Should smoking in c...
 

[Closed] Should smoking in cars be banned ?

51 Posts
29 Users
0 Reactions
106 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

After all, surely it's far more dangerous than making a quick phone call........ All that ash and smoke flying about !


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Bourbon, Americano, chair... right, I'm sorted!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

troll


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:15 pm
Posts: 2804
Free Member
 

It's a stinking habit.

Banning it is against personal choice though.

However, I do feel sorry for small children sitting in cars with smokers puffing away big style.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its a free country I swear. In a private space the State can keep its nose out.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:16 pm
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes, if only so it stops people flicking them out of the window.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:16 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

No. Next.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

smoking near kids should carry the death sentence as thats what you're effectively giving the kids you're filling up with second hand cancer.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:17 pm
Posts: 34117
Full Member
 

should just go all the way and ban fags alltogether

thats unlikely to happen, i think it should be banned if there are kids in the car

seeing as the mobile phone ban is a joke i doubt its worth it tbh


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Smokers are idiots


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Smokers are idiots

Then I haven't been an idiot for two whole weeks. Sweet!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Smokers are idiots

That is as may be but we can't ban idiots now can we?


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm an idiot! 😀

And so is my wife.

Oh no hang on, I jolly well have not got a wife...


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:20 pm
Posts: 311
Full Member
 

Surely the simplest way is to increase the age at which it is legal to own (not just purchase) tobacco products by 1 year every year from now on.

That way existing smokers won't feel discriminated against as they can legally continue with their habit and youngsters won't be able to buy cigs until they're (possibly) old enough to know the damage it does and then not start.

Why won't this work? Possibly because the Govt gets so much money from the tobacco industry in the form of taxation and sponsorship/donations it can't afford for people to not smoke.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:22 pm
Posts: 56890
Full Member
 

I'm not an idiot aany more either

Though if they ban smoking in cars i may start again on general principle

To summarise, as I could rant for hours on this subject:

If I, or anyone else wants to have a fag within the confines of a vehicle I own then its got the sum total of * all to do with you, you snivelling, whining, holier than thou, sanctimonious little power-crazed *!!

Any more than its my right to come round to your house and tell you what you're having for your ****ing tea!!!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:23 pm
Posts: 311
Full Member
 

Smokers aren't idiots but virtually all idiots are smokers.......


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:23 pm
Posts: 15991
Free Member
 

Yep should be banned whilst driving, no different to mobiles. Have no issues with passengers smoking in a car though, just helps kill them quicker 🙂


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:23 pm
Posts: 7563
Full Member
 

Yes. If only becuase it winds up the red faced guy from "Forest"


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Heh! Binners is a bit tetchy I see... 😆


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:24 pm
Posts: 2804
Free Member
 

binners - Member
I'm not an idiot aany more either

Though if they ban smoking in cars i may start again on general principle

To summarise, as I could rant for hours on this subject:

If I, or anyone else wants to have a fag within the confines of a vehicle I own then its got the sum total of * all to do with you, you snivelling, whining, holier than thou, sanctimonious little power-crazed *!!

Any more than its my right to come round to your house and tell you what you're having for your ****ing tea!!!

Would you have smoked with your children in the car binners?


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

If I, or anyone else wants to have a fag within the confines of a vehicle I own then its got the sum total of * all to do with you, you snivelling, whining, holier than thou, sanctimonious little power-crazed *!!

Any more than its my right to come round to your house and tell you what you're having for your ****ing tea!!!

^^This^^

*Applauds*


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If I, or anyone else wants to have a fag within the confines of a vehicle I own then its got the sum total of * all to do with you, you snivelling, whining, holier than thou, sanctimonious little power-crazed *!!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

First they came for the self harmers, then they came for the smokers. Soon they'll come for the mountain bikers 😉

just apply a polluter pays principle: i.e. only emergency medical care for smokers. Chronic care has to be personally funded either from your house or your insurance. If you cant afford it, tough.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 311
Full Member
 

If I, or anyone else wants to have a fag within the confines of a vehicle I own then its got the sum total of * all to do with you, you snivelling, whining, holier than thou, sanctimonious little power-crazed *!!

Any more than its my right to come round to your house and tell you what you're having for your ****ing tea!!!

^^This^^

*Applauds*

Just so long as the tab ends get retained INSIDE the car for safe disposal at home and aren't thrown out of the window!!!!!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They've banned it in our our company cars...

Mind, I don't smoke anymore, so its no real hardship...


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 56890
Full Member
 

I never actually smoked in the car as its minging. Should I be prevented by law from doing so?

Don't be *ing ridiculous! Some people in this country need to dislodge their *ing heads from up their own *ing arses and realise that:

a) People don't generally want, or need, saving from themselves
b) Nobody made them *ing God!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As kimbers says - We can't enforce the mobile phone ban with any great effect - do we really think that making smoking illegal is going to work?

Edit:

just apply a polluter pays principle

to be fair to the smokers, disgusting habit though it is, I reckon that the argument is quite strong in their favour on that one...


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mcboo - Member
Its a free country I swear. In a private space the State can keep its nose out.

The trouble is Mcboo, it is not a free country. Smokers do not have to take the full responsibility for their actions on themselves or on others as the State guarantees that they will be looked after. So doesn't that mean that the state can stick its nose it?

