Forum menu
Miners strike (quic...
 

[Closed] Miners strike (quick question)

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#373368]

Monday morning and politics isn't a good start I know.

Anyhow got into a *discussion* about the miners strike over the weekend, and the people I was talking to were saying how Thatcher had to do what she did because of the demands of the trade unions, and how the miners were demanding massive pay increases which would make them earn around the same as doctors and surgeons, which was wrong so she had little choice.

Now this smacks of propaganda to me, however they insisted this was true and as I don't know for certain if this is true it was hard to dispute, so does anyone have any links to information to disprove this (or even links to miners pay scales, and pay increase demands at that time) as it seems very unlikely to me.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:38 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

It wasn't about wage demands, it was about pit closures.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yup - they went out after Thatcher vetoed the Govs review committee & demanded the closure of Corntonwood Colliery for her own political reasons rather than any economics.

I think some of the scabs got extra money but no one else did IIRC


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:46 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sorry no links, that claim could be true by newspaper standards though. Ie. compare a junior doctor with a miner on shift work and i'm sure the miner would earn much more.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:46 am
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

I suspect this will run!


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:47 am
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

havent got the time to do the comparative analysis (dentist awaits! 🙁 ) but this should start you off

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/written_answers/1973/nov/27/coal-miners-pay


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I've been reading up on it, as I really didn't know much about it and it is certainly interested, Scargill and the Govt. both seem to have been utter bastards, and the miners got the shitty end of the stick for their blind loyalty.

Still no proof on the wages thing, I suspect it was newspaper/BBC spin on what IanM said tho.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A very politicised strike by both sides. ostensibly from the union side it was about pit closures - nothing to do with money. Thatcher used it to destroy a strong union power base ( who may have overused their power in the past) History vindicated the miners union - when pit closures went far beyond what they were predicting.

Thatchers legacy is such stupidity as in Lothian - where there was a coal mine and a coal burning electricity plant linked by rail - a reasonably "green" solution. Instead we go coal brought in by boat from Poland which had a far higher sulphur content thus increasing pollution.

In the economic calculations about the cost of coal mined in Britain Thatcher did not include the costs of paying unemployment benefits to the 1/4 million folk added to the dole queues nor the increased environmental damage from using imported high sulphur coal.

A very nasty politicised strike where we all lost and no one gained apart from Thatcher who improved her political standing with the CBI


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 9:58 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

thatcher did it for no other reason than to put a end to the power of the working man.
the pits were and still are a more viable source of fuel than anything else.
this will be proved with the opening of many of them in years to come.
i for 1 will celebrate with a days holiday when the evil ****ing witch dies.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looks like they might have been right, from those links average gross income for a miner seems to be around £32 (before any pay increases), whereas senior doctors/radiographers were on £33 pounds.

So any pay increase would put them on more than a Dr, however that appears to be because Thatcher was ****ing the NHS, rather than the miners being overpaid.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:05 am
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

I recall Scargill claiming that coal could be mined and given away free and still make a profit if the same subsidies that were given to other forms of fuel where given to coal production.

I cant be sure of the source of these figures but a powerful argument.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:09 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

i for 1 will celebrate with a days holiday when the evil ****ing witch dies.

+1


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:10 am
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

ton - you told me you were never nasty 😛


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:13 am
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

A few Elvis Costello supporters here!


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:17 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

ton - you told me you were never nasty

al, i consider this quite a pleasent view from me regarding this woman.
i come from a staunch mining/labour area of the uk.
this woman and her american enforcer ruined dozens of villages and towns in the north.
they also destroyed thousands of families and also the self respect of the men from those families.
no other strike or it's outcome has had the same effect on britain and i do not think it ever will.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:20 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

surfer ???
and for your info my dad was a miner at ackton hall featherstone.
most of the men there never broke the strike, he was one of them.
5 weeks after the strike finished he had a stressed induced heart attack which left him ****ed.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:23 am
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

Elvis Costello wrote a song about dancing on her grave.

Lest you misunderstand, I support your position.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

just out of interest Ton, what do you think of Scargill?


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:27 am
Posts: 13
Free Member
 

i for 1 will celebrate with a days holiday when the evil ****ing witch dies.

I'll be taking a full ****ing fortnight! And I suspect that it'll not be too far away into the future either.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:28 am
Posts: 4434
Free Member
 

Scargill? Possibly corrupt, bent some might say infinitely preferable to that old hag Maggie, and what she done to Sunderland and County Durham.

