Forum menu
They are right about one thing, they are being used as scapegoats.
they made the mistake of being caught, but it was systematic profiteering during a national crisis, and it was facilitate by the current government.
I believe the term used at the time was 'Chumocracy'...
Mo Mone, Mo problems 🙂
But what crime has actually been committed?
Hmm, so theotherjonv, which are you?
A – someone who benefitted
B – a right-wing shill
C – a gullible idiot
Maybe it's my 30 years as an Auditor and a definite struggle I have to see the 'grey', but as pointed out above:
Fraud, false representation, false accounting, tax evasion, conspiracy to defraud, bribery
Facilitated by a corrupt procurement process - it's like the stuff I (professionally) encountered in the early 90's when the Wall came down and Eastern Europe & the USSR turned into the Wild West.
I'm none of them as I hope I've made clear. I very much hope that some of the
Fraud, false representation, false accounting, tax evasion, conspiracy to defraud, bribery
can be proven, as I said in my post last night that you seem to have ignored before attacking me. But I also suspect or fear that they'll find a way to be just the right side of the line - which I'm sure you'll have also encountered as a professional auditor.
In fact that's where your "definite struggle I have to see the ‘grey’ " is the issue. We all know it's bent, but in a binary situation their advisors will be sufficiently skilled to be just legal enough.
She’s a BILF…. A Baroness I’…..
IGMC
At least protection/PPE for the deed shouldn't be in short supply.
At least protection/PPE for the deed shouldn’t be in short supply.
It may not be easy to aquire, what with being stuck in a warehouse (waiting for disposal).
You may have more luck giving the Jungle SAS manchild a message,he knows bloke in a pub
What can be proven is they are both morally corrupt and lacking any remorse.
With that in mind I would suggest getting booted from the Lords should happen.
I suspect, sadly, that they will manage to stay to the right side of what can be proved legally. Plus they will have the resources and 'friends in high places' who will not want the full detail to ever make it into court.
As someone previously involved in setting up some large contracts with Government departments, the endless process and hoops you have to jump through in order to get on contract / draw down funding even as a fully-qualified contractor/supplier. The only people who have the authority to over-ride these rules are Department Under Secretaries and Ministers, so we're obviously only seeing half the story here and the role of various people in the setting up of the VIP Lane and the circumvention of regular process in order to commit large-scale fraud. Its pretty clear that the likes of Gove, Hancock and other were involved here and they should be as much held to account as they facilitated the fraud.
But what crime has actually been committed?
I'll be entirely unsurprised to find that everything they've done is legal. They still decided to prioritize their greed during a national pandemic, tried to hide their involvement, lied about it, and then thought that it would be a good idea to go on telly to try to explain that they still think they've done nothing wrong. Although even other Tories think they're arseholes, so there's that I suppose.
Her wiki has been grim reading for a while
Your comment prompted me to have a read. Crikey, it really is grim.
The interview was nauseating. To suggest she was a victim, to say the only thing she did wrong was to lie and to claim they were just trying to do the moral thing and help the country. You really have to wonder what planet these people are on to think that that sort of chat will help their cause at all.
Plus they will have the resources and ‘friends in high places’ who will not want the full detail to ever make it into court.
It's Starmer's job to make sure it does.
As someone previously involved in setting up some large contracts with Government departments, the endless process and hoops you have to jump through in order to get on contract / draw down funding even as a fully-qualified contractor/supplier. The only people who have the authority to over-ride these rules are Department Under Secretaries and Ministers, so we’re obviously only seeing half the story here and the role of various people in the setting up of the VIP Lane and the circumvention of regular process in order to commit large-scale fraud. Its pretty clear that the likes of Gove, Hancock and other were involved here and they should be as much held to account as they facilitated the fraud.
With that in mind, not to absolve them of anything, do you think they are being served up as a conveniently high profile scapegoat?
