Community

Forum menu
motorway speed limi...
 

[Closed] motorway speed limit.

Posts: 341
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So most Motorways have 3 lanes,LGV`s in the inside lane maximum speed 56mph,so to pass them you can do 70mph, middle lane,coaches,65mph,maximum,(both speed governor fitted),and outside lane 70mph,so if youre allowed 10%plus 2 miles which equals 77mph.

So why do drivers feel the need to exceed the speed limit by so much as is seen every day.

Discuss.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:30 pm
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You need to edit your post as your maths is crap.

Motorway speed limits are too low in this country and beacause of this people dont take responsibility for their actions when driving.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 813
Full Member
 

I would make it 100mp/h


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 4277
Full Member
 

If only the entire country had the same instructor as I did, the needle would hit 70 and you'd feel a sudden sharp pain in your left ear...


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:38 pm
 mt
Posts: 48
Free Member
 

I'd make it 55 and speed limit all vehicles to that speed.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:39 pm
Posts: 3398
Full Member
 

Nah, restrict goods vehicles & coaches to the left hand lane only. And train drivers with proper lane discipline and slip road discipline. And keep the limit at 70.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:41 pm
Posts: 145
Free Member
 

variable speed limits according to traffic volume and conditions are what's needed, as on the M25 & M42. Sometimes 100mph is safe, other times 50mph on the same stretch of road is dicing with death.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

speeding problem solved for me, lost my Honda Accord and replaced it with a oil burning Picasso


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:44 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Variable speed limits on all motorways governed by conditions at the time i.e. weather/lighting/traffic volume. You could write some algorithm to decide what's the most suitable speed...and display this speed as a mandatory limit a la M25.

All to be enforceable by average speed cameras positioned at the required intervals along the carriageways which should also be modified to detect tailgaters (surely somebody can come up with a method for this...don't they have some system for it in Germany or Switzerland?).


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:44 pm
 WTF
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Most people drive about 80 on a normal stretch of motorway as they are aware that 70 is the limit.
If the limit was 80 then most people would drive at 90 which wouldn`t be very good as the vast majority would be unable to use their phones or read maps and adjust sat-navs at that speed. 🙂


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:45 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Lets make the maximum 70mph,except when overtaking, whe10%plus 2mph, should be allowed.

Possibly ban anyone over 50 with a baseball cap on, while driveing.

Audi drivers with side lights as well as BMW drivers on sidelights.

Old people with cushions on the back window cill,and stickers saying we`ve seen the Lions at Longleat etc.

Single mothers with kids, between the hours of 8 and 9 am.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:47 pm
Posts: 21639
Full Member
 

let people do what speed they like...and then hammer them for poor lane discipline.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

....unable to use their phones or read maps and adjust sat-navs at that speed

Let alone roll a fag and drink a cup of coffee...


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mt, I take it that either:

1. you never travel far by road
2. you have the patience of a saint
3. you love being in your car more than anything in the world
4. you are actually Ralph Nader

If 70mph was considered safe for a 1965 Ford Anglia with drum brakes, no seat belts and crossply tyres which was flat out at 83mph, why is it unsafe now?


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:55 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

If 70mph was considered safe for a 1965 Ford Anglia with drum brakes, no seat belts and crossply tyres which was flat out at 83mph, why is it unsafe now?

Roads were much quieter back then too...no matter what limit is enforced, people learn their stopping distances for the driving text, then completely forget them (I know I did). Even when everybody said, ok, forget the stopping distance and use the two-second-rule, loads of folk ignore this one too.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I believe the biggest cause of fatal accidents on motorways is people falling asleep at the wheel. Force everybody to drive at 55mph and there would be a whole lot of snoozing going on....


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd close all the motorways and turn them into allotments.
SB


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why did I let myself get suckered into posting on this thread
.
.
.
.
.
.
Stupid
Stupid
Stupid


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I stick to 70 because it saves loadsa money compared to 80.

(If I could just punch in the postcode and have the robo-chauffeur do it I would. I could sit back and read a book... Which reminds me, I saw a woman 'driving' in the middle lane of the M4 the other day reading a magazine!!!)


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:23 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

You're not allowed 70mph + 10% + 2, thats just the error margin they allow in case of cumulative cock-ups in measurement. Technically anything over 70 is illegal.

I'd be happy with a higher limit if people actually followed the rules of the road and used their brains while driving, reducing their speed where needed due to rain, traffic, bends etc. Unfortunately people seem incapable, the more people seem incapable the more responsibility we have taken off us, the less we try to use it.

