Forum menu
Oh yeah, forgot you tried mine. What you moaning about if you're in Flow "slippers"? 😉
Still not as auto as stepping in to ski bindings, though, or as auto as skiing straight off the top of a lift.
Still wonder why there's not been more effort made to get a real clip in binding for boarderists. There must be some way to make it work.
@GrahamS K2 Autos are great until the cable snaps, trying to get hold of a replacement is a nightmare! Or rather I'm having a nightmare trying to get one in Tignes.
Still wonder why there's not been more effort made to get a real clip in binding for boarderists.
They certainly tried. I rode Switch bindings for years. They were great because the didn't clog with snow and you could clip-in as you slid off the lift. But the sacrifice was heavy stiff boots.
[img] 
[/img]
@GrahamS K2 Autos are great until the cable snaps..
Yeah I heard that was an issue with some of the earlier ones. Thought it was resolved now though? Mine were originals but got recalled and a new bit fitted.
Never had an issue with them, though I have had my BOA laces on my boots seize up leaving me trapped in the boot. That was fun! (I now always carry a BOA tool and spare laces!).
If there's a 'between the poles' policy in place, then it doesn't really matter where the lifts are, surely? Just ski within the poles.
Sorry to be a dog with a bone on this subject but how is this policy communicated? (Other than looking for the avalanche flag).
How do the skiing public know whether they should stick to between the poles or are fine and dandy to go rip up the freshies?
A couple of seasons ago we were on a lift watching the young French race team practising to the side of a piste. Next moment a small avalanche was triggered and a couple of the young racers were tossed about like rag dolls. It was awful to watch, hubby and I felt helpless. Luckily their instructors were onto radios straight away and help was soon on its way.
One young girl ended up unconscious and in hospital for a few days and one other slightly injured.
So please be careful out there, because this can happened where it did (side of piste) and with experienced seasons ski racers and their instructors.
Well, a trip this am to Rosenheim's Blue Tomato shop and a new pair of Vans Encore boots walked out the shop with me! Very good knowledgeable staff and helpful too...
On the slopes the pm and I can confirm it was the old boots causing the heel lift!
Thanks for all the help and advice on here... Happy boarding and skiing folks! (we just need more snow here in the Tirol!)
A few mates who go regularly have said that ski's these days are a lot more fun for the novice
As GrahamS mentions, skiing technology has 'borrowed' from snowboarding - with the result that a novice skier can get more 'mileage' in a relatively short period of time - whereas the novice snowboarder will be nursing bruised knees & butt-cheeks ... 😯
Plus these things are often cyclical ... the early generations of snowboarders are now getting on a bit, and thankfully the brash 'punk' image has given way to a more considered approach with the likes of Travis Rice (Art of Flight) & Jeremy Jones (Further, Higher & Deeper) documenting the search for the ultimate [snowboard] descent.
Still wonder why there's not been more effort made to get a real clip in binding for boarderists. There must be some way to make it work
There is such a thing CFH - it's the hard-boot binding/interface used for laying down big Euro-carves!
... for most people the soft-boot plus 'strap' binding is ideal but it relies on the boot & binding working together for performance, support and control of the board. Soft(ish) boots alone with a binding interface on the sole will never be able to provide the same level.
Each year something new comes along that is supposed to transform your ride e.g. last year the big thing was removing high-backs etc to give a more 'surf inspired' feel such as the 'NOW Snowboard' binding. This year seems to be about offering stiffer highbacks for control on steeper descents etc ... go figure 🙂
The slack country, on / off piste thing.
I note the the pisties seem to have turn up and got the medical helicopter out for Schumacher. Sounds like an unlucky fall - trust he'll be back joking about how some recreational skiing almost did for someone who spent most of their life racing F1 cars. Hopefully.
I note the the pisties seem to have turn up and got the medical helicopter out for Schumacher.
Not even the French would just leave you to die if you were out-of-bounds, but could be rescued with relative ease and safety.
BUT.. if it is outside patrolled piste then [i]my understanding[/i] is that they no longer have any duty of care, responsibility for your safety or any legal obligation to rescue you.
Is that right?
if it is outside patrolled piste then my understanding is that they no longer have any duty of care, responsibility for your safety or any legal obligation to rescue you
That's my understanding also GrahamS, but I guess the point [that I'm clearly struggling to make] is regarding the distinction between piste/off-piste and safe/dangerous from the perspective of many 'winter sports enthusiasts' ...
