surrogacy mothers a...
 

[Closed] surrogacy mothers and maternity leave... a little Q...

22 Posts
15 Users
0 Reactions
146 Views
Posts: 3370
Free Member
Topic starter
 

purely out of interest, sparked by watching a program just now on surrogacy.

if the surrogate mother has a regular job, which offers maternity leave (which, from what i understand is paid leave?), and is also being given money by the eventual parents, do the same maternity leave rules etc apply?

just wondering, as it seems that in some cases (and i realise not necessarily all cases), women may have some financial motive to become a surrogate mother. if so, does she also get all the maternity money too?

taking a break from a job, while getting paid, in order to get more money.

?

🙂
just wondering how it works, not a comment on the ethics etc.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes - she is pregnant she gets mat leave. It is not a means tested benefit


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:03 pm
Posts: 3370
Free Member
Topic starter
 

i see.
she gets money for being off work, and for carrying the child.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:20 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

yes but is no where near as much as the OP thinks and will be less than her actual pay after 6 weeks.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 3370
Free Member
Topic starter
 

so full pay for 6 weeks, and then a percentage of that there after (what sort of %?)? and how long is maternity leave?
one woman was getting £20k for having the kid.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:22 pm
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

statutory maternity pay and maternity allowance are both generally a little over £100 pw


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:33 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

But some employers pay 9 months at regular salary rates 🙂

And the woman who adopts the child is also eligible for full maternity pay too.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

My wife is a teacher, and the maternity pay is pretty poor


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:11 pm
Posts: 3370
Free Member
Topic starter
 

'And the woman who adopts the child is also eligible for full maternity pay too. '

maternity or paternity? (afaik maternity is pre-birth, paternity is post? i could be wrong...)

if so, er, why? (i can fully understand paternity btw!)


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:32 pm
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

err, no.
maternity = mother
paternity = father

don't kids learn any latin these days? tsk


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:39 pm
Posts: 3370
Free Member
Topic starter
 

well, i was half thinking that, but i wasn't sure...
was taught latin about 10 yrs ago, for a year.
🙂


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:40 pm
Posts: 34502
Full Member
 

What's your point? She should drop it at her desk 'cause she's giving it away?


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:06 am
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

maybe just that the 9 months maternity isn't needed?

it's an interesting point, might have a look tomorrow in work to see if the law takes account of it


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 12:09 am
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Surely surrogacy! for money is a business, I don't know. Surely it can't sit well with employers when a member of staff is a surrogate mother with a financial contract outside of her main job.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 7:38 am
Posts: 1594
Full Member
 

Surrogacy for money is illegal... the surrogate is only allowed to be paid reasonable expenses, but quite how you define that is anyones business though...


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 7:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surely you can only claim 'Maternity Pay' if you have a baby, given also thataternity pay continues for the original period if the child dies at birth or within the first 9 months.

If that is so then when the surrogate mother gives the baby to the mother who has 'sponsored' it then surely her right to maternity pay ends.

Also, as the sponsoring mother is not adopting the child she cannot claim maternity pay!

Yes or No??


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 7:54 am
Posts: 13259
Full Member
 

Maternity leave is not just about baby care. The surrogate will have to get body tone back (tendons and ligaments softened by hormones need care to avoid problems caused by work biting the employer), the sponsor is adopting and is also entitled to the babycare element of leave.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 8:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sandwich;

Technically the sponsor is not adopting as the child has not been put up for adoption via an adoption agency.

The increase in paid maternity leave was about ,quality time, with the child before being forced back to work.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 8:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It's £123 a week. I really doubt anyone would go through surrogacy just to get that!


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 9:26 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I wouldn't go through pregnancy and childbirth again even for a million pounds.

Were these surrogates in employment HM? I didn't see the programme, just a trailer, I would be surprised if someone 'addicted' to being pregnant as it was suggested these women were, would be 'stable' enough to be in gainful employment.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 3:56 pm
Posts: 408
Free Member
 

£123 is the stat meternity pay, I think my employers pay full pay for 22 weeks and then a decent percentage for the rest of the first 9 months. You also accrue holiday while on mat leave so thats another month of full pay


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never worked anywhere who gave more that statutory pay.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

Personally dont think I'd risk death, disfigurement and masses of pain to give someone else a child. Though I am male, the whole situation seems very odd to me.


 
Posted : 10/03/2009 5:27 pm