Solve my lad's...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Solve my lad's maths homework?

26 Posts
18 Users
0 Reactions
102 Views
 TomB
Posts: 1648
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Hi folks. My year 5 (age 9) son has a maths problem: Subtract a 3 digit number from a four digit number to give a 3 digit answer. Use each digit 0-9 once only in your solution.

I'm stumped on a method that doesn't just use trial and error. Apart from 1St digit of 4 digit number being 1, how do we go about solving this? Thanks all!


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oops!

Double oops!


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:06 pm
 km79
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm stumped on a method that doesn't just use trial and error.
What's wrong with trial and error? I'm pretty sure that was part of maths when I was a kid.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:10 pm
Posts: 77692
Free Member
 

Aged 9? Have they been doing coursework in school to show them how to solve this?

I'd have thought trial an error would be the only sensible approach at that age. Cut out cards with each digit written on them, draw squares on a sheet of A4 to placehold the cards in the sum, then spend the evening shuffling them to find an answer that works (I expect there will be multiple solutions).


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:11 pm
Posts: 4197
Full Member
 

ignote that didn’t read it right! Can only see trial and error!


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:11 pm
Posts: 6769
Full Member
 

They want trial and error to make them do lots of sums.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:12 pm
Posts: 9135
Free Member
 

1023-456
1024-356
1025-346

...This could be a long evening. 😆


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it's not looking for 1 correct answer, it's a way of practising column subtraction (show working no calc)

trial and error do lots( well 10)


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:13 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Mother in law was a principal maths teacher ... She can't think of a simple method without there being pages and pages of algebra.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:14 pm
Posts: 77692
Free Member
 

This isn't the same sum, but looks to be a similar concept.

http://mathematicscentre.com/taskcentre/043numbr.htm


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1089 - 764 = 325


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:16 pm
Posts: 77692
Free Member
 

OP is asking for a method, not a solution.

The kid can't go back to school tomorrow with a correct answer and when asked how he did it say "my dad asked a bunch of alleged cyclists for an answer."


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:19 pm
Posts: 20335
Full Member
 

They want trial and error to make them do lots of sums.

Yes and no. It's a logic problem more than anything. After a bit of trial and error, you'll realise that carrying is allowed (the problem doesn't say it's not!) and then you can start working out where the zero can go.

At higher level this is done algebraically and you work out that the digits of the 4-digit number always add up to either 9 or 18.
A further concept that builds on this is that 0+1+2+3....+9 = 45 (again, you can do that with algebra)

1062
- 479
583

1206
- 347
859

1305
- 879
426

(there are several other solutions).


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:21 pm
Posts: 20335
Full Member
 

Think about where the zero can go, that's how you start this.

It can't be placed in the ones or tens places of the number being subtracted. If it was then [x] minus zero = [x] and we can't have 2 [x]
It can't be placed in the hundreds place of the number being subtracted either, because then it would be a two digit number instead of a three digit number.
It can't be in the hundreds place of the answer line for the same reason as ^^.
Also, to get a 0 in the tens or ones place of the answer the two digits above have to be the same, and we don't have two digits the same to use, so there can't be a 0 anywhere in the answer line.

Go!

Here's another

1089
- 456
732


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:25 pm
Posts: 12704
Free Member
 

I think logic is supposed to be the orderof the day.

Change ine at a time.

1234-567=
1234-675=
1234-765=

Some of them are become clearer when you start.

It has to be 1000 and something.
You can never end on a 4 and subtract anything that ends in a seven. 8-9 6-8 4-7 2-6 similarly.

You need to start with 10 as its the only number that you can recreate by subtraction maybe?


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:28 pm
Posts: 9135
Free Member
 

Are others reading the question the same way as me, in that the answer to the subtraction can include digits used once for the four digit and three digit numbers used in the subtraction?

Or if I use the digits 0-6 inclusive for the initial numbers, the answer can only use the digits 7-9 inclusive?


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:40 pm
 TomB
Posts: 1648
Full Member
Topic starter
 

No, the answer must use unique digits, that haven't appeared before. abcd-efg=hij


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:42 pm
Posts: 20335
Full Member
 

Or if I use the digits 0-6 inclusive for the initial numbers, the answer can only use the digits 7-9 inclusive?

Correct.
Or algebraically:
abcd - efg = hij

Each digit can only appear once in the overall sum.

Edit: dammit, 26 seconds!


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had bigger things to worry about when I was in Yr5


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:46 pm
Posts: 8672
Full Member
 

I think I was still learning my times tables at that age


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 7:04 am
Posts: 13554
Free Member
 

What’s happening?


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:25 am
 sbob
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

alleged cyclists

😆


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:31 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]What’s happening? [/i]

We're running pell mell into a distopian future where 'facts' are determined by weight of numbers believing them. But that's not important right now.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Surely the issue here is an addition not a subtraction (obviously it's the same thing but easier to "thunk" in terms of addition

Start with two three digit numbers to end with 4...

So 6+4=10
5+3=8
2+7=9

Voila

1089 - 652 = 437

Solve one digit at a time and it's easy

Anyhow method for a young un...

Maximum sum of two single digits is 17 so the first two digits must sum to 9 or more. (So that when you carry the one you end up with 4 digits. It's not possible to carry 3 in the right most column so no problems with multiple carries.)

Draw a number square 0-9 on each side. Write in the sums.

Pick numbers which meet your criteria from the number square starting with left most pairs summing to more than 9.

Easy to visualise and follow.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 11:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

to more than 9.

Should read 9 or more sorry.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 11:42 am
Posts: 12704
Free Member
 

Thats a good point.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 12:22 pm