Well, suckered in to this post, but points still stand.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I could sit back and read a book...

catch a train?


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:31 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

The trouble is that they can't just decide to make it 100mph or whatever. How many motorway junctions and sliproads would have to be rebuilt to allow the increased speed. Think of the cost!


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:33 pm
Posts: 14774
Free Member
 

catch a train?

IME catching a train means catching a taxi either end, and/or a bus, and planning an extra hour either end for "transfers", and of course stops you taking anything larger than a brief case anywhere.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its the price you pay if you want to read a book? Public transport is always going to be flawed.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How many motorway junctions and sliproads would have to be rebuilt to allow the increased speed.

None?


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thefallguy: I do take the train when
a)there's a station somewhere near where I'm going
and b) I'm prepared to pay a lot of money (I took my family to Barcelona by train for our holiday year before last, it was great but cost more than twice what flying would have, but wow! that Eurostar is cool and the overnight sleeper train from Paris is ace too)


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 10:45 pm
Posts: 33902
Full Member
 

Indicated 80mph = 72mph. Speedo usually reads 10% over. My old Puma did, and my Octi does, according to GPS, so I'll happily sit at 80 thank you very much. 55 and restricted? Don't be stupid. Do you [i]really[/i] want to have miles of motorway with nose-to-tail trucks, coaches, cars, vans, etc, because nobodywould be able to pass any other vehicle. Please engage what passes for a brain and think through the consequenses of such a situation. It would be untenable and downright dangerous, which anyone who drives would recognise. Very seldom is [u]excessive[/u] speed the issue, it's [i]inappropriate[/i] speed, like doing 70 in fog.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 11:03 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Audi drivers with side lights as well as BMW drivers on sidelights.[/i]

Our Audi has a setting that just turns the lights on when it gets a bit dark, I presume the above are the same.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 11:11 pm
 JxL
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would leave it at 70 as it is. My car is pretty small (1.4), and max I can get out of it is 90mph on a straight motorway, but it doesn't feel too good and burns loads of petrol. When im in no rush, usually drive at 60, otherwise 60-80.

100mph limit would make the roads freaking crazy with bell**d BMW and Audi drivers flying all over the place without indicators.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 11:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would leave it at 70 as it is. My car is pretty small (1.4), and max I can get out of it is 90mph on a straight motorway, but it doesn't feel too good and burns loads of petrol.

You could stick to 70 then. Those of us with big lazy diesel lumps don't tend to do much worse at 80 than 70 (and still better than almost all petrol cars do at 70).


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 11:26 pm
 will
Posts: 44
Free Member
 

😆


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 11:33 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]catch a train? [/i]

Who did you think we are? Richard Bransen? I couldn't afford to travel by train to somewhere far away. Lets say I need to go down the smoke, about 200 miles or so one way. If I book a return train ticket a week in advance, it'll cost me about 70 quid. If I have the audacity to not be sure when i'm coming back, that jumps right up to 240 quid. 240 POUNDS!!!! I could buy a car with a full tank for that!

The only time train travel is viable is when my company is paying for it.


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 11:38 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

How many motorway junctions and sliproads would have to be rebuilt to allow the increased speed.

None?

I reckon it would be a fair majority. Don't forget that they will have to meet a safety spec that says something like "the sliproad must be X metres long for every 10mph of speed required"


 
Posted : 17/08/2009 11:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Our Audi has a setting that just turns the lights on when it gets a bit dark, I presume the above are the same.[/i]

don't be so presumptuous.

My BMW has a rotary switch on the dash - off, sidelights, dipped headlights. And the indicators do work.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 12:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BTW I've just got back from a holiday in Canada. You British drivers suck. Sooooo aggressive.

Here's a disturbing observation. I drove from Leeds to Newcastle this weekend up the A1. There was a Ford Ka being driven by someone who could best be described as "possibly french" for no reason other than the driving style.

The car would spend ages in the right hand lane at 68 for most of the journey, regardless of the traffic (or lack of it) in the left hand lane; occasionally a left indicator would come on - usually for something up it's exhaust pipe - followed by 100 metres in the left hand lane. Then it reverted to the overtaking lane, despite the inside lane being empty

This went on for far too long. Sometimes I wish I was a traffic cop. Just sometimes though - I really wouldn't want that job


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 12:17 am
Posts: 785
Free Member
 

To balance that - Calgary drivers are the worst I have ever witnessed.

Thank you

Plum


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 4:08 am
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

No speed limit but heavy penalties for driving too close to the car in front and poor lane discipline.

