Forum menu
SOME dog owners mak...
 

[Closed] SOME dog owners make me very angry.....

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ditch_jockey - Member
Great minds think alike!

Indeed they do!

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member
Prezet - why should I have to accept your dog coming up to me and sniffing me? [b]I don't like it[/b], I don't want your dog to do this. Please acccept your legal responsibilities and control it.

TJ - I thought (for a while) that we had the same opinion on this.

But it appears we don't.

You sound totally whiny and pathetic here to be perfectly honest.

My only issue is with bounding/running dogs, that are not returning despite their owners commands. Because that makes me assume that the owners hasn't trained the dog well enough, and doesn't know the dog well enough to know what it might do. So I can't predict what it might do either.

I have no issue whatsoever with a dog calmly walking around, exploring the area and the people in it.

And to be honest if you do have an issue with that, then it's your problem, not everyone elses.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:04 am
Posts: 15457
Full Member
 

TJ, You are perhaps being a bit harsh here, I'm happy to accept "Prezet" and some others do fall into "Group B" rond my way the "Group A's" are the majority, that might well be due to the location. From what he's said it seems he has a Responsible attitude to Dog ownership and understanding of what it means to Control an animal.

My Daughter loves the odd friendly (and under owner control) Dog that she gets to stroke in the park, My Missus is far more nrvous than me about Dogs and I can always hear a tense murmur from her when any Dog comes within about 20 foot, but she controls the nerves, it does help if the owner is with the dog, and the dog is responding to commands/looking to the owner for approval (not half way across the park shouting at and being ignored by the dog) this generally suggests control and a good level of training are in place and working...

The trouble is that most of the Dogs we seem to encounter are not what I would consider to be under control, I'm sure it's down to where we live (a large Town, and We're local to a large public park popular with alot of people/Dog walkists of all ilks), this along with having kids, probably does colour my view of the issue.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ, You are perhaps being a bit harsh here, I'm happy to accept "Prezet" and some others do fall into "Group B" rond my way the "Group A's" are the majority, that might well be due to the location. From what he's said it seems he has a Responsible attitude to Dog ownership and understanding of what it means to Control an animal.

he clearly does not as he thinks it acceptable for the dog to go up to people that do not know it and he will not control the dog.

he also thinks to go back to the OP that in that case the father was wrong and should have accepted the dog scaring his child. rather than dealing with this issue he then mocks and denigrates people who don't want the dog to come up to them.

I do not want your dog to come up to me and that is my right. if you fail to stop the dog doing so then the dog is not under control. No if but of ands.

If you do not appreciate this then you are simply another selfish dog owner that thinks your dog has rights greater than mine.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:16 am
Posts: 2087
Free Member
 

TJ - You sound totally whiny and pathetic here to be perfectly honest.

+1


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - your opinions usually err towards mine on many issues, but your stance on this subject is clearly ludicrous. Dogs walk about. They may pass you on the path. They may have a quick sniff as they pass you.

What's the frigging problem?


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:22 am
 Amos
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Prezet:
OK my words were the [i]dog was having a sniff[/i] which is a point that keeps getting brought up and apparently my tone aggressive. As I've stated my tone wasn't at all aggressive just a little exasperated but not aggressive. Now I want you to understand it was the fact the dog was quite large very jumpy (hence the use of the words bouncy and bounding) and it was making my daughter very nervous. Now I'm not suggesting he was about to rip her face off (although I don't know the dog or his temprement) but the fact still remains he didn't return after a couple of calls from the owner and more the point the owner didn't make any attempt to retrieve him. My anger is in the fact that they assumed I was at fault for protecting my daughter and apparently instilling a fear of dogs SOMETHING I've tried very hard not to do, but it's Ok I'm a dog owner we'll teach her as we own 5 dogs and it's our right to let them do what the hell they like with out apology!


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:27 am
Posts: 15457
Full Member
 

Interesting...

