[Closed] ISIS -Islamic State of Iraq and Syria

I see Tony Blair's middle east peace envoy role is going well. I reckon he could really make a difference if he went to Iraq personally and asked them all to calm down a bit, i that will do it.

Well the next bonus we'll be getting is the city boys amping up the news of Oil issues to drive up prices if they haven't already done so.

I think the Russians are being quite restrained in not standing up and saying "Why the * do you think we were arming Assad? Who the * did you think these 'freedom fighters' were he was involved in a civil war with, you ****-wits?!!"

Once again Putin shows that his ex-KGB brain is considerably better at reading international situations, and that his policies are far more effective than the Wests indecisive and ineffectual (not to mention expensive) meddling. No bloody wonder he gets 80% approval ratings at home, compared the contempt we view the idiots we're lumbered with (such as Blair) and their bloody stupid policies

@ross - oil prices jumped some days ago as a result of this. Most oil traders are not in the city, they are sat in companies around the world who need and use oil so buy more when events like this occur.

Also I suspect this action doesn't come as a surprise to the US or UK military or governments. It was fairly predictable at some stage and I am sure they had the intelligence briefings with various scenarios. there is a view that having your two enemies fighting each other is not a bad thing.

rossi46 - Member
Next stop Baghdad- but then where after that?

us, their going to attack us, the PM said so, I think we better bomb them first.......

The people in that regime, as well as trying to take territory, are also planning to attack us here at home in the United Kingdom.

I hope he's got some sort of secret service dossier to back up thee claims

They've got WMD's apparently. They could probably deploy them in 45 minutes

[img] [/img]

the whole region is tribal, they have blood feuds dating back [s]years[/s] centuries

At least this time the brainwashing media picked the catchy and easily remembered ISIS than the Al-Keyaydeur we had so much trouble learning to pronounce. Why the name even sounds like the archetypal enemy in a strategy shoot'em up...

Funny how ISIS has for years been operating in Syria taking large swathes of the country and committing horrifying atrocities

I think the Russians are being quite restrained in not standing up and saying "Why the * do you think we were arming Assad? Who the * did you think these 'freedom fighters' were he was involved in a civil war with, you *-wits?!!"

I was about to ask why the hell did the Western world label Assad as a lunatic genocidal leader and arm the "resistance". What a total F up!

+1 ernest and binners.

I like this: http://www.cityam.com/1403210711/forget-neocons-how-lawrence-arabia-can-help-save-iraq-chaos

Apparently there are over 300 British nationals who have joined ISIS. Is that 300 KNOWN or are M16 just giving a rough guesstimation 😐

[url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10917357/The-brilliant-brothers-who-left-British-suburb-for-jihad-in-Syria.html ]Bristol Jihadis[/url]

That's 300 potential terrorist atrocities than could happen on British soil. Worse is that they have openly admitted that they can't keep track of them!
And that's just those who are or have been to Syria and Iraq- what about all the nutters lurking on our streets who are 'under the radar' ?

To be honest it's a bloody concern at the very least 😯

Apparently there are over 300 British nationals who have joined ISIS. Is that 300 KNOWN or are M16 just giving a rough guesstimation

No one outside ISIS can know any accurate details about its membership. How many of its fighters are British nationals is pure speculation - they don't offer their membership lists for perusal.

Total membership estimates of ISIS vary from as much as 10,000 to, according to a former Saudi intelligence officer, no more than 3,000. I believe that they do release details of the nationalities of their "martyred dead" which offers the best indication of their makeup with regard to nationalities, most are Arab. I'm not sure if ISIS has announced the death of more than one Brit, I don't think they have.

I feel fairly sure however that the huge publicity they have been receiving recently, much of it focusing on their stunning victories, will massively help their recruiting drive, British TV has even broadcast bits of their recruiting videos.

That's 300 potential terrorist atrocities than could happen on British soil. Worse is that they have openly admitted that they can't keep track of them!
And that's just those who are or have been to Syria and Iraq- what about all the nutters lurking on our streets who are 'under the radar' ?