Says the perfectly safe driver on 9 points.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 6:30 am
 Drac
Posts: 50568
 

That would be very worrying and thank god they didn't as learners aren't allowed on motorways.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 6:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

1) No women allowed on motorways
2) HGV's not allowed to overtake between 0700-1930
3) Coaches also not allowed to overtake
4) Speed limit increased to 100mph
5) minimum speed in outside lane 80mph (or booked)

That'll do for now.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 7:30 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Speed limit? What's one of those? Surely maximum speed is goverened purely by how far the throttle turns and how long you dare hold it there?


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 7:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it any wonder no one knows how to drive on motorways? As a learner you aren't allowed on them - so how can anyone instruct people what is right or wrong?

Imagine if they applied that theory to the whole driving test - you can't use traffic lights or roundabouts yet - you're a learner, have a go at them after you've passed your test, see how you get on!

I still think you should also have to play on a skid pan as a learner so that you get the feel of what a car does when you lose control - cos the first time you lose control (& 17/18 year old boys do quite alot) it's usually on a country lane & they've got no idea how to avoid a car/hedge interface.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 7:51 am
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

British driving standards are piss poor. I remember reading that 95% of british drivers think they're better than average.

Best drivers I've seen are the French, Dutch, Italians, Germans, Swiss, Spanish, Portuguese in that order - british drivers would be way down that list.

Crap attitude and not taking responsibility for their own actions are what make british driving standards so poor. It isn't a competition and you dont own the ****ing road. Trying to scare people into moving over isn't acceptable either.

Billybob - i would love to teach folk that stuff. problem is folk aren't willing to pay for it.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 8:24 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Is it any wonder no one knows how to drive on motorways? As a learner you aren't allowed on them - so how can anyone instruct people what is right or wrong?

My driving instructor used to take me up the A1 (Near Newark where I lived at the time) and encourage me to do 70mph (Well, it's not hard!). I also used to drive 7 miles each way to town where the test routes were on fast single carrigeway A-roads and he taught me to overtake cars doing 40-50mph. I'll never forget him saying, "OK we'll pass this learner. Drop to 3rd and pull out and pass without slowing too much"

I'd imagine most towns have some dual carrigeway to practice on.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 8:31 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Best drivers I've seen are the French, Dutch, Italians, Germans, Swiss, Spanish, Portuguese in that order - british drivers would be way down that list.[/i]

Much as I like to get cross about poor driving in Britain, I'm still happy to admit that we have pretty much the safest roads in the world with only the swedes, dutch and Maltease being safer.

[url] http://www.driveandstayalive.com/info%20section/statistics/stats-multicountry-percapita-2004.htm [/url]

I can't believe you put the Italians and Spanish in that list, are you on crack? I have never driven in a crazier place than Italy in my life. The Spanish were marginally better but only because they use their horns less.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 8:40 am
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Reason for putting the italians and spanish on that list is that they know exactly what is all round them all the time. Briish drivers are completely oblivious to their surroundings.

How many times have you got to your destination and cant remember a thing about the journey?


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 8:44 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Never, I'm a safe driver.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 8:48 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Most of the accidents I attend on the motorway are because people are traveling to close to the vehicle infront, remember the "only a fool breaks the 2 second rule" ad? Most drivers think that the motorway signs etc are not directed at them they are for the other drivers. If drivers manage to crash at 70, they will do even worse at higher speeds.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 8:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So Spain has 4,751 deaths for a population of 40 million, and we have 1500 less deaths for a population 50% bigger. But apparently they're a lot better drivers?


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 9:05 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Brits on holiday init 😉


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 9:08 am
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yip. Statistics are like miniskirts - they show you a lot, but hide the good bits. I would guess that our emergency services and speed of access to healthcare are better.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 9:08 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Statistics are like miniskirts - they show you a lot, but hide the good bits.[/i]

lol, quality.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 9:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The worst driving I have ever seen was in Spain - so many idiots. Someone literally tried to kill me on the motorway as well (deliberately swerving towards me, driving in front of me then slamming on the brakes).

My speedo seems to be a bit out - according to the GPS I am doing 70 when the speedo says about 74. I think most of the time there is no real need to drive more than about 65-70, but I do sometimes.

I read a study somewhere that showed that driving quickly actually makes very little difference to your journey time - things like congestion, traffic lights etc make much more difference.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 9:18 am
Posts: 5825
Full Member
 

TZF - one question ever seen a car in Italy without a dent, I haven't - you know why, cos they never have a flippin' clue what is around them, that's why they crash into it all the time!


