Jeremy's perfect de...
 

Subscribe now and choose from over 30 free gifts worth up to £49 - Plus get £25 to spend in our shop

[Closed] Jeremy's perfect description of the pm

53 Posts
39 Users
0 Reactions
164 Views
Posts: 431
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Clarkson strikes again
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7873624.stm


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:23 pm
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

In November, more than 1,800 people complained to the BBC after Clarkson made a joke on Top Gear about lorry drivers killing sex workers.
The joke followed the conviction of forklift truck driver Steve Wright for the murders of five prostitutes in Ipswich.

Eh? I thought it was a joke about Peter Sutcliffe, not Steve Wright?


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I bet he wouldn't say it to his face though. Brown v Clarkson Square Go - I would pay to watch that !


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:32 pm
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

what is offensive about calling a one eyed scot 'a one-eyed scot'

the idiot thing is debateable; the rest is fact!


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:34 pm
Posts: 2259
Full Member
 

Clarkson displaying yet more evidence of what a complete and utter w*nker he really is.

About time the BEEB banned him as well as Carol Thatcher.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:36 pm
Posts: 7561
Free Member
 

About time the BEEB banned him as well as Carol Thatcher.

What a terrible shade of grey you'd like to paint the place Philby.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clarkson being just an idiot, rather than a one-eyed scottish one.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This really is a load of rubbish. The bloke told a joke (that has a lot of fact in it). FFS there really are more important things to get worked up about.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what is offensive about calling a one eyed scot 'a one-eyed scot'

the idiot thing is debateable; the rest is fact!

Dunno - mentioning someone's nationality while insulting them seems a little xenophobic (no surprise there from Clarkson).

How about if he was talking about, say, an Indian?


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

Doesn't the curl-haired English idiot have a right to slag off the PM?


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:42 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7203
Full Member
 

I thought he summed the pm up a treat 😉


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 431
Full Member
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

How about if he was talking about, say, an Indian?

What if an Indian TV presenter from the Tamil Nadu region had a go at an Indian politician from the Himachal Pradesh region?

(Regions picked at random.)


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:46 pm
 Smee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We disowned GB a few years back - he isn't a scot any more - naturalised english is what he is.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:51 pm
Posts: 45685
Free Member
 

[url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_Prime_Ministers_by_nicknames ]PM Nicknames[/url]

[url=

back spitting image I say.[/url]


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 12:55 pm
Posts: 1604
Free Member
 

Storm in a tea cup. Bloody media.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I've been reading Clarkson's stuff for years, since probably the late 80s/early 90s and in that time he's insulted just about everyone and everything at some point. (And being a cyclisy/motorcyclist a lot of it is straight at me!) But I just find him amusing, knowlegeable, passionate and funny. Always have, always will.
People take him faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar too seriously, methinks. And anything like this will be stirred to the max by the press after the Ross/Brand affair anyway.
I imagine JC doesn't give a flying **** about it, TBH.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Weesus, break out the vegetarian sandals, the lafties are at it again 🙂

Bewing factual and being racist are often very different. We are being programmed not to see the difference.

To use the example.

Calling the hypothetical person an indian idiot. I ain't got a problem with that.

Calling him a ****stani idiot is insulting to the majority of Indians and factually incorrect.

A glass of perspective and tonic are needed here.

Conks


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clarkson in 'Jeremy Clarkson behaving like an @rsehole shocker' .

Immature English geriatric.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:07 pm
Posts: 513
Free Member
 

i like him 😉 his books are quite funny and the pm is a one eyed porridge muncher 😉


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As Brown represents a Scottish constituency in a UK parliament that makes laws to govern England, while Scotland has its own parliament for Scottish matters (and Brown's party doesn't control that parliament), mentioning his Scottishness is perhaps very aposite...


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about if he talked about, say 'stupid polish bastards'? What is the relevance of mentioning people's nationality in that context, other than implying its in some way derogatory.

I'm not saying its out and out racist and I don't see any massive problem with him saying it, but it is probably indicative of the fact that he is basically a xenophobic troll. He can be entertaining at times, but he is an utter cock.

Besides we all know how touchy the scots are. 😛


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:14 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

with grummm sometimes funny often offensive bit of a kn0b really.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Martin Brundle got away with calling the workers relaying the asphalt at the Canadian Grand Prix Pikeys, which is far worse than calling a one eyed scot a one eyed scot..