The only point she made that I halfway agree with was, everyone was doing it, why are we the bad guys? Neither of them benefit from the old school ties that will protect the government, Gove, Harding et al, so their very public skewering will do nicely as a distraction.
At least protection/PPE for the deed shouldn’t be in short supply.
But possibly not fit for purpose....
Her husbands Wiki is not much better. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Barrowman
I'm just listening to it all on Five Live now. I love his statement: "I'm a very private person and thats why I live on the Isle of Man'
Nothing to do with the tax regime there then? I presume thats just a happy coincidence?
How stupid do they think we all are?
The only point she made that I halfway agree with was, everyone was doing it, why are we the bad guys?
I think - even for the Tories - such a blatant "accumulation" of £60m is enough to raise eyebrows. If it had been £6m, they'd probably have applauded her for it but £60m is taking the piss, even by their standards of treachery and corruption.
Dead cert though that if she'd been a Labour peer, they would not be letting this lie, Sunak would be treating it as if all his Christmases had come at once.
Bloody good job she's not a black woman accused of dodging a train fare, she'd have been hauled violently into jail by a dozen police by now.
With that in mind, not to absolve them of anything, do you think they are being served up as a conveniently high profile scapegoat?
Oh almost certainly, but I think the LK appearance has upped the stakes a bit rather than let it die a death through lack of comment. Will SKS escalate the issue at PMQs now do we reckon?
The only point she made that I halfway agree with was, everyone was doing it, why are we the bad guys? Neither of them benefit from the old school ties that will protect the government, Gove, Harding et al, so their very public skewering will do nicely as a distraction.
It's an interesting one, I'm sure lots of them were taking advantage of the available opportunities, but the way they each went about it probably differed. JRM will just have nudged his fund managers towards the right investments for example but wouldn't have been doing anything as grubby as making introductions himself I'm sure.
Gove particularly seems to have been quite conscious of the potential for future embarrassment/scandal. every time he has been questioned on TV/radio he seems to suggest he only ever put his contacts on to the relevant Public procurement people and sought no further influence or advantage (whether that constituted a bit of queue jumping is another question). I reckon he knew how this would eventually play out and was keen to appear as untarnished as possible, perhaps favouring non-financial compensation and/or some owed favours down the line. all speculation.
Those without the guile to turn down an 'Executive Directorship' or 'Consulting fee', let alone choosing to just spark up their own Ltd Co. deserve to be burnt at the stake.
But I reckon a few of the more slippery members of the Chumocracy will have managed their links to PPE contractors more carefully.
the Fact that Mone had been trying to scare journalists with solicitors letters and says it all.
There will have been lots of journalists digging for the last ~24 months, Mone is potentially the least careful/most clueless tip of a Tory PPE corruption iceberg I reckon...
Tax evasion manual, Chapter 1, paragraph 1.
Follow the money.
Who provided the financial guarantees for the £130+m purchase? Who then guaranteed the importation tax & duty process..? in other words, who else was in on this deal... Who handled the funds, taking a cut along the way?
Then, check the pathway for the income itself; whose hands did this pass through to get to the offshore trust..? Who owns the shares, who stands to gain at every stage of the process..? What did they spend it on. the new yacht appears to have been a particularly badly times acquisition, suggesting a destination for some of those funds. who does own that yacht, anyway? Where else do the family have substantial assets, property, trusts, shareholdings, investments, collections etc.
You really have to wonder what planet
It’s the planet where you cruise around on your private yacht,having 200 million squid contracts thrown your way.
It will be interesting to what comes of this and what they get dragged into court over,if anything.
crazy-legs
I think – even for the Tories – such a blatant “accumulation” of £60m is enough to raise eyebrows. If it had been £6m, they’d probably have applauded her for it but £60m is taking the piss, even by their standards of treachery and corruption.
