[Closed] So here's the deal

For clarity, I'm not saying "don't report posts," I'm saying "don't make posts that need reporting."

What we need is shadow bans. 8)

[img] [/img]

For clarity, I'm not saying "don't report posts," I'm saying "don't make posts that need reporting."

Reported for being paradoxical 😉

Amazed that you've put up with it this long Cougar.

I imagine that fat pay packet helps.

Might we also incude the amount of **** swearing that appears on any * thread that's about ****** politics?

(Note - asterisks for effect to illustrate the usual style of posts in said threads. No intention to evade the swear filter! I'm more creative than that...!)

Respect is earned. Respect is not to be confused with fear. Collective punishments reduce respect for any institution imposing them. Think back to school. They facilitate bullying creating a negative dynamic in which victims are doubly punished. The good student who is also a keen swimmer misses out on his swim session because the bully group gets the whole class caught up in a detention.

You know who the villains are Cougar, and the guy who's served the longest ban and still come back isn't one of them. While the sniping, sneering condescending villain of the piece continues the taunting with impunity, I've come to assume the villain benefits from immunity due to a share holding or something.

Anyhow, what works in a school will work here, "firm but fair". If anyone who gets a ban can see at least some justification then you'll still earn and merit our respect (because you do), start punnishing the victims and the bullies will reign supreme.

If you're really fed up with it, take a break Cougar, if you're going to continue doing it, do it right.

Here's the thing though, this isn't a democracy and sure as hell doesn't have to be fair. If YOU don't like it YOU can take a break. I did, well after my last ban ended, because I was sick of the constant word twisting and often downright fantasy being applied to the things I say by the same people. The first person you refer to (assuming TJ here) was one of them and in fact the one that wound me up so much I lost my temper and posted a rant that got me banned.

Frankly I'm still sick of the passive aggressive BS on here, if this was a pub most of the "big hitters" would have been barred or glassed long ago. A lot of people need to take a long hard look at themselves and ask if they really would treat people the way they do on here. THM isn't the only villain (again, assuming he is no.2) and to his credit has the decency not to make stuff up to be outraged by. Just because you agree or disagree with someone doesn't make them better or worse than you.

So yeah, as critical as I can be of this place and the mods I'm glad they are taking a stand. Frankly if a few folk buggered off never to return I don't think the place would be any the poorer for it.

TL:dR - live with the rules or leave.

If we get one more reported post of someone being a bellend on these threads, irrespective of who's guilty or innocent I'll blanket ban all the big hitter parties for a month and to hell with collateral damage.

Crikey.

Would it work if there were some sort of deputy mod? These people, could monitor specific subject areas, i.e. religion, North American politics or European politics., veganism etcetera. Each deputy mob would only then need to follow one or two threads more closely and deal with any issues. They could then escalate any problems to a mod which may prevent large scale bans. This might take the pressure off mods who oversee the forum as a whole. It would be preferable the deputy mods have a grounded understanding of their specialised subjects though, to reduce personal bitching or confusion.

Well I’ve banned you all from my forum already. It’s a great feeling.

Remove anonymity for reporting posts.
That'll be sure to make the bedwetters think twice and is certain to lighten your workload. 🙂

Divisive topics lead to divisive opinions, however, the aggressive and sometimes passive-aggressive way in which opinions are sometimes expressed is a shame. Perhaps subject related bans for persistent offenders?

I would prefer it for this forum not to resort to 'posts awaiting moderation'.

Either way I don't envy the task of the mods.

I know this will never happen*, but some forums have a bunfight section where all the angry adult sized toddlers can throw poo at each other to their hearts content. No rules, no reporting etc.

?
?
?
?
?

*New forum coming etc etc

If you're really fed up with it, take a break Cougar, if you're going to continue doing it, do it right.

You may have a point.

Remove anonymity for reporting posts.

Um... I have some bad news for you...

Couger. Just for clarity what would I have to do to get the EU thread closed and all the big hitters banned and would I be allowed back in time for the 6 nations rugby spite?

Maybe just post some warnings out there in the thread? Maybe a generic

Det. Insp. Jack Regan: All right, Tinkerbell. You're nicked!

Um... I have some bad news for you...