To be honest it's a bloody concern at the very least

Calm down, despite all the scare tactics by successive governments terrorism in the UK remains an extremely small problem. At least wait until there is some evidence that this is no longer the case before panicking.

In the meantime focus on problems which have a far greater impact on us than terrorism, such as type 2 diabetes, lorries turning left, and cancer.

Talk of "nutters lurking on our streets" just plays into the hands of warmongering governments.

There's a difference between joining a paramilitary organisation in a faroff land to fight there in what you see as a just cause, and suddenly becoming a domestic terrorist. I had family who ran away from home to join the international brigades, they didn't all come home and blow up a school.

Firstly, ISIS is:

Well trained
Well equipped
Strategically aware
Building in numbers but most importantly finance
Also building a propoganda machine (see front covers of papers about british jihadi's

All of the above point to a bigger regional play. This is all about oil and control and Israel.

Iraq is sandwiched between two of the most powerful players (and enemies in the middle east) Iran and Saudia Arabia. One is shia and generally hates the western world (iran) and one is Sunni and gets a regular booti call from the US (Saudi). Iraq is a failed state and the only way to now control its vast oil fields is to divide the nation.

Saudi's with the US and Israel may look at ISIS and think 'Iraq is a problem state, the only way to control is to break it up'. ISIS will do that for them, control the middle of the country, annoy Iran and the Saudi's with the US control the south with the puppet government.

In all of this, many people / children will die / become orphans and another humanitarian disaster. Sad 🙁

Looking back on history after the World Wars, this cycle just seems to repeat:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/posts/hes_behind_you

I think it's time the West called it quits on messing about in other peoples countries and focused on the real issues that affect the futures of [b]all our children[/b]:

[b]
Did you know that despite the swift decline of bees, you are still more likely to be killed by a bee than by a terrorist; given that much of our food depends upon bees, the future of the planet as it stands is none too pretty; all the oil in the world won't fix that[/b]

The good news is, change is happening

I don't think ISIS are particularly well trained and equipped. They might have seized a lot of equipment recently but it's not that that's brought them success, their main adversary in Iraq the Iraqi army is far better equipped - the US government having spent over $20billion training and equipping it.

And whilst ISIS undoubtedly has experienced fighters in its ranks I doubt that a 20year old medical student from Cardiff is better trained or suited to war than an Iraqi who has experienced armed conflict throughout his life, be it full war or just daily NATO bombings during the implementation of the No Fly Zone.

I guess there is this assumption that ISIS must be a remarkable fighting machine because of their recent spectacular successes, but that's probably misreading the situation.

I was wrong to previously refer to ISIS's "stunning victories", that's misleading - they haven't had any stunning "victories" they've had stunning "successes", for example when they took Iraq's second city, Mosul, without a fight.

So how does ISIS do it ? Well it would appear to me in a simular way to how the Taliban swept to power in Afghanistan. "Taliban" is not a complete misnomer, many of the Taliban fighters that eventually took Kabul were young, inexperienced, and of student age and demeanor, they did surprisingly little fighting under the circumstances.

The single most important tactic the Taliban had was to form alliances with warlords. A warlord switching sides could add vast areas under Taliban control without the need for any actual fighting.

Secondly they brought both an end to fighting and they brought order in areas which came under their control, the yearning for peace and stability at almost any price from war weary people should not be underestimated.

And thirdly they were brutal to those who opposed them, staging public executions and leaving the bodies on display so that everyone could see and know what to expect.

ISIS tactics appear to be rather simular, they have forged alliances with people ideological quite different to themselves. They relish in displaying just how brutal and merciless they are by posting videos of their atrocities, and leaving decapitated or crucified bodies in the streets for children to gorp at and their enemies to ponder over.

They also bring an end to fighting/violence and restore order which is welcomed by the local population. For example although it is hardly reported in the western press car bombings, many of them carried out by ISIS, are a regular occurrence in Baghdad - almost daily, if ISIS takes control of Baghdad their bombing campaign will cease.

And finally ISIS are greatly helped by the fact that the US backed (up until now) Iraqi prime minister is corrupt, power hungry, sectarian, bigoted, and despised by many Iraqis, and the Iraqi army is both demoralised and seen as the tool of the PM.

