Forum menu
Is this sexual and ...
 

[Closed] Is this sexual and racial discrimination ?

Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Jeez Tracker, where's the fun & potential to spout ill-founded moans about the legal system in that?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 11:39 am
Posts: 129
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Just beacuse the liebor party have our servicepeople currently engaged in conflicts of questionable moral standing it should not detract from the very good work they do.

Good point backhander.

TJ - last time I drove up to visit my parents, I don't recall having to catch a ferry. They could do a quick patch-up on that wall though, that would keep you nice and safe 😕


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 11:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

liebor

Do you regularly post comments on the Daily Mail site by any chance?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 12:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

🙂


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No.
Do you approve of and support the war in Iraq by any chance?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Grum do you automatically accuse anyone with a dislike of labour of being some kind of "daily mail" (that's getting sooo tired BTW) bigot? Or just anyone who doesn't conform with your own political beliefs?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 12:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sad fact is 100k for this case yet lads and lasses getting injured in the sand have to get pretty badly cut up to get 100k damages.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 12:45 pm
 Dino
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Grum do you automatically accuse anyone with a dislike of labour of being some kind of "daily mail" (that's getting sooo tired BTW) bigot?

No it's just the tell tale use of the term 'liebour' - very common on the Daily Mail comments section ;). Do you refer to Tony Blair as Tony Bliar as well?

I'm no fan of New Labour either btw.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Tony Bliar

LOL, how ever did they come up with that one? Genius!! 🙄 🙄


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never read the mail in my life. The caterers in work buy it and leave it out which I ignore due to;
a) it's shit and more importantly.
b) the rugby section is crap.
They got any names for brown I can nick?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:12 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

Interesting comment on one of the sunday morning political shows the other week "of course, the reason why Germany are coming through the recession so well is because they don't have to pay for armed forces".

Not saying it's true or I agree, but something to think about.

I would think all the Army have to do in above case is show that they have also put male and white soldiers on a charge for failing to report due to childcare issues - although as many of said there is likely more to it than the BBC article.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:14 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
Topic starter
 

there is likely more to it than the BBC article.

Don't worry, we'll get all the 'facts' once Max Clifford has negotiated a suitable deal with one of the Sunday papers.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who pays for the bundeswehr?
They are more than twice the size of our army.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Woody - Member

TJ - last time I drove up to visit my parents, I don't recall having to catch a ferry. They could do a quick patch-up on that wall though, that would keep you nice and safe

Que? what on earth?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:46 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

Backhander - I could be wrong, but aren't all German citizens obliged to do National Service ? I met a German guy while travelling (1995 ?), and he had opted to spend some time looking after a disabled person instead.

I'm not an expert, I just thought it was an interesting comment.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:49 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

Lol at the Hadrian's wall comment - you know the funny stories your parents tell you when you are a kid that you think are true ? My dad told me they made that wall to keep the Scots in (he was Scots) and I believed this for many years until I went to Uni.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you mean it was actually to keep the Romans out ?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

True hels, but they still get paid. Quarter of a million troops and associated equipment don't come cheap.
Having said that, they aren't committed to as many places or in the intesity that we are; funding afghanistan isn't particularly helping our economy. Maybe ask the US to pay for it or else we'll f*** it off?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 1:53 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Lol at the Hadrian's wall comment

TJ's obviously a bit 'tired' today + LOL @ SFB, who is obviously not 😆


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 2:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who pays for the bundeswehr?
They are more than twice the size of our army.

Not according to [url= http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_troops ]these figures[/url], although they have a significant number of military reservists. The actual per capita of military personnel is lower than the UK (3.5 to 3.9 per 1000). Germany may have a larger military, but have over 20 million more people than the UK. These figures may be skewed by the fact that Germany has compulsory National Service, although persons can opt out, as [b]hels[/b] points out.

Germany doesn't seem to be involved in as many overseas military 'theatres' as the UK.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 4:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Actually, you're quite right, they are only a bit bigger but do have a massive amount of reservists (350,000!!). Having said that, they are still the 6th biggest spender on defence. We're 4th but this could be attributed to the fact we're heavily committed in an expensive war.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 4:51 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Who pays for the bundeswehr?

**** all use as well.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 4:58 pm
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

simonfbranes - from what I can gather now that I live in Scotland, it is to give a ready supply of half bricks to lob across the border during the 6 Nations.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 5:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Even if she was discriminated against it does not warrant £100k payout, it should mean severe consequences for the perpetrator's if it is indeed the case.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 5:14 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No one has asked the most pertinent and important question in all this debate though; Is she fit?


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 5:27 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
 

Wrong question Hora -"what are her chebs like?"


