Forum menu
Did we get a ruling on how old is old? Regardless my present bikes are a 2005 883 sportster, a red 1996 Honda C90, a blue 1992 Honda C90 and a bsa which is a pile of old cack.
I was going to post my (even slightly older) Sportster, but I don't think it's a classic. In my head I think the definition of old/classic is the ignition system.
To be classic in the absolute sense of the word it has to have points (or something equally mechanical). Allowances can be made for bikes that were in production long enough that fundamentally the same bike was upgraded to some form of electronic ignition.
But if someone said "Classic Sportsbike", "Classic Trials", "Classic dirt bike" etc. Then that's different, it just has to be measurably worse than a modern one. So a 90s Fireblade is a classic. A similar age monoshock trials bike isn't, but a pre-65 is. A Yamaha XT500 is a classic dirt bike, and XT600 isn't despite arriving only 3 years later. An XT550 is the awkward missing-link, the exception that proves the rule. It's worse than a modern bike, but it's just too ugly to be a "classic".