Forum menu
Username change in the offing then Dom? 🙂
What conditions are you writing up in? Like are you working full-time - that is never easy. If you've got a free run at it though - just have to pull yourself together I am afraid.
If there's some conceptual problem you're having with pulling the material together then you should speak to your advisor - it's their job to help with things like that.
my problem after doing my PhD is I now just can't do a 'normal' job. Have no interest in 9-5 or 8-6 or whatever hours in the same place day in day out. It's not the hours as I'll do 60hrs a week no problem but something else.
Looking into getting in medical engineering/materials and nano-3D printing (self employed now) and failing that might just go back to Uni and do medicine!
Actually I think my problem is I want to do too much! Had the same problem with my PhD. I still put in quite a bit of time each week helping students at my old Uni as I love helping them with their work and giving them new ideas and explaining things to them. I've got no interest in their work directly (that is their work and nothing to do with me and I switch off from it) but I do benefit in return as when I get stuck into suggesting things for them to try it keeps my creativity buzzing.
Just noticed that this thread was started at the time when I was finishing writing up. My 2p is as follows:
Cut and paste any old crap from papers etc into a rough outline of the 'meat' of the thesis. Then you have a good idea of how the overall flow of the results will be. This 'story' then informs what you need or can ignore from the literature in your intro/review sections. Next come conclusions and future work (future work is v. important) which should be clear from the content. Lastly, abstract and intro.
I found the best way to work was to fire out a rubbish draft quickly (6 wks) and then spend a significant amount of time refining and reworking it (another 6 wks). This way, you avoid 'blank page' problems. Also, don't be frightened of keeping it short and sweet: 150 pages max IMO (no examiner wants to read 400 pages when 130 would do).
I think of it as taking a truly massive dump: painful and feels like it will go on for ever, but eventually you'll be left satisfied and a little sore.
Dr Choron (EE)
[u]Cut and paste[/u] any old crap from papers etc into a rough outline of the 'meat' of the thesis.
WTF?!?
Best advice I can give is don't EVER, EVER, copy and paste in academia, especially your thesis. The rush can easily get all too much, and before you know it, your pride and joy, complete with the copied text (you were going to reword it, but forgot about it, right...) is going through turnitin, and you're definitely never, ever going to be Dr....
Is PhD by publication an option? This was the route I chose. Advantages:
1) Too many people have PhDs these days, you'll need the papers to distinguish yourself from the others
2) Keeps it succinct and focussed (papers usually 5-8000 words max)
3) Makes it very hard to fail your viva if all your research has already been peer reviewed
4) You'll actually write the papers you may be kidding yourself that you'll do once the thesis is submitted
Dr Zokes (Env. Sci.)
The wife, who is the academic in this house but useless with a spanner, had her viva last week. The fact that she had 3 papers published before the viva meant that it was pretty much a done deal. She has a bit of tidying up to do, 80,000 words gives you plenty of chances to make the odd grammatical slip, but the external examiner has signed her off. It was self financed, part time and has taken 6 years of her life but a great achievement.
As said above do not be tempted to cut and paste as your work is subject to peer revue and then published. A major element of the viva is to check that it is all your work. You will get found out. I know of some one who was asked to view another film makers show reel for a job interview and asked where some of the footage was shot. The interviewee started to come up with a story but was stopped mid waffle by the interviewer as it was his footage that had been copied!
He meant cut and paste your own papers (obviously) to get a structure of the thesis, then enlarge on them. Not someone else's papers! All theses are built around your published work so this is good advice - and the main reason why theses without published papers are so much harder to write.
If you do as half arsed a job as I did with my dissertation you won't know the aims until you've got halfway through the rest of it...
He meant cut and paste your own papers (obviously) to get a structure of the thesis, then enlarge on them. Not someone else's papers!
Sorry, that's not how I read it... It does beg the question as to why the OP needs to write a thesis if he's already published it all. Just stick them together with an intro at the front and overall discussion at the end tying it all together. Bob's your uncle!
A colleague and I have done a bit of work with undergrads found guilty of plagiarism and poor academic practice. Turns out that in most cases they haven't deliberately sought to deceive it is the way they write their essays. They start taking notes from online articles in word, and cut and paste quotes. The problem is they don't label them well enough. When returning to their document a few days later they can't distinguish their words and the quotes. If they don't check their own work carefully enough in TurnItIn they get found out.
I'd be very concerned if one of my PhD students took that approach when writing up.
I'd be very concerned if one of my PhD students took that approach when writing up.
Agreed!
I'm still amazed by this suggestion of copy and paste. There's quite a useful skill for academia known as reading...
If most established academics have the time to do it this way, I'm pretty sure a PhD student does...
Cant be bothered to read all this but my experience was that starting to write my thesis was a bloody nightmare, actually writing it was fairly easy. Plan the chapters with a rough idea of the content and just sit down and write for an hour, dont stop just write, dont worry if its crap, just start. You'll be fine.
'Thesis' isn't capitalised, except at the start of a sentence.