It's apparent from reading threads like this and other media coverage etc that many people have a somewhat 'cavalier' attitude to off-piste safety - GrahamS - you mentioned this being very much the case in Slovenia.
I'm incredible risk averse when it comes to slack/back & sides and having done various courses over the years, I will study the avalanche report/weather forecast/snow-pack etc before making an informed decision and will often be with a guide if heading into the backcountry proper ...
... but I've just had what alcoholics refer to as a 'moment of clarity':
... for the majority of winter 'sports' enthusiast heading to the Alps etc - hitting up the easy access off-piste freshies has become a modern right of passage, but few are perhaps aware of the potential dangers since I can't for the life of me recall how these are communicated in Europe with the exception of the yellow & black & chequered flag system. How many Brits are au fait with this?
Is there a presumption in Europe that anyone venturing past the piste markers is 'self determined'?
I'm heading to the Alps for a couple of weeks in March so I've made a mental note to try and discover the answer to my question.
Have just read the Guardian article. I will definitely be staying inside the poles when we're away in France next week. No matter how well equipped or prepared, common sense avoidance must be the first order.
I've not been out in Europe for a few years, but in Canada there are always big signs/maps setting out what is safe and what is not at the foot of the mountain, as well as notices at top and bottom of all the uplift.
Even with best will can still get unlucky I guess so stay safe out there folks.
I could be wrong but my understanding is that the "approved off piste areas" carry a health warning about the dangers and a ski at your own risk disclaimer. Including if you get caught in an avalanche (although often these areas are checked / "bombed" for avalanches). All the decent resorts have designated off piste routes generally with a marker board at the top and a rope gate. Numerous companies and the official ski schools offer off piste guiding. In Switzerland resorts often have marked itineries - these have a single pole down the centre but are not patrolled. They are declared open/closed though. My point being that off piste skiing is approved with certain caveats.
@Digby with regard to insurance the French carte neige covers you for helicopter rescue off piste. Normal ski insurance doesn't, just on piste rescue. Carte neige is pretty cheap and can usually be bought with the lift pass.
CFH had a look at those links, the section down from the top doesn't look steep enough to be an avalanche risk, it certainly does look very enticing 🙂
Hi everyone. Got my first ever snowboarding holiday booked in January, going to serre chevalier and I'm just wandering if anyone takes a camelbak for hydration or do you fill you pockets with bottles? or is it a case of just finding a cafe?
TIA
Off-piste guiding should be with a UIAGM or similar - look at the fuss the french have made about the qualification requirements for mtb guides in the alps! ESF and Evolution2 will only take someone off-piste with a qualified guide. The guide will evaluate the conditions on behalf of the clients.
Itineraries are just ungroomed pistes surely? If they are subject to closure, then they are patrolled and evaluated and therefore don't really constitute 'off-piste' orthe type of terrain I'm referring to since it's clearly marked. For example the run from the Lognan down the glacier de rognon at grand montet and the runs off the youla and arp in courmayeur are closed when conditions are poor.
What i was trying to ascertain was how do folks evaluate conditions for terrain that falls between a run defined on a map/with poles etc and the backcountry ... this seems to be the grey area where a number of these incidents occur! 🙁
@flux your camelback hose will likely freeze (especially in January !) - you can get covers for the tube. I sometimes carry a small bottle of water in my backpack if I'm wearing it otherwise I dont bother. "Rehydration" occurs at suitable outlets on the mountain 🙂
@Digby I'm most familiar with the itineries in Verbier (Switzerland) and they are not patrolled. They are declared open or closed generally based upon avalanche risk and they are scouted as such. They tend to have a variety of alternative lines some of which can be quite far from the poles. Another resort I'm familiar with is Val d'Isere where the main off piste routes are pretty well known and I would say some of the easier ones are skied by most people without a guide.
@flux - if possible, avoid taking a backpack when riding in resort. Not only can they throw you off-balance when riding but they can be awkward for you and your fellow passengers on the chair lifts! Don't risk spoiling your important first snowboard holiday! Plenty of places to re-hydrate in resort! 🙂
anyone takes a camelbak for hydration or do you fill you pockets with bottles? or is it a case of just finding a cafe?
Cafe usually for me. No shortage of them in most resorts. Don't usually snowboard with a pack on at all.
