Just taking his turn as a portable Elphicke…
https://twitter.com/seaniegriff/status/1642432592111718401?s=21
As for pot holes…
https://twitter.com/studio_dbm/status/1641917650723905541?s=21
Of course. The clue is in the name.
Cool. Because the Daily Mail missed it.....
Yeah, I remember that. Might not have even been aware of his work if it was not for that cockup.
Thats a great 'take' there from the Daily Mail.
Almost as good as when they released a commemorative coin for VE Day a couple of years back accompanied by the byline: "Victory over Europe".
I kid you not, the advert stayed up on the Mail Online for quite a while before the 'mistake' was realised....
Nearly as good as when UKIP used a picture of a Spitfire on one of their flyers without noticing (or more likely not knowing) that it was carrying the insignia of a Polish pilot
GF has just been talking to BBC telling them how it is at Dover.
Don't mess with the middle class trying to get on Ski-trip.
Very latest Deltapoll, fieldwork carried out the last 4 days.
https://twitter.com/DeltapollUK/status/1642930659713794050
DeltaPoll had the labour lead @ 10 2 weeks ago. The Tories thought their culture war/war on boats was working where in reality it's just a very bad polster.
I see Sunak is running from Home Sec's "Asian Grooming Gangs" dog whistle racism. I guess he doesn't really want to debate it with the Guy who authorized the Rochdale prosecution.
https://twitter.com/DouglasCarswell/status/1642997217781850112?t=jZsdr0uMG-lEjUZVvZpvOQ&s=19
No sense of ****ing irony at the mess Neoliberalism has delivered today.
Why did Mississippi let this idiot in?
Tories simply don't understand nothing they do works (apart from delivering income to asset portfolios at the expense of the state BTW.)
It’s the usual double-speak. Once Cruella and her mates in the right wing press have put it out there, all Rishi has to do is mention ‘grooming gangs’ and the word ‘****stani’ is automatically added as it’s implied by default
This is a really interesting book about how politicians weaponise words and language to manipulate debate, which is exactly what’s going on here
Well colour me shocked! I never saw that one coming, said absolutely nobody
Throw a load of racist guff up as a dead cat, while you quietly drop one of your main manifesto pledges. The social care reforms have been kicked down the road so many times already, the whole thing being quietly dropped was inevitable
This government don’t actually DO anything. They’re basically just a crap PR office
They won’t do anything about a collapsing social care system because the fundamental problem is that there are enormous numbers of vacancies and no staff. Hmmmmmmmm…. I wonder why that is?
So once again the country is held hostage to right-wing Brexit ideology
This government don’t actually DO anything. They’re basically just a crap PR office
Accurate. But they've done well out of crap PR because it's well targeted.
No ideas, no imagination, no effort, no empathy, no moral code, no control - and on.
When your ideology is broken and has demolished the state where else are you going to turn?
When your ideology is broken
Neoliberalism is only broken if you assume that it was ever sincerely designed to benefit society as a whole.
I’d suggest that far from being broken, it’s a finely honed, superbly managed system that in 40 years has totally succeeded in its aims.
Unfortunately.
They won’t do anything about a collapsing social care system because the fundamental problem is that there are enormous numbers of vacancies and no staff. Hmmmmmmmm…. I wonder why that is?
So once again the country is held hostage to right-wing Brexit ideology
Well that's depressing. If it is true and it has nothing to do with a lack of funding it means that a change of government won't have any effect, the problem will remain.
Neoliberalism is only broken if you assume that it was ever sincerely designed to benefit society as a whole
Going by how it has been sold to us.
I'd say it was broken on its own terms, as well as what you say.
It is important imo to make a clear distinction between stated aims and actual aims.
There is little doubt imo that neoliberalism has been massively successful in both making the wealthy elite wealthier, and keeping them in political power.
Well that’s depressing. If it is true and it has nothing to do with a lack of funding it means that a
change ofConservative or Labour government won’t have any effect, the problem will remain.
FIFY
Lack of vacancies is linked to funding. If it paid really well there'sd be more applicants for social care jobs.
FIFY
Well done for pointing out that the current government and the next government will either be Conservative or Labour.
Probably a given to most people but should nevertheless be pointed out.
Well done for pointing out that the current government and the next government will either be Conservative or Labour.
Probably a given to most people but should nevertheless be pointed out.
Read what I said, or rather edited what you said... in other words this problem will not go away under Labour or the tories. They are both pro brexit, anti FOM parties, this probelm will exist with either.
Other political parties are available that do have solutions.
Other political parties are available that do have solutions.
I also have solutions. But have even less chance of replacing Sunak than Ed Davey, Carla Denyer or Adrian Ramsay.
