Forum search & shortcuts

'Luxury' car tax......
 

'Luxury' car tax....a first world grumble

Posts: 26892
Full Member
 

this so very much

I second this.

Most I have ever spent on a car is £10k


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 6:03 pm
Posts: 5807
Free Member
 

Plenty of people will be happy about it though as they don’t like others having nice things

There's a bit of a victim mentality emerging here. I think people are generally perfectly ok about other people having nice things but can be a bit puzzled by them complaining about paying a tax they've become knowingly liable to by making what's really a purely discretionary purchase.

Enjoy your car, but the tax was baked into the price when you bought it.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 6:21 pm
peteza, wheelsonfire1, davros and 15 people reacted
Posts: 1293
Full Member
 

Poorly conceived idea. I've said it before but VED should be on three simple metrics:

1. Pollution

2. Weight

3. Volume

V8 Range Rover, takes up loads of road space and weighs a ton. £800 a year? Tesla? Same. Zoe £50?  Pick-up truck no longer defined as a commercial vehicle, so £800 year


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 6:23 pm
multi21, andy4d, TedC and 3 people reacted
Posts: 44823
Full Member
 

bikesandboots - apologies if thats not what you meant - thats how I read it


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 6:24 pm
bikesandboots, peteza, andy4d and 3 people reacted
Posts: 901
Full Member
 

If the car industry is struggling because no-one can afford a £40k new car, then it ought to collectively get together and think of ways to reverse its wrong headed direction of car culture. Most folk just 'need' a simple utilitarian vehicle, but we get promoted unnecessary performance, superficial luxury tat and techno trinkets. By this point in time every car in production should be simple, durable, fixable, recyclable and as low impact as possible - and arguably relatively low performance. The fact we are so far away form that point is why the industry remains toxic. They should have started towards that more than a decade ago. If a tax nudges buyers away from excessive consumption and forces the manufacturers to steer away from needless luxury then I'm all for it.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 6:47 pm
peteza, geeh, tjagain and 37 people reacted
Posts: 257
Free Member
 

£40 is definately a luxury car. List price of a Dacia Sandero is about a third of that. Looking at what you can get for £40k,

- Base spec tesla model 3
- Hyundai Ioniq 5
- A posh spec long wheelbase caddy life with the biggest engine, autobox and a couple of grand of extras.

Hell, you can get a focus for under £30k that comes with luxuries like adaptive cruise control!

I think it is a bit like bikes; manufacturers have made their products better and more complex and sold consumers the idea that they still need products with the same brand name. So yes, the base spec passat is almost £40k, but it is a far more luxurious and complex car than the passat I had 20 years ago. That certainly didn't have luxuries like autodimming headlights, a satnav with integrated ChatGPT or an electric tailgate! I'm not sure that even included air con as standard in base spec.

So the tax doesn't include everything, but it is a simple tax which makes it cheap to adminster and hard to game.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 6:48 pm
davros, scotroutes, rogermoore and 9 people reacted
Posts: 16383
Free Member
 

Great points from endoverend and minus. Cars are massively over complicated and the makers push these cars onto us. There's no need for constantly  bringing out new models and making all the parts incompatible with previous models or even other brands or stuffing them full of unnecessary tech or luxury. If you want that then you can have it but expect to be taxed on that luxury.

This tax seems like one of the fairest. Only applies to those with high amounts of disposable income and is very easily avoided by personal choice.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 6:58 pm
peteza, kelvin, peteza and 1 people reacted
Posts: 3231
Full Member
 

Also many £20k used cars that were £40k new can have a year or two of this left to pay. Those aren't luxuries.

Worst case is something that with an inflated list price, sold new with heavy discount. And or with some expensive options that bumped up the list but arent worth much second hand.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:17 pm
Posts: 12888
Free Member
 

So firstly i’ll say I can’t afford a new car costing 40k. But I recently bought one second hand for under 30k

just be thankful you’re too poor to be able to afford a 2nd home, then you’d really have something to humblebrag about 🙂


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:18 pm
peteza, andy4d, quirks and 3 people reacted
Posts: 8338
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Whereas to people living in the real world it’s a bloody fortune

10k is alot of money. But it's not an expensive car. No more than 100k is an expensive house. Just because millions of folks can't afford it doesn't change that fact. And noone outside of argumentative knobers on stw would try to argue that a 10k car is expensive in the context of buying a car.

It didn’t stop you buying it, so are you just moaning?