Having said that it would be fairer for people to be totally free to take full responsibility for looking after themselves and to bear the consequences of their actions. But of course that would never happen.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Binners - Satsuma time fella 😉


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:31 pm
Posts: 56890
Full Member
 

I've just chain-eaten two 😀


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:32 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought smoking while driving was already illegal? 😕


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

binners, email me and i'll tell you what you're allowed to eat for dinner xx


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 3410
Free Member
 

It's going too far. In a way I'd happily see smoking go as it's a filthy, pointless habit but, basically, binners is right.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Stoner, that's perilously close to arguing for the destruction of the NHS.....

*Watches above for the arrival of the obivous tag...*

😉


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:33 pm
Posts: 325
Free Member
 

I'm not an idiot aany more either

Though if they ban smoking in cars i may start again on general principle

To summarise, as I could rant for hours on this subject:

If I, or anyone else wants to have a fag within the confines of a vehicle I own then its got the sum total of * all to do with you, you snivelling, whining, holier than thou, sanctimonious little power-crazed *!!

Any more than its my right to come round to your house and tell you what you're having for your ****ing tea!!!

This in its entirety. Get something better to do


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[ philconsequence - Member

binners, email me and i'll tell you what you're allowed to eat for dinner xx ]

Yep piping hot Roast and Veg....... In the fast lane. Delicious !


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:38 pm
Posts: 34117
Full Member
 

there were some quite impressive statistics on the news today about the reduction in heart attacks since the smoking ban came into force in pubs

the effect on cancer rates in particular will probably be just as positive allthough that will be a longer term benefit
something the nhs could well do with as cancer drugs are incredibly expensive and a big drain on funds

telling you what you can and cant do in your own home is taboo , but what about when it can save the taxpayer milions

or do you exclude smokers from the nhs, and do you include their children?


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yep should be banned whilst driving

+1 , you're not supposed to eat or drink whilst driving and IMO smoking is the same i.e. one of your hands is taken up to hold your ciggy therefore leaving you less in control.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:41 pm
Posts: 10173
Full Member
 

They've banned it in our our company cars...

that's because it's defined as a workplace and is therefore covered under the 2007 ban


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:41 pm
Posts: 56890
Full Member
 

Exclude all smokers from the NHS? Fine. No Problem. I assume you'll then be taking ALL the tax, other than VAT, off fags at the same time

It'll become evident pretty damn quickly who was getting the better deal


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Binners is right, BUT only if the freedom to kill yourself created no financial obligation on others or caused others any harm.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:44 pm
Posts: 10173
Full Member
 

smokers are good for the NHS, as the level of tax paid over a smokers life is far more to than they will ever use as most smoking related diseases tend to be fairly short and brutal and no where near as costly as age related dementia etc..

The fact that smokers die younger also means that they consume less in their shorter lifetime and are therefore kinder to the planet than some mung bean eating health freak who insists on living as long as possible whilst wondering why the population is increasing to rapidly as not enough folks are dying..

We actually need smokers otherwise the whole system falls over

so erm..stick that in ya pipe and smoke it


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 34117
Full Member
 

surely that just proves the point that smokers are idiots

(im a sanctimonius ex-smoker- who stopped when i had kids as i couldnt put my kids through what my parents put me through)


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 56890
Full Member
 

Tazzy is bang on. And could I just add that the activities of this forum over the last 2 weeks are going to cost the country a small fortune. Both in lost revenue, and having to watch us lot piss ourselves, while dribbling Werthers Originals, watching Cash in The Attic 😉

I suspect quite a few bike shops might do quite well out of it though


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 4:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

not read all of the above but

"Smoking in Cars" no! (unless kids are in the car)
"Smoking while driving" Yes!

Purely because it's something in your hand and takes focus away from actually driving. It's probably worse when lighting and putting 'em out than when actually smoking (unless you just flick it out the window like most litterers/smokers do). no different from the mobile phone ban IMO.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:00 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

This is kinda pet hate of mine. BITD my old boy used to chug along in his Renault 12 puffing away on his fags and I ****ing hated it. The fags, I mean, although the Renault was ****ing minging too. Kinda dark metallic nicotine brown.

Plus I've had to share a car where the driver sits mouth split pluffing out the window except that it always goes straight up my nose...

So I say ban it. Ban it NOW! 😀

And don't presume smokers all die youg neither. My grandad smoked from (I think) about 9 until his early 80's before quitting and THEN manifesting lung cancer. He lived on his own (once my gran died) for years until his terminal last hospital visit. I dont hate smokers but I do hate smoking. If I did I'd have to hate my grandad and he was a beautiful person...

If there are way future generations looking back how will they view our processed food, alcohol and drug consumption and smoking? With incredulity I would imagine.

Oh and Binners, what am I having for tea? If you could pop round and put it on I'll be doubly grateful 😆


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:04 pm
Posts: 17
Free Member
 

I'm not against doing anything in cars, assuming that people are careful about how they do it and where/when. Technically there are laws that cover using phones and causing accidents already, the phone one is a bit pointless IMO. Likewise, at risk of being flamed, it's not always nuts to be using a phone when in a car, but it seems people can't identify the sane and less sane times to do it, so a universal law is used against everyone.


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

tazzymtb - there's a new job out there, just waiting for you!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:16 pm
Posts: 10173
Full Member
 

there's a new job out there, just waiting for you!

oooo really? will it be more fun than packing fudge at a werthers factory?


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes - but the benefits will be less tasty!


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:26 pm
Posts: 10173
Full Member
 

benefits will be less tasty!

I'm not going back to being a taste tester for play doh. It made my poo a funny colour and the little people in the barbers shop set always looked at me funny


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Ken Lee[/i]......


 
Posted : 16/11/2011 5:36 pm