Forum search & shortcuts

Shorthold tenancy/r...
 

[Closed] Shorthold tenancy/relationship breakup issues

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I would love for a solution this month but I think that's beyond possible now. the best I could hope for is a resolution by the new year, I will ring LL again once we have reached a decision. thanks for your help.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:03 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member
nick - its only 3 months losses if the landlady cannot relet it in 5 months FFS taken the route I suggest. one months notice and forgo the deposit. So that is 2 months to find a tenant before any loses build up ( bar a few quid in admin perhaps)

If you can't find a tenet in 2 months the flat is overpriced.

Irrelevant - tenants are still due to pay LL's losses as they signed up to the lease.

See enforcement of "Keep-open" clauses, recent COS case-law, for a simila scenario.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Al - the landlord has to attempt to mitigate the losses by getting new tenant. Yes the tenants have to make good any losses so you would be gambling but its a gamble that has good odds as you are giving the landlord 2 months to find new tenants

It would be unlikely there would be any significant losses


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The landlord cannot just sit back an sue for the remainder of the tenancy, he has to endeavour to get a new tenant and prove he has tried.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:13 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

TJ

It would be unlikely there would be any significant losses

That may be the case (neither of us know the local market), but nquite different to my point and a bit of a change from your original position?

Indeed toys - but LL doesn't have to lower rent immediately to get a tenant in either.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Al - its exactly what I have said right from the beginning.

Who said the landlord has to lower rents?

Try to actually read and think about what is being said rather than finding imaginary picky points to attack on.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:28 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Who said the landlord has to lower rents?

If the rent is too high (your postulation) then she would be under a duty to lower it to mitigate her loss, then claim the difference, rather than sue for the full rent.

Al - its exactly what I have said right from the beginning.

Earlier...

TandemJeremy - Member
Teh loses would not be 2 k - they would be nil.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Al - please stop finding pedantic picky points to attack me.

Its clear what I have said and its consistent. You seem to find it necessary to continually attack me. I don't know why. Do you find me that threatening? Does it make you feel better?


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yawn..
The point is made, by the optimisits among us, that the OP could give notice, be as clear and upfront as poss, and help the LL to find new tenants and possibly not lose any or much dosh.

Pessimists would say she will not be able to find any tenants and you will end up paying the rent to cover most of the remaining tenancy..

You decide.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 7:54 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

TJ in the past you have argued over much less and there are loads of threads where I could argue with you but don't.

If you engage with me then respond in this manner when I make perfectly valid points, well, up to you.


 
Posted : 04/11/2010 8:07 pm
Page 2 / 2