Forum menu
Sciencologists: can...
 

[Closed] Sciencologists: can you pass the Christian Science Monitor test?

Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Err.. yes.

("Sciencologists" in the thread title was meant as a reference to the commonly used jib at science types on here - not a slexydic attempt at spelling Scientologists)

Gotcha.

(But, for the rest of you. "Elron" Hubbard in the red corner, Mary Baker Eddy in the blue corner.)


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

82%. But then I am a scientist.

I'd have expected scientists to only get a handful right, given they generally know nothing about anything outside their narrow field ๐Ÿ˜ˆ


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:43 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

When did biology stop being a science?!

It's practically a humanities subject ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:51 am
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

It's practically a humanities subject

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:54 am
Posts: 1912
Free Member
 

46/50 (92%).

and that's not how you spell Sulphur ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:55 am
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

and that's not how you spell Sulphur
I wasn't sure whether that was americanism or a biblism

edit or indeed, correct ๐Ÿ˜ณ


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:56 am
Posts: 91163
Free Member
 

and that's not how you spell Sulphur

Yes it is.

... the IUPAC adopted the spelling sulfur in 1990, as did the Royal Society of Chemistry Nomenclature Committee in 1992.[43] The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority for England and Wales recommended its use in 2000,[44] and it now appears in GCSE exams.[45] The Oxford Dictionaries note that "In chemistry... the -f- spelling is now the standard form in all related words in the field in both British and US contexts."


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:02 am
Posts: 2810
Full Member
 

88%, not bad for a builder eh?
jebus was a chippie.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:05 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

42/50 = 84%

A couple of (educated) guesses that I got right balanced out by making a couple of silly mistakes that I knew were wrong as soon as I submitted. And one wrong answer was a meteorology question, so that doesn't count.

Not too bad though.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:08 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

we all know maths is pure it is just a shame it is incomplete * ๐Ÿ˜‰

Without observation it is also pretty useless in scientific terms as the Higgs Boson has just shown - ie we need evidence beyond the "pure" to "know".

I may have taken your humorous point a little to seriously ๐Ÿ˜ณ

* see Godel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:08 am
Posts: 91163
Free Member
 

Dammit, three wrong, that's 94% ๐Ÿ™‚

Admittedly there were a couple of guesses in there.

And the periodic table questions all had other clues in them or even outright giveaways - I haven't got the table memorised and I only got one of those wrong.

I got the surface gravity one wrong.. picked Saturn as I knew it was the least dense, so if you presumed it actually had a surface I'm sure it would come out low.

The halogen one - lack of latin skillz.

And the cloud one - just didn't know.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd believe everyone's %ages more if the questions were't multiple choice, and you had to actually know the answer without a prompt or the chance to guess ...


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:44 am
Posts: 1912
Free Member
 

and that's not how you spell Sulphur

Yes it is.

...

Actually, I still prefer 'brimstone'.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:50 am
Posts: 91163
Free Member
 

I knew the majority of them without needing multiple choice, to be honest.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:00 pm
Posts: 17329
Full Member
 

88%. Misread one question, and some guesses on the Space Science field that failed to materialize.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:14 pm
 momo
Posts: 2106
Full Member
 

72% should have done better


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:36 pm
Posts: 7617
Full Member
 

96%. Cloud one got me too


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:44 pm
Posts: 91163
Free Member
 

Am I in the lead then?

EDIT: no


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:48 pm
Posts: 3449
Free Member
 

72%, but the wording of a lot of the questions gave it away- there's one that asks what has an atomic weight of x (no idea) and a name derived from the latin for something (one obvious candidate).


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:50 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Am I in the lead then?

Nope [b]sas[/b] claimed to have got 49/50.

I nominate him Chief Scientishalist.

You can be his Understudy.

Edit: ooh richmtb beat you too. You are here by demoted to Under-Understudy.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Only 80% for me sans any googling, which is a bit poor considering I'm actually a scientist. In my defence I've never studied any biology!


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:52 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

I'd believe everyone's %ages more if the questions were't multiple choice, and you had to actually know the answer without a prompt or the chance to guess ...

I'd believe everyone's %ages more if they were lower, it's like watching an episode of the apprentice.... bullshit bingo anyone?


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 12:57 pm
Posts: 8005
Full Member
 

72%.

Not bad for someone who teaches colouring in and watching TV as their day job.

slainte ๐Ÿ˜† rob


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 1:01 pm
 grum
Posts: 4531
Free Member
 

Oh, my score was actually below 50% btw - I'm not a scientist but I did get A* in my dual award science GCSE. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 1:28 pm
 loum
Posts: 3624
Free Member
 

Nice link, but I reckon one of the questions does not have the correct answer as an option.
So I'm giving the quiz a score of 98%. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 2:00 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Nice link, but I reckon one of the questions does not have the correct answer as an option.

Controversial! Which one?


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 2:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

78% here. some of them were wild guesses and some I answered to hastily but glad I got more than I expected!


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 2:20 pm
 loum
Posts: 3624
Free Member
 

Graham S
I've been weighing up whether they are wrong or not, and tbh it's not clear 100%. Its a badly worded, leading question that leaves interpretation open. Could be described more as a "[i]wrong question[/i]" than a "[i]wrong answer[/i]".
But in the interests of controversy: 23.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 3:23 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

But in the interests of controversy: 23.

Ah.

23. Noting how light from objects that are moving away from the observer tend to shift to the red end of the spectrum, what scientist first established that the universe is expanding?

You're going to argue that it was that Belgian bloke instead (as mentioned on a thread the other day)? Fair enough, though if you know that then you know the answer they want.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 3:37 pm
 loum
Posts: 3624
Free Member
 

Yup, the Belgian bloke dunnit ๐Ÿ™‚
But you are right, there was an obvious answer they were looking for.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 4:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

84% ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 9:49 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

56% - happy with that for a Clasics grad who dropped science at 5th form.

There were some serious freebie points on offer if you studied ancient greek ! Would have done worse without that. Pallas Athena is Greek Lit 101.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There were some serious freebie points on offer if you studied ancient greek

I was wondering how many of those with really good scores had studied greek/latin.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 10:43 pm
 Ewan
Posts: 4395
Free Member
 

86% Silly mistakes including forgetting how to divide on the nanometer question.


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


jebus was a chippie.

yeah, but he couldn't fix two bits of wood together if his life depended on it


 
Posted : 06/07/2012 11:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Strong smell off bullshit on this thread! ๐Ÿ˜€

24/50


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 12:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

82. The shame.


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 1:48 am
Posts: 6312
Full Member
 

88%- go me! I made mistakes in the units type questions. And the age of the Universe is not 14 trillion years- oops, silly me.


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 1:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

90%..............but my job title does have the word "Scientist" and "Chief" in it...* and I'm crap at astronomy*


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 2:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 2:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

62%... meh


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 2:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oh dear i score 52% (26 out of 50)

and a lot of those were lucky guesses ๐Ÿ˜ณ


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 6:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Snap...

52%. But if I had thought a bit more about one or two it would probably have been around 60%. It's been a long time since my last physics lesson ๐Ÿ˜ณ


 
Posted : 07/07/2012 7:28 am
Page 2 / 2