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 9:52 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

Reason for putting the italians and spanish on that list is that they know exactly what is all round them all the time. Briish drivers are completely oblivious to their surroundings.

Serious LOL on that one. Italians neither know nor care what is behind them.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 10:15 am
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

toby1 - yes many.

bimbler - yes they do.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 10:19 am
Posts: 23324
Free Member
 

is there a speed limit on the motorway? don't see much evidence of it on the M5 down in the SW and very little enforcement.

keep your eyes open and you can pretty much go as fast as you like without much fear of being pulled. the A30 is much the same.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 10:32 am
Posts: 388
Full Member
 

read a study somewhere that showed that driving quickly actually makes very little difference to your journey time - things like congestion, traffic lights etc make much more difference.

Ever driven from Preston to Glasgow on the M6/M74 at night?


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 10:47 am
 Olly
Posts: 5264
Full Member
 

im torn

people (we/you/they/I/everyone) becomes numb to the speed very very quickly.

we are quite happy and comfortable to trundle along at 80mph in the pissing rain and all is well.

but, my first car had ABS, disk brakes on all corners, and weighed 800kg, my second (current) car doesnt have any assitance like abs or esp, drum brakes on the back and weights 1300kg with a 2L diesel lump at the front.

i found out the hard way how much of a difference this makes when some BERK decided she would STOP on a dual carrigeway to let someone out, in the rain too.

i was shocked how far my car skidded! it went MIIILES.

we rely on out clever cars too much i think, 70mph is PLENTY, and going at 80mph, gains you no more than a few minutes or even seconds over a short ish trip.
over a 100 mile trip it will only gain you 5 or 10 mins!

irritates me when people say "im fine at 100, its everyone else who is rubbish"

ON THE FLIP SIDE.

speed is relative. if eveyrone drove at 100, it would be fine, but not everyone does, not everyone feels comfortable doing so, not everyone wants to.

70mph is the best balance between speed and ineffiency due to wind resistance anyway.
80 mph destroys my economy.

ive totally lost where i was going with this.....


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 11:20 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Is it any wonder no one knows how to drive on motorways? As a learner you aren't allowed on them - so how can anyone instruct people what is right or wrong?

I had a motorway lesson a few months after I passed my test. This was 20 years ago, do people not do this any more?

Speed limit should be 80mph to bring us in line with Europe. Everyone drives at 80mph anyway.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 12:44 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Speed limit should be 80mph to bring us in line with Europe.

Hmmm... seems pretty variable across Europe too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limits_by_country

And if we are worried about European alignment then shouldn't we also move to km/h?


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Graham - our limit is ~110kph, usually in Europe it is 120 or 130 (~75 or ~80 in mph).

As to changing to kilometres, different subject but I'd be in favour. Problem is metric is viewed as some EU conspiracy here especially by right wing newspapers owned by Australians (odd then that Australia uses kilometres).


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mr Tweed-Beany actually believes he is driving safely at 65mph in the 'cruising' lane. He wouldn't dream of using the 'slow lane' that's for Granny Miggins in her Micra. She thinks he's a maniac and can't even conceive of going at the insane speeds that Ron Rep does in his Vectra in the 'german cars only' lane.

If every car went the same speed it would actually be safer, it's the different speeds that cause the problems. Every vehicle would slot in to a space the motorway and trundle along to their exit safely. (Boring though.)


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Audi drivers with side lights as well as BMW drivers on sidelights.

The thing is, daytime running lights (which I assume are what you mean), are about to become a legal requirement on all new vehicles (2012 IIRC). Audi and Saab already have them as standard on most models (not sure about BMW). Pretty soon all cars will have them.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i found out the hard way how much of a difference this makes when some BERK decided [b]SHE[/b] would STOP on a dual carrigeway to let someone out, in the rain too

As if we wouldn't have guessed 😉


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ever driven in Germany? I did some 500+ miles on their motorways several days ago at speeds that could put me in jail in UK. No problems whatsoever.
The Brits should learn from the Germans and stick it to the EU by removing the speed limit on motorways (with the condition being if needed it can be implemented locally and penalties MUST be severe if one breaks it there).
How many more dead would there be on British roads? Natural selection dictates it'd be beneficial to the species in general. The idiots in "souped-up" £100 Fiestas would die quickly and you could go to a chippy without having to see chavs.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Juan and I were arguing about which country had the better motorway drivers - the UK or France. We each thought it was the other lot.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 16196
Free Member
 

70mph is plenty fast enough. If you increase the limit, you increase fuel consumption & emissions (when we should be conserving it) increase the potential severity of accidents, and reduce the number of vehicles that the road can carry.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:26 pm
Posts: 66093
Full Member
 

Trolling Zoo Fighter: "How many times have you got to your destination and cant remember a thing about the journey?"

