Forum menu
TBH it's a fairly well recognised photographer and some of his other work is actually fairly nice. I've still not been able to get hold of him though ๐
Having been away and had a think, I've got the idea now ๐ณ I was thinking in 2D and once I thought in 3D it suddenly clicked. I still think it's done in PS as opposed to with a TS lens, but I see how it could be done.
check you and your fancy focussing ways, been a good while since I used that technique - all but impossible now as the majority of modern lenses don't even have a focus scale...
Luckily I only have the budget for nice old kit! ๐
Although I think only one current Canon prime lens doesn't come with a scale and pretty much anything above the budget model zooms still has one, so with decent second-hand kit it's still possible without spending a fortune! ๐
That really is a good example of why some people should be prevented from having access to a computer with PS on it.
Agreed. Further to your description of the process, it also appears as though the adjustment brush has been used to increase the exposure on and around the statue on several of the shots. It's a matter of opinion of course, but I think the effect is quite awful.
I know David Levene, he uses tilt shift lenses from time to time and would never photoshop stuff the way some on here have suggested. Ive used tilt shift lenses myself and that effect would be very easy to create without any photoshop nonsense, not everybodys cup of tea tho.
Ive used tilt shift lenses myself and that effect would be very easy to create without any photoshop nonsense, not everybodys cup of tea tho.
Images 3, 7 & 8 all appear to have localised exposure adjustments/differences. Is this possible with lenses/filters?
Id say there may be a bit of burning or dodging but not much more, the rule for wire images and newspapers is you can do whatever you could do in the darkroom, so cropping, burning, dodging, a bit of saturation is ok but no major image manipulation is permitted.