The best advice I was given was to park your thesis at the top of a hill at the end of each day because it's easier to get started the next day. By this I mean don't completely finish the idea that you're writing at the end of the day - do the bulk of it but make a few notes of where you're going with it so that you start the next day with something to write. Otherwise you'll start the next day with a blank page and no ideas. Worked really well for me.
Johnny has it actually - I do this with just about every paper or report I write now. Two or three bullet points in red at the bottom highlighting what you're about to do next makes starting the next day much easier..
Oh, and add STW and facebook to your hosts file. I know it's just as easy to un-block them, the the fact you have to do that is often enough to kill the urge to take a breather for 5 minutes that turns into an hour arguing with TJ....
just to annoy you i wrote me PhD up in 12 weeks and passed with no corrections.
granted I already had 3 publications a well
best thing i ever did - eventually, after i left academia and moved in to industry
[s]Dr[/s]DomRob - Premature Capitulation. MTFU and get it done or accept that karma is playing a role.
The problem with a PhD is that once you got it you will earn peanuts, I mean how many years have you studied only to earn less then London underground tube driver eh ...
A friend of mine who got his Permanent Head Damage (in engineering) many years ago could only end up with a hourly part-time teaching contract because of his very minimum publication. I think he only published about 3 papers in decades (because previously he was a research associate) but the point is that he has all the qualifications yet none of them matters because many of the industries (engineering whatever) do not need them. Teaching is his only route but the amount he is earning now will be a major problem once he retires from teaching and may need to choose between either heating his house or putting meal on the table.
Yes, yes, being academic means freedom etc but the old skool approach is already gone. According to my friend if one does not publish enough or bring in funds (research funding apparently, on top of publication, teaching, administration etc) then s/he is not going to last very long. 6 - 10 years max. Also if you are single entering the academic field you WILL remain single for a very long time and perhaps never have a family forever. Yes, look around to check how many of them are single. There is something wrong about the system ... the higher the qualifications you have the shite you will earn.
He is very concerned about this retirement fund at the moment as every time I mentioned pension he went into rage (he has minimum i.e. not enough and may need to sell his kidney) but I kept mentioning it because he just kept going into rage. Rather fun for me as he is like a robot with an On/Off button ... yes, he is very proud about his PhD ... hmmmm ...
So the moral of the story be prepared to be permanently damaged if your pride and joy is to gain a PhD only.
Err, amazed that I need to clarify this, but...
[b]Cut and paste from your own publications (and other unpublished but written up research) only[/b]: this way you can put in the results that you want/need and remove the unnecessary and or unneeded ones.
Publication based thesis would have been fantastic, but for me wasn't an option (edit: depending on Uni regulations, this kind of thesis may or may not be permitted. The OP might have 10 papers in Science and Nature, but that in and of itself doesn't get you a PhD: you still need to write a thesis.). I was writing from more or less a blank page (in thesis terms) but with ~20 peer reviewed publications.
@chewkw - You have a good point, but my feeling is that if you spend a massive amount of time and effort getting a PhD in order to get rich, you will almost certainly be disappointed. Depending on the field (and to a lesser degree the quality of the research) there are well paid jobs for PhDs out there, but for most people I don't think that this is a primary motivation.
chewkw - Member
The problem with a PhD is that once you got it you will earn peanuts, I mean how many years have you studied only to earn less then London underground tube driver eh ......
Yes, yes, being academic means freedom etc but the old skool approach is already gone. According to my friend if one does not publish enough or bring in funds (research funding apparently, on top of publication, teaching, administration etc) then s/he is not going to last very long. 6 - 10 years max. Also if you are single entering the academic field you WILL remain single for a very long time and perhaps never have a family forever. Yes, look around to check how many of them are single. There is something wrong about the system ... the higher the qualifications you have the shite you will earn.
Sorry to hear about your friend, but what you describe is a long way from my experience. I got my PhD, had a year as a dogsbody doing all the teaching available and any research assistance anyone needed, but i got a good job with only two publications. It is hard, but it is worth it because the money ain't bad (£35k two years in), and there is far more freedom than most other jobs. Publishing is important, it is part of the job description, so if you don't do it then why should/would you stay? In reality one article a year is plenty in lots of places.
But anyone doing a PhD to enhance their earning is naive imho.
PhDs use can be very subject specific in their career advantages. In biology/genetics (my area) if you want to get just about anywhere in academia then they are essential. Otherwise you career options/ chances of directing really intersting science/ earning potenital are severely limited. In industrial biology/genetics it's not quite as black and white but it is similar to academia.
Wow!
Wasn't expecting this! Thanks to everyone for your input, especially the input that came in the form of MTFU!! I have been telling myself this for a while now, but it's amazing how much more effective it is when someone else says it!
I am currently writing a research proposal, which has somewhat got in the way of my doctorate, which is what my initial comment was about. However I am still struggling with the writing. I find it frustrating because I seem to have all the answers in my head, but when I come to write it down I find holes which then need filling and before long I am at the bottom of a heap of work I didn't realise I need to do!!!!!! I think I need to allow myself to make assumptions more.
