Forum menu
Sean Penn hates us....
 

[Closed] Sean Penn hates us. Should I support The Falklands?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3679335]

I'm really very ignorant of the cold hard facts and would like your help to put the record straight.

We 'took' the falklands a couple/several hundred years ago, from the Spanish.. before Argentina existed, right?

It was/still is a useful Naval Outpost, but now also serves to possibly support a claim to oil reserves found in surrounding waters, correct?

We have thousands of settlers there whom have claim to being born & bred?

Argentina has no claim other than 'it's really close to us', or possibly 'we used to be spanish' ?

In the interest of knowing exectly how I should feel about the dispute without sounding like a hardcore fundamentlist van driver, what facts am I unaware of and is this a cut & dry argument?

Your least sarcastic and argumentative opinions welcome.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:44 am
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?

You mean Islos de Blanco?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:46 am
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?

Like emigrating to the IoW and learning to tango with dusky South American girls!


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?

For what reason? If there was a legitimate claim i'd at least listen.

My main point of thought is, how far do we go back in history to lay these claims?
Do the French still have reason to claim Britain as their own, or Sweden/Norway/Denmark even?

If Argentina never actually 'owned' the Falklands, why should we give it back? (or give it back at all?)

As I mentioned, I really don't know many facts but i'm very interested to learn


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:48 am
Posts: 9143
Full Member
 

I think there is a valid argument for self determination here.

In the past the islanders have been offered money by the Argentinians to give up their sovereignty, but have declined. They have been invaded (note: not in any way liberated from an oppressive UK), and seem comfortable with being who they are.

My personal opinion is that the possibility of a lot of oil nearby has an awful lot to do with the claims. That and it is a sure fire way to get a country behind you in times of trouble ("Remember those islands? How the nasty <country> beat us last time? Well, let's get them this time!").

Sean Penn doing this has not helped calm things down at all. I like his films, but he should really keep out of stuff he has no call to be involved in.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?

They can claim the moon if they want


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?

If they'd owned it before the UK even existed and all the residents wanted to remain part of Argentina then I'd think it fair enough.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

'How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?'

One of the least educated posts on any subject I've ever read on this site.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And on the subject of islanders and self-determination, let's not forget those displaced inhabitants of Diego Garcia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Garcia


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How would you feel if Argentina claimed the Isle of Wight?

If the residents were Argentinian then I would say fair play.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:54 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Argentina did have ownership of the islands in the past. Its all a bit disputed and a long time ago

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands#History_to_1982

Molgrips - the residents of the islands are not British - they are falkanders

As well as Deigo Garcia there is also HongKong for parallels


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The point is - whatever either government wants - the people of the FI have a right to self determination. Its democracy they can vote and they have. Oil, history etc etc has no relevence to today.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:55 am
Posts: 6991
Full Member
 

And on the subject of islanders and self-determination, let's not forget those displaced inhabitants of Diego Garcia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Garcia

Always good to bring this up and it's a crime how little it gets mentioned by the mainstream press when discussing the Falklands.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

as i was kicking about when this kicked off.. most people in the uk thought the falklands were somewhere near the hebrides..

most of the inhabitants of the island seem to be relatives of former whalers etc ..of a mix of nationalities.. frankly though if they have a democratic system and they do and they choose self determination.. which they do and they seek membership of a union which they do and the other party is willing which it is.. then thats democracy god love it..

argentina can play he said she said for 1000 yrs but if billy malvinas chooses to post his letters in a little red box then its his choice..


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 11:59 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I loved Diego Garcia as Huggy Bear in 'Starsky and Hutch', but he's not really done anything else since has he?.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I don't think any of the European empire builders of the past are without blood on their hands

You can't go back and change it so you need to deal with it as is is now and allow the residents to decide
Same as Gib, they've had a couple of referendums about transferring to Spain, pretty much unanimous decisions to stay as is.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:03 pm
Posts: 3422
Free Member
 

Is HK really a parallel though? We leased that from China as a settlement for an opium war, and returned it when we were supposed to, as far as I can tell there was no such lease for the Falklands.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

the residents of the islands are not British - they are falkanders

except they are apparently Bristish Citizens

So the Argentinians have laid claim to the islands before & since we took over in 1833 - do they have any legal claim to substantiate this? I gather not.

Are the Islands recognised internationally as an independently governed state/country ?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm looking forward to Sean Penn calling for Nuevo Reino de Filipinas: La Provincia de Texas to be returned to Mexico if Mexico demands it.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Argentina did have ownership of the islands in the past

Untrue, they were permitted to settle. The argies have never owned the FI.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:30 pm
Posts: 17292
Full Member
 

I should imagine the indigenous peoples of south America would like to claim Argentina back.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:31 pm
Posts: 7100
Free Member
 

I'm looking forward to Sean Penn calling for Nuevo Reino de Filipinas: La Provincia de Texas to be returned to Mexico if Mexico demands it.

Or Hawaii, which is about a couple of thousand miles away from thr USA mainland.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:32 pm
Posts: 770
Free Member
 

Back to the op.
Just hate sean penn. It's a lot easier.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What is the indigenous people to the north of Hadrian's wall want to claim that back?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

slimjim78 - Member

the residents of the islands are not British - they are falkanders

except they are apparently Bristish Citizens

Ah - changed after '83 - they were only dependent territories citizens before that which did not give them right of abode in the UK


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:34 pm
Posts: 10747
Full Member
 

The government tells us that buying dodgy DVDs at a car boot sale for a fiver each funds terrorism but it still lets us buy Fray Bentos pies in Tesco to help pay for HMS Belgrano II


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

He's clearly just upset that his marriage to Eva Peron didn't last. That she then shacked up with a posh British bloke with a mockney accent must have been the icing on the cake.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:41 pm
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

You mean the [i]ARA General Belgrano[/i] surely? 😉

It should be up to the Falklanders to decide. Since the 1950s, Britain has been keen to offload it's former colonial posessions as quickly as possible (too quickly if you consider Palestine/Israel). Had Argentina not invaded in 1982 then there's a strong chance that the Islas Malvinas would be at the very least independent by now.