Hip flask sometimes... 😉
..... for the majority of winter 'sports' enthusiast heading to the Alps etc - hitting up the easy access off-piste freshies has become a modern right of passage, but few are perhaps aware of the potential dangers
Completely understand your point. I guess one issue for the resorts is that the more layman information they give out regarding how safe or otherwise the off-piste is, the more they open themselves up for being sued when someone is inevitably killed on a "safe" day. Hence they mainly just publish the facts about weather, snowpack etc and leave the final decision to the skiers.
I think the other issue is that for many of us we only get away for one or maybe two weeks a year. And we might only get a chance at good off-piste for a few days of that. So spending thousands on avalanche gear and training courses, plus doing regular rescue drills etc, can seem a bit disproportionate and OTT.
I'm not sure I know what the answer is there. 😕
@jambalaya - apologies, i guess we're using the same word with different meanings. Scouting and evaluating a run or piste and then declaring it open or closed constitutes 'patrolled' in my book. Sorry for any confusion.
I'm not sure I know what the answer is there.
I would have thought the answer was simple; if you want to go off-piste and don't have the training and/or equipment to do it safely yourself then hire a guide. They'll take you to the best places within your ability and within the safety limits of the off-piste areas, and the better guiding companies will be able to provide transceivers as part of the service.
I would have thought the answer was simple; if you want to go off-piste and don't have the training and/or equipment to do it safely yourself then hire a guide.
That's fine for "proper" off-piste but do you really expect someone to hire a guide for 500metres of in-bounds slackcountry between two pistes?
I think Digby's point is that there is a pretty large grey area of slack and "just" off-piste which is the domain of noobs and part-timers like me which can be difficult to assess or get clear info about.
Flashy's lift run in Serre Che is a good example.
There's no lack of avalanche info in europe. Forecasts are on line and posted on notice boards at tourist info, guides offices, pisteurs huts and lift stations.
The problem is that a huge number of people either don't know that, don't think it's relevant to their activities or don't have the skills to interpret that info.
in-bounds slackcountry between two pistes
In North America, where there's in-bounds and out-of-bounds, then possibly not. In Europe generally there's on piste - i.e. between the piste markers - and there's off-piste, which is not between the piste markers. I don't think I've come across any "in bounds/out of bounds" concept in Europe. The term "slack country" is not meaningful.
Go off-piste and you need to know what you're doing and have appropriate equipment and insurance in case you're the one that causes the avalanche onto the piste below. Obviously there's an element of risk management in all of this - if a bit of off-piste has been well used and the snow pack is stable then you might still feel it's ok to go there, likewise if it's obviously not steep enough to avalanche.
As for the equipment being expensive - a [url= http://www.amazon.co.uk/PIEPS-Freeride-Avalanche-Search-Beacon/dp/B001NCDE6Q ]Pieps freeride[/url] is not brilliant for searching but will help mountain rescue find the body and you can get one for less than £100.
Jambalaya, there are deceptively steep bits either side of the piste. To the right (looking down) is a very shaded area that gets super steep (Some nice couloirs for boothiking up to, however). To the left, there are gullies that [i]could[/i] present a risk of smaller avalanches tumbling down the gully itself. I suspect it was up to the right.
Flux, I never bother taking water on piste. Every place you stop for a coffee/lunch etc on the mountain will have jugs of water and glasses freely available. In many, they're put on your table before you've even had a chance to ask for it!
Top slope-stops at Serre Che for you;
Le Bercail, at Aravet. Lovely sun trap, great food. Try the sugar cubes.....! At the bottom of the piste here, in line with the trees to the left
[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8078/8346339855_fb17ff72ee_b.jp g" target="_blank">
Little cafe just off the Cucumelle piste, in Frejus.
[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8430/7800514376_546d1be04e_b.jp g" target="_blank">
The Terrace, at the bottom of the Luc Alphand, to the left hand side as you ski down.
[url= http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8283/7800881074_f64e528cc9_b.jp g" target="_blank">
The Station, at the right hand side of the bottom of the Alphand used to be great for a few rowdy beers and the Harper Brothers, but not sure what's happened there since their recent fire.
Spin - Member
There's no lack of avalanche info in europe. Forecasts are on line and posted on notice boards at tourist info, guides offices, pisteurs huts and lift stations.The problem is that a huge number of people either don't know that, don't think it's relevant to their activities or don't have the skills to interpret that info.
