Forum menu
plane and conveyor ...
 

[Closed] plane and conveyor belt

Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

So... can a sea plane take off from a fast flowing river? 🙂

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 1:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Probably a little less for these beasts 🙂
[url]


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 1:41 pm
Posts: 20663
Full Member
 

More worryingly than this being debated on a bike forum...
This question caused a very long debate over on both Pprune and airliners.net with even professional pilots arguing that the plane wouldn't take off. I might ask the captain next time I board a Ryanair flight - if he says no I'll re-book!


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 1:42 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

You'll have to pay £20 to talk to him though, and another £30 to get an answer.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Flaperon - Member
YES, for crying out loud, YES!

With a name like Flaperon, if he says yes, then YES!


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 8:43 pm
Posts: 33970
Full Member
 

You'll have to pay £20 to talk to him though, and another £30 to get an answer.

Sadly, that's so very, very true.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:00 pm
Posts: 368
Free Member
 

when I read the question I assume that the plane is not moving in relation to the ground (as a person running on a treadmill is not moving in relation to the floor of the gym). Therefore there is no air moving over the wings, therefore no take-off.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:08 pm
Posts: 17846
Full Member
 

eckinspain - a person requires their feet to be in contact with the ground to move - hence, if the ground is moving at the same speed but opposite direction to that which they are trying to run at, then they will remain stationary - same as a car on a rolling road.

Ask yourself whether the plane uses it's wheels to propel itself forward while attempting to take off or whether it uses the big spinny thing attached to the engine and whether that big spinny thing is concerned about what's happening to the wheels? 😀


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No, the tyres would explode.
Edit: With LHS et al...


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what if both plane and treadmill were inside a vacuum?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:31 pm
Posts: 25940
Full Member
 

Terrible news, all you stats/offspring puzzle fans:

I think (allowing for bearing friction & safe tyres) the plane will take off, therefore clearly that is the wrong answer 😕

Now, if the pilot was a traveller and the passengers all bankers or MPs, would the weight of stw opprobrium allow it to take off ?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stumpy - Ask yourself if the plane is flying from the moment it starts to move forwards or has to reach a certain speed before the effect of lift can overcome the force of gravity?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find these threads immensely entertaining.

Ignoring peripheral silliness about wheel bearings and tyre ratings etc. I really can't understand how anyone would think the answer is no.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 9:43 pm
Posts: 17846
Full Member
 

Stumpy - Ask yourself if the plane is flying from the moment it starts to move forwards or has to reach a certain speed before the effect of lift can overcome the force of gravity?

Eh?

The plane will not fly until the air moving over the wings reaches a certain speed. It is almost immaterial as to whether the plane is actually moving (e.g. stationary plane, very strong head wind).
Assuming this 'experiment' takes place on a totally still day, then the aircraft will have to obtain a ground speed high enough that the airflow over the wings creates enough lift to overcome gravity.

EDIT - should have said that the wing will start to overcome the force of gravity from the moment that the aircraft gains enough speed for it to generate 'some' lift. At this point, the plane will start to become 'lighter' (if we imagine a runway that not only has a conveyor attached but a giant set of scales under it). Eventually the plane will be going so fast that the lift=the weight of the aircraft and any further increase in speed will cause the plane to fly.....


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So how does it reach that speed if the ground is always moving back at a speed greater than the speed at which it can propel itself forwards?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Southern Yeti - Member

So how does it reach that speed if the ground is always moving back at a speed greater than the speed at which it can propel itself forwards?

why does the speed at which the ground is moving backwards have any effect whatsoever on the speed at which the plane can propel itself forwards?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FFS, THE GROUND SPEED IS TOTALLY IRELAVANT!

A plane will only fly given sufficient AIRSPEED.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gravity?

Why won't my jet propelled bike link work? Anyhow, will a jet propelled bike go forwards on a tread mill going backwards at the exact same speed or stay still?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:16 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Forward

(and if it doesn't then you really need to grease your hubs).


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:18 pm
 DrP
Posts: 12116
Free Member
 

If you tie a bit of string to the front of the plane, then [b]pull it forward [/b]by that string (imagine God is pulling on the string...) - does it matter one bit which way the wheels are moving? Forwards/backwards - as long as the plane is moving forwards, the wheels don't matter (neither does the floor).

