[Closed] School strike...

Excellent project, I can only assume that without this wage boost the school would not have improved under their stewardship.

funded by the various organisations and companies that have brought into the system

Academies are funded by the government through Department for Education, who then passes it on to the Young People's Learning Agency (YPLA) who then passes it on to the academies. A nice bit of work for a quango which we are told this government despises so much then.

It was a lot younger for Miners, quarrymen and steelworkers.

and even aged 12, I supported the striking miners. Education was shot back then, so many didn't have the option NOT to follow dad into hard labour.

Just perhaps, not every one wants to live next to a huge caravan testing and parking area, and with the M6 running past it.

🙄

Academies are semi-independent local state schools that provide a free education for all abilities. They are established by [b]sponsors from business[/b], faith or voluntary groups working with partners from the local community. Academies can be brand new schools in areas which need the extra school places, and are a viable option to many local authorities dealing with a school in special measures, or subject to an improvement notice. Historically academies were introduced to replace existing weak or underperforming schools.

They have not contributed enough to cover their pensions. that's what i would go after

That's awfully vague. Exactly what do you mean by "that's what i would go after"? Specifically, who are "they", what are you going after, and how do you plan to do it?

Public pensions are funded by the workers themselves. here is how it works: every time a worker gets paid they get taken some money off, these go into what is called a pension fund, which the worker at the end of his working age claims back. so no other tax payer is involved at all.
The disgusting thing is when the government [s]utilizes[/s] steals from the pension fund to pay for other things, then the taxes are used to put back what has been taken from the pension fund, and may I add rightly so!

what do you want a white paper 😉

who are "they",

Those retiring or retired , due to increased life span, who will draw out far more than they have paid in or were expected to claim. When the scheme was instigated they were not expected to live as long. They are getting back more than they paid for. People working now [ if you believe the shortfall arguments] are increasing their contributions so the commitment to those people can be met whilst getting a worse deal themselves. That does not seem fair to me in much the same way If we just shrugged paid the same and let the next lot sort it out whilst saying yes but we paid.
I would suggest we say to those currently drawing pensions [ state ones] that they also need to share some of the pain caused by their longevity.
You could easily pick holes in how this would be done but the principle may be worth a discussion.
Why is their pension untouchable when the length of it is the part of the problem
this may not be my finest constructed argument on here and i prepared for flaming.

project - Member

Academies are semi-independent local state schools that provide a free education for all abilities. They are established by sponsors from business, faith or voluntary groups working with partners from the local community. Academies can be brand new schools in areas which need the extra school places, and are a viable option to many local authorities dealing with a school in special measures, or subject to an improvement notice. Historically academies were introduced to replace existing weak or underperforming schools.

Thank you project for that copied and pasted comment which you took from [url= http://www.weightmans.com/library/newsletters/commercial_property_focus_-_au/school_academies_-_beginners_g.aspx ]School Academies - beginners guide to setting up[/url] It was most informative.

Do you now fancy providing some sort of proof that all the children and all the parents in the school in Liverpool which you referred to, want academy status ?

Or did you just make that bit up and you don't actually have any evidence to back up your claim ?

when i said state ones i dont mean the state pension I mean public sector pensions. C'mon elfin want that assist

mattsccm - Member

Like many I joined as they generally didn't strike.

Makes the overwhelming "yes" vote a bit hard to understand really. I suspect your "many" is "a tiny minority"

That does not seem fair to me

What a wonderful description of life in general.
How much longer can this be drawn out everyone realises that it's just repetition? There must be an internet theory for this...

Gove on the Andrew Marr show:

Of course the ability to strike is a basic human right. I just think its wrong

you dont see hospital consulatants going on strike so teachers shouldnt

still cannot decide if he's a total genius or completely stupid.

ernie_lynch - Member

Do you now fancy providing some sort of proof that all the children and all the parents in the school in Liverpool which you referred to, want academy status ?

Or did you just make that bit up and you don't actually have any evidence to back up your claim ?

Posted 11 hours ago # Report-Post

according to other news sources they the children and parents all agreed, now its become political, with the kids as the fulcrum.

You have commendable powers if you sat through it even for a tory overlord he is smug. i think he in can even out smug Blair.
I always think where are these news sources when someone tells me what news sources say.

[b]you dont see hospital consulatants going on strike so teachers shouldnt[/b]

"still cannot decide if he's a total genius or completely stupid"

I don't think he's either, I think he's merely relying on the fact that many people have been honed by the press and media into believing that a one day strike by teachers will be an unmitigated disaster which will cause untold chaos and misery.......almost a life or death situation. And going by the some of the ranting on here, some indeed seem to think that it's a life or death situation - the Tory press has done its job well.

Of course if Gove thinks one day off school for kids is that important, then perhaps he could do something about the Tory introduced Baker Days, which I guess you could say amount to 5 one day strikes every year. Even though some headteachers appear to use them very wisely :

[url= http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=18480 ]Day trip to France is least we deserve[/url]

[i]"The teachers, from Gravesend Grammar School, Kent, used one of their five Baker Days for a trip to Boulogne."[/i]

according to other news sources they the children and parents all agreed, now its become political, with the kids as the fulcrum.

I provided "news sources" which says the opposite, where are your "news sources" ?

I think we can safely say you made that bit about all the children and parents agreeing to academy status up.

what do you want a white paper

Not really, just more clarity about who the "they" you would "go after" are. So it's Public Sector pensions then, and you don't think that the recipients have paid in enough to be allowed to draw them. What you're overlooking is that many Public Sector pensions were never intended to be funded by employee contributions, and neither was there a mechanism where the employee could choose to do so.

Today's PS pensioners (average pension £4k-ish I believe, but in any case not huge) had no opportunity or requirement to fund their pension in any other way, and it's impossible for them to now carry out any retro-active financial planning without a time machine - these are the ones you want to "go after"?

I think we can safely say you made that bit about all the children and parents agreeing to academy status up.

Does that mean that if I can't see something, it doesn't exsit?

Nope D.S, however it means if he cannot produce anything other than a vague claim parents are all for it, and kids as well ( AYE RIGHT) Then projects previous when talking about public service workers has to be taken into account and bullshit called, as Ernie has done.

Edit: Can't be arsed.

Does that mean that if I can't see something, it doesn't exsit?

It means I want to see your evidence, otherwise the evidence which I've provided and claims the opposite, stands.

And if you couldn't figure that out don simon, you're either not very bright or, you just get an irresistible urge to argue with ernie_lynch no matter how inane the point/argument is. I suspect it's a little of both.

I'm not very bright ernie... Or I simply can't be arsed through boredom...