Exactly - I think if they'd been upfront about it and explained it as "we were trying to help and we built in a decent margin but still undercutting everyone else - just our overheads were very small" there'd be a lot less ire over this. As it is, especially with money going offshore, little tax being paid on it and the deny deny deny tactics of the last few years and they deserve every bit of heat they're getting for it.
Also this "I don't have the money, it's held in trust" schtick isn't fooling anyone. I don't have a family trust but if I did, I'd certainly consider it "my" money. It's like they're on a different ****ing planet.
They'll still walk away very much richer and with a very nice life once all this has blown over.
It’s like they’re on a different ****ing planet.
They are.
People like this are greedy, opportunistic vermin, sociopaths who are a cancer on society..
Why did the idiot Barrowman reveal the percentage profit they made? They could have been evasive or not answered. Almost comes across as bragging about it!!
One does not want one's business colleagues to think one does business with poor margin - its important for investor relations that you sound like 30% is not especially good (which actually I'd agree with - if in the middle of a demand boom like the pandemic they couldn't get 30% margin the business was shite or its management were stupid). The margin was not the scandal - it sounds scandalous to people who don't know how profits work but be assured none of the other suppliers were working for less. The first scandal was the quality of the product which is a matter for the course. The next scandal is that they got VIP'd whilst other, probably better suppliers were getting stuck in bureaucracy. Then there's the scandal that there was no track record or seemingly scrutiny of the vested interested (which is odd, because our company supplied stuff to the government that they came and begged for and we still had to jump through hoops on who everyone of the beneficial owners was!). But that would all have been forgiven if the product was useful.
Then comes the denial scandal which this interview was about. I am sure this happens because of internal belief amongst those close to the idiots. Same thing happened to Andrew. "I believe you. If everyone saw things from your perspective they would believe you too. Lets tell everyone our perspective." Either these people have got fed up listening to the BS and think the world needs to know how our of touch their mates/boss is or they just worship them so much they can't see when they are wrong. Having opened the Kimono, people who have zero interest in offshore tax, family trusts etc are now going "surely that can't be right, I don't do that with my money how do they get to do that with theirs" etc. You aren't going to win the public over with those issues.
What confused me was the "protecting my family defence". Can anyone here, without looking it up, remember any occasion when her family was in the media? I didn't even know she has kids or if her parents are still alive? Does she really mean her husband (i.e. the beneficiary!) or that a relative will call her up and tell her to stop being a spoiled greedy ****? Best way to protect your family is not to do stupid shit!
Why did the idiot Barrowman reveal the percentage profit they made? They could have been evasive or not answered. Almost comes across as bragging about it!!
My take is that they are starting to feel a bit hot under the collar because the NCA investigation and Civil case might be picking up a bit, so this could be prep for whats going to come out by pushing back with the message "we will take you down with us".
The ownership of medpro was always going to come out and now they have put it the public domain.
Egregious profiteering isnt a crime and along with the "we are not the real baddies here it was the people who awarded the contracts" it puts heat on Sunak, Gove etc to let this die of natural causes rather than pursue vigorously and push to be fully resourced before the General Election mid next year.
They might also be thinking a former DPP will know exactly how to go after them when in Govt
The "Baroness Mone and the PPE Scandal" film has only had 43k views so on to Kuensburg to up the anti a bit.
Further pressure on Sunak:
https://twitter.com/MichelleMone/status/1736754263055815050
Why did the idiot Barrowman reveal the percentage profit they made?
Cos it’s harder for innumerate people to convert it to real money. He looked sheepish as **** when he delivered that particular snippet…
The next scandal is that they got VIP’d whilst other, probably better suppliers were getting stuck in bureaucracy.
This is the main issue. There are loads of stories of reputable PPE firms, with bags of experience who could have supplied it, but couldn't get near a government contract. Meanwhile, as the 'VIP lane' was introduced, it seemed like all these (Tory) shysters piled in and well and truly buried their heads in the trough, with little regard to whether the PPE they were sourcing was useable or the contracts deliverable. It looked like a feeding frenzy for the disaster capitalists who now fund the party
Anyway... she's having a pop at Gove now. Looks like she's decided that she fancies taking them all down with her
Rats in a sack
https://twitter.com/MichelleMone/status/1736735992487317595?s=20
And no mention of Hancock and the ex-publican Alex Bourne who could suddenly conjure up £20m worth of vials.
