Forum search & shortcuts

Should Theresa May ...
 

[Closed] Should Theresa May resign?

Posts: 8027
Full Member
 

Don't see it,

Yeah under normal circumstances she would be gone but really not sure now.
Its not that she is now utterly powerless its just she makes a handy target, sorry, figurehead.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 4:18 pm
Posts: 7214
Free Member
 

the government decided to set up a state owned oil company and keep all the profits for the benefit of the country

Hmmm, rein in spending today so there's less debt in the future and lower interest payments. It might just work...


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 4:20 pm
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

Don't see it, she's got control of the ship until it crashes. And everyone can see the crash coming.
But you can just [i]feel[/i] all the squirming, manoeuvring and general sucking up going on under the surface. Their patience just isn't that good. You don't get to be Gove/Boris/Mogg by being measured and careful.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 4:29 pm
Posts: 13292
Free Member
 

Norway as an example - what did they do with their North Sea oil?

Not really a fair comparison. Norway has/had far more fuel per head of the population than the uk and have far greater opportunities when it comes to natural resources. That is how they can afford such great social care policies.

Norway is one of the greenest countries with hydro power and electric cars, etc, which is fantastic if you ignore the fact that they pay for that greenness with the proceeds of the oil they sell.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 4:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As far as I know, Norway is still a capitalist economy

I was in Norway recently and a Oslo local* described the country as a thinly veiled communist state.

* I should disclose this was a in a bar and we had been there for a while.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 4:41 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Not really a fair comparison. Norway has/had far more fuel per head of the population than the uk and have far greater opportunities when it comes to natural resources.

The point I am making is that the state kept and invested the money. I'm not saying we could or should be like them - I am saying there are different approaches. Both Norway and the UK had a resource - they invested in it for the people, we sold it to big business.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 4:57 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14061
Full Member
 

I was in Norway recently and a Oslo local* described the country as a thinly veiled communist state.

Sounds like a good advert for communism to me.

* I should disclose this was a in a bar and we had been there for a while.

Must have been an expensive evening - hope work was paying!


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 4:58 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

They weren't drinking, just sitting there. Hence the anger, they couldn't afford drinks 🙂


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 6:52 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14061
Full Member
 

Maybot seems to have been knocked off the front page by Ted Heath. Makes you think ...


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 7:07 pm
Posts: 66127
Full Member
 

martinhutch - Member

I'm not sure I could name anyone in the current crop of politicians who is capable of any form of leadership. Amber Rudd? Boris? Andrea **** Leadsom? David Davis? Gove?

Harriet Harman? She's less likely to oppose Tory policies than Boris...


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 7:23 pm
Posts: 436
Full Member
 

Molgrips - what about the tax side of the equation. The uk benefitted from taxing the North Sea oil companies, supporting government spending and lowering income taxes on everyone else.

The difference to Norway is that we benefitted in the same way but took the money straight away. Not entirely straight forward to say which is better. In any case difficult to have a sovereign wealth fund when you run a persistent current account deficit because you are addicted to German cars...


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 8:00 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Well - and I'm not an economist - but taxation of the oil business put some of the profit into the hands of the government. The rest became assets for private businesses or cash profits for private businesses and individuals. The Norwegian government took ALL the profits.

But more than that, they (afaik) didn't just fund tax cuts, they kept it and invested it to create a massive sovereign wealth fund, and the proceeds from that go to fund crazy stuff like paying for students to have a funded gap year. Because they want their population to be broad minded and well traveled.

I'm not advocating it necessarily, just pointing out how different they were from us.


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 8:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Norwegian government took ALL the profits

No they didn’t/ don’t


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 8:38 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I was in Norway recently and a Oslo local* described the country as a thinly veiled communist state.

I've heard that very phrase from drunken weirdos in more countries than I can remember, but mostly in America.

?


 
Posted : 05/10/2017 8:59 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13394
Full Member
 

So there I was getting excited about May being booted, until I found out it Grant bloody Shapps leading the plot. Like that snivelling little s*** is ever going to persuade anyone to follow him! Maybe he's a plant?


