[Closed] Swiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing!

Whatever, she is pretty I reckon.

She is a management consultant for Deloitte, noting that she considers it important for MPs to have "experience of the real world"

Bwhaaaahaaa! Haa!

Tiresome and predictable, yet again. So what? Several of them received one of the very best educations money can buy. Would you prefer illiterate morons running the country?

You mean a group of people well known for looking after their own?

Please note entry to Eton is not about how clever you are its about your ability to pay

And about passing the entrance exam, and/or the scholarship exams as well as ensuring that you achieve a sufficiently high level of GCSE grades to remain at the school in the Sixth form.

Sorry about that.

CF's dead right. Prince Harry demonstrates exactly how tough it is.

So what? Several of them received one of the very best educations money can buy. Would you prefer illiterate morons running the country?

Easily the most offensive quote on here in quite a while and one which highlights exactly why the Tories are still the party for the rather ignorant rich and priviliged. To suggest that people outside of public school education are both illiterate and moronic speaks volumes about the contempt in which the Tories hold the rest of us.

Gawd bless you Cap'n sir.

And about passing the entrance exam, and/or the scholarship exams as well as ensuring that you achieve a sufficiently high level of GCSE grades to remain at the school in the Sixth form.

What... like any other school?

The conservative front bench is naturally gifted, and in no way subsidised, I heard they used to beat up the SAS because their cuffs lacked a crisp Guatemalan stretch.

To suggest that people outside of public school education are both illiterate and moronic

Did I suggest that?

No, I didn't. I merely asked if you would prefer illiterate morons to someone who had been educated at a Slough comp.

I merely asked if you would prefer illiterate morons to someone who had been educated at a Slough comp.

Of course. Keep on wriggling.

No, you suggested that the country should be governed by people with the resources to fund the best education money can buy...

I did? Thanks for letting me know.

I do so love the inverse snobbery that exists on STW. One of my favourite things.

You're right Cap'n. You should be free to insult the little people without any lip.

Bally bolshies.

Did I suggest that?

Well actually you did.

You offered only two choices - either someone who was educated in a top public school or, an illiterate moron.

I don't think there's much doubt what you were suggesting.

[i]Please note entry to Eton is not about how clever you are its about your ability to pay[/i]
Getting into Eton isn't just about affording it (and in any event there are more expensive schools out there...) - its about getting on the list, having connections, etc. - and thats why so many Etonians are where they are.

Eton - Oxbridge (inc Bullingdon etc), then maybe to Sandhurst for a bit and then onto the City.

Her age isn't really an issue to me, as demonstrated by the complete lack of moral compass demonstrated by many MPs twice her age! And William Pitt was 3 years younger than her when he became PM!

William Pitt was 3 years younger than her when he became PM

I wouldn't read too much into that, We're talking about an age where slavery was legal, children worked in factories and only the rich could vote.

Sounds like a Tory's wet dream 😉

William Pitt was 3 years younger than her when he became PM

So 'William Pitt the Younger' wasn't ironic then ?

That's a disappointment 😐

I had always assumed that it was a case of good ol' British p*sstaking....

You offered only two choices - either someone who was educated in a top public school or, an illiterate moron.

I don't think there's much doubt what you were suggesting.

I'd suggest there's only no doubt for those with closed minds determined to see snobbery where there is none.

What a shame this thread had to descend into such petty squabbling over the tiresome old subject of Cameron et al being toffs, and that supposedly making them unfit to govern.

Yes, but he didn't exclude the possibility of there being other options in between.

Another wriggler.

Another wriggler.

I have just taken a job as chief execute of Britain, the first thing I will do is give everyone I went to school with senior positions in my organisation.

The uneducated public won't mind because I will strategically avoid any contentious/pressing issues by not offering solutions, but rather by telling people what I am not going to do.

......those with closed minds determined to see snobbery.....What a shame this thread had to descend into such petty squabbling over the tiresome old subject of Cameron et al being toffs, and that supposedly making them unfit to govern.

LOL ! You're new around here are you aracer ?

The Captain comes on this forum everyday proudly declaring that he is a toff ........
"Oh you'll never guess how much I paid for a portion of chips in Harrods today"

And you feel that he is now being unfairly accused of being a snob ? !