In much the same way that "we're all individuals" and at various times opt in/out of various easy to define groups ("Cyclist", "Driver", "Parent", etc, etc), "Dog owner/Lover" is just another label and as such is rather indiscriminate: It groups Scum with a Staffy Attack Dog and perfectly pleasant people with well trained a Lab' in together, people with totally different world views and reasons for owning Dogs...

I'm happy to play silly stereotypes on a forum, but I do actually know that real life has far more shades of grey than you seem to be attuned to TJ, your world view is a bit monochromatic, Day to day life must be a real trial for you...

That does assume your not playing the Troll... Which of course you are, So Troll on Brother!


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:28 am
Posts: 1970
Full Member
 

I suspect dog owners perceptions will vary according to the context in which they live - we live in the countryside to the north of Glasgow, so my daily dog walking haunts tend to be sparsly populated and consist mainly of other dog walkers, cyclists, runners and the occasional horse rider. We can be out for an hour or more and not encounter another human being, especially if the weathers poor.

I would only exercise the dogs in a public park in extremis as it's just too much work keeping two energetic collies under close control, and the combination of boisterous dog and wobbly toddler is rarely a happy one. If i lived in town, or in a situation where I didn't have space to let the dogs burn off energy in safety, I'd probably either forgo dog ownership, or stick with a smaller breed - largely because the sort of conflict people describe in these threads is pretty much inevitable in a crowded urban environment.

Despite my best efforts at responsible dog ownership, things do sometimes go wrong ... I would like to apologise again to the wee Boy Scout we encountered at the top of Ben Lomond last year, who lost his sandwiches to an impressive display of canine cunning and teamwork; one of them walked up and let him pat them, while the other nipped in from behind and grabbed both his butties and legged it with the spoils. I'm pretty sure the bag of Jelly Babies which was all I could offer in compensation was a pretty poor exchange for your mum's ham and cheese rolls!


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=TJ].....

I do not want your dog to come up to me and that is my right.

[u][b]if you fail to stop the dog doing so then the dog is not under control. [/b][/u]

No if but of ands.

Is that the "TJ's Law" definition of what what constitutes an Out of Control dog ?

Because it sounds nothing like the [b]Actual Legal Definition[/b]

Would you care to explain which law you are referring to that states a dog is Legally out of control, if it wanders up to a stranger that[I] "doesn't like it"[/I] and has a sniff before moving on somewhere else.

[Scottish or English law will do]


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:28 am
Posts: 2087
Free Member
 

he didn't return after a couple of calls from the owner and more the point the owner didn't make any attempt to retrieve him

Sorry, I must have missed the bit where you wrote the owner attempted to recall the dog, and it didn't return and then made no attempt to come and manually retrieve the dog. That's a bit poor on the owners behalf - and I can see why you said what you did to them. Fair enough.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Prezert -and you are a sterotypical selfish dog owner thinking it acceptable for the dog to upset others. Waht the effect your doghas on others is of no account to you is it - all that matters is your dog gets to run around freely

Let me describe a situation that actually happened to me.

Out of a bike ride. me and the missus stopped for a sandwich in a park. sitting down. on the grass

A dog comes up to us and starts sniffin around us and our picnic. teh dog is right in our faces as we were sitting on the ground and gets its nose within inches of our food as well as actully tryng to get inside the bag the food came in.

Is that acceptable to you? I do not know what the dog is going to do so I have to grab my food and get it out of the dogs reach. the dog owner was not in sight

Spoils my nice relaxing picnic


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:37 am
Posts: 2087
Free Member
 

No - I agree, that's not acceptable.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - You sound totally whiny and pathetic here to be perfectly honest.

+1

TJ next time you get sniffed by a dog, please please ring a dog warden and explain how you have been assaulted by an out of control dog that's randomly sniffing things, and see what reaction you get.

As I think it might help clarify things for you, when a complete stranger laughs in your face and calls you a sad little man.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Right - so now we are getting somewhere.

Its all I ask - just get your dog under control and stop it annoying other people. If it will come when called and walk at heel or drop when told then thats fine. If not then keep it on a lead.