No it dodnt stop me because I really wanted the car, it was a good deal, its exactly what I wanted. So I chose to pay this arbitrary tax. There are plenty of things I buy or pay for that I think are a rip off, but I buy them anyway as I want to enjoy life. Doesn't mean I think it's a fairly thought out tax however, or I can't complain on here about it!

Other than the usual 'boo sucks to be you' arguments, aside from the point about capturing tax dodgers, I'm yet to hear a decent argument for why I should pay the same addition tax penalty on a 2nd hand car costing less than 30k as someone that pays 10 times that much for one brand new. Or why it's fair that if I buy a car brand new for 39999 I don't pay the charge, but if I buy one second hand for half that I possibly might?


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:22 pm
multi21, andy4d, slackboy and 5 people reacted
Posts: 7513
Free Member
 

The tax is (should be) reflected in the price.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:24 pm
Posts: 3051
Free Member
 

I know about 5 people who ve bought a new dacia duster, c20k, does everything needed. Its only the badge snobs who dont like them. Car mags rave about them. 1 even bought the pov spec one and bought the body kit online, you can t tell the difference.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:30 pm
Posts: 8205
Full Member
 

The £40K tax point is now hitting a lot of pretty normal cars (e.g. VW Passat)

Passat is a luxury car, look what segment it is aimed at. The golf is the more normal one.

A decent spec A4 or 3 series

Pretty normal A4 estate

Also luxury cars

Mini Countryman PHEV

Guess what....... See a theme here

EVs subject to the same rules starting next year isn’t it?

About time, they should never have been exempt in the first place. Still luxury aren't they.

Don't get me started on whether SUVs should attract more tax!


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:34 pm
wheelsonfire1, davros, endoverend and 3 people reacted
Posts: 901
Full Member
 

well....the carbon cost embedded through its production exists throughout its lifecycle whether you buy it first or second. Like most taxes, its a clumsy way to do it- and as a society were still a long way from a better way of assigning cost relative to consumption.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:37 pm
quirks and quirks reacted
Posts: 14803
Full Member
 

Passats, Audi rep mobiles and Minis aren't luxury cars. Get a grip


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:45 pm
multi21, slackboy, slackboy and 1 people reacted
Posts: 8338
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Passats, Audi rep mobiles and Minis aren’t luxury cars

I have to agree. And up until this point in my life I'd never spent more than 10k on a car, and never once in the past have I thought that either

But tbf the tax isn't a 'Luxury car tax', it's an 'expensive car tax'. Is 40k expensive for a passat..I'd say very much so!

I'm not particularly against a tax on expensive cars. But I think it should be a tax percentage of the cars value at time of purchase, and should apply to ALL cars. More you can afford to spend the more you pay. Would be fairer imo


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 7:56 pm
multi21, slackboy, Mincer and 5 people reacted
Posts: 43956
Full Member
 

I think it should be a tax percentage of the cars value at time of purchase, and should apply to ALL cars. More you can afford to spend the more you pay. Would be fairer imo

There's already a flat rate tax on cars - VAT. Increasing the tax on ALL cars would adversely affect those with smaller budgets. Basically works the same way as income tax bands.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:05 pm
johnnystorm, matt_outandabout, kelvin and 3 people reacted
Posts: 8205
Full Member
 

Got one thanks, they absolutely are luxury vehicles. Passat is aimed at executive purchasers and Audi don't make anything not aimed at the upper end in the relevant target segment, even the A1. Minis are sold at a premium over similar vehicles because they are different or cool.

Cost is a good way of defining a luxury. None of the above do anything better than lower cost options but they cost more because they are perceived as better, have more luxuries or are built more luxuriously.

When I was looking earlier in the year pretty sure you could get a base Passat under 40k.

I’m not particularly against a tax on expensive cars. But I think it should be a tax percentage of the cars value at time of purchase, and should apply to ALL cars. More you can afford to spend the more you pay. Would be fairer imo

Sounds better than the current scheme.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:05 pm
peteza, davros, kelvin and 3 people reacted
Posts: 4176
Free Member
 

Thanks OP - useful thread.

I'm currently looking for a second hand EV in the 15-18k price bracket which could easily fall foul of this and I didn't realise.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:10 pm
andy4d and andy4d reacted
Posts: 8205
Full Member
 

FWIW I think all cars are too cheap. We need less cars on the road and should be encouraging getting longer life out of each and every one. I also think a lot of vehicles have become bloated and over powerful and that these should be penalised to encourage more use of appropriately sized lighter more efficient vehicles. Sadly these are minority views.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:12 pm
peteza, tjagain, davros and 17 people reacted
Posts: 4617
Free Member
 

I’m currently looking for a second hand EV in the 15-18k price bracket which could easily fall foul of this and I didn’t realise.

