Community

Forum menu
Renault did attempt...
 

[Closed] Renault did attempt fix the Singapore GP

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78668


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 368
Free Member
 

OMG!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:06 pm
Posts: 3710
Free Member
 

OMG!

Indeed.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well they'd already pretty much admitted that hadn't they (the only dispute being over who's idea idea it was). No surprises about the falling on swords - presumably hoping to avoid punishment for the team by removing guilty parties.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:14 pm
Posts: 584
Full Member
 

Briatore has been happy to cheat, ever since the Schumacher days. Good riddance, Flabbio. Deliberatly putting a driver in danger is very serious so I would expect Renault to be severly punished by the FIA for this.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:17 pm
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

The transcription of the radio conversation doesn't seem to fit with this outcome.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The transcription of the radio conversation doesn't seem to fit with this outcome

No - it didn't seem to be the smoking gun everyone expected


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:23 pm
Posts: 3710
Free Member
 

[b]FIA adviser:[/b] Mr Symonds were you aware that there was going to be crash at Lap 14?

[b]Symonds:[/b] I don't want to answer that question.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:25 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

Deliberatly putting a driver in danger is very serious so I would expect Renault to be severly punished by the FIA for this.

But the driver did that, not the team. Driver could have been asked to take himself out of the race, that could have been done by getting stuck in a gravel trap, not bouncing off a wall with huge financial costs etc. However to get a safety car out I suppose thats harder to fix.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The transcription of the radio conversation

Where would I find that?

I was assuming that would be fairly clean though, given they know these transmissions are being monitored nowadays - hence why it needed to be pre-arranged.

Whilst looking I found [url= http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78647 ]this transcript[/url] though, which is pretty damning by omission - especially when he says at the end that he'd expect conclusions to be drawn!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Driver could have been asked to take himself out of the race

But he wasn't - he was asked to get the safety car out, which is a whole different thing, and did require him to bounce off the wall.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:29 pm
 Stu
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The transcription of the radio conversation doesn't seem to fit with this outcome.

Funny that! Its hardly like Flavio's going to shout down the radio "Crash now Nelson!" is he?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

The transcription is on planet f1. Can't link to it as i'm browsing with my pikey phone


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:30 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Briatore has been happy to cheat, ever since the Schumacher days. Good riddance
+1

Good riddance.

In addition, I dont think Piquet or Symmonds should get another job in F1 again. ALL are as bad as each other. Fixing races stinks.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

A pundit on one of the F1 sites came up with a plausible MO - given what was already leaked

Alonso is put on low fuel in the hope of something happening & therefore making the most of his - out of position - grid slot & this is obviously discussed at the post qualli debrief
Baby Piquet later suggests to Symonds/Briatore that he could crash deliberately & help the odds a bit
Race day - after much chin rubbing - Piquet is called in & told when & where it would have the best effect


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 584
Full Member
 

Piquet didn't think it up on his own, tho - the team asked him to crash at a corner where they knew it would cause a safety car incident. The transcripts wouldn't show anything as the whole thing was pre-planned and the team knew they would be monitored. The 'smoking gun' is the telemetry, which shows NP applied throttle harder and earlier on the crash lap and continued to hold it down after the car started to slide.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

Hard to argue it really, the telemetry would give it away.

Still, briatore is "retiring" to holidays on the beach with his wife...
[img] [/img]

I'm sure he wont care.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

But the driver did that, not the team. Driver could have been asked to take himself out of the race, that could have been done by getting stuck in a gravel trap, not bouncing off a wall with huge financial costs etc. However to get a safety car out I suppose thats harder to fix.

There aren't any gravel traps at Singapore IIRC - it's all Armco & concrete


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So, what do you think attracted her to multi millionaire Flavio Briatore?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:48 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

So, what do you think attracted her to multi millionaire Flavio Briatore?

His cash, that he probably still has...


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think Cheesy was being rhetorical ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think Cheesy was being rhetorical

I think he was being a plagiarist (copyright Mrs Merton when questioning Debbie Maghee about her marriage to Paul Daniels IIRC).

