Forum menu
ot: 50cc scooters ...
 

[Closed] ot: 50cc scooters - any thoughts? Peugeots ok?

Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Molgripos - you don't understand - sorry.

Its been pointed out to you over and over again. You have no idea of the capabilities of a motorcycle so I could be doing a perfectly reasonable and legal manoeuvre and still surprise you.

Its safer to get the manoeuvring out of the way quickly - if that suprises the car driver so be it.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:37 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

TJ I am not talking about motorbikes now. Surprising other people is bad. It may be the lesser of two evils in some particular situation, but it's still bad. No matter if you are driving or walking or anything else potentially risky.

End of, now lets move on.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Molgrips - you really need to ride a bike to understand this.

suppose I had two ways of doing a manoeuvre - one does not surprise the car driver, the other will but has greater safety margins - I take the one with greater safety margins everytime.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:42 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Now, stuff like this makes me even more convinced that motorcycling is inherently more dangerous than driving.

I think the lack of the steel cage, crumple zones and air bags would have been more of a clue! 😯

You should have a look at those bicycle things though. Lycra and comedy lumps of polystyrene balanced on your head. Makes motorbikes look safe.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:46 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I'll read the last 3 pages properly later, maybe.... But I've had a skim through.

FLOW:
Stability. Yes, a bigger wheeled bike may be more stable (And it may not) but stability isn't necessarily what's needed! Scooters generally turn faster and in traffic, that's what you DO want! 🙂

Like I said, anti-scooter bias and no idea what you're on about! 😛


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:53 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

flow
And for the record, a scooter is a moped.

No it's not.

Moped/Scooter classification

A 50cc scooter is also technically a moped. Pedals have nowt to do with it.
A 50cc trail bike is also technically a moped. Gears have nowt to do with it
A 50cc sports bike is also tecnically a moped. Style has nowt to do with it.

I scooter can be a moped, and a moped can be a scooter, but one don't necessarily follow the other!
Mopeds are 50cc things you can ride on a car license, basically, and these days there are more 125cc+ ones than 50s, probably!


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:58 am
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

Lycra and comedy lumps of polystyrene balanced on your head. Makes motorbikes look safe

Next time I feel I can't brake so I have to gun it to 80mph through a narrowing gap on my MTB I'll bear that in mind 🙂


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm acutely aware of this at all times - perhaps from cycling - and I've always found braking to be far more effective at keeping oneself out of a blind spot.

I suspect that having the power on tap tempts one to use it, when braking would do just fine.

When conversely, in a forum thread it seems your favoured method of getting out of a situation is definitely not to slow, but to keep moving forward.

To avoid falling into a blind spot, you can generally do it in two ways. One is to fall back and risk a situation where the other driver continues to be oblivious to your presence. The other is to move forward, out of their peripheral vision and into their direct line of sight, thus doing everything you can to ensure they see you.

The first option, slowing, also has the potential to close the distance between yourself and following traffic. A rear end shunt on a motorcycle isn't a bent bumper and a phone call to the insurance company. It's straight to hospital after being skittled across the tarmac.

Being stuck in a tight spot on a motorcycle is different to being stuck in a tight spot in a metal box. And the solutions are accordingly different. On two wheels, trying to make yourself as visible to everyone while still acting as if you are invisible is a good way to stay safe.

As you should well know from being a cyclist and a driver, there is no one solution to fit every situation. Anyone acutely aware of their actions on the road at all times will know this. Accepting, and being capable of adapting to the infinitely variable situations around us proves most helpful in staying safe. Closing ones eyes to a potential method of avoiding trouble simply removes one option we have at our disposal.

So a situation arises around you, and there's clear road ahead you can get safely into? Go get into it. Being behind a problem means you're at the mercy of it as it unfolds and your safety is dictated by the actions of others. But if you have the flexibility to put trouble well behind you, you can have more control of your safety and not have to rely on others. Relying on the skills of those we share the road with is the best way to get into trouble.

Sometimes it's safer to slow, yes. But despite what you've always found - an opinion formed only of your own experiences, and I'm yet to meet a man that has experienced everything the roads have to offer - sometimes it is safer to move forward.

No doubt I'm wrong, somehow, on some technicality or semantic detail, but it's the last post from me on this (off) topic. So on the winding road which is this thread I'll step on the brakes and drop back, using your favoured driving method, and hope for the best. We'll see how that goes.

My apologies to the OP for contributing to the irreverent arse wiping all over your thread.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 12:00 pm
Posts: 91169
Free Member
 

I've often found myself in a blind spot, and considered accelerating through it (and done it a few times too) - but then I wonder what would happen if they choose that moment to change lanes and I back off. By which I don't mean slam on the anchors.

But anyway, someone please close this as I apparently can't help myself.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 12:05 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Righto. I've read a bit more now. Let's clear this bit up and put it to bed, shall we?

To which PP said

That's mid information at best, poor advice would be a better description.
Please tell me
A) how many miles you've done on scooters (I've done a good 20000-30000 at the very least, and probably 150000 on motorbikes)
B) why a 125 bike is any safer based on your knowledge

I get sick of anti scooter bias by people that don't know a thing about them.

My reply

Because generally they accelerates quicker, stops quicker, have bigger wheels so are a lot more stable, they can go faster so you are not always being overtaken - which is dangerous.

I was comparing engine size, like for like, so 125cc bike vs 125cc scooter etc. I might not have been too clear though. Sorry if not.

That said, lets compare a 50cc scooter and a 125cc bike for a minute.

Would you STILL like to tell my why 'faster' = 'safer' ?
Becasue I'm fairly sure that you'll be less likely to crash at 30mph, than you will be at 70mph......and if you do it won't hurt as much, will it?
I've ridden a 50 round town. It was fine. I see no reason why not to get one if you spend all your time in 30 & 40 limits.
-------------------------------
Back to same size engines, 125 vs 125.

Why is a bike 'safer' than a 'scooter'? Scoots turn and stop on a sixpence. Mine has the same cross section front tyre as my Ducati for example!(120)
[u]THIS[/u] is the anti-scooter bias I mentioned, becasue you'll probably come out with an OPINION (based on zilch) and present it as FACT.

And I'll tell you right now, there is **** all difference to all intents and purposes between the two, apart from image and best primary use.
Having run 3 125cc bikes and 4 scooters, primarily as commuters, I'll tell you for free that scooters:
Do the job better
Are more comfortable
Are cheaper to run
Are FAR better in traffic

This is why I still have one (Vespa GT200) but most 'bikers' are blinkered and sneer at them becasue they aren't big and tough and loud and impressive and are for girls and kids.
I can live with that, but the bullshit and predjudice does annoy me sometimes!


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 12:21 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I still wounldn't touch (Another...) Peugeot scooter though. They are a bit shonky.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 12:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

oh my days what has happend i leave for 1 day and it turns into a bitchfest
end of the day
1.scooter/moped its just a clasification deal with it
2.a 50cc will do fine for the short trip o/p is sugesting**
3 de-restriction IS legal as long as over 17,license allows and ins are told
4.Peugeots are fine but there are better out there but cost more(se other posts)

**but a 125 would be better as once u get on ul get the bug
good luck to the o/p sifting through all this.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 10:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think it's true to say that the law does not recognise the term scooter, in essence it's a style of motorcycle and/or moped as far as that goes. Though where the dividing line between scooters, scooterettes and other sub-categories lies has been debated elsewhere but seems to lie in the hands of manufacturers' marketing departments.


 
Posted : 14/11/2011 11:34 pm
Page 4 / 4