Often- but why do you think that's of any relevance? Observing and remembering aren't the same thing at all. In fact, I'd go further, I think I remember more detail the slower I go, I have more brain free to remember details as I'm not spending so much effort on observation and response. When people say they remember a journey, they usually mean they were looking at the trees and mountains and picturesque little villages instead of the road, when I remember nothing it's because I was looking at nothing but the immediate surroundings, which frankly aren't memorable unless something goes wrong.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

I don't necessarily think that the issue is what the speed limit is, or even whether or not it should be changed. I think that perhaps the biggest problem we have in this country is that we have created rights and neglected to also create responsibilities.

In relation to the road, I would argue that we could perhaps abolish all speed limits...but make every driver responsible for their speed for every moment of the journey. Therefore in the event of any accident the driver would be liable unless they could prove that they were driving at an appropriate safe speed. I think a similar system operates in Germany on the Autobahns.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 1:32 pm
Posts: 16147
Free Member
 

I do a weekly 100 mile a day commute on the M1 from Sheffield to Bradford. At rush hour its great the average speed is about 80-90mph and every one is switched on and concentrating... until the numpty driver who normally sits in the middle lane doing 60 blocks everything up.

Driving on the motorway on non rush hour time scares me, you can feel the lack of concentration and the speed is so slow... well ok avg 70mph.

Oh and speed doesnt cost money, Im currently getting 50mpg out of my Mondeo diesel at 85mph !


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh and speed doesnt cost money, Im currently getting 50mpg out of my Mondeo diesel at 85mph !

But what would you get out of it at 70mph? You have a miracle engine if it is more efficient at 85 than at 70.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 2:14 pm
Posts: 16196
Free Member
 

Firstly, if you can't concentrate at 70mph then you shouldn't be driving.

Secondly, 70mph is more economical than 80+mph.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 2:14 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

Trust me, from someone who lost control of his car & had it hit the barriers before rolling, 70mph is plenty fast enough. 🙁 🙂

So many theories as to what would work on our motorways/roads.
Usual idiots aside, given how crowded our roads can be we are pretty well disciplined drivers.

[me aside]


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 2:26 pm
 ski
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Has anyone here ever experienced a tire blow at 70mph?

Did you manage to control/keep your vehicle in the lane you were driving?

Just curious, I guess new cars that use run flats might make it a bit safer, but just a thought going out to you 80-90mph drivers here?

btw the only flat I have had to deal with was years ago, in a Morris Minor at maybe 40mph and that left me in a ditch 😉


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 2:39 pm
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

ski...it looks like that is what caused my crash, although I don't remember hearing/feeling it. Couldn't control the car, the back started snaking then it spun. Happened very very fast.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anything over 70mph is pure madness...my steering wheel starts to shake making it impossible to read the newspaper I've draped over it.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 2:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Has anyone here ever experienced a tire blow at 70mph?

Yeah - years ago I swerved to avoid an animal in the road late at night, doing 70 or 80 on an A road in my Fiesta XR2. It whipped left/right/left/right then eventually hit the roadside embankment and flipped onto its roof. The only injury I got was a little cut as I crawled out of the still upside down car and caught my hand on some broken glass. Every single body panel was damaged. I couldn't believe it when I wasn't even breathalysed. (The police reckoned the tyre came off its rim on the original swerve).


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 3:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We had a tyre go on the M4, probably at about 85-90? Front nearside on a subaru legacy - made a racket and a bit of a mess but wasn't dangerous. It was more dangerous changing the wheel with my arse hanging out into the lane!

I imagine if we'd been steering hard / needed to brake suddenly things would have been different, but speed didn't make it particularly tricky.

I think that a modern car with wide tyres, decent rubber and brakes would be completely different to a moggy minor


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can somebody please explain to me what is so magical about 70mph?


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 3:40 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I say de-restricted the M6 toll road but have Police on patrol for reckless driving.

This is a serious post. There is a distinction between speed and reckless driving. Plus, you wouldnt get the lazy laners on the toll road as they would be scared for their idiot safety.


 
Posted : 18/08/2009 3:44 pm
Page 1 / 2