I'd have loved...
 

[Closed] I'd have loved to be on this plane, or the other one

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
74 Views
 SST
Posts: 5
Free Member
Topic starter
 

[url=

close you could wave[/url]

[b]edited to make it work... 😉 Mod[/b]


 
Posted : 24/09/2009 8:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I can't get the link to work


 
Posted : 24/09/2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

that's a set up right?


 
Posted : 24/09/2009 8:14 pm
 SST
Posts: 5
Free Member
Topic starter
 

It's parallel runways at SFO


 
Posted : 24/09/2009 8:16 pm
Posts: 91102
Free Member
 

I've been in planes where they've done that. And ferries too funnily enough.


 
Posted : 24/09/2009 8:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

there's the SOIA approach, which is what SFO has. For a SOIA approach, rather than have the runways separated by at least 3,000 feet, they have the approach courses separated by at least 3,000 feet. The ILS to 28L is a straight-in approach, and 28R has an LDA with glideslope that is offset a couple of degrees. Pilots flying the ILS to 28L can go all the way down to Cat I minimums. Pilots flying the LDA to 28R can only go as far as the point where the approach courses are 3,000 feet apart before they have to have visual contact with the other traffic. That is the missed approach point, and beyond that a go-around must be made if the traffic cannot be seen, since there is no way to guarantee separation in IMC. Naturally, the minimums for this approach are quite a bit higher - 2,100 feet ceiling and four miles visibility. And thus, when fog rolls in, SFO is down to only one runway for landing.


 
Posted : 24/09/2009 8:23 pm