Do any of us really believe that people on lower incomes went out and bought lots of healthy food with their windfalls?
'Ahh, £190 - now where is the organic freerange kiwi fruit isle?'
Thats a pretty ****y thing to say m_f.
What are your feelings on, say, the provision of state funded fertilisation treatments to lower income groups?
Why? Because they'll pay your pension 😉
And some of them will have to change your incontinence pants 😳
tiger - from observation, that's about right 🙂
Thats a pretty ****y thing to say m_f.
Maybe, but also pretty accurate I'd say, from brief observation and knowledge of a few couples of that group.
Mr Woppit - I agree!
Given the amount of food my wife is stuffing into herself as we enter the last few weeks before the ETA of something small and screamy I think that a bit of extra cash for the less well off for food is a good idea. Possibly vouchers for veg and fruit might help how it's spent by some though?
But £500 won't go far.
I would rather see Jonny Two Audis get nothing if it means a genuinely needy child gets his £500 as well as their own £500.
I agree, and that's how it should be, especially in the current climate. The hope is like a pension, it will be worth substantially more in 18 years- enough perhaps to make the difference to a childs life.
So in effect you are using it, to build up an investment for the future?
Yes, but they won't be able to spend it when ther are 18 😆
But my point is that we can afford to do this without state help. We shouldn't get it and taking it a step futher if we as a middle income family don't need it then there are a lot of more wealthy people who really don't need it.
From a governmental point of view any money they give out in benefits is better off given to the 'corsa, Xbox, big earring' brigade who'll spend as much as they can ge hold of. As soon as the money's spent the govt will get a significant portion back in VAT, national insurance and income tax from the retail establishments that provide these things. If the money's saved it's gone as far as the govt is concerned.
As soon as the money's spent the govt will get a significant portion back in VAT
Well it goes out of the cofers now, won't be spent for 18 years and who gets to look after it for 18 years. It's our friends the banks (and not the nice High Street ones, its the bloody investment we ****ed it all up banks)
It's a dumb idea and well done the Conlibs for binning it.
If the money's saved it's gone as far as the govt is concerned.
Well it is available to be lent out in return for interest which increases the lender's profitability and results in more tax paid. The the borrower spends it on something - investment in a business maybe or goods which results in tax in the short or longer-term plus the economy as a whole is helped.
😆Dyslexia must be kicking in, could swear it said Tony Curtis content.
Thats a pretty ****y thing to say m_f.
Come off it - do you really believe the vast majority of people use that money to buy better quality food during pregnancy?
Some Tony Curtis content 😉
My, he was a handsome chap in his day!
[img] 
[/img]
Can you give me a good reason why I should be paying for YOUR children?
No, but thanks for the cash all the same
Not sure how it is going to cost you £750 directly as you aren't being asked to spend the money - it was a handout the government gave you when the child was born and I think a top up when they reached 7 - so unless you stuck your hand in your own pocket and gave yourself the £750 then it's not cost you anything - what it has cost you child is £250 to start a savings account that might help them a little along the way when they reach 18...
I suspect each person who is paying tax is probably sticking a few pence of their tax payment to the whole childcare trust thing so even if you get down to the nitty gritty then you are perhaps 'saving' a few pence on your tax payment to be spent on something else...
Now that could be resolved if you have some wealthy family members who think a savings account is a great idea and set it up, but otherwise, you haven't lost out unless you plan on replacing the £250 government handout with your own handout?
Shame it is going but makes sense...only thing I've lost out on will be the top-up in 5 years time for my daughter - but by then things should be much better* so not somethign to be concerned with.
* Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaa...apparently!
Some Tony Curtis content
Yaander lies duh castle uv my fadder...
This really annoys me the way cuts are portrayed as Tory, lets face it for the past thirteen years we have been misled and had needless public sector jobs created at the expense of the tax payer, we have been crippled by a target culture and bureaucracy, Labour spent more than the tax receipts are bringing in, so wake up and smell the coffee this is reality not some Labour spin who totally dug there heads into the sand. We are facing economic meltdown, and if you remember many people had to pay back their family tax credits because of miscalculations etc, so welcome to the real world guess you will have to survive like the rest of us.