One is shia and generally hates the western world (iran) and one is Sunni and gets a regular booti call from the US (Saudi). Iraq is a failed state and the only way to now control its vast oil fields is to divide the nation.

To portray the Shias in Iran as enemies of the West while the Sunni in Saudi Arabia as the West's friends is misleading imo.

Firstly the people of Iran have very good reasons not to trust the West - it was the West which organised the overthrow of an elected Iranian government, the West then went on to support to the hilt a brutal and hated dictatorship.

When this hated Western-backed dictatorship was eventually overthrown the US responded by supporting and encouraging their friend and client, Saddam Hussein, to attack the new Islamic Republic. This Western backed war resulted in the loss of well over half a million Iranian lives.

US support for Saddam Hussein during this war ranged from supplying him with some of the most advanced military hardware available, to supplying him with the chemical weapons to use against the Iranians.

Despite decades of hostile acts by the West against Iran, Iran, and Shia Muslims generally, have never carried out reciprocal hostile acts against the West. In contrast a small minority of Sunnis, often Saudis, have for years engaged in hostile acts against the West.

The West has fought Saudi dominated Sunnis in Afghanistan and Iraq. Almost all those involved in 9/11 were Saudis, none were Iranian. The killers of Lee Rigby were Sunni, and so on. To claim therefore that Iranian Shias hate the West but that Saudi Sunnis don't is misleading imo.

And I don't believe that the West wants to see the breakup of Iraq, not least because of the problems an independent Kurdistan would cause Turkey a staunch/pivotal NATO member in the region.

So according to the news, the artist formally known as ISIS (or as they would now like to be known- The Islamic State) have a 5 year plan- and it's [url= http://www.****/news/article-2674736/ISIS-militants-declare-formation-caliphate-Syria-Iraq-demand-Muslims-world-swear-allegiance.html?ito=social-facebook ]World Domination![/url] 😐

Or at least to 'take back a bit of Europe'.

Sooooooooooooo- good luck with that 😆

Considering they are fighting against the combined might of Iraq, Syria, Iran, and the good ole USA, I can't help but wonder who helped finance their PR campaign...

but I could make some educated guesses 😉

wonder who helped finance their PR campaign

good ole USA

Well them and i'd guess Saudi Arabia.

Considering they are fighting against the combined might of Iraq, Syria, Iran, and the good ole USA, I can't help but wonder who helped finance their PR campaign...

The US and the former colonial powers of the region have subcontracted support for the jihadists fighting in Syria to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar, 3 countries which despise and won't tolerate Western style democracy.

Out of the 3 Kuwait probably has the greatest involvement in supporting the jihadists in Syria.

Isis gains in Iraq are an unintended consequence of Western foreign policy. The history of neo-colonism and Western foreign policy is the history of unintended consequences.

Well here is the man of the moment (well in Iraq at least)

Its a war cry allright, i wonder if the CIA are feeling pleased with their latest project 😉

Well here is the man of the moment (well in Iraq at least)

You mean al-Baghdadi ? Well I think you'll find that al-Baghdadi reckons it's no longer Iraq but now the "State of the Islamic Caliphate", and he's the Caliph. That al-Baghdadi is one bad daddy. igmc

2014 marks the 100th aniversary of (modern) British miltary involvement in Iraq I don't think you can put all the blame on Bush and Blair. I gues the question is "what would have happened if we hadn't done anything?" and "Can we feasibly get away without doing / try to do anything for the time being?"

I gues the question is "what would have happened if we hadn't done anything?"

Bush and Blair were absolutely adamant that if we 'hadn't done anything' Saddam Hussein and the Ba'athist Party would have remained in power.

That's why it was apparently necessary to send an invasion force of over a quarter of a million and spend eight years fighting at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives and $2 trillion.

Are you doubting that Bush and Blair's involvement in Iraq had any significant effect on the course of Iraqi history ?

Or are you suggesting that Al-Qaeda were poised to seize power in Iraq anyway ?

If you want to know how someone as insignificant as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi became a major player in Iraq today you have to go back to the speech Colin Powell made at the UN in 2003.