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 9:20 am
Posts: 34543
Full Member
 

My thoughts exactly daz!

This Brexit/Corbyn paralysis that has the Tories all rabbit in the headlights, seems to have neutered their usual efficiency at swiftly decapitating weak incompetent leaders!


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 9:25 am
 dazh
Posts: 13394
Full Member
 

This Brexit/Corbyn paralysis that has the Tories all rabbit in the headlights, seems to have neutered their usual efficiency at swiftly decapitating weak incompetent leaders!

I'm not sure what they're worried about. At a strategic level, there is surely an argument that it would be better to relinquish govt to the labour party and then take advantage later following the inevitable brexit chaos brought about by a bumbling Jeremy Corbyn. Unless of course they believe that labour will make a better job of delivering brexit and Corbyn is not the incompetent ditherer they make him out to be?


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 9:48 am
 DrJ
Posts: 14061
Full Member
 

Unless of course they believe that labour will make a better job of delivering brexit and Corbyn is not the incompetent ditherer they make him out to be?

They are acting in the national interest as they believe that the socialists will destroy the economy just like they did in Norway.

Oh. Hang on a mo ...


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 10:36 am
 R979
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Boris has a brilliant cameo in this:


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 11:48 am
 Del
Posts: 8284
Full Member
 

Unless of course they believe that labour will make a better job of delivering brexit and Corbyn is not the incompetent ditherer they make him out to be?

or they think labour won't execute brexit.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 11:55 am
Posts: 7214
Free Member
 

At a strategic level, there is surely an argument that it would be better to relinquish govt to the labour party and then take advantage later following the inevitable brexit chaos brought about by a bumbling Jeremy Corbyn.

Not really, Labour are going to borrow half a trillion and the following Government are going to be the deeply unpopular people who have to pay it all back. That's a worse job than the one they've already been lumbered with. Apart from that putting Labour in to bat would be *very* appealing.

There's no way out for May.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 12:04 pm
Posts: 7214
Free Member
 

or they think labour won't execute brexit.

You mean May thinks the people who have campaigned to leave Europe for 30 years will change their mind? Interesting.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 12:05 pm
Posts: 34543
Full Member
 

or they think labour won't execute [s]brexit[/s]enough poor people

But yeah don't wanna mess up brexishambles is the priority, amusing coz it means they get to own it and continue alienating everyone under 50, to keep their dying demographic of choice happy.

If May is replaced sooner means that have to be a rabid brexiter replaces her Patel in with a shout if members can get past her ethnicity, Rudd seems obvious but majority is tiny, Johnson, Mogg both shot their bolts too early, so I reckon Raab or someone equally odious that the members will be happy with.

This all requires May to go, I reckon she's got 1 more fukup before she's out.

And one thing we've learnt about May is that she's very good at ****g things up.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 12:19 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

'I have have the backing of the full cabinet'

Sounds like she's for the chop then lol

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41519601


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 1:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If Grant Shapps has 30 MPs signatures Diane Abbott must be doing the adding up 🙂

Supposedly this is from an MP’s WhatsApp group after Shapps was added (just one of many)

There are fewer signatures on your list than files sent to the CPS after the election campaign you ran as chairman.

[url= https://order-order.com/2017/10/06/shapps-mauled-in-tory-mps-whatsapp-group/ ]Sauce[/url]


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@kimbers Rudd has little chance of being elected Leader, see poll of Tory members last week. She’s miles behind Boris and even Davis who doesn't even want to stand based on his age.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I so what to see her chuck in the towel, the aftermath would be amazing - Boris V Mogg you can not make that up. Can you imagine the sheer knee trembling reaction of the swivel eyed party members, my god how would they choose.

Please let it happen....


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:15 pm
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

Boris V Mogg you can not make that up.

They'd have to have a duel. It's traditional. What what what.