Anyway, money is needed for training and recruitment. Some was announced loudly several times, and much of it later removed quietly. As has been Sunak's way both as Chancellor and PM. The money wouldn't have ended up on the front line anyway... consultancies would have hoovered it up.
Casting the recruitment net wider is also needed. And that includes being more welcoming and accomodating to people from overseas. Something will have to give there at some point.
I also have solutions. But have even less chance of replacing Sunak than Ed Davey, Carla Denyer or Adrian Ramsay.
Great, so don't be part of the problem by voting labour and perpetuate the status quo. As long as people feel they have to vote labour (because tories are bad), then nothing will change.
Ok Labour might get in for a term or two, and slowly start to beging unpicking the tory stuff they don't like, before it gets chance to impact anything then the tories will be back in afterward when people get pee'd off with labour, as they inevitably will, and set fire to everyting labour may or may not have started to enact.
Ok Labour might get in for a term or two
That’s step one. I mean, there may be other paths towards improving the UK, but any that involves the Conservatives immediately getting another decade to do their thing to the least well off in our society can get in the sea. You may want to play that long game, but I’d consider it too selfish to play myself.
We'll have to agree to dissagree, then. Labour voters are just usefull idiots as far as the tories are concerned.
All depends on the seat of course.
All depends on the seat of course.
And the only party that will put PR into place are the Lib dems, it's not in labours interest as they know they'll get a go at the steering wheel sooner or later, if only for a term or two, during which time they will achive pretty much the sum of sweet F.A.
And whatever they do achive will instantly get burned to the ground the second the tories inevitably get back in thereafter.
It is important imo to make a clear distinction between stated aims and actual aims.
There is little doubt imo that neoliberalism has been massively successful in both making the wealthy elite wealthier, and keeping them in political power.
Good point.
Trickle down being the fail but inequality being the win.
You may want to play that long game, but I’d consider it too selfish to play myself.
Not sure its being selfish thinking beyond just the next five years. Possibly more the opposite.
molgrips
Full MemberLack of vacancies is linked to funding. If it paid really well there’sd be more applicants for social care jobs.
NoBoDy WaNtS tO wOrK aNyMoRe
NoBoDy WaNtS tO wOrK aNyMoRe
Thats inaccurate.
Just look at all those tory MPs who selflessly volunteered to work extra days on top of their mp workload to help out a South Korean company for a paltry 10k a day.
Thats the get up and go attitude this country needs.
molgrips
Full MemberLack of vacancies is linked to funding. If it paid really well there’sd be more applicants for social care jobs.
Yup, a friend of mine had to quit social care looking after adults with downs, etc, he just couldn't afford to live on minimum wage or less after unpaid overtime, so he retrained and does something else now.
NoBoDy WaNtS tO wOrK aNyMoRe
I personally know a lot of people who work at the arse end of social care, and they simply don't get paid enough to retain staff. I'm not talking about house managers or whatever, I'm talking about the people who litteraly have to bath and toilet people who are incapable of doing it for themselves.
They generally do the job until they get burnt out and quit.
The NHS is going the same way.
I personally know a lot of people who work at the arse end of social care, and they simply don’t get paid enough to retain staff.
Amen.
Still, I'm sure throwing away votes and letting Sunak carry on as PM will get social care sorted. Long game and all that. Worth it to feel like you've made a stand for PR sometime after 2035.
Vote Lib dem, then, this 'must vote labour to get the tories out' theme is not going to change anything.
Labour are not interested in PR, not interested in the EU, they simply rely on 'we're not quite as shit as the tories' voters, 'give us a go at driving the bus thats on fire and has no wheels.'
We need political reform, and we need better integration with the EU... and, plot twist, you won't get that with labour.
Worth it to feel like you’ve made a stand for PR sometime after 2035.
Well I guess we could go for the apply a couple of thin patches government but increasingly normalise the damaging practices and encourage the tories to go even further in 2035.
I mean its a plan.
It didnt work out well last time but hey why not try again.
So you'd sooner encourage someone to vote for a party that you have no beleif in, or aspriration to?
Seems like a silly way of voting if you ask me.
was never a fan of Carol Vorderman but here twitter feed is just open warfare against the tory party
this was funny against Lee Anderthal
https://twitter.com/carolvorders/status/1643003043099680769?cxt=HHwWgoC9zYGkj80tAAAA
she's posting endless twitter bios of tories pretending not to be tories
https://twitter.com/WestminsterWAG/status/1643617757022285825?t=yGhDsWimhPaWsO7S4ZKkxQ&s=19
Oh those darn pesky markets.
Carol Vorderman's twitter feed is unexpectedly fantastic.