Colin Powell effectively took a man who no one had ever heard of, and who was sheltering in the Western imposed No-Fly Zone to put himself beyond the reach of Saddam Hussein's forces, and instantly made him an internationally known figure throughout the world

Overnight as a consequence funds and volunteers from across the world poured in the direction of al-Baghdadi, he's never looked back since. Another unintended consequence of failed Western strategy.

If you want to know how someone as insignificant as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi became a major player in Iraq today you have to go back to the speech Colin Powell made at the UN in 2003.

Colin Powell effectively took a man who no one had ever heard of, and who was sheltering in the Western imposed No-Fly Zone to put himself beyond the reach of Saddam Hussein's forces, and instantly made him an internationally known figure throughout the world

Overnight as a consequence funds and volunteers from across the world poured in the direction of al-Baghdadi, he's never looked back since. Another unintended consequence of failed Western strategy.

Sorry ignore the above ^^ as it's incorrect. I'm referring Colin Powell's reference to al Zarqawi the founder of ISIS in his 2003 UN speech. Al Zarqawi was eventually killed by the US and al-Baghdadi took over ISIS in his place.

I had a good night last night and I'm not thinking straight 🙂 😳

. I gues the question is "what would have happened if we hadn't done anything?" and "Can we feasibly get away without doing / try to do anything for the time being?"

In answer to the first question: not much, there were no WMDs and Israel would have looked after itself.

To the second question: Yes, so long as they are cut off from arms supplies.

Are you doubting that Bush and Blair's involvement in Iraq had any significant effect on the course of Iraqi history ?

No - just they were very far from the first people in their position to meddle with Iraq, just some of the most blantant and arguably unsuccessful.

they were very far from the first people in their position to meddle with Iraq

Well no, the Romans were messing about with Mesopotamia 2,000 years ago. But I think most people would agree that what we have today in Iraq has more to do with what the US led invasion force did 10 years ago than what the Romans did 2,000 years ago.

Obviously George Bush and Tony Blair and their supporters would have liked to have taken all the credit for the situation in Iraq today, had everything gone according "to plan", but as it's turned out to be a complete **** up they now want to pass the buck and blame just about anyone but themselves.

So well done for reminding everyone that the disastrous situation in Iraq is not all Bush and Blair's fault when it so clearly is.

[url= http://www.****/news/article-2666213/Blair-growing-pressure-stand-Middle-East-peace-envoy-diplomats-demand-removal.html ]Tony Blair is still stirring up the region in the name of all of us in Europe.[/url]

Edit to add non DM [url= http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jun/23/tony-blair-middle-east-envoy-quartet-sacked ]Link[/url]

Just wondering, now that it's all kicked off again in Israel- how long before ISIS and Hamas join forces to kick Israels arse?
Those Hamas rockets seem to be getting more and more range, do you suppose they are being armed with the weapons our governments gave to the Syrian rebels?
Oooooh, the irony if that were true 😯

Wonder how much of this is true?

[url= http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/iraq-crisis-how-saudi-arabia-helped-isis-take-over-the-north-of-the-country-9602312.html ]US Allies Saudi Arabia behind ISIS[/url]

Just wondering, now that it's all kicked off again in Israel- how long before ISIS and Hamas join forces to kick Israels arse?

ISIS is fighting a fractured and mostly unprofessional army in Iraq.

In Syria they are facing a determined and regular army with limited resources.

If ISIS took on Israel do you think it'd amount to much? I wonder how quickly Saudi Arabia would collapse.

The IDF would firmly 'kick' ISIS into the weeds. (if you want to talk about it in very basic terms).

Look what a very young Israel did to Egypt in 67? Attack and out maneuver at speed from air and land.

There seems to be a lot of 'leftwing' hate for Israel on STW.

On all sides Israel is faced with people who aren't exactly friends. In the middle east/Arab world the only thing that is respected is brute force/attack. Democracy doesn't exist in their mindset. So how should Israel act against such foes?

There seems to be a lot of[s] 'leftwing' hate for Israel[/s] concern for disproportionate levels of violence, heavy civilian casualties, and the use of collective punishment on STW.

