Forum search & shortcuts

Thursday Science Qu...
 

[Closed] Thursday Science Quiz: Can you do science better than 93% of Americans?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think you may still be slightly confused

I think he might be talking about nitrogen fertilizer bombs 🙂


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 10:51 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

ernie has it.

Maybe they use fortified nitrogen in fertiliser 😉


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 10:55 am
Posts: 2344
Free Member
 

And on questions like continental drift- you can know the answer but disagree with it on principle.

erm.....


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 10:58 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]I just did but all he was interested in was the usual phone sex.[/i]

*nods* .. distractions.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:00 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

And on questions like continental drift- you can know the answer but disagree with it on principle.

That's awesome. Taking a principled stand against geological processes.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:00 am
Posts: 66129
Full Member
 

I don't have many principles but I stick to them damnit!


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I take a principled stand against Britain getting closer to Europe.

If you get my drift.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Inflammable means flammable? What a country!

13/13

Awesumz.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:05 am
Posts: 3729
Free Member
 

Makes you wonder how they ever managed to land a man on the moon.

Or did they ?

Wasn't that largely down to the Germans?

As for the Nitrogen, I'm amazed that so many people got that wrong. Getting the third most common gas in the atmosphere wrong I can understand (it's Argon) but the first two?


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:07 am
Posts: 2344
Free Member
 

5thElefant - Member

And on questions like continental drift- you can know the answer but disagree with it on principle.

That's awesome. Taking a principled stand against geological processes.

I for one would like to see a facebook campagin organised against those nasty pyroclastic flows


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:08 am
Posts: 2344
Free Member
 

gonefishin - Member

As for the Nitrogen, I'm amazed that so many people got that wrong. Getting the third most common gas in the atmosphere wrong I can understand (it's Argon) but the first two?

Water Vapourist!!!


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wasn't that largely down to the Germans?

Yes of course it was. The Germans probably also showed those daft Americans who know bugger all about science, or even how to spell the word "maths", how to build nuclear weapons.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

100%. GO me.

Not exactly hard questions though 🙂


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:15 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Yes of course it was. The Germans probably also showed those daft Americans who know bugger all about science, or even how to spell the word "maths", how to build nuclear weapons.

Yeah, a German Jewish fella.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You mean no indigenous american was involved ?

No wonder they were slaughtered.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Genuinely shocked that so many folk on here are not getting 13/13. 😯
This is mostly basic highschool stuff (and a bit of current affairs).

Sadly, I shall no longer be able to place the absolute confidence that I previously did in the all-knowing oracle that is the STW forum. 😐


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:20 am
Posts: 91174
Free Member
 

No-one pointed out the bad grammar in some of those questions then?


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:22 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

You mean no indigenous american was involved ?

No wonder they were slaughtered.


Actually he was Austrian, Otto Robert Frisch, he was the bloke who calculated that critical mass could be achieved. His work kicked off the whole bomb program.

I don't think any native americans were involved.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:23 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

[i]This is mostly basic highschool stuff[/i]

That's the problem - we don't have "High Schools" here.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:24 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Inflammable means flammable? What a country!

Inflammable is correct, from the Latin root [i]in[/i] ("in", "on") and [i]flamma[/i] ("flame")

But apparently too many people (understandably) misinterpret inflammable to be the opposite of flammable. Which has fairly dire consequences!

So these days we mostly just say flammable.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:25 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Sadly, I shall no longer be able to place the absolute confidence that I previously did in the all-knowing oracle that is the STW forum.

Hey the world needs artists as well as scientists.

.

(well, when I say "world", I mainly mean McDonalds 🙂 )


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:28 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Hey the world needs artists as well as scientists.

Needs is a strong word. "Has" might be better.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hope this is the right video (can't play it on this computer)


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Phew, 13/13 and I only did one science O level. Thank goodness for opportunity to supervise GCSE revision - especially the electrons!!

That is a worrying survey!!


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:32 am
 69er
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bit late to the party but a respectable 13/13 here. What's the prize?


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:34 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Chuffed with my 13 out of 13!

A long time since I got 100% in a test.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:36 am
Posts: 7098
Free Member
 

13 here, phew!

much laughs at dinosaur 'science' paper


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What's the prize?

The prize is that you can smugly declare how daft the Americans are.

Despite the fact that they tell us what to do, and we do exactly what they tell us. It's called the 'Special Relationship'.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:38 am
Posts: 3008
Full Member
 

13/13 Wot skillz! Shove over Prof Cox! 😀


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:39 am
Posts: 6259
Full Member
 

13/13

anything less would have been embarrassing

think I got the demographic ones at the end right, too


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:40 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Have to ask ernie_lynch - did you actually do the test??


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes I did, thanks for asking.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:43 am
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

eh ? 1% out of 1006 got them all wrong 😯


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:44 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

My pleasure.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1% out of 1006 got them all wrong

They probably didn't answer the phone 🙂


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:47 am
Posts: 16221
Free Member
 

Yeah, a German Jewish fella.

But the guy who showed them how to build space rockets was a German war criminal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 11:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If my maths was right earlier on you'd expect 2 people out of 1000 to get them all wrong if everyone was guessing.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 12:02 pm
Posts: 8954
Free Member
 

Phew 13/13. that desmond did me proud


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 12:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Now I'm depressed, we are being told what to do by the thick bully in the playground, who'd a thunk it?


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 12:10 pm
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yawn. Think you would find exactly the same (if not probably worse) in the UK to be honest with the poor level of science teaching in british schools.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 91174
Free Member
 

Talking to my wife about this.. it seems that in US education they still do a certain amount of drilling of a selection of facts, which isn't really popular here. So the function of red blood cells is subject to drilling, but the composition of the atmosphere is not. So the former becomes something that 'everyone knows'. The stats for the respective questions back that up.


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 12:20 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

I got 13/13, but I teach A level physics and have taught GCSE Science, so you'd hope that I would 🙂

Yawn. Think you would find exactly the same (if not probably worse) in the UK to be honest with the poor level of science teaching in british schools.

Anyone passing GCSE Science [s]would[/s] [i]should[/i] know the answers to all 13 questions. Do you have any evidence for alleged poor level of science teaching in the UK? (Better evidence than for Diet Coke being bad for you, obviously.)


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 12:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Disagree with poor science teaching argument. I reckon:

Common Entrance science covers 1,4,5,7,10,12
GSCE 2,8,9
Inbetween/common sense 3,6,11,13

School kids should be able to score well but parents may have "forgotten" some of it!!!


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 12:47 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Edit: (oops wrong thread)


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 1:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Edit for edit!!


 
Posted : 26/09/2013 1:04 pm
Page 3 / 4