Forum menu
One for the languag...
 

[Closed] One for the language pedants

Posts: 218
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#634842]

I've never been the best at written English and would appreciate help with the following:- Should the sentance read:

A group of buildings was present (single group but plural buildings) or
A group of buildings were present ?

Ta


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

was


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:27 pm
 Pook
Posts: 12698
Full Member
 

was

"sentence"


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sentence. and was.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:28 pm
Posts: 2407
Free Member
 

I think it should be 'was': a group was present.

But it might be tautological to say that a group of buildings was present. If they weren't present, they wouldn't be buildings ... how about 'there was a group of buildings'?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:30 pm
Posts: 35074
Full Member
 

Dorset knob has it.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:32 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Agreed with Dorset-Knob.

Or ditch the "group", as it isn't clear it's adding anything to the plural. "Building[b]s[/b] were present" if you must use the passive.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 3:54 pm
Posts: 2407
Free Member
 

Or ditch the "group", as it isn't clear it's adding anything to the plural

That's a good point. If the fact that the buildings formed a group is relevant, leave it in.

But if it's coincidental, you could just say 'There were some buildings', which implies that they're grouped anyway.

So now it's easier to talk about why the buidlings are important: 'There were some buildings, [b]which[/b] ... ' and then go on to finish the sentence.

... then write it out a hundred times before dawn.


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:15 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

"Some buildings were grouped around..."?


 
Posted : 15/06/2009 4:22 pm