Evs are currently exempt from this, so whatever ev you buy now (second hand or new) will not have the luxury tax applied, but Evs (new or second hand) registered from a date I can't remember but some point in 2025  will be subject to it like any other car.

So go ahead and get whatever second hand ev you want (as long as it wasnt registered after the date in 2025) , you don't need to worry about the luxury tax.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:18 pm
slackboy, Steve_B, kelvin and 3 people reacted
Posts: 13813
Full Member
 

I’m currently looking for a second hand EV in the 15-18k price bracket

Also looking ........Hi fives bourgeois brother


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:27 pm
winston and winston reacted
Posts: 8338
Free Member
Topic starter
 

As above it doesn't apply to ev's registered before 2025

It does apply to hybrids however


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:32 pm
 Ewan
Posts: 4398
Free Member
 

Just on the survey point.... Why would 800 people lie on an anonymous survey on an MTB site about their income. I would bet it's fairly representative. Mtbing is middle class sport - of all the people I'm acquainted with through MTB (maybe 40-50) pretty much all are higher rate tax payers.

40k is not a luxury car in my view these days. Sure it's not a budget car. I think this is another example of people having not realising things have changed since their 20s. See people's understanding of the number of people in extreme poverty, not realising how much richer china and India are since even the start of the century etc.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:34 pm
davros, andy4d, doris5000 and 7 people reacted
Posts: 6454
Full Member
 

In a Simpsons point and laugh manner, ha ha - my perfectly adequate diesel Volvo is zero tax ? but I guess that's why my neighbour sold his rolls, range rover & Audi S5 & replace them with a solitary Tesla, so the tax must be doing some good.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:35 pm
Del and Del reacted
Posts: 44823
Full Member
 

Hi fives bourgeois brother

Petit bourgeois surely 🙂


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:35 pm
bruneep and bruneep reacted
Posts: 14803
Full Member
 

but I guess that’s why my neighbour sold his rolls, range rover & Audi S5 & replace them with a solitary Tesla, so the tax must be doing some good.

Someone who can afford a Rolls, Range and Audi S5 surely isn't that bothered about a couple of grand a year in rfl?


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:43 pm
doris5000, kelvin, kelvin and 1 people reacted
Posts: 14293
Free Member
 

As above it doesn’t apply to ev’s registered before 2025

Didn't know that - probably should have given it some thought!

*thumbs up thingy*


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:44 pm
Posts: 8338
Free Member
Topic starter
 

In a Simpsons point and laugh manner, ha ha – my perfectly adequate diesel Volvo is zero tax

Yeah.. But you have a diesel volvo, so ultimately the jokes very much on you..;-)


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 8:47 pm
Posts: 5393
Full Member
 

Says the man who's got a Seat... 😉


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 9:04 pm
Posts: 8338
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Says the man who’s got a Seat… ?

Technically it's a 310 bhp cupra with a 0-60 time of sub 5 seconds. So my comment stands..

Although when I'm feeling playful ill take the Porsche..(that ironically is far cheaper to tax!!)

😉


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 9:30 pm
Posts: 7143
Full Member
 

Also luxury cars

When new, maybe/yes. As I mentioned though, mine was almost 3 when I picked it up. Alternatively I could’ve gone to Ford/Skoda, ordered a brand new Focus/Octavia with likely more trinkets than the A4 but not had to pay the extra tax. That doesn’t seem like a well implemented tax regime to me


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 9:41 pm
Posts: 2650
Free Member
 

My  £4k z4 has 231 bhp and not had many bolted as it pulls so good in every gear lots of torque and no need for a radio with the induction sound

£40,000 car must take some salary, business owner employing maybe 5 or most likely loads of tick. Lives in spam valley, shops in Aldi.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 9:45 pm
Posts: 14803
Full Member
 

By this point in time every car in production should be simple, durable, fixable, recyclable and as low impact as possible – and arguably relatively low performance. The fact we are so far away form that point is why the industry remains toxic.

A Trabant for everyone it is....