You do not have to put your dog on a lead on public paths, as long as it is under close control. But as a general rule, keep your dog on a lead if you cannot rely on its obedience.

http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/enjoying/countrysidecode/keepdogs.aspx

Is there a legal definition
of โ€™close controlโ€™?
No. However, the Code defines โ€˜under close
controlโ€™ to mean that your dog responds to
your commands and is kept close at heel.
If he can lie down or return to you on
command, your dog would then be under
close control. If youโ€™re not sure that your dog
can do this the responsible thing is to keep
him on a short lead.
Did you know?...
A short lead is two
metres or less.

From the scottish guidance


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why did this need to go past Buttercup's post on the first page?

'tis the season of goodwill and tolerance, don't you know!?!


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

richc - another one who thinks its acceptable to lt their dogs annoy people

What selfish views some of you have.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A dog comes up to us and starts sniffin around us and our picnic. teh dog is right in our faces as we were sitting on the ground and gets its nose within inches of our food as well as actully tryng to get inside the bag the food came in.

Is that acceptable to you? I do not know what the dog is going to do so I have to grab my food and get it out of the dogs reach. the dog owner was not in sight

Sounds like a PITA to be honest.

However I hope I wouldn't still have my knickers in a twist several months/years after the incident, if I did I would be quite embarrassed about dwelling on it

Do you wake up in the night after dreaming about this and fantasying about what you 'could have done', and screaming 'No! No! leave my cheese and hummus on wholemeal stone baked half baguette ALONE!'?


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 11:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Richc - I am merely useing that to illustrate why having a dog come up to you and sniff at you is not acceptable. I do not have my knickers in a twist. I just want you dog owners to gain some understanding of what is acceptable

Why you have to denigrate me is odd. Is it emabarrasment?


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:00 pm
Posts: 2746
Full Member
 

Edit: Actually, I can't be arsed to try & rationalise anything in here.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:10 pm
Posts: 15457
Full Member
 

'No! No! leave my cheese and hummus on wholemeal stone baked half baguette ALONE!'

Surely a baguette with Hummus is a bit on the adventurous side, mighty white with Darylea is more likely...

Hang on theis wasn't on top of Ben Lomond was it? you weren't dressed as a Scout were you TJ?

Why you have to denigrate me is odd. Is it emabarrasment?

Its slowly developing into a sort of a sport i think, like Bull fighting, badger baiting or weasel fighting...


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No need for the abuse TJ is getting, personally speaking, from this thread he's coming out better than the animal lovers.

I don't mind dogs myself, but the Missus does have a (slightly irrational) fear of them. Why should she have her right to use public spaces limited by those who refuse to control their charges? Should dog (or any animal for that matter) ownership be limited to those who have the space and facilities to look after their chosen animal? Not sure of the answers, but worth a little think about...


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:11 pm
Posts: 26890
Full Member
 

The incident you describe is obviously wrong. I have to be very careful with kea in the summer because some pinicers will cal her over and feed her which is unhelpful to say the least i usually walk her elsewhere. However in your example as i have said before if you could handle dogs better yourself your life may be more pleasant.
As for the types of owners earlier, the worst are the "dont worry he's friendly" types and when kids are around i understand the worry. I am always shocked by the owners who let their dogs run up to kea when she's on the lead as she was when she had stitches. Many dog owners are idiots and most dogs poorly behaved, thats life moaning at me on the interweb wont help, giving yourself the power to take charge of the situation may.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cookeaa

Its slowly developing into a sort of a sport i think, like Bull fighting, badger baiting or weasel fighting...

careful - you will get embroiled in the 1000 post circular argument that will haunt you for days


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thats life moaning at me on the interweb wont help, giving yourself the power to take charge of the situation may

Agreed. Always provide feedback when incidents occur. Don't let people get away with not cleaning up after their dogs either, tell them to pick up and take pictures of them.

My park has a notice board so I've considered doing the pictures thing and popping A4/A3 print-outs of the owners in there in a name and shame kind of context.

I'd hate to be a responsible dog owner, it must be a constant embarrasment.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:22 pm
Posts: 2006
Free Member
 

giving yourself the power to take charge of the situation may.

taser? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=TJ]...Prezet - why should I have to accept your dog coming up to me and sniffing me?
I don't like it,
I don't want your dog to do this.

