Forum search & shortcuts

human rights or sof...
 

[Closed] human rights or soft leftyism?

Posts: 496
Free Member
 

that dog makes me feel a bit sick 😕


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 9:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

There is no doubt in my mind that the man is question is an odious little turd, who deserves some time inside.

However one of the things that is great about this country (as opposed to other less open states) is that the law is the law, it's not for bending, once a matter comes to court there are checks and balances to make sure the law is applied properly it's not perfect but it's pretty good. If judges started bending the law on a whim that would be pretty disasterous.

That is a very very very ugly dog. Jeebus has it got three legs as well?


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:00 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

that dog makes me feel a bit sick

More intelligent than your average Sun reader though.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:00 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

wThe sun is a poor rag but most of that articel is the words of the father

"Amy was my only child... due to medical reasons I am unable to have any more children.

"Amy was and is my family, so my point is, it is my right to a family life that has been deprived and not Mr Ibrahim's.

"Mr Ibrahim claims to be a family man but if it's your actions that define who you are and not your words, then offences for possession of drugs, burglary, harassment, damage to property and theft as well as driving convictions and my daughter's death, you could argue that Mr Ibrahim is a negative influence as a role model as a father.

"I cannot understand by letting Mr Ibrahim remain in the UK what benefits he could bring to society.

"Had he shown some real remorse for what he had done and not committed any more crimes, I could accept that this was just an accident.

"On the evening of November 23 2003 Mr Ibrahim struck Amy, he didn't kill her outright, she was still conscious.

"She was fully aware what was happening around her even though she had the full weight of the engine block of the car on top of her, she was crying because she was frightened and in a lot of pain ... he could have at least tried to help.


Given the person had the family after the event we could have easily have avoided this scenario.
It does nto sit cmfortably with me that this person - who may rehabilitate but it seems unlikely- gets to stay for his family despite removing this right from a law abiding member of society.
I have to be honest he would not be on this earth if he did this to me and left me without my kids. I would require alot of remorse from him for his actions to persuade me otherwise. Cant beleieve my love of my kids instantly strip sme of all my liberla lefty tendencies - primal sadly guess why we have neutral impartial peole to decid eon these things.
The sun is an awfull rag
It is being used locally to stir up racial tension which is not helpful FWIW.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That dog makes Ann Widecombe look attractive


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

how about if it were a british national commiting the same crime in another country

Well you'd be at the mercy of that country's legal system and would be punished accordingly.

I think the leniency issue is valid ...4 months in prison for fleeing the scene of an accident in which a young girl was killed does seem lenient, especially if the child is your daughter.

I think that some kind of face-to-face meeting between the 2 parties would allow the deprived father to express his grief and anger and seek closure.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:01 pm
Posts: 7875
Free Member
 

As a parent with a child the same age the latter part of the quote is heartbreaking. I find it inconceivable that anyone could leave the scene.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:04 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I'll go with the decision of the British Justice System, Ton.

Because I've got faith in that


you realy cannot think of any act by the justice system you think was wrong as you have faith- I am so looking forward to quoting this back to you - scurrie soff to rozzers with guns thread.
some are totally out of touch with reality

given your posts here i assume you find many people are not in touch with your version of reality


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The fact the git showed no remorse is a very bad sign imho. Personally I would have him inside being punished for his crime, then shipped back to Iraq but hey ho that's me 😀


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]'I think that some kind of face-to-face meeting between the 2 parties would allow the deprived father to express his grief and anger and seek closure.'[/i]

Unless he shows no remorse there too. That would go down well.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

surfer - I've just read that quote too ...the poor thing, how utterly sad and heartbreaking for her loved ones.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sirlickalot - yes, I see what you mean.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would trust teh justice sytem rather than the sun

How do you guys know he showed no remorse? Any other info other than the sun article - which is clearly intended to be inflammatory and partial and to stir up emotions exactly as it has done with you guys

Its all part of the Murdoch agenda of string up anti immigration anti asylumn seeker feelings.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How do you guys know he showed no remorse?