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 9:55 pm
Posts: 16175
Free Member
 

Evs are currently exempt from this,

I didn’t realise that, it’s good to know when such shit cars as the ID3 (Golf) are £40k +


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 10:24 pm
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

minusFree Member
£40 is definately a luxury car. List price of a Dacia Sandero is about a third of that. Looking at what you can get for £40k,

– Base spec tesla model 3
– Hyundai Ioniq 5
– A posh spec long wheelbase caddy life with the biggest engine, autobox and a couple of grand of extras.

Hell, you can get a focus for under £30k that comes with luxuries like adaptive cruise control!

I think it is a bit like bikes; manufacturers have made their products better and more complex and sold consumers the idea that they still need products with the same brand name. So yes, the base spec passat is almost £40k, but it is a far more luxurious and complex car than the passat I had 20 years ago. That certainly didn’t have luxuries like autodimming headlights, a satnav with integrated ChatGPT or an electric tailgate! I’m not sure that even included air con as standard in base spec.

So the tax doesn’t include everything, but it is a simple tax which makes it cheap to adminster and hard to game.

lol these are all bog standard, bang average cars that you've listed.  Go and ride in an S Class, or a Range Rover Vogue, or a 7 series then tell me that any of those  you've listed are luxury. I mean Hyundai is literally the non-luxury arm of HMG, yet their base spec family car is only £100 under the 'luxury' tax level. It's not a luxury car, it just isn't.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 11:11 pm
Posts: 44823
Full Member
 

yes it is - by virtue of the fact on the well off can afford one.  a cheap car is an i10!

To be able to afford a £40 000 car you need to be earning well above the average.  How out of touch are you?  Two average earners will not take home much more than £40 000 pa


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 11:21 pm
peteza, wheelsonfire1, doris5000 and 7 people reacted
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

tjagain

To be able to afford a £40 000 car you need to be earning well above the average. How out of touch are you?

It's not me that's out of touch here, it's you.

The only reason things like Passats etc are falling into this tax bracket is because we've had high inflation in general, even moreso on cars and the threshold hasn't been increased in line with it.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 11:36 pm
andy4d and andy4d reacted
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

Someone who can afford a Rolls, Range and Audi S5 surely isn’t that bothered about a couple of grand a year in rfl?

but maybe someone who can’t really afford them, but has them anyway, might be?


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 11:43 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

The optics of some here remind me of that guy on QT who thought he was poor - he was on £70K or so.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 11:43 pm
peteza, doris5000, scotroutes and 13 people reacted
Posts: 9010
Free Member
 

Free to those that can afford it, very expensive to everyone else.


 
Posted : 23/11/2024 11:51 pm
peteza and peteza reacted
Posts: 43956
Full Member
 

I mean Hyundai is literally the non-luxury arm of HMG, yet their base spec family car is only £100 under the ‘luxury’ tax level. It’s not a luxury car, it just isn’t.

Hyundai Bayon - RRP from £21,480.

Hyundai i30 Wagon - RRP from £21,720

Hyundai Kona - RRP from £24,990

Hyundai Tucson - RRP from £30,540


 
Posted : 24/11/2024 12:05 am
davros, doris5000, kelvin and 3 people reacted
 5lab
Posts: 7926
Free Member
 

The £10k thing is nonsense. This only applies for the 5 years of a cars life, even really heavily depreciating EVs (which are exempt for now anyway) are unlikely to drop 75% of their value in 5 years


 
Posted : 24/11/2024 12:09 am
doris5000, kelvin, doris5000 and 1 people reacted
Posts: 2086
Free Member
 

scotroutesFull Member
I mean Hyundai is literally the non-luxury arm of HMG, yet their base spec family car is only £100 under the ‘luxury’ tax level. It’s not a luxury car, it just isn’t.
Hyundai Bayon – RRP from £21,480.

Hyundai i30 Wagon – RRP from £21,720

Hyundai Kona – RRP from £24,990

Hyundai Tucson – RRP from £30,540

Yes, you've listed a load of different (mostly quite a lot smaller) Hyundais with petrol engines? Obviously they're cheaper, it doesn't change the fact that a base spec Ioniq 5 is not a luxury car.

I'm not sure how I can make it much simpler than this:

Passat wagon price in 2020 = £27K  Luxury threshold = £40K

Passat wagon price in 2024 = £40K  Luxury threshold = still £40K


 
Posted : 24/11/2024 12:37 am
bikesandboots, andy4d, ianpv and 5 people reacted
Posts: 9010
Free Member
 

 
Posted : 24/11/2024 12:47 am
peteza, davros, scotroutes and 3 people reacted
Page 2 / 7