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I wonder if Flav & Ecclestone will still sit together in the director's box at QPR?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If nothing else, at least something interestings happened in formula 1.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So "overtaking" via pitstop is too exciting for you - you prefer "overtaking" via law court? ๐Ÿ™„


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:20 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mad Max is trying to break the Fellowship of the Ring ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

French team cheats after it becomes clear their motor conveyance is unable to compete with Germanic technology shocker.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

This is a bit like Rumfeld's 'the knows we know' speech at the moment

But I guess the big question now is who else knew? - I guess by that I mean did Alonso know? before, after or not until now?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Which Germanic technology is that?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like the fact that when Bernie was asked if Flavio was a friend he replied "he likes to think so"


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:32 pm
 awh
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

I wonder if Ferrari will still want Alonso after this.
'Hello Mr Domenicali, please can you fix it for me to win a race because I haven't won any for a long time.'
Are Massa and Piquet Jr friends? Could make the Ferrari garage a bit tense!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:33 pm
 tyke
Posts: 19
Free Member
 

At least it leaves Flavio free to stand for FIA president to replace Max!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wonder if Ferrari will still want Alonso after this.

But do you think Alonso asked for the race to be fixed?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:39 pm
Posts: 1909
Free Member
 

We await the Spanish Inquisition


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I wonder if Ferrari will still want Alonso after this.

Can you remember Massa's race @ Singapore last year?

He was leading until baby Piquets crash
In the panic to get in & out of the pits under the [Renault manufactured] safety car Massa left whilst still attached to his fuel hose
it would be reasonable to expect him to have carried on & scored good points - probably won if that hadn't of happened

He would therefore have been world champ - had all other races last year still finished as they did


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:42 pm
Posts: 774
Free Member
 

Can't condone cheating, but from a tactical point, it did work!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Which Germanic technology is that?

Merc engines? Probably only the badge but that wasn't the point I was jovially making ...


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:43 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Which Germanic technology is that?

Must be that technology mainly developed in that part of Germany known as 'The Thames Valley'.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Flav for President?

Well he has juust taken a public spanking ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:46 pm
Posts: 41798
Free Member
 

We await the Spanish Inquisition

You expect too much........................

Maybe they should just allow F1 teams to work as a team? I mean it's not like pro tour teams are trying to get a discovery/anasta/confidis/rabobank/etc 1,2,3 are they? They want 1 man on the podium and the rest of them to dutifully tow them to the line.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:49 pm
 awh
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

Can you remember Massa's race @ Singapore last year?

Didn't remember that.
Who cares that next year's racing is going to be less interesting without fuel stops when Bernie can arrange things like this to keep us all talking about F1 ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Must be that technology mainly developed in that part of Germany known as 'The Thames Valley'.

Brixwoth Northants. aren't they? - formerly known as Ilmor


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 3445
Free Member
 

What surprises me about this is not so much that they entertained the thought but that they thought it wouldn't come back on them. Involving Piquet was just asking for it to come out sooner or later, so what were they thinking?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who cares that next year's racing is going to be less interesting without fuel stops

They are still stopping for tyres as this season - just not re-fuelling due to safety concerns.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

At least next year there won't be any guessing who's carrying what fuel in qualli - they'll all be on empty tanks so we'll see who's outright fastest.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

At least next year there won't be any guessing who's carrying what fuel in qualli - they'll all be on empty tanks so we'll see who's outright fastest.

Very true


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:11 pm
 awh
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

They are still stopping for tyres as this season - just not re-fuelling due to safety concerns.

I'm going by Brundle's Blog. He reckons it wont be as good racing when fuel economy becomes a more important factor. I have to agree, different fuel strategies, the unpredictability of the refuelling rig, race predictions based on fuel weight corrected qualifying times, etc, all add to the excitment. Isn't a car carrying more fuel more dangereous if it crashes?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Isn't a car carrying more fuel more dangereous if it crashes?

I can't remember the last F1 car that 'crashed & burned' - There's been one or two flare ups in the pits though


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I did enjoy this last weekend & the fact that some were two stopping & some were on one stop, I even enjoyed the nonsense that says you have to run different tyres, it all spiced it up a bit. Not always like that though


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I did enjoy this last weekend & the fact that some were two stopping & some were on one stop

I think the trouble with that this year is you know in advance who's doing what & when their stopping
I preferred it before they had to declare their weights


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Even without fuel stops, different cars will have different strategies as each chassis reacts differently to every circuit and track temperature so some will still run with one stop but average slower, whereas others will run two stops for quicker lap times when they are out on track.