Now - imagine this - it's [b]NOT[/b] God pulling the string, but [b]propellers/jet[/b] pulling the plane.......

Geesh - how hard is it to get!

DrP


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Put a model car on a treadmill and push if forward with your finger. Does it move forwards? Of course it does.[/i]

That explains it perfectly IMO. Unless there enough friction in the bearings it doesnt take any more effort to push either. Put plane in place of model car, and plane engines in place of your hand. Or am I getting it wrong?

Edit: Dr P's explanation is good.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:19 pm
Posts: 17846
Full Member
 

Oh no - I tried for so long not to post on this thread & now I can't stop.....

The Southern Yeti - Member
So how does it reach that speed if the ground is always moving back at a speed greater than the speed at which it can propel itself forwards?

You've kind of answered your own question there.....'propel itself forwards' is what you wrote....
How does it do this??
Does the plane rely on:
a) the wheels which are just fitted to free spinnig hubs so the plane has something to sit on & move around the ground on, or
b) the great big propeller/jet engine that has no contact with the ground and pushes heaps of air backwards

to propel itself along.....??

If your answer is a) you are wrong.
If your answer is b) you are correct.

Considering that you went for b), then the little wheels can be doing whatever they want against a conveyor/hundreds of marbles/zilions of ants running the wrong way but the propeller/jet engine is still gonna be pushing air backwards causing the plane to move forwards.........


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

HAHAHAHA, can I ask another question?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:23 pm
Posts: 17846
Full Member
 

no.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Right people - stop being thick. Newton's 3rd Law explains it all.


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 17846
Full Member
 

.....?

Strain = (L'-L)/L

or am I looking in the wrong book? 😉


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The every action having an equal and opposite reaction one... If people the people on here that say the plane wont take off are correct how are vertical take off and space travel possible?


 
Posted : 01/06/2010 11:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The whole reason Hovercraft can't fly but can only get a little bit off the ground is because they don't have any wheels.


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 1:13 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

But would it make a sound?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 1:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Depends on the Doppler effect. How fast is it moving? And how fast are you moving?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 7:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Vertical take off and space travel do not rely on airspeed in the same way as an aircraft does. They basically use brute force from the engines to overcome the gravitational pull of the earth.


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:05 am
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They use thrust from the engines to move the plane against the [b]AIR[/b]

Just for anyone who missed that

[b]ITS THE REACTION AGAINST THE AIR[/b]

for clarity

[b]THE WHEELS AREN'T POWERED[/b]

🙄


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wait - so if the plane and conveyer belt was in a vacuum it wouldn't be able to take off? yeah, right!


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about if the plane is full of Americans on their way home from Disneyland?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:24 am
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The rocket itself is 'pushing' against the inertia of the propellent which is being ejected.


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mintman - what about when they are outside of the earth's atmosphere - how do they accelerate then?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]The rocket itself is 'pushing' against the inertia of the propellent which is being ejected.[/i]

I've had mornings after a vindaloo like that.


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:30 am
Posts: 368
Free Member
 

FFS, THE GROUND SPEED IS TOTALLY IRELAVANT!

A plane will only fly given sufficient AIRSPEED.

I agree, but surely the airspeed is zero? The treadmill is going round, the wheels are moving but the plane is staying still, no?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No. the wheels will be spinning twice as fast. The plane will still go forward at the same speed. Unless there's enough friction in the wheel hubs to stop it moving forward. In which case it won't take off.

It's easy to see why it causes confusion though.


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought in the original problem the conveyor belt continually matched the speed of the plane, so the plane goes forward at 10 mph, conveyor moves back at 10 mph therefore overall speed of plane through air (wind over wings) equals 0. Plane accelerates to 20mph, conveyor matches, plane through air = 0 and so on?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It has no affect the air movement though.


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can a Swan take off on a treadmill?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After it's broken your arm.


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:47 am
 LHS
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think some trolls have crept into this thread! 😉


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The arm is irrelevant. Can the swan take off?


 
Posted : 02/06/2010 9:49 am
Page 2 / 3