Sole Trader vs. Lim...
 

MegaSack DRAW - This year's winner is user - rgwb
We will be in touch

[Closed] Sole Trader vs. Limited Company

10 Posts
11 Users
0 Reactions
74 Views
Posts: 1748
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Hey Chaps

Looks like I'll be setting up as a business for 3 months initially, just freelancing.

Is it best to setup as a Sole Trader at the moment, to simplify tax and admin? Or should I go fully Limited Company?

Cheers!

Ricks


 
Posted : 17/06/2019 10:00 pm
Posts: 717
Free Member
 

It really depends on what you think your liabilities are likely to be... so depends on the role/industry/contract details..

non-lim and you stand to loose everything you own in the event of your mess-ups, being sued.
lim lots more hassle & expense in the long run, but you have no* danger of loosing your house....

So, if your setting up providing custom tuning for high end super cars, when you might blow up a Ferrari, and get sued then id say, register.

If your going to work a IT developer as a contract as part of a team for a large multi-national, then its probably a risk worth taking....


 
Posted : 17/06/2019 10:40 pm
Posts: 314
Full Member
 

Are you taking on any financial risk/potential liability that you want to keep separate from your own personal liability? If not then for three months it is unlikely to be worth the hassle of setting up a LTD. You can always do that later. There are plenty of potential exceptions to this rule of thumb but that’s the main one I can think of.


 
Posted : 17/06/2019 10:40 pm
Posts: 2329
Full Member
 

yadda yadda... plus looks more professional quoting and invoicing through ltd...


 
Posted : 17/06/2019 10:52 pm
Posts: 7871
Full Member
 

If you are setting up limited and will be a director just bear in mind that it is your liability as member (shareholder) not as a director that is limited.

While you get insulation from some normal trading liabilities it won't save you if you commit a breach of things like company law, h&s regs, insolvency law etc. and watch out for hidden directors' guarantees in any trade or bank accounts too.


 
Posted : 17/06/2019 11:01 pm
Posts: 6382
Free Member
 

Have you checked with your client what they'd prefer- in some business sectors some companies won't deal with sole traders.


 
Posted : 18/06/2019 7:06 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

I started as a sole trader for a few months then set up a Ltd company when things took off quickly.

If doing it for just a short spell and not megabucks I'd just go sole trader I think.


 
Posted : 18/06/2019 8:02 am
Posts: 8706
Full Member
 

If your going to work a IT developer as a contract as part of a team for a large multi-national, then its probably a risk worth taking….

Or in the real world that big multinational will only deal with Ltd Co contractors and you will want professional indemnity insurance.

So my answer is it depends on the business


 
Posted : 18/06/2019 8:15 am
Posts: 229
Free Member
 

Also look for PI insurance, PL insurance as necessary for your line of work. This should reduce the risk for either option should things go wrong. I'm am architectural designer, 8 years as a sole trader, nice and simple plus it keeps my accounts private.


 
Posted : 18/06/2019 8:19 am
 IHN
Posts: 19877
Full Member
 

lim lots more hassle & expense in the long run

How do you figure that? LtdCo is very little hassle and expense (only extra expense is an accountant, and in theory you could do all that yourself). And, he says donning his flameproof suit, it's more tax efficient.


 
Posted : 18/06/2019 8:58 am
Posts: 3119
Full Member
 

Limited company is more tax efficient but does take slightly more work. If it is for a short period there are people who do all the work for you for a small weekly fee, these are known as umbrella companies. I used one called boss (southampton I think) when i first did some contracting and it was made very easy.


 
Posted : 18/06/2019 9:51 am