His idiot status is obviously open to discussion.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]andym - Member
Clarkson in 'Jeremy Clarkson behaving like an @rsehole shocker'[i]

Probably more like 'Jeremy Clarkson saying something to provoke a reaction shocker'

I'm with Peterpoddy on this. Whilst I don't agree with a lot of the stuff he says I have been reading his stuff for years and find him really funny. It is also abundantly clear that the vast majority of the things he says are said to provoke a reaction not necessarily express his views.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I like the fact that everyone is concerned about Brown being called a Scot.

No one is disputing he is an idiot.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

>As Brown represents a Scottish constituency in a UK parliament that makes laws to govern England, while Scotland has its own parliament for Scottish matters (and Brown's party doesn't control that parliament), mentioning his Scottishness is perhaps very aposite... <

So the West Lothian question makes Brown a de facto idiot?

Its apposite btw


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:44 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Jeremy clarkson polarises opinion and upsets somebody.

Yaawwwnnnn.

I think he's funny, but most his stuff is said specifically to get a reaction. No problems here.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:49 pm
Posts: 91096
Free Member
 

Clarkson's a dick. End of thread.

I thought he was funny when I was 11 or 12.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why so much attention is paid to what Clarkson says, is beyond me. I mean, of what importance is he? He's just a TV presenter, same as Wossy, Chris Tarrant, Sarah Beeny or whoever. Would we reallly care, if Terry Wogan said something 'controversial'? Not really.

If he were a politician, or someone with some political or financial power, and their comments could affect the running of things, food production or people's lives, then maybe there'd be cause for concern.

But it's Clarkson, ffs. He's just a bloke with a big gob, who says 'outrageous' stuff, to get attention. Bit like me or Hora.

I bet his ego has been fed nicely by this media hysteria. He loves it- it helps his career!

This is just one of those stories for those who can't understand more important and complex issues, or who are to scared to face more alarming facts, so that they can have something to prattle on about at work or wherever.

Meanwhile, in other news, Famine, War, Death, Destruction, Chaos....

Personally, I'm far more concerned with, amongst other things, how our courts appear to kowtow to orders from the American military, and the implications this has, on Truth and Justice in our Nation, than what some tw4t in ill-fitting jeans and a silly hairdo thinks...


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because he's very good at being a troll.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 2:22 pm
 Stu
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Clarkson's apology:

"In the heat of the moment I made a remark about the Prime Minister's personal appearance for which, upon refection, I apologise."

Really love the fact that everyone is offended about the one eye thing but nobody disagrees about the idiot bit! 😆


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 2:59 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

But, surely the one-eyed bit is fact, whereas the idiot bit [i]could[/i] be debated. OK, so I know which side of the fence I'd be on, but you could debate the issue.

He IS a Scot and he has only got one eye. Those are facts.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 5:09 pm
 srrc
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Go for it JC! Upset as many as possible. Sanctimonious ****s.
Perhaps Carol T could go to Oz and start calling people Gollys as well.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

As with Bwand 'n' Woss and the ridiculous Carol Thatcher, I could care less, and do not want to be bothered.

Since we are caring:

- calling a one0-eyed man "one-eyed" is not particularly insulting, and accurate. But it is unnecessary.

- calling someone who is scottish "scottish" is also fair enough, but unneccessary.

- calling the prime minister an "idiot" is fine, but let's have a discussion about his idiocy which does not refer to his nationality or personal appearance, which add nothing to the argument that any sensible person needs to know. If Clarkson is a serious public figure with somethign interesting to say about why BGordon Brown is an idiot then he should get on and say it. Until he bothers, and while he lives in the land of "poke people and watch them get out-raged" then I reserve the right to regard him as a person on no interest or consequence, much like Jade Goody, Paris Hilton, Andy Murray et al.

🙂


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 5:29 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

If Clarkson is a serious public figure with somethign interesting to say about why BGordon Brown is an idiot then he should get on and say it. Until he bothers...............