With the high accuracy and low recoil of modern handguns, and the close proximity of the target there's a high chance they could kill each other.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Handguns? Surely they should each get an AR-15 with a bump stock in order to make sure.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:27 pm
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

it still needs the big hitter to execute the coup de grace ala Geoffrey Howe in the commons for all to see

It is rather like sending your opening batsmen to the crease only for them to find the moment that the first balls are bowled that their bats have been broken before the game by the team captain.

what is it with the tories and europe


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:30 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

see poll of Tory members last week

Too small a sample size.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:33 pm
Posts: 15555
Free Member
 

Surely they should each get an AR-15 with a bump stock in order to make sure.

That's a great idea, it's keeping the tradition, but it would also show that the Conservatives are progressive and can embrace modern technology and adapt to change.


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:42 pm
Posts: 34543
Full Member
 

jambalaya - Member
@kimbers Rudd has little chance of being elected Leader, see poll of Tory members last week. She’s miles behind Boris and even Davis who doesn't even want to stand based on his age.

And that's why the Tories are in trouble, the ageing members want someone as rightwing as possible, unpalatable to the majority of the electorate.

The irony is that it's the constant sniping of the brexies, IDS,redwood, mogg & johnson etc that have so undermined May & weakened the party


 
Posted : 06/10/2017 8:46 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Looks like the next leader will be the last one in the room really, expect the same games and stupid moves, some spectacular self destruction and reputation damage.


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 4:41 am
Posts: 7513
Free Member
 

Tories really are working hard to shake off the "ruthless with weak leader" reputation. It seems quite possible that she will sit there twisting in the wind, a national laughing stock, for weeks or even months to come.

Or she could be gone in a few days of course.


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 7:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Interesting change of words from May (reported in guardian re. whether she'd sack BJ) , she's given up on "strong leadership" and dropped it back to "calm leadership." Tacit acknowledgment she's in an awful position?


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 7:18 am
Posts: 34543
Full Member
 

Well I see her intervention on behalf of 4000 NI workers to Trump has worked well, tarrifs on bambardier gone from 220% to 300.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-41532309

Meanwhile an actual conservative party leader has stepped up to defend her
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-41534552

& Torygraph reports that the EU now talking to Corbyn, as they want to talk to the person who's actually going to be running the show


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 8:53 am
 DrJ
Posts: 14061
Full Member
 

A week ago it probably seemed like after her car crash on Marr that things couldn't get any worse....

Oh well.


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 8:54 am
Posts: 7128
Free Member
 

I observed the comings and goings from St Peter's Square. In front of the Midland hotel was a high metal security fence with some armed coppers and a sign saying 'Welcome to Manchester'. Despite their losing younger voters most of the young men were dressed up like old men. They seemed terrified of the locals and not one of them was seen in the City Arms, the Brink had a sign up saying 'Beware: the publican is a socialist'. People like Rory Stewart immediately held phones up to their ears in the street to avoid anyone speaking to them. Despite the claim that over 47 people become Tory many of the protesters in the square were pensioners. MrsMC had the final speech on her ipad on the way back and that greatly improved driving through the M6 roadworks. Interesting to compare Labour's dignified reserve to the way the Tories went for Diane Abbott.


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 9:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=BillMC ]Despite the claim that over 47 people become Tory many of the protesters in the square were pensioners.

Clearly it's an average - 47 is simply the age at which more people support Tory than Labour.


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 10:56 am
Posts: 7513
Free Member
 

And being in that age bracket, I fully expect that threshold to increase at a rate of about one year per year.

Old enough to remember Thatcher but not the preceding Labour shambles 🙂


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 12:44 pm
Posts: 34543
Full Member
 

As I understand it that's not happening, the switchover, is being delayed, either something to do with having kids later & living longer, memories of the last real Labour gov (70s) dimming, or just conservatism falling out of fashion


 
Posted : 07/10/2017 7:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 15/10/2017 8:50 pm
Posts: 17294
Full Member
 

Exactly. **** off.


 
Posted : 15/10/2017 9:08 pm
 tomd
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

^ sadly that's the nail on the head, she needs to go.


 
Posted : 15/10/2017 9:16 pm
Page 30 / 36