Forum menu
I wish my world was the simple black and white place that some people inhabit, it would be so much simpler than the shades of grey I see
Maybe if you slowed down a bit things wouldn't seem so blurry.
Went to one of these 6 months ago and also found it full of 40-60 year olds.
Given none of us wanted to be there the instructor did a good job of making it interesting and relevent.
A lot of the attendees were pretty ignorant of speed limits with the result many left knowing they could go 10 mph faster on single carraigway roads than they previously thought as they had thought the national limit was 50mph.
One guy also found out his conviction was bogus as he found out that the speed limit signs on the road he had been caught on were not placed according to regs.
Lol at konabunny. 😀
I think it's a shame that as speed is much easier to quantify (and automatically detect and raise funds fine people) than quality of driving it has become the default measure.
I think there's a reasonable correlation between speed and quality of driving. There are exceptions, of course there are, but as a general rule, I don't think it's being particularly outrageous to suggest that anyone doing 40mph past a camera in a 30 zone is driving poorly. I can't think of a more cost-effective way of policing it, can you?
And I think it's a misnomer to think that speed cameras are profit-making.
Most people on the course had had their licence for 25+ years. And they are the people who are "generally" complacent about their skills and experience.
complacent or unconciously competent?
Do any of us actually remember anything about the drive to work this morning? I don't. I wasn't thinking about any of it.
I think it's a shame that as speed is much easier to quantify.. than quality of driving
Nice YouTube video from Essex Police showing them enforcing a "quality of driving" issue (namely tailgating):
Several people in the comments defend the driving of the van saying the police should have moved over, it's entrapment, etc
I would imagine if this kind of operation gets more common then people will just moan that it's a money raising exercise too.
Maybe if you slowed down a bit things wouldn't seem so blurry.
I like the warp speed effect, makes it easier to pretend I'm Han Solo on the Kessel run 😀
I think there's a reasonable correlation between speed and quality of driving
I think there's a reasonable correlation between excessive or inapproprite speed and quality of driving.
Unfortunately I can't find the article or the stats to back it up, but the basic premise was that statistically the safest drivers are those who often knowingly drive a little above the speed limit. Not excessive speed just a little above the speed limit, around the figures that might get you sent on a speed awareness course. Not talking about doing 35mph past a sachool at 3pm, but more on the 'open road'.
These drivers are generally compotent and confident. Those at the extemes of the speed spectrum, excessively fast (reckless) or excessively slow (not confident, and maybe not compotent?) where most likely to have accidents.
You can't see what the traffic conditions are like ahead of the police car in that video so you can't make a judgement on whether there was any provocation but the van they've both just overtaken undertakes them at some point so it could be seen as provocative if the way ahead of the police car was clear and he was just slowing down. Doesn't excuse the rude and dangerous driving from the van though.
These drivers are generally compotent and confident.
I think that is skewed by the fact that these drivers are the ones that are aware of what the speed limit actually is, even if they are breaking it, whereas the other groups are skewed by containing the complete muppets who have no idea what is going on.
but the basic premise was that statistically the safest drivers are those who often knowingly drive a little above the speed limit.
So what, would be my response to that. Whether or not someone is "statistically a safer driver" does not alter the fact that when speeding, they have broken the law. You also appear to have confused correlation and causation. Just beacuse some people who break the speed limit are "safe" drivers it doesn't mean that if you allow all drivers to break speed limits that they will magically become "safe" drivers. I'd also have serious reservations about anyone who uses the logic that "I'm a safe driver therefore I'm allowed to break the speed limit".
If the speed limits were abolished do you really think that accident rates would fall?
it could be seen as provocative if the way ahead of the police car was clear and he was just slowing down. Doesn't excuse the rude and dangerous driving from the van though.
Exactly. Most tailgaters seem to do it to bully other drivers or to "punish" them for some perceived transgression.
Regardless of whether the cop car had room to pull left, or whether he slowed down unnecessarily*, the van is acting dangerously and comes with 1 foot of the bumper while doing 70mph and takes both hands off the wheel to wave them about! 😯
.
* Essex Police say in the comments that [i]"To clarify, the officer was unable to make a natural over-taking manoeuvre whilst remaining within the speed limit because of the position of cars around him, out of view? of the camera."[/i] - but then they would wouldn't they 🙂
Ecky-Thump - Membercomplacent or unconciously competent?
Do any of us actually remember anything about the drive to work this morning? I don't. I wasn't thinking about any of it.
If they were that competent then surely they should be aware of the speed limit where they are driving and comform to it, or know where the cameras are and slow down before it.
It's no secret where the cameras are, they are all published on websites.
Some awfully poor attempts at reasoning on this thread.
Fact remains, there is a speed limit, so drive to it or pay the fine. End of.