From the Father as he was interviewed on the news.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - the father said that he had been stood 6' from him when he had the opportunity to show remorse and did not do so. Heresay I know but he sounded perfectly level & reliable as he reported that.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Right. 🙄


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:24 pm
 ton
Posts: 24307
Full Member
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Cant believe my love of my kids instantly strip some of all my liberal lefty tendencies - primal sadly guess why we have neutral impartial peole to decide on these things.[/i]

I don't have kids, and am fairly liberal on a lot of things, but I wouldn't bat an eyelid if I saw him dead. The fact that he left the scene is what angers me the most. I hit a girl of a similar age when I was about 18. I sat on the pavement shaking. But then again, I'm a British national, was driving legally, and without a string of offences behind me.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I am so looking forward to quoting this back to you - scurrie soff to rozzers with guns thread.

Notice I said British JUSTICE system... 😉

S'important, that bit.

Being that none of us are possessed of the full facts of this entire case, and the asylum issue, I think it's probbly best to go with the Court's decision, unless we know more than them. No?

Two separate things though innit? Bloke's a bit of a scrote, runs down a little girl, flees, she dies. We don't know the full facts of this case; she may have simply run out in front of him, his brakes may have failed, all sorts. Maybe he just panicked and ran. We don't know all this do we? All we know is that the courts din't think he'd killed her deliberately, hence the 'lenient' sentence.

It's very, very sad indeed. I feel so sorry for her poor family. No-one should ever have to go through this.

But the gist of this Sun 'article' seems to suggest that as a non-British national, he should either suffer a longer sentence, or be deported back to a country where his Human Rights would be at risk. He's an Iraqi Kurd; not the luckiest people in history...

The suggestion he had children with someone simply in order to stay here is nothing more than the opinion of the grieving father. Again, we have no idea as to the true nature of his relationship with a [b]British[/b] woman. He is the father to two [b]British[/b] children. What about their rights? As tragic as the little girl's death is, is it right to tear a family apart, or send them to a country where they could well suffer persecution or even death simply because of something that wasn't done deliberately?

Stupid muck-racking inflamatory inciteful gutter press crap from the Sun as usual.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Naranjada

I think that some kind of face-to-face meeting between the 2 parties would allow the deprived father to express his grief and anger and seek closure.

This is done in appropriate cases with very good result. It both allows closure for the bereaved / victims of crime the perpetrators have to face up tho the effects of their crime.

IMO it should be used a lot more than it is


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:28 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

Its all part of the Murdoch agenda of string up anti immigration anti asylumn seeker feelings.

or perhaps what has happened is wrong?
What about the issue TJ ?
http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/8742619.Death_crash_asylum_seeker_wins_right_to_stay_in_this_country/
read it here and then talk about the issue eh?
http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/Judges-let-failed-asylum-seeker.6663142.jp
there you go one from Yorkshire for balance


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In fairness Elf, the story appears to be told in a pretty similar fashion in all the media outlets.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

TJ - yes I suppose that you know best and I am a bad man for taking a grieving father's witness as accurate. What a fool I have been.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:35 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Elfin:

We gather not fully understanding stuff that requires a bit of thought isn't exactly your strong point, Ton.

Ouch.......but actually the double negative is contradictory to the intended meaning, whoops.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Sun is a rotten comic, as many have said deliberatley stirring the racial tension issue. Also very true and relevant is that we don't know the true story so we are all speculating. However if it was my duaghter under that car I'm not sure what my response would be but probably illegal. Whatever race the perpatrator was. I also think we have a pretty good justice system overall but in a society of 60 million there are bound to be wrongs. It must be so deeply sad if it's you and you are affected like the father of that poor girl.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeah, but with the same overall crappy 'journalism', in the examples cited here at least. Not that I'd trust owt with 'Lancashire' or Yorkshire' in their titles... 😉

Lazy sensationalist journalism.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Junkyard - I gave my answer. I have more faith in our justice system 5than in the yellow press.

