as it is was to shiny and new to have been there before the truck went boom!

who to believe…


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 10:37 pm
Posts: 2936
Free Member
 

Definitely the Russians 🤷‍♂️


 
Posted : 23/05/2023 11:00 pm
Posts: 12378
Full Member
 

I think this is a fairly plausible theory.

https://twitter.com/MarkHertling/status/1661038471106920448


 
Posted : 24/05/2023 5:51 am
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

thats what I said up there 🙂


 
Posted : 24/05/2023 7:54 am
Posts: 13643
Free Member
Topic starter
 

This guy reckons they returned. All usual caveats apply etc

https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPR/status/1661120743478906882?t=avHbwthJQrD9E17HgmvrYg&s=19


 
Posted : 24/05/2023 9:28 am
Page 349 / 495