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 5:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

She would of have to have been a serial offender to get disciplinary action against her as well. Good riddance one less war dodger in the Army. Commonwealth soldiers get it too easy due to management being scared of the racism or bullying card being pulled. They also get an extra 6 weeks off too to go back home to there country.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

She would of have to have

to go back home to [b]there[/b] country

🙄


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 5:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

She would of have to have

She would of been

to go back home to there country

to go back to their home country


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

She would of been

😀

Sorry landy that [i]is[/i] funny.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 6:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

FFS another admin burden!!! At least she's gone. I am sorry but most single parents are an absolute nightmare in the forces. It's not a normal 9-5 job so if you don't like it, get out.

The former corporal said she was expected to be available for duty "24/7, 365 days a year" and was told the Army was "unsuitable for a single mother who couldn't sort out her childcare arrangements".

Well that's what you get paid for!!! This is a total farce and people like her make urine bubble.
This made me laugh out very loudly
The tribunal criticised the Army for not helping to make childcare arrangements.
**** off. Why are the Army/MOD responsible? They have a duty of care to her but that doesn't extend to sorting out her own admin. Jesus H what next??
The Army will have to look very carefully at what they are asking single parents to do, she added.

Simple get rid of those that moan and let someone who is capable of doing what they are paid to do!!
My mates now wife was a single mother when she went out of area for 4 months did she try and dodge it? Nope she made arrangements and got on with it as it's her DUTY!! I know when I go out of are next, I will not go as it upsets my Mrs and I don't want to be away from my son 🙄


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 6:21 pm
 ibis
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]
Send the Kid to the front as well??


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 6:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do other employers provide care? if so then the army should be no different.

Personally I think an employer would not employ someone who has kids that is needed on call.


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Being available for duty or deployment 24/7 is part of any service persons Terms of Service, which everyone is made fully aware of. It is also the individual's responsibility to sort their family business out, although some flexibility can be arranged in extreme circumstances. There must have been some extra 'treatment' which we do not know about (such as different rules for other soldiers in similar situations). Sad day though, there's a growing number of female service-people who milk the system on this issue (yes I do have experience of this issue in my unit and several previous units).


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 8:15 pm
Posts: 1033
Free Member
 

Germany doesn't seem to be involved in as many overseas military 'theatres' as the UK.

Talkemada, there are quite a few constitutional/political restrictions placed on the deployment of German Armed Forces that limit where/when they can deploy too, unlike British forces. It is something that came as a result of what happened in the 1940s .......


 
Posted : 13/04/2010 8:29 pm
Posts: 11
Free Member
 

I was talking to an ex army mate of mine this morning. Lucky I was on the 'phone, he was spitting blood about this. His take: if you join the army, you know what level of commitment is expected of you, if you can't live up to the commitment then the forces aren't the place for you. He also said something about her being offered a 5 year posting with child care and that, that level of accommodation was practically unheard of.

Next thing, thy'll have their guns taken away from them cos they are dangerous!

.. and so it went on.

Do any other forces, ex forces peeps agree with him or was he just spouting rollocks?


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Totally agree with your mate.


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 7:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Next thing, thy'll have their guns taken away from them cos they are dangerous!

amazingly good idea! All that macho posing with hardware is [b]so[/b] outdated anyway, and this would emphasise their humanitarian credentials! It'll also stop them "accidentally" shooting each other in barracks 🙂


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 7:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do any other forces, ex forces peeps agree with him

are you asking the right people after they've been trained to subservience ?


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 7:25 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ahhh ! but SFB it is exactly, like it or not, [i][b]"all that macho posing with hardware"[/b][/i] both now and over the years which allows you the freedon to posture and post your utopian ideals on an internet forum 😉


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 7:33 pm
Posts: 1033
Free Member
 

are you asking the right people after they've been trained to subservience ?

Can't remember that during my training, but then I do not eat brown rice, wear sandles and spout crap.

agree with what monkeychild said.


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 7:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but then I do not eat brown rice, wear sandles and spout crap.

that remains to be seen 🙂

Ahhh ! but SFB it is exactly, like it or not, "all that macho posing with hardware" both now and over the years which allows you the freedon to posture and post your utopian ideals on an internet forum

I'm not convinced that soldiers ever do more than support oligarchies, and that most of them would rather shoot me than allow me to do as I please 🙁


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 1033
Free Member
 

that remains to be seen

No, I have no sandles and I do not like brown rice, that is a fact.....

most of them would rather shoot me than allow me to do as I please

Yup, if you were doing something illegal/unlawful and their rules of engagement permitted otherwise they would let you go, this time...............


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 7:54 pm
Posts: 129
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm not convinced that soldiers ever do more than support oligarchies
you could argue that point citing anyone anywhere

and that most of them would rather shoot me than allow me to do as I please
............only soldiers?? 😉


 
Posted : 15/04/2010 8:09 pm
Page 2 / 4