Simple physics says more speed is more dangerous. End of. That is why we have limits. Now there are many other types of bad driving, and they need addressing, but that does not change these facts. Just get used to it and stop whining. It's like talking to my four year old daughter.
annebr, I wasn't defending anyone, just commenting on a factor that might contribute to the perceived imbalance of attendees skewed towards 30-40-50 agegroups.
How about a more honest approach to the speed debate?
I quite like driving fast.
I know if I am caught I will be fined and I'm willing to accept it. No bleating or whining.
But realistically the risks of being caught are very small and I enjoy "making progress". If I do get caught doing 85 on a quiet motorway or 75 on a well sighted country road i'll suck it up and pay the fine.
No excuse for hooning about in town mind you but lets not kid ourselves about the amount of thought that goes into speed limits they are largely just arbitrary numbers. Motorway speed limits haven't changed for over 40 years
Just get used to it and stop whining.
Didn't see anyone whining to be honest. Just some debate about how safe or not a driver is or isnt based on the speed they are doing above or under an arbitrary limit.
Safe isnt necessarily legal and legal isnt necessarily safe.
Question to all those suggesting that speeding is a black and white issue, and that breaking the speed limit makes you a bad driver. Full stop.
What if the section of road you are on used to be a NSL DC, and perfectly safe as such. Does getting caught speeding in what is now a 50 limit make you a bad driver? I acknowledge that breaking it is against the law, but that is a separate issue (there are quite a few strawmen getting thrown around by the absolutists here).
"Motorway speed limits haven't changed for over 40 years "
neither have human reaction times.
The nature and volume of traffic has in terms of more vehicles and more HGV's.
The nature of motorway surfaces has, many are now badly degraded and patched as they are at the end of their life span.
Brakes have improved on average but so has power of acceleration. The average age of drivers has gone up so more slow reactions . Lots more people on the roads in shoddy cars . lots more people on the roads who passed their tests or not in foreign lands.
bad weather is either just as common or more common.
Motorway speed limits haven't changed for over 40 years
People often say that. Does anyone consider what needs to happen to significantly increase the speed limit on our motorway?
I'm no highway engineer but I would imagine that the speed of traffic has a pretty big impact on road design factors like the minimum radius of corners, length of slip roads, camber, sign size and distances from hazard, lighting, crash barriers, lane width, etc
Sounds like increasing the speed limits would either involve A) a LOT of money spent on road rebuilding or B) re-writing or ignoring the existing safety guidance and just accepting the increase in casualties.
If they were that competent then surely they should be aware of the speed limit where they are driving and comform to it, or know where the cameras are and slow down before it.It's no secret where the cameras are, they are all published on websites.
True, however I was caught on the way home from work a few years ago. It was a wide but winding road with a 40mph speed limit. There was one of those big "40" signs painted on the road and another small "40" sign on a post next to it.
One day I was coming home and just around the corner I was stopped by the police. The speed limit had changed to 30mph that day. The big sign on the road was still saying 40, but the little sign on the post now said 30...
The police clobbered hundreds that day, a few challenged it in court, but it's the little sign with the red border that counts. I was given 3 points and £60 fine, no offer of a course. I was doing 37mph.
People often say that. Does anyone consider what needs to happen to significantly increase the speed limit on our motorway?I'm no highway engineer but I would imagine that the speed of traffic has a pretty big impact on road design factors like the minimum radius of corners, length of slip roads, camber, sign size and distances from hazard, lighting, crash barriers, lane width, etc
You're making a good argument to justify the motorway limit being upgraded there, given a lot of those factors are related to the performance of vehicles. Not to mention that the de facto speed limit is significantly higher than 70 and the highway engineering seems to cope just fine in general.
aracer why are you breaking the speed limit in your example?
1 because you don't know it has changed? .. bad driver.. poor observation.
2 because you believe that you are entitled to make a personal value judgement as to which elements of the criminal law apply to you and which don't ..bad driver hubris poor judgement lack of acknowledgment that others may be on the road and create a problem that you have no time or opportunity to avoid.
3 because you are in a hurry and late.. bad driver poor planning and incapable of prioritising.
4 because the road has been cleared specially for you and you know that you can handle the car at that speed on that road .. good driver.
The absolutist argument does not hinge on the individual safety of any given driver . They are public roads for all qualified drivers and vehicles the law has to apply to all or none and requires a clear black and white boundary so that it can be applied and enforced . It just so happens that the debate can tangent into purely the safety of speed as accidents at speed are both common and dangerous and reducing speed reduces the risk of accidents and their effects.
What do all of these roads have in common??