Interesting piece in the paper today about the fact that skis and kit are now marketed as being more gnaaar, and so people feel that they can just hop off to the steep and deep stuff without a care.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/snowandski/10542580/Skiing-British-snow-gobblers-who-ignore-dangers-of-a-winter-wonderland.html
I think the other issue is that for many of us we only get away for one or maybe two weeks a year. And we might only get a chance at good off-piste for a few days of that. So spending thousands on avalanche gear and training courses, plus doing regular rescue drills etc, can seem a bit disproportionate and OTT
I think you've possibly hit the nail on the head there GrahamS! Appreciate your honesty and candidness.
It occurs to me that this is a relatively new phenomenon - but one that also occurs in other areas of 'The Great Outdoors' with more people heading out without the basic kit or skills - much to the chagrin of various mountain rescue teams. It doesn't happen (at least as far as I'm aware) with activities like sailing etc - I guess the perceived danger of drowning is drilled into us from a young age, whereas the danger of avalanches etc aren't.
Getting the kit and skills needn't cost the earth though ... what price your life or the life of a love one?
The alternative is that fatalities increase and a knee-jerk reaction results in backcountry access being restricted for everyone. Similar restrictions have been muted when fatalities of climbers & mountaineers increase.
Be safe out there folks!!
I took my camelback the first couple of times away but last year the hose kept freezing so it was just annoying. Bags can be handy but as with cycling they just encourage you to carry stuff 'just in case'. And you end up with a big weight on your back that also makes it a bit sketchy getting on and off chairlifts.
This year I wont be taking my bag but I will make sure I have plenty of beer money while I am on the hill. There are plenty of opportunities to chill out with a drink.
[url= http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3725/11664197045_84c9568aa7_h.jp g" target="_blank">
Interesting piece in the paper today about the fact that skis and kit are now marketed as being more gnaaar, and so people feel that they can just hop off to the steep and deep stuff without a care.
exactly CFH - a little sensational but the article possibly summarises what I've been trying to articulate (only slightly more succinctly)
lol @ “les bouffeurs de neige” though ... gotta love those French turns of phrase!
@Digby no apology needed, I use the term patrolled to mean someone skis down at end of day (at least) to check
@CFH I see now where you mean.
On skis I would say the new equipement opens up off piste to a much wider group and the kit encourages people to ski there to try it out. I've been skiing 35 years and my off piste technique is so much better now (ie it's the skis really). Also IMO boards are designed for off piste. Frankly once you've been skiing a few weeks most people are going to try off piste, I took one of my daughters boyfriends off piste after 4 days, he was a natural boarder (v good skate border and DH mtb-er so had the balance skills) and just lapped it up. So yes the kit allows you to access off piste more than ever.
Finally as I posted on the Schumacher thread French TV said he was skiing fast and actually broke the helmet in two on the rock, they also showed a relatively flat area so it makes sense he was carrying speed to clear out off the slope. That's actually just how I bust my knee last year, skied the hard part, concentration lower building speed to allow me to reach the piste. All supposotion of course but it makes some sense. From my memory of Meribel that area isn't that steep or technical (unlike the colouirs from the very top), I've skied between the runs there often.
Also occurs to me that whilst CFH's Daily Telepgraph article makes some interesting points from the perspective of ski guide Thomas Weller, there is no mention of the requisite skill and equipment required for off-piste skiing ... on the contrary the emphasis of the article is regarding helmets and the fact that 'only around 40 per cent of skiers opt to wear one.'
they also showed a relatively flat area so it makes sense he was carrying speed to clear out off the slope
Sounds familiar. Last day and last run of my last trip I was straight-lining on an icy and very shallow-angled slope to make sure I got to the end without having to take the board off and walk. Edge caught some ice and I took a good old whack to the head. It's too easily done and it made me think very hard about wearing a helmet. Not been 'boarding since 😆
Interesting piece in the paper today about the fact that skis and kit are now marketed as being more gnaaar, and so people feel that they can just hop off to the steep and deep stuff without a care.
And it's not just the skis - Seen that Ford ad with the guy skiing on his own, outrunning an avalanche? Ain't no thang for the kind of dude who drives a Ford!
Digby, the helmet argument will always trump anything in a media storm like this, as it's the easy way out.
A quick look at some of the imagery used by the bigger and smaller stores selling ski kit in the UK, though, shows that the zeitgeist is all about shredding the gnat and getting off piste these days. As Graham says above, for most of us it's a week or two once a year, with a little smattering of back/slack or a day's guided fun in the steep stuff (Which is about where I am these days!), but the marketing, the images, the kit, etc is all moving towards bigger, deeper and steeper.