My doctorate will get me to where I want to be financially, I am sure of that, but then my expectations are fairly modest so...
Choron: I got what you meant!
Darrell: If there was some way of barring you from this thread I would use it 😛
Zokes: Publication route isn't an option I am afraid.
Additionally I am doing an EngD, the program has morphed from a broad engineering based qualification which focused on putting people into industrial R and D roles, where I wasn't expecting to drive as deep into the theory as PhD would, to all of that plus the requirement to have the PhD level of theoretical backup.
As a result, my project which had covered a huge base including pure engineering, economic and political influences has had to be squished and molded to meet the new expectations. Combined with the almost never ending problems associated with long term data logging has put me a long way off where I expected to be.
Still my industrial sponsor seems happy, and my supervisor is backing my application for more research monies so I can't be doing too bad.
I do however need to do more publications... Many many many more!!!
Cheers again guys!
I find it frustrating because I seem to have all the answers in my head, but when I come to write it down I find holes which then need filling and before long I am at the bottom of a heap of work I didn't realise I need to do!!!!!! I think I need to allow myself to make assumptions more.
There are two types of academics when it comes to writing:
1 - those you have it all in their head in a pretty coherent form and can just put it down on paper.
2 - those who have most of it in their head, but the writing process reveals more and shapes the final form.
You, like me, sound like the latter. It is just how it is. I can't stand people who are no.1s.
I find it frustrating because I seem to have all the answers in my head, but when I come to write it down I find holes which then need filling and before long I am at the bottom of a heap of work I didn't realise I need to do!!!!!!
That sounds like the draft of my first chapter- it had about 50 TODO notes for bits which I wasn't happy with. When my supervisor saw it she told me off for being too negative!
You need to think of ways to word it creatively and postively. E.g. Instead of "X was bodged together, after which Y was done, and I need to go back to do X properly" say "X had to be done before Y. Since the focus of this project was on Y an empirically verified method of completing X was used. In future the effects of changing X will be investigated". Or "This method does not perform as well as hoped on our data" should be "Despite our dataset being extremely noisy and challenging I/we successfully developed an analysis method for extracting relevant parameters. Although this is not yet reliable/accurate enough for use in practical applications it is a significantly advances the field, and provides a foundation for future work."
And another thing- use your supervisor! Don't do extra experiments/research because you think there's a gap, just write your thesis and let your supervisor decide whether it's necessary or not (they'll probably say don't bother).
Don't be tempted to write in comic sans.
Though it is good to visit 'PhD comics' from time to time. And the odd mountain bike forum.
I know. I've been there.
Dr SR
I have a colleague who won't use anything put comic sans. She went to a presentation where someone said CS is useful for people with dyslexia, and now uses it for everything, no matter the audience.
Garamond is your friend for the final text, but more importantly your examiners will like you for it.
You, like me, sound like the latter. It is just how it is. [u]I can't stand people who are no.1s.[/u]
Smug mode ON! 😀
But then I tend to have to be, given the constant bombardment of funding calls etc. But on the bright side, at least there is decent research funding available.
Not too sure about most of chewkw's points. My job as a Research Scientist is to formulate research ideas into funded projects, carry out said projects, and publish their results, whilst being part of a collaborative research team and taking on line management and general admin. I suspect if i didn't do that, I'd rightly be out of a job, just as anyone in any other field of work would be if they consistently under-performed. Sure, the workload is high, but it is in most high-paying professional jobs. Plus, if you don't publish, what's the point? The purpose of research is to further knowledge - not much point in doing it if you don't write about it so noone can read it!
As for the pay, well, I'm on about double what the next-highest earner out of my friend circle from my school/uni year is on. So either they don't get paid much (not really true), or I get paid too much (probably true).... All I do is research mud!
zokes - Member
Not too sure about most of chewkw's points. My job as a Research Scientist is to formulate research ideas into funded projects, carry out said projects, and publish their results, whilst being part of a collaborative research team and taking on line management and general admin.
Lucky you for being a Research Scientist while my friend is just an engineer with a PhD holding on hourly PT teaching job.
He can't survive if he does not cover all those hours and can't publish because he has no time too due to hourly teaching duties. He is near mid 50s so can't compete with younger people for a full time job. Also, when the students say "jump" my friend has to response "how high" as any complains from them will result in my friend's contract being withdrawn or not extended in future (yearly). The students are "customers" now apparently.
Do you teach? i.e. students ... opps ... customers.
Should I advice him to get out and simply claim benefits?
All I do is research mud!
I'd guess mud with the sweet sweet oil within/nearby?
Do you teach? i.e. students ... opps ... customers.
Nope, I'm at a research institute rather than a uni. But most days I'd rather teach undergrads than deal with the bizarre time-wasting antics that seem to eat most of my time here. I seriously spend more time reporting on work than I do actually doing it, which is galling to say the least!
I'd guess mud with the sweet sweet oil within/nearby?
More important than that - agriculture. I guess Australia values food more than other countries...