Can you give me a good reason why I should be paying for YOUR children? If you can't afford them, DON'T HAVE THEM.
Yes I for one want to see hungry children and their parents begging in the streets like some third world country so fat IT consultants with enough money to drive, an Audi TT, at 90 half way across the country so they can ride a trail centre on their £3000 toy and have even more money for cakes after their ride
Even Tony Curtis spent his £190 on fags
[i]My, he was a handsome chap in his day![/i]
How times change.
[img] 
[/img]
😯
precisely why I said 'in his day'
She's a bit of alright though 😉
the average mean slary in this country is 22k
so what the median would be without it being skewed by all them bankers* must be somewhat lower
once again the white middle class male domain of stw knows the score
edit *or indeed the fat IT consultants in audi TTs
There's a much better photo floating around on the internet of him looking incredibly ridiculous next to that woman, can't find it now though.
I agree though, I bet he didn't have to work very hard to attract the ladies in his younger days.
fat IT consultants with enough money to drive, an Audi TT, at 90 half way across the country so they can ride a trail centre on their £3000 toy and have even more money for cakes after their ride
Yeah, how dare they listen at school, go to uni, work hard, get paid, pay tax and then spend it.
What a bunch of selfish c0ck5!
Whoever got in power isn't going to be liked, period. The country is in the financial Sh*t. There is no money in the bank...... zip, nothing and somehow we need to clear it. Tax, Duty, fuel, Booze, fags (you shouldn't smoke anyway) except it it will all go up..... In real terms there is a long way to go before we see the light at the end of the tunnel.
When it came to child tax credits we got a 1 off payment of £500 because he was adopted and that was it. Because my wife and I work our entitlement wasn't worth the paperwork we had to fill in to get it. So were not loosing out too much at the moment. But this will change
Yes I for one want to see hungry children and their parents begging in the streets like some third world country so fat IT consultants with enough money to drive, an Audi TT, at 90 half way across the country so they can ride a trail centre on their £3000 toy and have even more money for cakes after their ride
No, but I'd happily see people think twice before dipping their wick if they thought they might not be able to afford to look after the results.
What a bunch of selfish c0ck5!
well if they are happy to let peoples children grow up in need then yes they are selfish c0cks. - try giving my quote the appropriate context.
I also reject your insinuation that everyone poor is lazy and everyone wealthy works/studied hard. Plenty of poor people work f@cking hard they just get low wages. Plenty of us on here get paid very well and clearly do f@ck all as we have time to chat on here.
Can you give me a good reason why I should be paying for YOUR children? If you can't afford them, DON'T HAVE THEM.
It's simple, children grow up to become taxpayers. If people stopped having children then the future tax take would plummet and the government/country would be in serious problems as it could no longer fund healthcare, pensions, repay long term govt debt etc. In this respect, incentivising people to have children through child benefit/tax credits/CTFs etc is a damn good long-term investment.
Plenty of poor people work f@cking hard they just get low wages.
Yep, these people are sometimes the best people and should get all the breaks they deserve (Nurses, Social Workers, etc) in fact anybody who is deriving an income that doesn't fully support them should be helped.
But there are a lot of people who are lazy and rely on the system and people who work hard shouldn't be made to feel guilty about this.
Society should reward hard work and give people the will to work hard for themsleves and not rely on the state.
Plenty of us on here get paid very well
Indeedy. And I have no issue paying my taxes for others to benefit from, and for the CTF being dropped 3 months before North Jr. is due to show up.
But then again, I'm not a selfish Tory c**t.
>Can you give me a good reason why I should be paying for YOUR children? If you can't afford them, DON'T HAVE THEM.
The second point would be fair enough in theory, but life's not as black and white as some would like to believe - eg you could cap child allowance at one child but it's the additional kids involved in low-income families that are likely to suffer, it's not going to be a magic form of contraception.
There's loads of examples of what's effectively cross-subsidy - or even how you view it (eg is your tax supporting kids education, or the education you received as a youngster ?). Likewise public transport - people whinging about transport they don't use but the flipside of the is the more people use it, the more freely the other traffic on the roads can move - it benefits everyone. Or the lottery that's one's own health - you may be fine now, in 30 years time you may have to rely heavily on the healthcare system.