I still remember my old primary school head teacher telling us all how evil thatcher was(is), during our morning assembly.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:34 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

just out of interest Ton, what do you think of Scargill?

rich, i think he was a good union leader who was prepared to do what his members voted for.
but above all he was right.
he predicted all along that thatcher wanted to destroy the industry.
at the start of the strike there were about 175 pits in the uk, at present there are about 10. and we now need more fuel to run the country than ever before.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My Uncle was a miner at Plank lane colliery Wigan till the day it shut. He lived in a council house and went on 1 holiday a year (a package trip to spain usually) never owned a new car and ended up struggling to pay his gas bill. So no I dont think he ever earned anything like what a doctor earned or was ever likely to.

As he spent the last 4 years of his life connected to an oxygen bottle and died prematurely of miners lung I think he f*cking well earned every penny he got

When the North sea runs out of gas and oil and we have to go begging to some megalomaniac russian for gas we might regret getting rid of all those profitable pits


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:36 am
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

rich, i think he was a good union leader who was prepared to do what his members voted for.
but above all he was right.
he predicted all along that thatcher wanted to destroy the industry.
at the start of the strike there were about 175 pits in the uk, at present there are about 10. and we now need more fuel to run the country than ever before.

Ton I agree with almost all you have said however I would argue that Thatcher simply wanted a fight with a trade union given the damage they had done to Edward Heath. The Miners unions were the first in line and she used them as an example.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:39 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

i for 1 will celebrate with a days holiday when the evil ****ing witch dies.

+1

Me to I have a t-shirt ready with her picture on it and the phrase ding dong the witch is dead...my mate made it..he hates her I agree.... if they give here a stats funeral I predict a RIOT and see some of you there?


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:40 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well I hope I dont die too soon
I pray the lord my soul to save
Oh Ill be a good boy, Im trying so hard to behave
Because theres one thing I know, Id like to live
Long enough to savour
Thats when they finally put you in the ground
Ill stand on your grave and tramp the dirt down.

Elvis not mincing his words


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:45 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

i also think a lot of the problems in the country started in the 80s.
prior to the strike the villages and towns in yorkshire/nottinghamshire/lancashire/whereever that had mines were very nice busy place, plenty of shops, pubs and other businesses.
go into one of these places now and see what they are like. the places are ruined, shops have gone, pubs gone, working mens clubs are gone.
also when i left school in 82 the drug culture was nowhere as near as it is now. these villages are rife with drug, and drug realted crime and not only with the younger end.
a lot of these places have no future and this has rubbed off on the people.
i think the country went bad under thatcher.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:46 am
Posts: 41869
Free Member
 

If the pits are that profitable why are they still closed?


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:47 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

surfer, that is what i meant.
kill the most powerfull union in the country and the rest will be a pushover.
and it worked, and for that i hope the woman burns in hell.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I thought one of the major issues was Scargill wasn't prepared to put the strike to a vote (as a reported 70% would have voted against it) as he knew he would lose it, thus making it an illegal strike and allowing Thatcher to do as she wished when trying to break it.

Also his attitude that no mines should shut, regardless of there profitability scuppered any deals which may have saved the majority of the mines in the long run.

Like I said, I am no expert, I am just trying to educate myself a bit on this subject.

As for the coal miners demanding more than Doctors, due to normal inflationary payrises amazingly thats true, however that has more to do with how terribly underpaid Doctors and Nurses were, rather than the miners being overpaid (one report indicates that a Clerical Admin could on average earn more than a 10 year qualified Dr/ Radiologist )


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:50 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

thisisnotaspoon
who mentioned profit.
and it was a political thing not a cost cutting thing.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:51 am
Posts: 4434
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon. Would you work down a pit, there's no way I would, neither would I let my son. I can't ever see them being re-opened, but I doubt theyd have shut so easily without thatcher.

You're argument could be applied to the banks of today, why don't we shut them down? simply because we need them. This country should be ran for the people who live here, not to simply make a profit


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:55 am
Posts: 57
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon:

Because they weren't just abandoned,they were destroyed so they could not be reopened.
Machinery removed or wrecked, drains blocked so the rock below would become unstable. Very political rather than just economic.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:56 am
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon
who mentioned profit.
and it was a political thing not a cost cutting thing.

The question is a good one. At the time we were told there were more than a 100yrs coal underground. Given the volatility of external providers of fuel why have some of them not been re-opened?


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 10:58 am
Posts: 4434
Free Member
 

Like all the other trades. You stop bringing in the apprentices, you loose the skills. We probably couldn't build a ship on the Wear, using Sunderland labour if we tried now. Same with mining.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:01 am
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

the timing of my post has crossed with others.

There was an interesting debate over the weekend between Evan Davies and Heseltine (?) where Davies made the point that the mines may not be around today however their gradual demise would have ensured that some of the worst effects of immediate closures may have been mitigated as people gradually moved aways and replacement industry was created.
The fact that it happened almost overnight almost certainly led to the social and economic issues Ton points to.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:04 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

If the pits are that profitable why are they still closed?