I still think that rain is the best bit - I think they should have rain laps on every race - just install mahoosive sprinklers all around the track and randomly switch them on at certain points of the race.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:41 pm
 awh
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

+1 for mahoosive sprinklers!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Funnily enough, Ferrari already have those at its Fiorano test track


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Snow blowers too!


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Funnily enough, Ferrari already have those at its Fiorano test track

Doesn't surprise me - guess they need to test in all conditions.

Snow blowers too!

Spiked tyres?....
๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The ice racing is totally mad, that would be something to watch with F1 cars ... I read somewhere that the tyres are doing up to 150mph & the car is doing 70 sideways ... its where the old F1 drivers go anyway


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[b]Can you remember Massa's race @ Singapore last year?

He was leading until baby Piquets crash
In the panic to get in & out of the pits under the [Renault manufactured] safety car Massa left whilst still attached to his fuel hose
it would be reasonable to expect him to have carried on & scored good points - probably won if that hadn't of happened

He would therefore have been world champ - had all other races last year still finished as they did[/b]

+1

Why havent the rest of you spotted this?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 4:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Def a very important feature of this story will be if Alonso can make it through without too much doo-doo sticking to him. He's still the number one driver in F1, and it would be a shame if he doesn't make into a Ferrari.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 5:22 pm
Posts: 3710
Free Member
 

+1 for random sprinklers

And a big bag of ball bearings suspended over the chicanes, held together by a rope over a candle flame - will they? won't they?

Actually, I have a long-held view that F1 would be made more interesting by starting each race with the grid in reverse championship order - the quicker you are, the more you've got to overtake to get back up to the front.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 5:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another cheating scandal and there's the Spaniard again!

"It was not mee, it was heem and heeem and heems"

A cheat for sure, and not the great champion he would like everyone to think.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 584
Full Member
 

+1 to that! The 'crash' was for Alonso's benefit but he's claiming he knew nothing about it? Lying bull-stabber.


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 10:31 pm
 awh
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

I can't remember, is he a racist? Or did he eventually condemn the Spanish fans blacking up?


 
Posted : 16/09/2009 11:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes it's bad but let's put it into context

Piquet crashed his car into the wall so his team mate could win a GP.

Senna admitted crashing into Prost to win the World Championship and it was also premeditated.

Schumacher crashed into Hill to win the World Championship.

Schumacher crashed into Villeneuve in an attempt to win the World Championship but failed

1994 - Bennetton under the control of Briattore/Brawn tampered with the fuel rig to get faster pit stops resulting in a fire that burnt numerous mechanics

In all but the Piquet Jnr incident other parties were involved in the actual incident. At least Piquet had the good grace to only involve himself - yes there might have been others involved such as marshals if it went wrong but same can be said for the other "accidents".

Oh, and I thought the ban on refuelling was to do with cost cutting and not having to transport all the kit around.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 12:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd be surprised if Alonso is particularly bothered whether anyone thinks he is a great champion or not.

Fact is, he is. Before Hamilton got the best rookie drive ever (not taking anything away from him, but a unique circumstance nonetheless) Alonso was the youngest ever race winner and WDC. He got the title twice, in a Renault (FFS) against the most successful driver ever.

FA is the best driver out there, and most people who know about F1 agree. He might not be perfect, character-wise, but F1 is a dirty business.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 12:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yoda - I think the distinction is that when one driver collides with another, it is a unilateral decision made by an individual, not a pre-meditated plan by the team.

Also, I strongly believe those sort of incidents are heat of the moment decisions - just the adrenalin and a 'must win' attitude which are part and parcel of this kind of racing.

Just look at Cavendish blocking during the TdF...


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 1:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

glenp- I don't understand your 'in a Renault FFS' comment. Renault swept the world before them when they were an engine supplier to Williams. The Renault team itself was previously Benneton, who were multi Champion winners with the German. Just because they can't screw road cars together for toffee, you can't compare the two.