[b][u] Please acccept your legal responsibilities and control it.[/b][/u]

TJ, you don't seem to be able to come up with a LAW that the dog owners are breaking, by allowing their dog to wander around sniffing things/people.

It's odd because normally you seem to like quoting Laws and subsections and paragraphs etc.

Is it maybe because there isn't a suitable LAW to quote.

And it's just that you "don't like it" and maybe think it should be Illegal.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ a dog sniffing someone is not assault or a sign of an out of control dog, regardless of what you think, as I said call a dog warden about being sniffed by a dog and demand that it be impounded and see what reaction you get.

Here's the link to make the complaint: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/info/1093/dog_warden_service/1559/out_of_control_dogs

Please let you know how you get on, and if TJ's law applies.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 2087
Free Member
 

Right - so now we are getting somewhere.

Well, not quite. In that instance, the situation was wrong. The dog owner was no-where to be seen, and had obviously let his dog stray off some distance. In this case, yes, out of control, but, the dog was just being a dog and smelt food.

However, your recent posts insinuate a problem of a dog having a quick sniff of your feet should you happen to walk past it on your morning stroll. That, is not a dog out of control. Again, that is a dog being a dog. The only way you can stop that happening is to have all dogs on leads at all times - just because they 'sniff'. A tad overkill.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 2087
Free Member
 

Should dog (or any animal for that matter) ownership be limited to those who have the space and facilities to look after their chosen animal? Not sure of the answers, but worth a little think about...

I guess this would apply to horse owners too - only allowed to exercise them on private land? Cats won't be allowed to stray from their garden into public spaces. Again, a bit overkill due to intolerant people.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

richc - unfortunatly for yo it is a dog that is not under proper control.

You may not want to accept that because that would mean accepting you are a selfish dog owner that does not want to keep your dog under control.

Carry on being selfish dog owners that refuse to control your dogs and don't be supised as you become pariahs and someon boots your dog intot eh middle of next week


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:33 pm
Posts: 1970
Full Member
 

However, your recent posts insinuate a problem of a dog having a quick sniff of your feet should you happen to walk past it on your morning stroll. That, is not a dog out of control. Again, that is a dog being a dog. The only way you can stop that happening is to have all dogs on leads at all times - just because they 'sniff'. A tad overkill.

Aside from that, having a dog on a 2m lead isn't going to prevent it sniffing someone as it walks past - scent is important to a dog, so having a quick sniff of your aroma is the dog's equivalent of a pleasant "good morning" as you pass on the path. I'm not sure I could take someone who complained about my dog sniffing them as we passed all that seriously to be honest, particularly if the dogs were on the lead at the time.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Prexzet if you cannot control your dog then it should be on a lead. your dog does not have the right to irritate, annoy or to otherwise intrude on me at all. this is what yo seem to find hard to accept


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:35 pm
Posts: 57375
Full Member
 

Right - so now we are getting somewhere.

Dogs are rubbish! So there! And they smell!

No they're not! They're lovely and cute, n stuff

They're horrid!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

No they're not!

Yes they are!

Not!

Are!

Not!

Are!

Not!

Are!

Not!

Are!

Not!

Are!

Not!

Are!

Not!

Are!

Not!

Are!

..... have I missed anything?


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:36 pm
Posts: 1970
Full Member
 

Carry on being selfish dog owners that refuse to control your dogs and don't be supised as you become pariahs and someon boots your dog intot eh middle of next week

Keyboard warrior?

Are you actually suggesting that, if someone walks past you with a dog on a 2m lead and it sniffed you, you'd [i]"boot the dog into the middle of next week"[/i]. If that is the case, then you sound like someone who has some serious self-control issues that require a bit of professional help


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

richc - unfortunatly for yo it is a dog that is not under proper control.

Then report it! Here the link again http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/info/1093/dog_warden_service/1559/out_of_control_dogs

Otherwise you are just a sad little man, who walks around moaning about everything and anything

That is unless you don't have the courage of your convictions, and are too scared to speak to a real person on the telephone, about your brutal assault at the nose of a barely domesticated wild beast called 'Rover'! Next time it could be a childs face!!!!