It's almost like skiing/boarding is going through it's own [url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/when-mtb-went-badthe-huck-it-years ]huck it years. [/url]
shredding the gnat
That is some precise shredding!
the helmet argument will always trump anything in a media storm like this, as it's the easy way out.
Sadly CFH I think you're right ... reminds me of last year when the media stirred up a storm over Wiggo's helmet comments ...
A quick look at some of the imagery used by the bigger and smaller stores selling ski kit in the UK, though, shows that the zeitgeist is all about shredding the gnat and getting off piste these days
Couldn't agree more - but then this is an industry struggling at the moment (although some reports maintain that it's bottomed out [url= http://www.planetski.eu/news/5136 ]Linky[/url])
Either way the industry is keen to use the 'Extreme' images of winter [i]hobbies [/i]to promote it as a 'lifestyle' choice - case in point nedrapier ... dontcha just wanna grab yourself a Ford! 😉
BUT.. if it is outside patrolled piste then my understanding is that they no longer have any duty of care, responsibility for your safety or any legal obligation to rescue you.
This is broadly correct. In theory, if you're off-piste, then you're a job for Mountain Rescue, not for Ski Patrol.
Weirdly, this also means that rescue is likely to cost you less as most French communes no longer charge for mountain rescue, whereas ski patrol do!
Off-piste guiding should be with a UIAGM or similar - look at the fuss the french have made about the qualification requirements for mtb guides in the alps! ESF and Evolution2 will only take someone off-piste with a qualified guide.
Not sure what you're getting at here, but it is completely normal for a fully-qualified ski/snowboard instructor (i.e. not a UIAGM guide) to take people off-piste and both ESF and Evo2 most definitely use instructors in this way.
The debate about instructors vs guides in terms of off-piste safety training is an old one. Suffice to say that instructors are pretty well-trained in this.
French media was talking yesterday about a 50yr old skier in same unit as Schumacher with similar injuries, he was sking on piste and was wiped out by a young boarder. There was much coverage about fact French adults are much less likely to wear a helmet than other nationalities. I've worn a helmet for 10 years partly after taking a heavy fall and hitting my head on an icy mogul and partly as some security against being wiped out (have had two experiences with people I've been skiing with being totally smashed by boarders). Snow boarding without a helmet is madness IMO given the nature of the average fall.
This point about wearing a back pack is a good one. I used to wear a dakine pack on almost every trip, however I once had the huge embarrassment of getting the straps caught when dismounting the chairlift, luckily I was able to wiggle the strap and jumped down. On some chairlifts this would be positively dangerous, never mind the 'feeling a fool' factor.sketchy getting on and off chairlifts.
Note that the lifties prefer you to take the pack off and have it on your knee, this imo also causes many embarrassing dismounts.
Nothing funnier than someone with all the gear looking like a complete idiot, that's me that is.
Not sure what you're getting at here, but it is completely normal for a fully-qualified ski/snowboard instructor
Sorry stevomcd, I did start to try and list what my understanding is regarding the different instructor/guide qualifications (ISTD, EMS, ISIA, UIAGM/IFMHA and probably a few more) and what the distinctions are regarding off-piste instruction/guiding are but it got convoluted and verbose* ... my comment regarding Evo2 & ESF was more in line with off-piste terrain like the Vallee Blanche.
I guess that this highlights again the fact that the term off-piste is very broad and I'm sure there are loads of grey areas.
The point I was trying to get across was that the French in particular are very keen on people having the requisite qualifications for the level of instruction/guiding they are providing. I know it's possibly semantics but jambalaya's comment was:
Numerous companies and the official ski schools offer off piste guiding
I was trying to point out that off-piste guiding requires an appropriately qualified guide [and by inference off-piste instruction requires and appropriately qualified instructor]
* told you it was verbose! 🙂
BTW - if anyone is interested in what it takes to become a High Mountain Guide then Neil McNab (the author of the Snowboard book GrahamS mentioned earlier) wrote an interesting article a while ago:
[url= http://www.mcnabsnowboarding.com/advice/page/81 ]http://www.mcnabsnowboarding.com/advice/page/81[/url]
Andy Cave (climber & author) likened the UIAGM/IFMHA qualification to a PhD ...
18 more sleeps!
More snow on the way this weekend too.
Just about enough snow on Cairngorm today but crap vis, high winds and all the uplift off bar the funicular.
It beats me why people are willing to pay for crap like that. I was on the touring kit so it only cost me a few quid in petrol to work out it was sh!t then head for a cafe.