Forum menu
Is it time for Punk...
 

[Closed] Is it time for Punk again?

Posts: 7
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3187450]

I was born 73 so too young to remember Punk. But I gather the country was in a poor economic and social state, a lot of people unhappy with the current establishment and decided to do something about it.
AFAIK Punk was a political and social movement, of which the music was just the most visible and loudest expression.

So are we going to see a new Punk movement? Or do we lack the ideology now. Or was Punk just Malcolm McLaren playing games to make himself rich?...


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:26 am
Posts: 11402
Free Member
 

a few years of rick wakeman 6hr keyboard solos is needed first to kick it off.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We lack the ideology now. The soundtrack to our times is the X-factor sh*t.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Less focused anger and way more resignation nowadays, I'd say.

Time for Leonard Cohen, maybe. 😐


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:31 am
Posts: 1893
Free Member
 

I hope not, I can't stand it.

Plus re-hashing a 35 year old music scene as a form of protest/statement wouldn't really fit the 'punk' ethos surely- that really would be apathetic.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:44 am
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

Punk at its core was a bunch of middle class tossbags trying to pretend they were working class rebells.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:48 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Or do we lack the ideology now.

Yes, sadly.

Younger people were very politicised in the 70's and 80's, to an extent that would be unthinkable these days.

The same energy is there, but seems to be directed toward individual gain rather than a desire for social change.

Of course, we've been drip fed the 'greed is good' mantra for so long now that it would be surprising if this were not the case.

Altruism and a desire to help one's fellow man is now regarded with suspicion and derision, rather than something to aspire to an be proud of.

And yes, I blame HER. Partly, anyway. (Anyway, dancing trousers at the ready, can't be long now.)

As to the music, Punk wasn't very original anyway, just stripped down, speeded up Rock 'n' Roll.
Brilliant, but not original.

Some twist on an old idea will come along and refresh us all when the time is right, but do young people care about music enough for it to matter?

Perhaps the time as music as a symbol of social change ended with the death of the generation gap?


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I get what you mean - nothing else quite captures the anger, venom and energy as punk and it's later offspring.

However, plenty of other music from the 70s and early 80s has very strong political messages.

That political "bite" appears to have largely disappeared.

[not sure that I should admit this]
Was listening to "Streetfighting Years" on the ipod last week (the album title pretty much sums it up)...

... and was reminded how [u]so much has changed[/u] and how [u][b]so much remains the same[/b][/u]

"Mandela Day" -

It was 25 years they take that man awayBut freedom moves him closer every day.Wipe the tears down from your saddened eyeThey say Mandela's freeso step outside.Mandela day - Mandela's free.It was 25 years ago this very day

Originally played at Wembley a couple of years [i]before[/i] Mandela's release
He's been out of jail for 21 years now!!!

Yet the Tories (at the time) accused the band as being "left wing scum" for playing an anti-apartheid gig 👿


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 10:58 am
Posts: 10199
Full Member
 

it's because no-one really gives a _____ any more. as long as they have the latest Iphone, can tweet folks about x factor and watch endless drivel on the idiot box, what do they need to care about the real world?


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:02 am
 hels
Posts: 971
Free Member
 

Punk never went away in some circles...


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:03 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Twitter is the new punk.

Or so some people will probably try to claim.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i care tazzy.... i care.

just cos music doesnt have guitarz being smashed about doesnt mean it can't be political 🙂 i do likes me guitarz though!


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:10 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Punk hasn't died,
It's got grey hair and sore knees, but underneath it's still 21 8)


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:13 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

rkk01, Simple Minds were, at the very best, post-punk in their Life In A Day period, then mutated into stadium AOR (New Gold Dream onwards).

Maybe they were punk when they were Johnny & The Self Abusers, but that band really only existed for one single, as far as I'm aware.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:14 am
Posts: 23593
Full Member
 

Doesn't matter that you were born in 1973. I was born in 1971. The punk era was 1986. For me that is, for you it was 1988. The golden age of punk is whatever year you were revising for your o levels listening to a second hand copy of Never Mind the Bollocks bought from a record stall in the indoor market.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Plus re-hashing a 35 year old music scene as a form of protest/statement wouldn't really fit the 'punk' ethos surely- that really would be apathetic.

I disagree. It would be DIY, anti-establishment, anti-current music and - well - punk.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I always thought Never Mind the Bollocks was crap. It inspired some terrific bands, but was ultimately crap.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:19 am
Posts: 496
Free Member
 

The golden age of punk is whatever year you were [s]revising for[/s] wizzing off your tits and flunking your o levels

put a safety pin through that for you 😉


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:19 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

I always thought Never Mind the Bollocks was crap.

Burn him!!!!!!!
Great album, even the lighter stuff.....


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rkk01, Simple Minds were, at the very best, post-punk in their Life In A Day period, then mutated into stadium AOR (New Gold Dream onwards).

Maybe they were punk when they were Johnny & The Self Abusers, but that band really only existed for one single, as far as I'm aware.

errr, I wasn't suggesting that Simple Minds were a punk outfit - just highlighting that a whole stack of music and musicians in the 70s and 80s were political, in a way that no longer appears to be the case...


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I always thought Never Mind the Bollocks was crap. It inspired some terrific bands, but was ultimately crap.

😯 but' but' but'............ 😥


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:24 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

PMJ, I just can't accept that!

Holidays in the Sun
Bodies
No Feelings
God Save the Queen
Anarchy in the UK
Submission
Pretty Vacant
EMI

I've dropped a couple of the weaker ones, but of the remainder, which would you leave out?


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

We lack the ideology now. The soundtrack to our times is the X-factor sh*t.

