Jesus H Christ - (B...
 

[Closed] Jesus H Christ - (Bus Driver Content)

51 Posts
28 Users
0 Reactions
169 Views
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Was on a bus earlier today. Bus driver started reading his paper as he was sitting at the lights and only put it away at the next bus stop. What would you do in that situation?

He got very aggressive when I suggested that he probably shouldnt be reading his paper when he's driving.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Camera phone, police - then bus company if necessary... or would that be considered covert survaillance (sic), or some other such infringement of his human rights to read a paper whilst driving?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the same i'd do about someone sat at work on stw i guess...


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:30 pm
Posts: 158
Free Member
 

Shrug my shoulders and think about how I should get round to passing my driving test sometime and finally stop using what is an unreliable, overpriced mess of a PT network.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:31 pm
Posts: 11510
Free Member
 

film it. send it to bus company.

I drove round a one way system in brighton recently whilst the bus driver in the next lane was texting.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:31 pm
Posts: 6294
Full Member
 

(2.45 in)

😀


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Bus has CCTV. Bus company are going to check the footage and pursue it.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Email to LRT should sort it, doubt First would GAF though...


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:33 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

If it was a Stagecoach bus, they will take the matter seriously, report him, time date and bus route.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Or do like in my case when a bus almost ran me off the road when riding 'because I was holding him up' - don't even bother to respond to the letter personally addressed to the Chairman of the company.

Spoke to a friend about it (who co-incidentally owns a rival bus company and who gave me the contact details) and he says that the '**** everyone' mentality runs through most bus organisations so it *may* not always help if the people in charge of these companies don't really care anyway.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

muckytee - Member
Shrug my shoulders and think about how I should get round to passing my driving test sometime and finally stop using what is an unreliable, overpriced mess of a PT network.

I find the buses round here to be very reasonably priced and efficient.

(Driver for 10 years before I realised I didn't actually need a car.)


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:40 pm
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

You should have sent it recorded delivery, abnd followed up with a phone call, if it was that serious call the police in .


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:43 pm
Posts: 56882
Full Member
 

Don't be grassing drivers up! You'll make him angry!

[img] [/img]

Then we'll all incur his wrath! [b]EEK!!![/b]


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And he'll get 'Teh Brudders' after you, whoever that is.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 158
Free Member
 

Where is that, out of interest? oh and what is the main company.

Rubbish at my end round Braford/Leeds/Huddersfield, one bus an hour on my street, and most other services I use tend to have the same infrequency, coming on time is also great achievement.

Fares have been put up again aswell £2:80 to get into Leeds


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 3735
Free Member
Posts: 341
Free Member
 

£2.80 to get to leeds, but how much is parking and the cost of a vehicle.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the cost of a vehicle

But you don't buy a car to make one £2.80 bus journey.

In a thread recently I exampled how (in my experience) bus/train journeys often cost more than the average running cost of an average car.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:50 pm
Posts: 158
Free Member
 

mmm, fair point add in road tax, insurance, fuel and vehicle maintenance. But the amount of time wasted and the fact you still need a car for plenty of other things...?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 4:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Had a company's van park outside today and block in another company's van, even though one van had the engine running and was about to reverse.

The guy in the second van couldn't hear the engine because he was listening to an MP3.

There are a lot of bad drivers about!


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 5:00 pm
Posts: 19474
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]

Zombie shotgun! Don't leave home without it!


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 5:38 pm
Posts: 2061
Full Member
 

They'll probably do as much as they did when I emailed this picture to the bus company of a bus driving out of a "no entry" road. It drove forward, reversed onto the path and then drove across 2 lanes of traffic...

[url= http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7146/6766537701_4b54cc1688_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7146/6766537701_4b54cc1688_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/8133348@N03/6766537701/ ]Bus - no through road[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/8133348@N03/ ]oxym0r0n[/url], on Flickr

(I didn't even get a reply BTW)


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 5:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Inform the Police, driving without due care and attention!


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 5:58 pm
Posts: 19474
Free Member
 

What's the union going to do about this?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

think youll find all buses have an individual id tag on back give this no to the bus company and they can tell who was driving, i would definitely do something about, driving without due care and attention at least


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

or would that be considered covert survaillance (sic), or some other such infringement of his human rights

The right to privacy doesn't cover this.
Covert surveillance is not a de facto breach of a person's rights.
Someone with a camera is not the State.
It would not be covert.
etc

So no, it couldn't be a breach of teh yoomin rites.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:18 pm
Posts: 158
Free Member
 

all buses have an individual id tag on back give this no to the bus company

Yep usually just a number like 37448 or 452 (depending on the company), this number will be on the ticket as well, as the driver number, time and route number.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:25 pm
Posts: 2344
Free Member
 

Copy your complaint to the bus company to the relevant Traffic Commisioner.

http://www.dft.gov.uk/topics/tpm/traffic-commissioners/


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What would you do in that situation?

I'd take his paper and shove where the sun dont shine.