[i]I'd be surprised if Alonso is particularly bothered whether anyone thinks he is a great champion or not[/i]

I'm sure Alonso thinks his behaviour is all completed justified. That's half the problem. He got away with it last time, he needs slapping down.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 2:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wonder if Flav & Ecclestone will still sit together in the director's box at QPR?

Of course they will, it's business. I wonder however if Flav will fall foul of the Football league regulation stating that a Chairman of a football club has to be "fit and proper" to perform that role.

It might get that egomaniac shifted from QPR.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I wonder however if Flav will fall foul of the Football league regulation stating that a Chairman of a football club has to be "fit and proper" to perform that role

There's certainly talk of that
http://www.planetf1.com/story/0,18954,3213_5564668,00.html


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 3:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"We don't want a fault by two people to reflect upon the whole company and the entire Formula 1 team."

But he was in charge of the u****ing team - so who would you prefer to be punished?


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 3:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

reply from bernie

'Is Flavio a good friend of yours?'

'He thinks he is.............'


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Renault is not and has never been the top car. Bennetton had success with Schumacher and then became Renault and had success with Alonso - by a big margin the two best drivers of the era. Just look how few other wins that team has had in either guise without one of those two drivers. If the car had been dominant we would have seen multiple 1-2 finishes.

Not sure what you mean by Alonso getting away with it last time. If he was party to this thing then sure, he does deserve punishment.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:09 pm
Posts: 34968
Full Member
 

[i]FA is the best driver out there, and most people who know about F1 agree[/i]

Not at all, I think barring a few notable exceptions, F1 at the moment (and probably more so than at any point in it's history) is full of drivers that could rightly claim that given the right equipment, they could win the championship. Alonso is a good driver, but he's one out of about 10-15 or so that are equally as talented.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't think so. True there are a good number that [i]could[/i] win in the right car. But some qualities are very rare.

Always beating your team-mate (true, the Hamilton experience clouds that one, but otherwise Alonso has never been challenged).

Dragging the car further up than it otherwise deserves.

Plus dogged determination. Ability to adapt driving style (Alonso's flair in that regard is virtually unique). Cool tactical head.

Anyway - long and short of it being that FA could walk into any F1 team (even including McLaren). Hamilton might come up to the same level in time, but I can't think of another driver in the same class (since Schumacher retired).


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I disagree nick

out of the current bunch Alonso & Hamilton are clearly class acts, just look at how much they beat team mates by - there's not another 10 or 15 like them
In the next tier I'd put Rosberg, Vettel & Massa

If you follow all the rumours with say Rosberg, apparently he's desperate to partner Button next year rather than take the wheel along side Hamilton because he knows he can beat Button in the same machinery


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Massa

I would have him at the same skill level as Hamilton every day.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not so much Hamilton's talent as McLaren's team management to worry about. They can say what they like, but they are far too controlling to allow a straight fight.

I like Massa, but he is not in that absolute top class.

Vettel will be next big thing (well, he is already).


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

nah - Massa [along with Kimi]loses points by having a habit of losing interest mid-race if it's not going well


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:48 pm
Posts: 34968
Full Member
 

Off the top of my head:

Kubica last year at this point was winning the championship, car's let him down this year
Heidfeld last GP was 25th finish in row, beating a record set by Schumacher
Glock podium in a Toyota last year at Hungary
Massa Should have won last year, certainly had the measure of Hamilton
Riakonnen 2007 champion.

Then there's Vettel and Webber, Rosberg, Trulli, Sutil. put any one of those guys in the Brawn, they'd be on top.


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

put any one of those guys in the Brawn, they'd be on top.

I agree - but if they were all in Brawns?


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

nah - Massa [along with Kimi]loses points by having a habit of losing interest mid-race if it's not going well

Very true - but he has a similar skill level to Hamilton. If we are going to go picking foibles, Hamilton is prone to silly mistakes too. Just look at the last lap in Monza. In the season before last he messed up a couple of races too (and so did his pit crew).


 
Posted : 17/09/2009 4:52 pm
Page 1 / 2