The incoming government made a lot of noise about how labour approved a lot of spending in the last year as if it was all a bad thing, yet one of those is a public transport development that the local tory MP wants support for.
I don't have kids, not intending/likely to since I/the OH are 47 and 48. However, what I *do* want to see is a bunch of educated, well-rounded, useful members or society (tho' some on STW seem to fail at least one of those 😉 ) - and taxes are a part of that.
>Society should reward hard work and give people the will to work hard for themsleves and not rely on the state.
It's not the reserve of the long-term unemployed, I'm sure most people could think of at least one some well-educated, well-paid employed freeloader that doesn't pull their weight. But it's not that simple.
We had a cook here at work for a while - she was pretty damn good too - already had a child that was in daycare, funded by her ex-partner. She'd just got through her probationary period when he decided to chuck his job (iirc) 'cos he'd be better off unemployed and not paying childcare. Her only option was to take the child out of daycare because she couldn't afford it. So despite *her* efforts, she was screwed because of factors out of her control.
>But then again, I'm not a selfish Tory c**t.
I don't think you've ever been accused of being Tory.
😉
- Member
>Can you give me a good reason why I should be paying for YOUR children? If you can't afford them, DON'T HAVE THEM.The second point would be fair enough in theory, but life's not as black and white as some would like to believe - eg you could cap child allowance at one child but it's the additional kids involved in low-income families that are likely to suffer, it's not going to be a magic form of contraception.
There's loads of examples of what's effectively cross-subsidy - or even how you view it (eg is your tax supporting kids education, or the education you received as a youngster ?). Likewise public transport - people whinging about transport they don't use but the flipside of the is the more people use it, the more freely the other traffic on the roads can move - it benefits everyone. Or the lottery that's one's own health - you may be fine now, in 30 years time you may have to rely heavily on the healthcare system.
The incoming government made a lot of noise about how labour approved a lot of spending in the last year as if it was all a bad thing, yet one of those is a public transport development that the local tory MP wants support for.I don't have kids, not intending/likely to since I/the OH are 47 and 48. However, what I *do* want to see is a bunch of educated, well-rounded, useful members or society (tho' some on STW seem to fail at least one of those ) - and taxes are a part of that.
Oh, O.K., then.
Can you give me a good reason why I should be paying for YOUR children? If you can't afford them, DON'T HAVE THEM.
We need people to have kids in order to pay our pensions and operate our economy when we're all wrinkled old prunes staring out over Bournemouth seafront. Simple as that.
To do otherwise (ie, rely on immigration) is stupendously risky.
We need people to have kids
As long as they're nice middle class ones though...?!
We need people to have kids in order to pay our pensions and operate our economy when we're all wrinkled old prunes staring out over Bournemouth seafront. Simple as that.
We only need to replace those leaving us though, we don't need to grow continuously.
Society should reward hard work and give people the will to work hard for themsleves and not rely on the state
Das arbeit macht frei.
As long as they're nice middle class ones though...?!
I couldn't give a monkeys about class. I'd just like them to be somewhat well adjusted and productive members of society.
We only need to replace those leaving us though, we don't need to grow continuously.
And UK birthrate is well below replacement rate. Has been for over 30 years.
Yes but average working duration is higher, so they don't need replacement, you're only looking at death rate. Continuous growth = economic, life quality and free space suicide.
[i]I couldn't give a monkeys about class. I'd just like them to be somewhat well adjusted and productive members of society.[/i]
Reminds me a bit of Scroobius pip.
[url]
the government takes more than half my money
But it's not really your money is it ?
The clue......... is in the fact that all coins and banknotes have the same portrait of some tart on them.
Of course you could always make your own coins and banknotes - and slap a picture of yourself on them.
They would however be complete worthless.
The 'wealth' you enjoy is totally dependant on society and the state. Without the state you would be penniless.
So stop whingeing and be grateful.
No, but I'd happily see people think twice before dipping their wick if they thought they might not be able to afford to look after the results.
the 7th word is the problem, it would make no difference to many.