Read his column in the Sunday Times for a regulary update on why Mr C thinks Gordon is an idiot. He's right, too.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 5:31 pm
Posts: 2261
Full Member
 

Just watched a piece on ITN ref Clarkson.
Katie Derham,reading the news put plenty of emphasis into the phrase:"[b]One eyed Scottish idiot[/b]" when she repeated what he had said.lol.
Imho Clarkson was just stating facts:
One eyed.....Fact
Scottish.....Fact
Idiot........Fact


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 6:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

People going on about how he is only 'stating facts'. Its not really the point is it. Do you enjoy highlighting people's physical characteristics or race while insulting them

eg if you saw an overweight black person on crutches, would you refer to them as a 'fat black cripple'?


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 7:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but GB appears to have two eyes. Is one false? All I can find is that he is blind in one eye.

[img] [/img]

So, if he actually possesses 2 eyes, regardless of one not working, JC is actually factually wrong.

Not particularly nice to use someone's disability in a derogatory attack. Or their nationality.

As for the 'idiot' bit; GB is a lot more intelligent and better educated than JC appears to be.

Without going into the ins and outs; GB is the British Prime Minister, and JC is a w4nky TV presenter.

I doubt GB is too worried.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 7:12 pm
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

He could always throw his phone at the telly next time Top Gear is on.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 7:18 pm
Posts: 2261
Full Member
 

He'd probably miss...


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 7:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sootyandjim - Member
He could always throw his phone at the telly next time Top Gear is on.

Probably miss though.

EDIT: Dang.

Anyway, Clarkson. He made an off the cuff comment insulting a politician and people get upset. What did jesus say?.....let the first mafaka who aint done sum sheet be da first to do dat sheeit bitches... words to that effect anyway.

It's not as if Clarkson said it while he was presenting the evening news - he's a motoring journalist for ****s sake, who cares what he said. It was in jest and anyone who cant see that deserves to be shot through the head with a gun that fires frozen penises at great velocity.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm with you rude boy Clarkson and all the idiots on here are calling him a one eyed idiot when it seems that he does actually have two eyes and is just blind in one.Does that mean if you have had the snip you have no balls?


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

from the article

Clarkson is in Australia to host Top Gear Live, a stage version of the hit BBC show.

Now that strikes me a something much more worthy of an apology.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 8:40 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 8:44 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 8:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Those pics are old, they are from when he was 'heavy with' Hammond


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 8:49 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
 

Re the "Scottish" part of it..........I'm Scottish and it didn't bother me one bit. Neither would "Scotty, Jock, Jocko, haggis muncher, funny skirt wearer" or any of those sort of things. It also doesn't bother me if folk make jokes about Scots being mean, or drunks etc. I make the same jokes myself.

Wouldn't bother me if the remarks were by Clarkson, Carol Thatcher, Prince Harry or anyone else. It's a free country, they can say what they like.

So will anyone trying desperately to be offended on my behalf, or on behalf of most other Scots, please stop. It's nice of you to make the effort, but it really doesn't bother us.

Same would apply if I was Indian, ****stani, Irish, Jewish, one-legged or whatever. It's only words.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Gordon Brown has one artificial eye.

But I don't think Jeremy Clarkson really needed to apologise for that one sentence which he said about Gordon Brown.

What Jeremy Clarkson [i]really[/i] needs to make a public apology about, is for being a **** all of his life.

That's what I reckon anyway.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 8:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

kennyp - its great that you can speak for people of every race, nationality and physical condition, on the basis of being scottish.

Think grizzlygus summed it up fairly well.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 9:27 pm
Posts: 3535
Free Member
 

Grumm, I was speaking on behalf of the Scots that I've discussedthese sorts of things with. Can't see anything in my post where I presumed to speak on behalf of the rest of the world? I did say "It would be the same if [b]I[/b] was Indian, ****stani etc"....the emphasis was on the "I".

Also, in your earlier post you seem to mix up race with nationality. Myself, Gordon Brown and Jeremy Clarkson are in fact all the same race. It also wouldn't bother me if someone abused my racially. I'd just laugh it off (assuming they weren't violent of course). I was trying to make the point that people get very worked up about things that are of no great importance, and sadly, vice versa.


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 10:01 pm
 Nico
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 10:12 pm
Posts: 7336
Free Member
 

Nico, is there something you'd like to share with the group?


 
Posted : 06/02/2009 10:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nico has lost his goat porn collection and moved onto Clarkson porn 😉

Really can't see what all the fuss is about myself.


 
Posted : 07/02/2009 7:51 pm