I don't know about that..

the way I see it is that the underground is well enough developed and evolved to know that with a bit of nowse you can do [i]exactly[/i] as you please and that what the government and the old folks get up to is entirely their own busines..

fashion victims will always be fashion victims whether they are following sid vicious or simon cowell..


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:25 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I'd be really disappointed if "punk" came again as a rehashing of old guitar music with shouty vocals. Great (fantastic! life changing!) at the time, but I really don't see how a musical revolution could consist of some "heard it all before" guitar music.
The musical landscape (huh? did I just say musical landscape??!) has moved on so much from the 70s it would be virtually impossible for a new type of music to come along and f*ck up the establishment like punk did.
I mean you hear the C*** word on TV these days!


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

"Punk was the sound of my voice". - Johnny Lydon (nee Rotten).


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Unfortunately they tried a few years back and we ended up with these gonks:

[img] http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSMFa_gzYXLa2yXv9jtK6RRV___mc_ZG-QxDqWNMzDm7q65b7bD_w [/img]
[img] http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS7IMQ0Yf5ly2XiCYlSto6wfF1acaf5h5BT__jI204E_bLq1RLhrE66HUfy [/img]
[img] [/img]

Rollins explains it:


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:37 am
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Dogbert has a point. Bleurgh. That Limp Bizkit singer (can't be arsed to remember his name) what a prize twonk.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dogbert has a point. Bleurgh. That Limp Bizkit singer (can't be arsed to remember his name) what a prize twonk

Thank you 🙂

I loved Punk, and it's off shots (hardcore, straight edge etc) but there is nothing up to date with the same ethics, they all end up on MTV then turn up at a fashion show and get married to Avril Lavigne - f*ck that

Fugazi are probably the most up to date and most releases from the Dischord label are worth a look. Joe Lally (Fugazi bass player) his stuff is quite mellow


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 11:49 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Try Frank Turner - Thatcher F***** the kids - great song writer.

Avril Lavigne - f*ck that
Given the choice i'm sure you would too 😆


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 12:00 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

If it came with a time machine and it all sounded brand new again. I'd have it.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

Remember the first time you saw these lot?


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

DKs - listened to California Uber Alles & Kill The Poor a couple of weeks back....their early stuff still stands up.

Bad Religion never really gave up - The Empire Strikes First was every bit as bile-filled as their previous work, and again, it's something I still listen to.

Newer punk bands seem to be largely US, and I'm a big fan of AFI and Rise Against (though not the whole straight edge thing).

Punk never went away.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 12:24 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wasn't aware that's really ever gone away!


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 12:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Grunge was the new punk.

Dubstep is probably the new Grunge.

A musical revolution to unite the kids against the man? I doubt it will ever happen again, not when kids rely on mummy and daddy until they're 30. You also need a demographic spike to help sustain a movement.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Burn him!!!!!!!

😆

Fugazi. Pure brilliance.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

lets think about it..

why re-instate a tired 40 year old genre, when, if kids want to feel part of a rebellion, they can pay £2 to gain entry to any dingy rave hole in the country.. to listen to earth shattering new sounds with an explicitly anti-establishment, sexy, druggy theme..?

In the 70s were people really asking themselves if a good old Swingtime revival would wake the rebellious kids up..?

With a whole generation growing up with punk and hippy parents, and now a whole load of second generation ravers, the youf dem probably feel that it's most rebellious to get a nice litte job working for the man..
Young soul rebels these days realise that they can happily get off their faces and sit around in bedsits having sex between raves without having to get up everyone's nose about it.. (apart from an occasional bout of looting perhaps..)

Somehow the aftermath of the government's blind panic regarding the early 90s rave scene has resulted in a workable compromise..
shame really..


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:07 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

What about some working class Oi.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

...if kids want to feel part of a rebellion, they can pay £2 to gain entry to any dingy rave hole in the country.. to listen to earth shattering new sounds with an explicitly anti-establishment, sexy, druggy theme..?

So what you're saying is that grime and dubstep are the new punk? 😉


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

punk sounds about as edgy as a britney song to todays kids. you need to get into this kinda territory to start making kids feel like they're listening to something their parents wouldn't:

WARNING: there is a naughty word at the start of the track.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Music is too diverse now to have a genre that could polarise opinion.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 23
Full Member
 

If you want political comment and calls to arms have a listen to some traditional folk music (listen to the lyrics). They weren't smashing TV studios (obviously), but social and sexual politics play a big part in music tha was "written" hundreds of years ago.

Isn't the music the kids listen to these days political, bragging bout your bling and honey's and wanted to pop some caps in a sucka?

Who cares?

I really don't think I do anymore.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 5
Free Member
 

.if kids want to feel part of a rebellion, they can pay £2 to gain entry to any dingy rave hole in the country.. to listen to earth shattering new sounds with an explicitly anti-establishment, sexy, druggy theme..?
So what you're saying is that grime and dubstep are the new punk?

I'd go with that. Its not a musical style, its an attitude of mind. The Clash were the greatest 'successful' punk band imho. They constantly explored and redefined themselves.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

thats only a couple of levels harsher than slayer in reality though and I have been listening to them since I was a kid... and have been to a few grindcore gigs in my time so my kids are screwed.

FUGAZI are awesome!!!!!!
Operation Ivy were amazing until they became rancid.
ALL
Descendants
could go on all day...

modern takes that I have enjoyed are F*cked up and pissed jeans both awesome.


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:23 pm
 emsz
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]bragging bout your bling and honey's and wanted to pop some caps in a sucka?[/i]

🙄 lazy


 
Posted : 27/09/2011 1:33 pm
Page 1 / 2