The issue really boils down to the lake of oil beneath the Falklands. The technology to extract it is only just becoming viable now and I daresay the British government isn't keen to waive it's claimed ownership of the oilfield. Argentina's future energy security is also going to be strongly influenced by whoever owns the Falklands.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:43 pm
Posts: 14174
Full Member
 

The first record of someone landing on the Falklands was a British mariner a few hundred years back. There is no trace of them being settled (though they may have been visited) in previous history. Looks a godforsaken windswept place but Argentina has no valid claim on it - it's not even that close to them, 250 miles away! Looks quite close on a map, has good fishing, might have oil.

There were no indigenous people - it's nothing like all the other places we (rudely) colonised which already had inhabitants. Or HK which we were leased (free of charge) by the Chinese to stop us going to war with them after they got annoyed about us making lots of money selling their people opium and tried to ban it - amazing what Victorian Britain got away with...


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 17396
Full Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member
...except they are apparently Bristish Citizens

Ah - changed after '83 - they were only dependent territories citizens before that which did not give them right of abode in the UK

They were British before the introduction of immigration laws to keep out all those former members of the British Empire.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:48 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why can't he stick to being a Thespian?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:51 pm
Posts: 57400
Full Member
 

Maybe they could have a vote for independence and declare themselves part of an 'arco de la prosperidad' with some other randomly selected local islands, within a political union of South American Nations?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:53 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

the people of the FI have a right to self determination.
SO if Israel puts enough Jewish settlements in the west bank and Palestine - ignoring th eUn resolutions and violating International law - we should then respect the wishes of the people once the indegenous lot are outnumbered? What if they make them all leave and then settle - do we still respet cthe rightsof the settlers?
Its like arguing we should respect my wishes once i steal your bike /land /home because I /we have ”owned” it for years/generations

the UN is clear the Falklands is a colony and the rights of the people to self determination are not to be considered as they were planted there and are not indigenous

Whilst going on about the right of the people you may wish to consider how much the Uk respected the will of the Ireland vote and what the people wanted then - we partitioned the country and then "respected the wishes" of the state we created by the people we planted there

It is antiquated colonialism just like Gibraltar

I like the argies have no legal claim argument whilst insisting we do to a small speck on the other side of the world that we took by force from someone else


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:55 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

Tory MP Patrick Mercer, a former Army officer, told the Daily Mail: "What on earth has this got to do with Sean Penn? He's neither British nor Argentine and seems to know nothing about the situation judging by this moronic statement.
"A good number of his movies have been turkeys, so I suppose we shouldn't expect much better coming out of his mouth."

[img] [/img]

Another thing - all the loss of life in the 1980s was because Argentina INVADED. ie it was their act of aggression.

I hope Sean Penn gets turned away at any British airport if he ever tries to come into the UK again.

Looks like he is trying to become president of F.A.G.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

we took by force from someone else

Untrue.

the UN is clear the Falklands is a colony and the rights of the people to self determination are not to be considered as they were planted there and are not indigenous

Really? Reference please?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why can't he stick to being a Thespian?

Because he's not very good at that?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SO if Israel puts enough Jewish settlements in the west bank and Palestine - ignoring th eUn resolutions and violating International law - we should then respect the wishes of the people once the indegenous lot are outnumbered?

Good point - should send all the settlers back to Spain where they came from and let the indigenous population have Argentina back.

Or wasn't that what you meant?


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:07 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

Funny Sean Penn meme lost in translation


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I like the argies have no legal claim argument whilst insisting we do to a small speck on the other side of the world that we took by force from someone else

Is geography important then?
Unless im mistaken, pretty much every country on the planet has been taken by force at least once in the past, usually several times or more.

I revert to one of my original points, how long ago is long ago enough?

A line has to be drawn, as I see it, Britain has drawn it. Do we support or do we need to be more liberal?

I dunno for sure


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:12 pm
Posts: 14174
Full Member
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Falkland_Islands

The Falklands have no indigenous people!


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tordesillas ]This[/url] archiac claptrap I believe is the reason the Argies (nee Spanish) believe they have a claim to the Falkands.

Theres little else to substantiate any claim other than proximtiy.

Edit....Mr Penn is a complete tool.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:14 pm
 loum
Posts: 3625
Free Member
 

Can we give them Scotland instead?
They want out, but the Falklands don't, so why not?
It would even things up a bit too, with both countries having a territory in the other hemisphere.
Would also make the Six Nations more interesting. 😉


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:15 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

we took by force from someone else

Untrue.


False
In November 1832, Argentina sent Commander Mestivier as an interim commander to found a penal settlement, but he was killed in a mutiny after 4 days.[27] The following January, British forces returned and requested the Argentine garrison leave

ous

Really? Reference please?

http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/south-american-block-on-falkland-registered-vessels#post-3300853

and much more on this thread and links therin

Ie we have done this before


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:16 pm
Posts: 17292
Full Member
 

Looking forward to them claiming Antarctica and seeing how the Russians take the news.


 
Posted : 15/02/2012 1:19 pm
Page 1 / 6