FTFY

If ISIS even toy with the idea of crossing the Jordanian border the Israeli Air Force will erase them from the planet in no time at all. They will be well aware of this

If someone was dropping bombs onto Coventry, what would we do to their country? The British have a long history of disproportion return of violence.

[img] [/img]

rossi46 - Member

Just wondering, now that it's all kicked off again in Israel- how long before ISIS and Hamas join forces to kick Israels arse?
Those Hamas rockets seem to be getting more and more range, do you suppose they are being armed with the weapons our governments gave to the Syrian rebels?
Oooooh, the irony if that were true

and if that happened which it never would then we can all start cr 4 pping ourselves cos it wont take long for them to come for the UK, USA etc...

rossi46 you would be fine though cos you could tell you agree with them...

Well John Kerry was almost beside himself/rabid over Assad and wanting to arm the rebels/overthrow Assad so who knows? The Americans are known for arming Muslim freedom fighters and have the material later used on them.

Only a few years ago the Taliban had (and used) SAMS. Wonder where they came from.

Ah, thanks Lifer!

And we now know better and prefer to act with a conscience. What's your point there?

If someone was dropping bombs onto Coventry, what would we do to their country?

Depends if the bombs were coming from Solihull, which we'd now walled off, preventing the population from leaving, stopped allowing supplies in, turned all the water off, and were launching air strikes against, I suppose

Not sure if I've mentioned it before, but [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat ]Operation Ajax[/url] and [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone ]Operation Cyclone[/url] suggest that perhaps western intelligence services such as MI6, the CIA and Mossad have been shown to be a bit naughty historically.

[url= http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5320/mi5-and-mi6-tell-mps-to-censor-key-report-on-lee-rigby-s-killers ]Also, MI5 and MI6 seem to be a bit coy about some details relating to Lee Rigby's killers[/url] (I appreciate you might not have heard of Exaro News, but it is the same award winning investigative journalists who are making huge headway into the alleged VIP paedophile ring, which co-incidentally, also appears to involve the intelligence services)

Whatsmore, given the extent of NSA and GCHQ operations, why is there not more arrests relating to Child Pornography and Financial Fraud; if they are collecting that much data, it must be traceable...

how long before ISIS and Hamas join forces

A very long time imo, never in fact. ISIS are headcases, brutal killers who relish beheading and crucifying people, they see other Muslims as their principle enemies.

Hamas in contrast, despite the attempts of Israel to vilify them, are quite sensible and pragmatic - that is the reason why the EU encouraged them to participate in elections.

Israel's aggressive and murderous behaviour towards the Palestinians is what drives Hamas to take desperate measures. But they have a good record of being prepared to negotiate and if necessary to comply with ceasefires, certainly better than Israel's.

Hamas have nothing in common with ISIS other than being predominately Sunni. They have far more in common with their Shi'ite allies in Hezbollah. imo.

There seems to be a lot of 'leftwing' hate for Israel on STW.

There was a time long ago when Israel enjoyed extensive support across large sections of the Left, that support slowly evaporated to the point where the left is now predominately hostile to Israel. You can't keep stealing land and murdering those you have driven out and expect continued support from the Left.

I think also that while there was understandably huge sympathy among the Left for the plight of Jews after WW2 there then came the slow realisation of that making the Palestinians pay for the crimes committed by the Germans and other Europeans was a huge injustice.

There was also the slow realisation following WW2 that Jews for the first time in thousands of years were no longer being persecuted and could live freely.

I certainly made the journey from an extremely pro-Israeli left-wing upbringing to recognizing the brutal and racist character of the Zionist state. I also educated myself about the plight of the Palestinians, those once invisible people which shamefully many on the left simply ignored preferring to forget in inconvenient fact that it was their land which others decided to give away.

rossi46 you would be fine though cos you could tell you agree with them...

Erm how do i agree with them then? 😐

Anything is possible in the world that we live in, just think what a well placed rocket aimed at an Israeli Nuclear facility could do- oh hang on, good job they are a crap shot at the moment.
Im sure Israel would kick their Islamic arses, but then think of the hornets nest that would stir.