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

.......... have I missed anything?

Not sure.

But one thing you [b]Haven't [/b]missed is TJ telling us which LAW dog owners are breaking by letting their dogs wander round having a sniff of people/things ??

Any news TJ ?


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:41 pm
Posts: 26890
Full Member
 

TJ show us the law, not a guidline, not common sense but a law, even better would be an example of anyone prosecuted for having a dog annoy someone by sniffing in their general direction....

You may not want to accept that because that would mean accepting you are a selfish dog owner that does not want to keep your dog under control.

who are you talking to here becaue your personnal slanders are becoming more and more comical?


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Aside from that, having a dog on a 2m lead isn't going to prevent it sniffing someone as it walks past - scent is important to a dog, so having a quick sniff of your aroma is the dog's equivalent of a pleasant "good morning" as you pass on the path. I'm not sure I could take someone who complained about my dog sniffing them as we passed all that seriously to be honest, particularly if the dogs were on the lead at the time.

My missus has had a random loonie yell at her to pick up her dogs pee!

So unfortunately while irrational people like TJ are rare they are out there, I've only had one person try and kick my dog whilst its been running around, and it didn't end well, I am embarrassed to say ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

richc -- why the personal abuse? Because you have lost the debate?

Ditchjocky - not at all- just trying to get the selfish dog owners to understand that their actions irritate and upset a great many people and one day someone will snap. I didn't say I will do it - I said someone may.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Should dog (or any animal for that matter) ownership be limited to those who have the space and facilities to look after their chosen animal? Not sure of the answers, but worth a little think about...

I guess this would apply to horse owners too - only allowed to exercise them on private land? Cats won't be allowed to stray from their garden into public spaces. Again, a bit overkill due to intolerant people.

It was intended as a kind of 'thought experiment', I hadn't thought of the practicalities of it! Bear with me here slight tangent but perhaps it'll explain my reasoning. Apparently in parts of Japan space is so limited that people aren't allowed to buy private vehicles until they own a parking space in which to keep it. I'm assuming this is because they don't want parked cars cluttering up the public roads. Which is fair enough really, so I was thinking could this be applied to other scenarios, hence my suggestion.

Anyways, yes it is a bit overkill, but overkill is sometimes required if people cannot accept the responsibilities they should when they agree to care for an animal. Ultimately it depends on whether you view the rights of the dog/dog owners as more important than those who dislike them. Tolerance is all well and good, but there is very little of it in the public open spaces that many people use (witness the anger demonstrated on the roads for example), the only way around this is draconian rules and appropriate enforcement.

edited to add - Apologies for the dodgy quoting, it looked fine in the preview and still does. Just on the real site it doesn't work?! I don't have the IT skillz to sort it!


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

All I see is more and more desperate attempts from the dog owners to discredit anyone who wants them to behave in a responsible manner.- do you realise how laughable and sad you are?

It really is quite pathetic - especially the inventing of things I am supposed to have sad.

I really find it so sad that grown men will put their dogs before their fellow humans.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ you can end this argument really easily, email env.wardens@edinburgh.gov.uk with the details of your assault by a sniffing dog and post the reply up, here.

That way, we can end the supposition and guess work.

As you know you are right, what have you got to lose? You can show us all up as irrational and prove you are right, all it takes is a single email.


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ yesterday ๐Ÿ™‚

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:52 pm
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

I was out running early one morning across some fields when i heard a dog barking ahead of me. I came around a corner to see a collie type dog braking in a very aggresive way to a women runner who was pinned up against a fence.
The owner was standing about 10 feet away laughing while she shouted that he should call it off.
The path I was taking took me between the dog and the owner. The dog clearly enjoying things turned his attention to me as I passed at roughly 10 mph, possibly thinking he would get the same response.
He didnt and the owner thought my response was less than funny.
Anyway how we laughed. ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 21/12/2011 12:55 pm
Page 8 / 14