No longer a Conservative peer, or indeed a member of the party now, reportedly. Don't know who dumped who though.
Seems that the lawyer who brought down Zahawi thinks they just admitted criminal activity on the BBC interview. Worth reading the thread to the end.
https://twitter.com/DanNeidle/status/1735987372460749310
inners
This is the main issue. There are loads of stories of reputable PPE firms, with bags of experience who could have supplied it, but couldn’t get near a government contract.
I'm sure those other reputable PPE firms have UK employees, PAYE, Corporation Tax, rent and other bills to pay, all of which help UK Plc. These parasites trousered the lot.
Ain't no doubt it's plain to see,<br />Sixty million quid, no PPE...
I think someone mentioned it earlier, but many of us no doubt have to do our annual mandatory compliance/anti-corruption training at work, and the dodgy scenario you have to answer questions on is remarkably like the thing that's happened here with dodgy "VIP" treatment based on status.
The training scenarios at my work are almost always some unnamed corrupt South/Central American country, but we really are top of the league nowadays for absolute government corruption
Whilst she and her odious husband are clearly the lowest of the low, and will now be chased around the castle by wolves various it is important to remember that they are a symptom (to be eradicated rightly enough) but not the cause.
Don't be distracted
The current Tory party is the disease
but we really are top of the league nowadays for absolute government corruption
It sends out quite a message when a totally discredited politician who was not only proven to be corrupt to the core, but probably a threat to national security to boot, is made a Lord so he can then be appointed Foreign Secretary
kimbers
Full Memberooops
This whole thing about whatsapp is a scandal in its own right. How the **** are they using whatsapp, run by a third party, no security guarantees, apparently no centralised device management/backup etc.
They should be using Wire or similar and the devices should be locked down to ****. Aside from this perverting the course of justice which is clearly occurring, it is a national security risk if the devices are lost.
ooops
Is that evidence of perjury?
Edit: seems the lead rat is fighting real hard, and is happy to call out Lord Bethall.
Of course, I hope that the favour is now returned...
https://twitter.com/MichelleMone/status/1737034753839177995
This whole thing about whatsapp is a scandal in its own right.
Too right, when I first heard they were using WhatsApp for gov business, especially when there are all sorts of rules regarding email use, I thought it didn't seem at all right given that it relies solely on mobile devices not being "lost" or "accidentally" wiped. Bunch of total shysters 😡
Of course, I hope that the favour is now returned…
Ah happy days.
The rats arent only deserting the sinking ship but shoving each other in the water in their haste to get down the hawser.
This sort of thing on a smaller financial level goes on everywhere. I asked a well known investigative jorno publication to look into my local council leader as there is some juicy shizzle to be had there, the response was "As you can imagine we have limited resources and need to focus on the higher profile investigations" While I fully understand the situation behind the response it sends a very sour message. Local politics, planning permissions, jobs for friends (despte having a CCJ) are small fry compared with all the other corruption that surrounds us, but if this smaller stuff was exposed and snuffed out then maybe it would make the corrupt fu...ers who then climb the greasy pole, think twice about doing at such a level as the Mone.
It's a sad state of affairs, it really is.
This whole thing about whatsapp is a scandal in its own right. How the **** are they using whatsapp, run by a third party, no security guarantees, apparently no centralised device management/backup etc.
Because they're untrustworthy and not fit to govern a modern democracy - lucky then that we're not a modern democracy any more.
This sort of thing on a smaller financial level goes on everywhere. I asked a well known investigative jorno publication to look into my local council leader as there is some juicy shizzle to be had there
Have you tried private eye?