Or suggest kindly:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:54 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

I'd go to the cops....£5 says LRT will not give satisfaction.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 6:56 pm
Posts: 19474
Free Member
 

If the management can't be arsed to deal with rouge drivers for fear of union revoke then why not inform the union to see if they would step in to deal with these drivers? Otherwise, what's the point of union demanding higher salary and strikes while not even honest enough to deal with rouge drivers? Are they holding public to ransom?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Lothian have a decent record for dealing with idiot bus drivers. Unions will defend and represent their members of course - everyone is entitle to a defense - you get one in court after all.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What would you do in that situation?

It depends what newspaper he was reading.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It depends what newspaper he was reading.

The Sun. Has to be. Bus drivers are like white van men....


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No mercy then.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Think it might have been the Daily Mail, could have been the Metro though.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Think it might have been the Daily Mail

[b]SHOP HIM[/b]
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Daily Mail

Heathen......


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:48 pm
Posts: 12058
Full Member
 

Bus drivers are like white van men....
Do you mind, my paper of choice is the Independent, or 'I' if it's a short journey. 😀


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:50 pm
Posts: 19474
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member

Lothian have a decent record for dealing with idiot bus drivers. Unions will defend and represent their members of course - everyone is entitle to a defense - you get one in court after all.

If there is evidence to support that the drivers are at fault then I don't see any reasons to defend etc, just deal with it internally and swiftly according to company rules. Yes, they can have someone to witness the proceedings but that's all. What is there to argue when they are blatantly wrong.

If union cannot distinguish the wrong then there is no more hope ... we are all doomed.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 7:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So no defence then for people? prejudged as guilty before the hearing.

Chewkw thinks you are guilty thus you get no one to defend you.

Whats that called - a show trial is it? Or a kangaroo court?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

chewkw is in the "kill paedos" camp so I'd not take his views on justice too seriously.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 8:52 pm
Posts: 5146
Full Member
 

If the management can't be arsed to deal with [b]rouge[/b] drivers for fear of union revoke

wearing makeup isn't enough of a reason to get rid of a driver


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 9:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

wearing makeup isn't enough of a reason to get rid of a driver

Its political correctness gawn mad I telya


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 9:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

my paper of choice is the Independent

You're right, not all white van men are neanderthals!

My sincere apologies dear sir 😛


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 9:41 pm
Posts: 19474
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member

So no defence then for people? prejudged as guilty before the hearing.

Chewkw thinks you are guilty thus you get no one to defend you.

Whats that called - a show trial is it? Or a kangaroo court?

If the bloke is reading paper at the steering wheel or the picture of that bus going the wrong way ...

Errhhh ... hellooo ... what else do you need? Oh ya, I forgot to read this newspaper this morning so catching up while doing my job at the wheel or (the bus into the wrong street) sort the traffic rules, my bus is many times bigger than your tiny car.

Kangaroo court? No, it's called applying common sense.

Chewkw thinks you are guilty thus you get no one to defend you.

Yes, I am in the union but do I really need someone to defend me if I am blatantly wrong? i.e. if I am reading at the wheel! I mean the laws do not even allow a driver to use mobile let alone read newspaper and with the responsibility of so many passenger. It's a bit embarrassing isn't it having someone to defend for the obvious wrong? I would like to be defended if fat cat is trying to take away my livelihood without justification but the above bus drivers? WTF!

cynic-al - Member

chewkw is in the "kill paedos" camp so I'd not take his views on justice too seriously.

LOL! Yes, there are times when an item is damaged beyond repair that the only way to prevent further damage is to recycle it.

🙄

p/s: 😆 @ "rouge", should be [b]rogue[/b] ... no, no he can wear as much make-up or wear a skirt if he likes so long as he drives the bus with responsibility.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 11:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So chewk - you have decided befoer the hearing he is guilty and therefore should not be defended.

could be mental health difficulties?

Could be a spurious complaint from a vexatious passenger


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:04 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I'd buy a car so I didn't have to see him any more.


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:12 am
Posts: 18012
Full Member
 


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Could be a spurious complaint from a vexatious passenger

I love the word "vexatious".

Carry on....


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:20 am
Posts: 19474
Free Member
 

TandemJeremy - Member

So chewk - you have decided befoer the hearing he is guilty and therefore should not be defended.

Yes, there will be investigation but if the CCTV shows his irresponsible manner there is no need to go for elaborate proceeding. He gets it there and then.

could be mental health difficulties?

Those who employed him and all those that know his condition and yet put him in that responsibility should be fired. End off. As for the driver if that is the case he should have long gone and not to be put in that sort of responsibility. No sympathy for him whatsoever because there are more lives at stake.

Could be a spurious complaint from a vexatious passenger

That is another story but obviously there is investigation but if he is caught on the CCTV ... he gets to wax polish the entire fleet of bus and pump the tire of airplane ... 😆


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 12:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

road tax

What be this?


 
Posted : 27/01/2012 8:56 am