All those stories you post are from the same press release / press conference and are lazy journalism.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If this is true :

Although he now has two children, there was little evidence to suggest he was living at the same address so could not claim a right to family life, it was argued.

And also the claims that he had a string of convictions, then he should be deported without hesitation IMO.

Iraqis do not have an automatic right to live in the UK, and I see absolutely no reason why Britain should allow an Iraqi criminal to live in the country.

He's an Iraqi Kurd; not the luckiest people in history...

What has Iraqi Kurd history got to do with this case ffs ?

Iraqi Kurds do not need asylum.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:43 pm
 ton
Posts: 24307
Full Member
Topic starter
 

teej, fred, please tell me what is a good trustworthy newspaper to buy.
or a good trustworthy news source.

it seems that the daily mirror, telegraph, mail, express, guardian, independant and times are all running this story.
bloody gutter press eh????? 🙄


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh, and I think it is "soft leftyism" rather than human rights. Some people who claim to be left-wing, are far too terrified of being labelled "racist" to call for his deportation. Sad but true.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ouch.......but actually the double negative is contradictory to the intended meaning, whoops.

Touché... 😳 😆

Iraqis do not have an automatic right to live in the UK, and I see absolutely no reason why Britain should allow an Iraqi criminal to live in the country.

What about the father to two [b]British[/b] children? Or don't they, as [b]British citizens[/b], deserve a family life?

Iraqi Kurds do not need asylum.

Hence his failed asylum application.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:50 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I have more faith in our justice system 5than in the yellow press.

so do I but I see no reference to what you think of the issue/case but plenty of whay you think of the journalism


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

it seems that the daily mirror, telegraph, mail, express, guardian, independant and times are all running this story.

They do, but with subtle differences in the way the story is reported.

The Sun's version is overly emotive and makes a big thing of quoting the dad, which is basically nothing more than the dad's opinions, but quoted in such a way to add emotional weight to the story. The Guardian doesn't bother with all that, which is quite frankly irrelevant anyway.

The facts are:

Non-British person who happened to kill someone in a driving incident isn't sent back to his country of origin as he has a British partner and two kids born in Britain. Court rules he has right to stay under Human Rights legislation.

That's it basically. Everything else is superfluous really.

Simple facts don't make for juicy newspaper articles, and long arguing threads on STW, though...


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What about the father to two British children? Or don't they, as British citizens, deserve a family life?

Read my post.

Ref : [i]If this is true[/i]


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 11:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh stop fishing Ernie... 😀


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Eh ? 😕


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 11:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

DP....although I'm double confused


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 11:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about helping me with some advice on finishing plywood, or is actually being nice to people beyond you?


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 11:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd much rather [i]you[/i] gave me a lesson on Iraqi Kurd history. And explained to me how it gives individual Iraqi Kurds special rights in the UK today.

I feel that I ought to know.


 
Posted : 17/12/2010 12:25 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

seen this on the news tonite,i was almost in tears myself , listning to the dad talk poor bugger. send him back , he is not wanted here, leaving a child to die like that .


 
Posted : 17/12/2010 12:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]leaving a child to die like that[/i]

Getting human rights should require you act like a decent human. He didn't. They aren't really rights. they're privileges.


 
Posted : 17/12/2010 12:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I find it inconceivable that anyone could leave the scene.

Gotta keep in mind that he may well come from a country where the authorities are not known for their leniency. It may well be that he feared for what might happen to him if he stayed to report it.


 
Posted : 17/12/2010 12:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I mean, if you happened to hit a kid in Zimbabwe, would you wait for the police to turn up and explain it to them? Tough decision to make


 
Posted : 17/12/2010 12:55 am
 ton
Posts: 24307
Full Member
Topic starter
 

so he did not not leg it cos he was banned, uninsured then?


 
Posted : 17/12/2010 12:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dunno, maybe that would have made him even more scared. Add that to the Zimbabwe scenario if you like


 
Posted : 17/12/2010 12:59 am
Page 2 / 6