I think they mean that your name is affixed to the post you report. So everyone can see you have reported a post.

Not anonymity from your good selves.

Someone needs to have a read of article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

If we get one more reported post of someone being a bellend on these threads, irrespective of who's guilty or innocent I'll blanket ban all the big hitter parties for a month and to hell with collateral damage.

TBH I rarely visit them. I assume its the same few folk keeping them going. It's not like any of them are going to change their position either.

Couger. Just for clarity what would I have to do to get the EU thread closed and all the big hitters banned and would I be allowed back in time for the 6 nations rugby spite?

😆

I think they mean that your name is affixed to the post you report. So everyone can see you have reported a post.

Ah, right.

We want to encourage people to report things, not the opposite. Reporting posts isn't a problem, rather that it's difficult to make a decision on who's in the right / wrong when there's a thousand pages of context.

Just do a facebook live of the mods summit
[img] [/img]

on who's in the right / wrong when there's a thousand pages of context.

you dont have kids do you?

It doesnt matter who did wrong, or who snitched. They're both in the shit for interrupting Ski Sunday.

But those mega-threads are known to be a primary influence on gov policy, and not just in the UK. Without them the country, maybe the civilized world in its entirety, would be dead in the water. Hammer with care, think of the children.

Also - was anybody else [i]really[/i] tempted to report Cougar's OP?

I did but they did something to sto

[quote=mikewsmith ]Just do a facebook live of the mods summit

[img] [/img]
/p>

That TJ's flat?

nah it's just Mark's shed, TBH it would be good to know if you were being reported a lot or if your posts were being classed as fine but reported by someone who was grumpy that day... I've had a couple of warnings in my time and responded by looking back and taking note before posting again.

I’d like to report AA for insulting me on page 16 post 13 from the top of the 2017 rugby thread. 😉

If we get one more reported post of someone being a bellend on these threads, irrespective of who's guilty or innocent I'll blanket ban all the big hitter parties for a month and to hell with collateral damage.

Don't worry Kryton, you'll both be banned anyway when the troublemakers are expelled en masse by Cougar

Me? Im neither a big hitter or a troublemaker. Ok i lost my rag before Christmas, but that was a rare occasion, and with some help form another forumite ive modiefied my forum behaviour appriopriately since.

Note how i quickly left the Trump thread when rounded upon on Friday.

Could you automate a reporters next ten posts to "snitches it get stitches" regardless to what they put in the box?

I appreciate its not going to help anything but it would be amusing.

That TJ's flat?

[i]One[/i] of TJ's flat[i]s[/i]...

Just do a facebook live of the mods summit

I always picture it as more like this:

[img] [/img]

Just ban the three morons who ruin the forum. You're welcome.

I’d like to report AA for insulting me on page 16 post 13 from the top of the 2017 rugby thread.

And page 17, 19, 20, 22, 24-36 inclusive and page 45

Lings a mod? HTH did that happen

Hang on , clicks = revenue stream.....

And page 17, 19, 20, 22, 24-36 inclusive and page 45

😀

We want to encourage people to report things, not the opposite.

and a quote from an e-mail I got after reporting someone repeatedly making false accusations of lying and making things up to me and others which must surely constitute negative use of the forum. As nothing was done I reported until I got a reply which included:

"your reporting of these types of posts really isn't helpful when we have a very active Forum to moderate. Thanks."

When you were the go-to computer geek on here you seemed happier, Cougar. You helped us out and joined in on the controversial threads without being accused of favouritism or breaking the rules you are here to uphold. Has becoming a mod added anything to the experience or is it just a bed of nails? Would you like to borrow my "reformed troll" tag and see if it's easier to live with?

I assume its the same few folk keeping them going. It's not like any of them are going to change their position either.

People ‘report’ things they read on the internet? Golly, well I never. I mean i’ve Seen the report button but just assumed that was for things like when someone’s identity had been revealed who’s in the witness protection program...

What kind of stuff gets reported?

What kind of stuff gets reported?

The only things I've ever reported were one that was something about my Mum (who's been passed away for 18yrs) & one where someone who said I had drugs up me arse 'apparently'.
But that's the sort of stuff that should be.