.

And FYI, it is perfectly reasonable for the British electorate to expect the government which represents them,
not to be out of touch with issues which concern them.

.......government of the people, by the people, for the people, and all that.

And FYI, it is perfectly reasonable for the British electorate to expect the government which represents them, not to be out of touch with issues which concern them.

A bit unrealistic though

Well it is if they go out and vote for a bunch of Eton-educated privileged toffs.

🙄

Ah, so we're back to the inverse snobbery then 🙄

And you feel that he is now being unfairly accused of being a snob ? !

so we're back to the inverse snobbery

Yep.

Although I would prefer not to use the word 'inverse'.

It's straightforward snobbery, ie : the upper-classes aren't fit to kiss my proletarian arse.

Right, so CFH is a snob, GG is a snob. Glad we've got that sorted 😉

I'd probably prefer the PM not to be Eton educated, but unlike the vocal prejudiced on here, I don't see how it actually disqualifies somebody.

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that they have no direct personal experience of financial hardship

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that they have no direct personal experience of applying for jobs on their own merits

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that they have no direct personal experience of living in an ordinary community

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that the only people they have ever met are rich, selfish, complacent, lazy, well-connected, exploitative, private health scheme-insured, privately-educated, gated community-dwelling utter bastards

That's how it disqualifies them

we've got that sorted

Not quite.

I believe that the proletariat are superior. He foolishly believes that the upper-classes are.

I am right to be a snob. He is not.

There can be no agreement.

Let's not beat about the bush..
[img] [/img]
or
[img] [/img]

You decide!

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that they have no direct personal experience of financial hardship

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that they have no direct personal experience of applying for jobs on their own merits

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that they have no direct personal experience of living in an ordinary community

It disqualifies them because it virtually guarantees that the only people they have ever met are rich, selfish, complacent, lazy, well-connected, exploitative, private health scheme-insured, privately-educated, gated community-dwelling utter bastards

In this particular case your immovable pre-conceived views aren't actually doing you any favours.

Just in case it's at all relevant I should point out that I went to a pretty rubbish comprehensive, and wasn't particularly taken with many of the privately educated people I met at Uni (though my best friend at Uni was privately educated). However the Eton educated did meet people like me. It's not like I'm defending them because I particularly identify with them, simply because I think you're being ridiculous.

You complain that these people have no idea about people like you

Whatever made you think I was talking about people like me?

I've never suffered financial hardship. Some of the jobs I've had have been given to me because of family connections. I've never lived in an ordinary community. Most of the people I have mixed with in my life have been well-off, a bit selfish, pretty complacent, definitely exploitative, many of them (though not me) insured with BUPA and privately educated.

It may be an odd concept to you, but I was using a concept called EMPATHY - the ability to understand how other people experience the world. So I was suggesting that an Eton-educated cabinet would be a bad idea for the country, not for me.

How much direct personal experience of financial hardship do you think most Labour MPs have?

Probably quite a few. Most will have experienced some difficult decisions when it comes to financial priorities. Many will have come from families in which the parents were on fairly low incomes. All pretty much representative of society as a whole.

Certainly more representative than the Eton toffs.

Just in case it's at all relevant I should point out that I went to a pretty rubbish comprehensive

Of course it's relevant man. We know the actual name of one of the schools in this debate (it's "Eton") so to justify your side of the debate you now have to name your school.

Come on - its Eton versus ?? (a pretty rubbish but conveniently anonymous state comp)

aracer - Member

Another wriggler.

Is that really the best you can do?

No, it's just all that I could be bothered with due to the ridiculous nature of your post.
But hey, don't get offended, I didn't discount the possibility that your post wasn't ridiculous.

[i]the possibility of there being other options in between[/i]

I graduated from Oxford, having been educated at a rural comprehensive. I'll say this: I certainly met some over-privileged tossers, some of whom need shooting*. But I wouldn't take it for a general rule.

(*I'd start with the [i]oh-so-daring[/i] members of the 'Piers Gav'... 👿 ).

looks like there is some mileage in the good old torry bullingdon days yet....

[url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/27/david-cameron-boris-johnson-tv-drama ]borris and daves excellent adventure[/url]