What constitutes profit ? If the cost of keeping the next 3 generations on benefits, the cost of subsidiary business's going bust, the cost of extra healthcare resulting from increased poverty and the cost of decomissioning the mines is factored in, then the mines were incredibly profitable.

If anyone on this forum is totally unaware of the real cost of closing the coal mines, then I suggest that next time you take a trip to Glyncwrrg, take an hour to walk around town before you go ride your bikes.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:05 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

thisisnotaspoon - Member
If the pits are that profitable why are they still closed?

If the banks are not economically viable why are we bailing them out?
Politics, Old school tie, upper class or working class etc etc

Certainly not economics


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:07 am
 Andy
Posts: 3348
Free Member
 

TJs comment is spot on. Nobody won. At the time the belief was that the UK suffered from too restrictive labour practices. Thatcher forced the strike to break the strongest union. Scargill tried to lead a strike earlier as he saw this coming (doing his job for his members). By the time they went out it was too late. I still wonder if they had gone out 2 years before whether they would have won!


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:08 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

I still wonder if they had gone out 2 years before whether they would have won!

That's an interesting point. Two years prior, Thatcher was busy drowning Argentinians and certainly would have found it difficult killing people in two theatres. At the same time, it would have been seen in a lot of quarters as an unpatriotic act to destabalise a govt during what was ( ashamedly ) a popular war and a lot of popular support for the miners might have dissapeared.

More interesting would have been if the strike was 3 years earlier and had coincided with the 1981 summer of civil unrest. I doubt that she'd have stood for that and we'd have probably seen the army on our streets.

It does make it seem that we thankfully, live in pretty dull times.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:16 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Excellent article in the Independent this weekend:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/reunited-at-last-the-striker-and-the-scab-1639777.html

Thatcher believed that the working class had to be eliminated as a political force. The closure of the mines, destruction of our manufacturing industries and mass privatisation were all part of her agenda.

"There is no such thing as Society" is a quote that still makes me shudder, not because of it's ignorance and stupidity,but because it was the core belief of her philosophy.
I blame her for legitimising much of the greed and corruption in today's society.
The day she dies will be a happy one round here.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:17 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

Both Thatcher and Scargill were motivated primarily by political motives. Neither had the welfare of the nation nor of the workers as their number one priority.

Unfortunately both were single-minded in their zeal and no compromise would ever have been likely between what were basically a hard-line Stalinist and an ultra right-wing Conservative. Scargill did as much damage to the trade union movement with his undemocratic decisions and ulterior motives as Thatcher did by her bloody-minded desire to crush them.

The country was a victim of circumstance. Two ideologically opposed personalities as opposite numbers in a dispute in which the arguments of profit, people and sustainability were immaterial compared to their political goals.

As has already been said, no one won.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:27 am
 ton
Posts: 24288
Full Member
 

Thatcher believed that the working class had to be eliminated as a political force. The closure of the mines, destruction of our manufacturing industries and mass privatisation were all part of her agenda.

end of my input.
this was not cost cutting or anything so constructive.
it was thatchers evil twisted way of bringing the working man and his most powerfull union to his knees.
evil, hatefull woman.
pity the i.r.a did not get her in brighton. and i truly believe that.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Seems to me the attitudes promoted by her and her chums have led pretty directly to where we are now. Put me down for the party!


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:33 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

pity the i.r.a did not get her in brighton. and i truly believe that.

I pity you.

For whatever reasons, even with the huge amount of power the traditional Labour supporting cities wield in General Elections she was democratically voted in (although never by a member of my family I must add).

To wish a democratically elected official (and no hung chads were involved) murdered by a terrorist organisation that has (still is) responsible for many murders within the UK and overseas of innocent civilians speaks volumes of your irrationality.

Yes you may feel strongly over her actions (as do I and I'm sure many others) but to wish her murdered by criminals?


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:33 am
 Andy
Posts: 3348
Free Member
 

Trail monkey, sorry memory bit fuzzy and haven't read any of the recent articles - yes 3 years earlier, but wasn't Scargills first call to strike 18 months or so before?

And also for me whilst this was all done in the name of a more "flexible workforce" the irony is at the same time Apprenticeships ended and no attempts were made to bring in any kind of decent management or industrial leadership training leaving our "captains of industry" no obvious way to develop their skills. These people are now in their 40s and our leaders! I always thought that incompetant management was as much to blame for the economic woes of the 70's / 80's as supposedly too powerful unions.


 
Posted : 09/03/2009 11:34 am
Page 1 / 4