[URL= http://i924.photobucket.com/albums/ad88/RichMTB77/M74_zpsfa89c13f.jp g" target="_blank">
http://i924.photobucket.com/albums/ad88/RichMTB77/M74_zpsfa89c13f.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
[URL= http://i924.photobucket.com/albums/ad88/RichMTB77/A82a_zpsde9b7001.jp g" target="_blank">
http://i924.photobucket.com/albums/ad88/RichMTB77/A82a_zpsde9b7001.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
[URL= http://i924.photobucket.com/albums/ad88/RichMTB77/BealachNaBa_zps06350a29.jp g" target="_blank">
http://i924.photobucket.com/albums/ad88/RichMTB77/BealachNaBa_zps06350a29.jp g"/> [/IMG][/URL]
^ They are all too unfeasibly sunny to be in Britain?
^ all in Scotland (and probably all NSL 60 limits?)
they are all made from tarmac?
Do, I get a prize, what's my prize?
Rather than just speeding courses - we need not driving like a d!ck courses, that'd help loads.
As for the drive in this morning, don't remember a bit of it, I do remember that I could have done with a base layer on the bike though 🙂
The tutor on my course also said that they did courses for other misdemeanours.
Like talking on the phone/tailgating etc.
So they aren't *just* targeting speeding.
all in Scotland (and probably all NSL 60 limits?)
Yep all 60 limits.
Seriously its just a number on a pole.
I would rather people drove to the road and conditions and not the number.
That last photo would be fun at 60 😉
I would rather people drove to the road and conditions and not the number.
Absolutely - but I'd also rather they didn't exceed the number on the pole.
Or at the very least didn't endanger others when they did so.
Or drive an inch from my arse to try and make me exceed it!
Seriously its just a number on a pole.
And it's the legal speed limit. I struggle to see what the problem is here. You may not like driving at that speed - tough shit.
We need speed limits, because peopel can't be trusted. It really is that simple.
That last photo would be fun at 60
[url= https://maps.google.com/?ll=55.363692,-2.494819&spn=0.005006,0.009645&t=h&z=17 ]A68 by the Scotland/England border[/url] has some "interesting" corners for a 60 too.
Not uncommon to see a big hole in the crash barrier where someone has tried it too! 🙁
Whether or not someone is "statistically a safer driver" does not alter the fact that when speeding, they have broken the law.
That point is not being disputed by anyone one here.
You also appear to have confused correlation and causation. Just beacuse some people who break the speed limit are "safe" drivers it doesn't mean that if you allow all drivers to break speed limits that they will magically become "safe" drivers. I'd also have serious reservations about anyone who uses the logic that "I'm a safe driver therefore I'm allowed to break the speed limit".
Not at all. I'm not suggesting that exceeding the speed limit makes someone a better driver. The point tis exceeding the speed limit does not mecessarily make someone a bad driver.
Fact remains, there is a speed limit, so drive to it or pay the fine.
I know if I am caught I will be fined and I'm willing to accept it. No bleating or whining.
+1
I got caught fair and square, it was a fair cop, no arguments I was over the limit. I wasn't concentrating as I should have been, bad driving. See I'm not even claiming to be a good driver.
End of.
Sounds like my mother in law when she doesn't like anyone coming back at her and disagreeing with her point of view 🙂
Seriously its just a number on a pole.I would rather people drove to the road and conditions and not the number.
+1
crankboy, you're going to have to give me a better explanation as to why breaking the law (by ignoring the number on a pole) automatically makes somebody a bad driver. Your current one appears to include a lot of stuff about not being courteous and paying attention to other road users which isn't actually directly related to what number is on the pole.
For reference the correct answer is:
5) because the speed I was doing was perfectly safe for the road and conditions, and I prefer to pay attention to those. The road in question being far safer to travel at speed on than 2 of the pictures posted above (yes I did say 2 - I'll reserve judgement on the other), and the speed I was doing being legal for all 3 of those pictures.
You're making a good argument to justify the motorway limit being upgraded there, given a lot of those factors are related to the performance of vehicles.
I'm not arguing against it - just pointing out that it is a more involved task than re-printing the Highway Code.
The performance of cars may have [i]generally[/i] improved, but as crankboy points as out, the performance of drivers hasn't and the physics involved remains mostly the same too.
Not to mention that the de facto speed limit is significantly higher than 70 and the highway engineering seems to cope just fine in general.
It copes (just about) with people driving at 90 when the limit is 70. But if the limit was set at 90 then the de facto speed limit would also increase.
[i]"Motorway speed limits haven't changed for over 40 years "[/i]
Agree, but cars have.
Have you ever driven a pre-1970's car running drum brakes and cross-ply tyres - modern cars are a totally different proposition.
I've driven for 30 years, and according to the speed-kills brigade mantra me and everyone around me should be dead based on the speeds I've driven - except it's all been based on where it's safe to do so. Could be 20mph in a 30mph limit, or 170mph in a 60mph limit - and as someone who use to cover +40k pa, that's a lot of miles at serious speeds. No accidents, for me or anyone else.
Agree, but cars have.
Yes but people and physics haven't.
Didn't I just say this?
it's all been based on where it's safe to do so. Could be 20mph in a 30mph limit, or 170mph in a 60mph limit
I'd love to know under what circumstances 170mph in a 60 is [i]"where it's safe to do so"[/i]???
Perhaps a closed well-marshaled road, carefully inspected for debris and hazards, with wildlife-proof fencing?
crankboy - Member
Being a good driver is knowing that the legal limit is a maximum and being sufficiently in control of your car and ego not to exceed it and sufficiently aware of the road and a host of other factors to know when you should in fact be going a lot slower than the limit.
Thanks for the sermon, I'll take it on advisement.
molgrips - Member
Seriously its just a number on a pole.
And it's the legal speed limit. I struggle to see what the problem is here. You may not like driving at that speed - tough shit.We need speed limits, because peopel can't be trusted. It really is that simple.
Sure; there's a dual carriageway going into Bath, it has a 50 limit on it, and a camera, despite being away from buildings, (it's a bypass), and it had a 50 limit before it even opened, the reason being given that it was an accident blackspot.
How anyone knew it was an accident blackspot before being opened was beyond me, until I did one of these courses, after being caught by a hidden van while going into Bristol in a line of cars all doing the same speed. Lucrative day, that... 🙄
Anyway, it turns out that the criteria for setting speed limits and placing cameras where there are accidents is that the camera can be placed anywhere within 2Km of the blackspot. The blackspot in this case is Batheaston, a narrow, traffic-choked section of the then A4, which the bypass was designed to alleviate. So having bypassed a dangerous stretch of narrow, 30 limit road with a dual-carriageway, BANES Council thought it a great wheeze to use the accident radius to put a camera and lower limit on a road built to take traffic up to 70mph. Blatant money-making excercise, and the camera has been deactivated now, not that it ever stopped me doing 60-70 along there.
Speed limits in the UK are set by politicians, not the police, as they are in the US; they reflect political thought, not real experience of what a speed limit should be, based on the actual road, and driving conditions.
I'm sure Hora and cheeky boy will have something to say about my driving.
I couldn't actually give a shit.
It copes (just about) with people driving at 90 when the limit is 70. But if the limit was set at 90 then the de facto speed limit would also increase.
A point which is often made. But why would it increase? Is it not possible that the speed people currently drive at is what feels comfortable and not particularly based on what the current limit is. Also any new limit could be more strictly enforced - which leads onto another point, that the current situation with motorway speed limits (where the limit is less than what most people feel is a safe speed, and isn't really enforced that much) results in all speed limits being devalued, and those more important ones in towns also being ignored. Of course this driving by numbers game also leads to the situation where people think it's OK to do 70 on the motorway in fog...
Yep all 60 limits.
LIMIT. The key word in that sentence is LIMIT. Its not a target, it's not a mandatory speed it's a limit. It does not, nor should it be taken as, mean that anyone thinks that it is necessarily safe to travel at that LIMIT!
Oh and it is actually possible to obey the speed LIMIT and travel at a speed suitable for the prevailing road conditions, but then I'm sure that all you awesome drivers knew that already.
If you are under +/- 25 it would makes sense to ask your mother, father (or grandparents) to take the blame and attend the awareness course for you rather than incur the extra cost levied on you by the insurance company when you renew..............
Cars are better than they were in the 70s sure. So you think we should increase speeds until the death rates are as high as they were in the 70s?
You may not like speed limits. Tough. They are there to protect everyone. You may be Mr Safe, but what about dozy pillock sending a text and doing makeup? You want them doing 100mph as well?
All you speed camera whingers- what are you actually asking for? Abolition of speed limits?
I've resisted thus far, but just can't hold it in any longer. Here's a selection for you molgrips - sorry I'm not sure if there are quite enough in this pic.
[img] 
[/img]
All you speed camera whingers- what are you actually asking for? Abolition of speed limits?
Nothing really. I'm pretty happy with how the UK's roads work. Speed enforcement is such that the number on the pole becomes more of a guideline than a rule and I'm cool with that.
Read upon the Solomon Curve and the 85th percentile of speed if you are interested in how slower is not always safer
I have to attend my speed awareness course on friday . I was caught doing 35 in a 30 .
Are you obliged to inform your insurance co that you have been caught for speeding , and have opted for a speed awareness course?
Acceleration rates have increased over the last 30 years . Yes , but deceleration times/distances have also dramaticaly reduced over the last 10 years with ABS+ ESP .
You still do not automatically get prosectued for crashing , but you do for speeding although no crashing occured. Who is the worst driver ? One who is 10% over the speed limit , or one who has crashed ?